SCOTUS Props Up Trump Travel Ban, Cop Pick-Pockets Hot Dog Vendor on Camera, Congress Worries Over 'Sextortion' and Doxxing: A.M. Links
-
Ed Suba Jr./MCT/Newscom The U.S. Supreme Court said President Trump's refugee ban may proceed in some capacity for now.
- The Department of Justice has declined to bring charges against any Baltimore police officers in conjunction with Freddie Gray's death in police custody.
- A California cop was caught on video stealing cash from a hot-dog vendor while issuing him a citation.
- "Surely you just didn't just say the undue burden is met if we tell women you can't have an abortion in Ohio but you can certainly go to Michigan?"
- The U.S. Department of Agriculture is being sued over organic pigs.
- Missouri was down to one abortion clinic, but several more are now opening thanks to federal courts, Planned Parenthood, & the Satanic Temple.
- Ohio's Supreme Court affirmed limited liability for businesses if drunk patrons commit a crime after leaving.
- A California bill would end mandatory-minimum sentences for small-scale drug crimes.
- Congress is considering yet another internet-censoring bill to address supposed sexual exploitation, this time in the name of stopping "sextortion" and doxxing.
- Are you ready for The Scaramucci Post?
Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's always sex with you, isn't it, ENB?
Hello.
It's interesting SCOTUS has overturned the 9th (a couple of times now is it?) regarding the ban and sided with Trump, while Obama the constitutional lecturer consistently lost in SCOTUS rulings.
Am I missing something?
This is a very interesting interpretation of SCOTUS limiting Trump's "refugee ban" once and then having to redefine that limitation.
You seem to have some gross misunderstanding about what actually happened.
Maybe so. I read the article that's linked and it's talking about the debate around the definition "bona fide" which originated from the court's first review of the ban.
Send me other info if that's wrong please.
You're missing most of a functioning brain. Please keep your idiocy at The Site That Shall Not Be Named. For some reason they seem to like you. Maybe as a pet?
So, do you let Obama finish in you or on you?
Rufus is never going to fuck you, buddy.
On you then, got it.
You never got back to me about your wife and dry anal, by the way.
Wow, I really hurt your feelings.
Oh, for Hail Rataxes, it's always in.
He shits it out and rolls in it later, for the full Obama Experience.
It's just more of TreasonNN's (get it?) plan to appeal to millennials by being edgy and cool.
Hate to break it to you, Crusty, but sex is not edgy. It's always been cool, though.
Tell that to the puritanical leftists TreasonNN is trying to appeal to.
And it's cool to edge before sex.
Okay, WTF does "edge" mean? Is it some new word like "Antifa"?
Seriously? That one's not even obscure or gross
I DON'T GET IT.
Never? Not even with ENB? Sad.
Thank God.
Better ENB than Chapman.
+1 CIS point
She wouldn't have it any other way.
The U.S. Supreme Court said President Trump's refugee ban may proceed in some capacity for now.
Everything is coming up Trump!
Was there ever any doubt that the President had rather firm legal footing in his actions?
Nope, there was never really the slightest doubt to anyone with a brain at least.
The president has clear, long-established, and rather broad powers to protect Americans from foreign threats.
Mikey feels threatened by little brown kids. They give him nightmares, in which they feast on his spleen while Obama watches from the shadows as he screams.
All of the brown children have the twitching, walleyed faces of Dave Weigel.
You can take your race card and shove it up your gaping bunghole, Nick Gillespie junior.
And you seem to feel threatened by Mikey.
The mean girls thing you guys do obviously works, though, right?
Yes, my jokes and stories come from a place of fear. You totally exposed me, brand new commenter that is most definitely not hiding his previous username.
"Yes, my jokes and stories come from a place of fear. "
Yes, everyone who watches you pathetically mean girl people constantly knows that, your predictable sarcasm notwithstanding.
These sad little junior grade Obamabots are as predictable as they are pathetic. When you can't win an argument, pull out the race card. It's their general purpose security blanket.
I have Indians where I live. The biggest threat I have is curry stench.
+1 two-dollar bill
At Reason?
Absolutely.
Liberty has been abandoned in favor of adhering to the latest of the left's ever changing SJ platitudes.
Rights? Pshaw!
Rights are structures of oppression designed by the white cisheteropatriarchy to keep people from uniting as a benevolent dictatorship of the proletariat.*
*sadly, this isn't at all over the top
At Reason?
Absolutely.
Liberty has been abandoned in favor of adhering to the latest of the left's ever changing SJ platitudes.
Rights? Pshaw!
Rights are structures of oppression designed by the white cisheteropatriarchy to keep people from uniting as a benevolent dictatorship of the proletariat.*
*sadly, this isn't at all over the top
skwerld
The Department of Justice has declined to bring charges against any Baltimore police officers in conjunction with Freddie Gray's death in police custody.
Oh boy.
THIS WAS REALLY UNEXPECTED!
A California cop was caught on video stealing cash from a hot-dog vendor while issuing him a citation.
Remember the good old days when Reason would link solely to its own posts? Poor Shackleford.
That money was guilty as sin.
Why do you consistently confuse Shackford with polar explorers?
THAT'S THE JOKE
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is being sued over organic pigs.
I bet the packaging containing the legal documents is nearly impossible to open.
A California cop was caught on video stealing cash from a hot-dog vendor while issuing him a citation.
THE CITATION IS THEFT.
Whole other can of worms = opened.
It's real simple - if you don't want your cash taken, don't get a citation.
Imagine how nice it will be when cash is outlawed and authorities don't have to go into your wallet to take your resources.
Or have cash.
In Berkeley you don't need government papers to cross the border or enroll in college, and a government ID is too burdensome to make voters get one, but you dang sure better pay up for your hot dog vending license.
"Surely you just didn't just say the undue burden is met if we tell women you can't have an abortion in Ohio but you can certainly go to Michigan?"
Hey, if I have to go across the border to Ohio to buy fireworks...
A California bill would end mandatory-minimum sentences for small-scale drug crimes.
Don't worry, future leaders, you still have control over defining "small-scale drug crimes"
Possession with a street value under $0.01.
Equivalent to buying alcohol for minors would be satisfactory.
Are you ready for The Scaramucci Post?
I WAS BORN READY
When I came out of the womb I proclaimed, 'TA-DAH! Hey, doll hand me that towel. It's chill here.' /wink.
Like most Canadians, you were born wearing flannel long-johns, and with three full sets of teeth.
Then he reached back into his mother's vanaynay and pulled out his racoon hat.
Dude, it was a beaver hat...
it was a tuque
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is being sued over organic pigs.
Instead of following that link I'm just going to assume there's a cybernetic bacon industry trying to develop.
Crowdfund or GTFO!
Ohio's Supreme Court affirmed limited liability for businesses if drunk patrons commit a crime after leaving.
Bars that serve 100 people a day are at least partially on the hook for 300 felonies a day.
Does the city or State own the stadiums where the Browns and Indians play? I guess either way, the "people" of Ohio are on the hook for those establishments.
The county owns the Indians' stadium, and the city owns the Browns' stadium.
The county and city serve alcohol to patrons and then pull them over for driving while intoxicated. It's all part of their plan.
Missouri was down to one abortion clinic, but several more are now opening thanks to federal courts, Planned Parenthood, & the Satanic Temple.
One of these things is not like the others ??
Hint: it's the one that isn't funded by theft backed by the threat of deadly violence.
Satan is fuming somewhere in hell:
"It's all backwards! I hate these followers."
Led Zep backwards explains it.
"Congress is considering yet another internet-censoring bill to address supposed sexual exploitation, this time in the name of stopping "sextortion" and doxxing."
How is this bill internet-censoring?
"which aims to curb the forms of online harassment which have become colloquially known as "sextortion," "swatting," and "doxxing." It updates federal criminal statutes to clearly and unambiguously prohibit these forms of online harassment and provides civil remedies for victims of these offenses. Critically necessary, it provides for collecting data on the prevalence of these forms of harassment, dedicated federal law enforcement officers to investigate and prosecute these offenses, and $24 million for training law enforcement."
"Critically necessary, it provides for collecting data on the prevalence of these forms of harassment, dedicated federal law enforcement officers to investigate and prosecute these offenses, and $24 million for training law enforcement."
But a committee investigating voting fraud is totally a waste of money.
Voting fraud is an integral part of American democracy, so much so that it is sacrosanct. It ranks up their with gerrymandering, bundling of campaign donations, special constituent services, and presidential foundations.
It's pointless to investigate voter fraud because any changes in the system would inevitably create even more voter fraud.
But you're assuming that voter fraud happens.
And there's no evidence it does.
Because we haven't looked for the evidence.
With no evidence of it occurring, why would we?
Are you ready for The Scaramucci Post?
Nah, I'm into post-scaramucci these days, it sounds a lot like scaramucci, but its a critically praised version.
Kid Rock gives Little Caesars Arena a rowdy, defiant initiation
Fuck yeah!
Man, people will protest anything these days. What the hell do they think they will accomplish by protesting a Kid Rock concert?
What the hell do they think they will accomplish by protesting a Kid Rock concert?
A show of support/solidarity with John Lithgow's character from Footloose?
Why would they protest against Deez Nutz? Just an Iowa Farm boy, wants to be president, has Warren G on his side.
...thanks to federal courts, Planned Parenthood, & the Satanic Temple.
But I repeat myself.
Are you ready for The Scaramucci Post?
Fuck yeah!
Ohio's Supreme Court affirmed limited liability for businesses if drunk patrons commit a crime after leaving.
The only cure is to nationalize bars.
The simple fact of life in 2017 is that the internet ? and technologies fueled by it ? are inextricably interwoven with our daily lives. It has given us the ability to live, work, learn, and socialize in innovative ways, with the capacity to connect with people in all corners of the world quite literally at our fingertips.
Very nice intro. And yet 70% of internet usage is for porn.
And yet 70% of internet usage is for porn.
Your statements are not mutually exclusive.*
*In the interest of commentary integrity I should disclose that a portion of my income is derived from the porn industry.
mad casual's the guy commenting on every porn video with, "Stunning!"
+1 cunning stunt
mad casual's the guy commenting on every porn video with, "Stunning!"
I feel like you're being underserved by your current porn options...
A California bill would end mandatory-minimum sentences for small-scale drug crimes.
Whoa. Someone's union lobbyists are dropping the ball in Sacramento.
Congress is considering yet another internet-censoring bill to address supposed sexual exploitation, this time in the name of stopping "sextortion" and doxxing.
Is there some reason we haven't outlawed the internet yet?
This 'fatberg' clogging a London sewer is longer than two football fields, weighs more than 11 buses
The "Fatberg Clog" was my nickname in college.
Mine was Victorian-Era Sewer.
Are you ready for The Scaramucci Post?
Any opportunity for more fandango jokes.
Scaram??sh Scaram??sh it's a repost fandangle!
"All Scaramucci jokes are terrible." - Matt Welch
Like he's president of the memes.
All Weiner jokes are great, though, right? RIGHT?!
Ohio cop pleads guilty to using sex toy on two women during illegal traffic stop
Lesson learned: never keep your sex toys in the backseat.
Front seat in plain view, with the batteries in the trunk.
Frankly, I'm shocked that he was treated like a prole.
'Best swimsuit for my curvy bod': Lena Dunham shows off her figure and a hidden neon orange tattoo on her derriere as she models red bikini
Of course she has a restaurant tattooed on her. Of course she does.
I guess sometimes the map IS the territory.
I'm not looking forward to her approaching transition into Bruce Jenner Mk II.
I am very glad the London civil servants liberated her from the Fatberg.
"Curvy"? Looks more lumpy and rectangular to me.
Missouri was down to one abortion clinic, but several more are now opening thanks to federal courts, Planned Parenthood, & the Satanic Temple.
GOP Aborto-Freaks at work.
Why don't these assholes actually CUT SPENDING?
Because they're Republicans?
What do you think this is, the 1950s?
Hey girl, need a caffeine fix? Trendy Los Angeles cafe sells lattes with Ryan Gosling's FACE on them - and fans are going mad for hunk-covered coffees
Back in my day bartenders made designs in the head of a pint of Guinness using only their fingertips, and now these damn WOMEN are using a MACHINE to make their overpriced coffee seem more interesting.
Disgusting.
You know you would.
Isn't this a Title IX violation, on the face of it?
Would have been funnier if they sued the Dept. of Justice
'The Orville' Review: Seth MacFarlane's 'Star Trek' Rip-Off is Creatively, Morally, and Ethically Bankrupt
Nerds. smdh.
If MacFarlane truly wanted to create an homage to all of the qualities that have made "Trek" a beloved property for years, he would have done so by actually creating his own sci-fi universe ? his own aesthetic, his own episode structure. He would have striven for actual originality, which is not an impossible feat within this genre.
I don't think MacFarlane truly wanted to create an homage to all the qualities that made Trek a great show you fucking moron. Is the reviewer on the payroll at Salon (if they still even have a fucking payroll)??
It's like the reviewer missed any episode of Family Guy, which would have shown him that McFarlane is the most derivative hack in Hollywood this side of Tarantino.
"Based on the trailer, the assumption was that Seth MacFarlane was doing a "Star Trek" parody, a la "Galaxy Quest" ? theoretically not an annoying notion, especially since "Galaxy Quest" was a great movie."
yeah, it looked like a crappy Galaxy Quest
I saw the first episode and it was pretty good and probably better then the new star trek you can only get on line which I don't have
Who are these people who have never seen an episode of Star Trek?
Also, I'm trying to picture the person who hasn't seen an episode of Star Trek and would be impenetrably baffled by its nuance and complexity. The only people I can come up with would be startled at the point of turning the talking picture box on.
Family Guy fans, then?
Hillary Clinton's funny idea of authoritarianism
Wow. Just wow.
I know this place is 100% male but to a woman any government that is telling you what you can and cannot do with your baby-hatch is "authoritarian" while tax collection is just government being government for the good of the people.
fuck off
Shreek hasn't touched a vagina since he got shat out of one, but damned if he'll let an actual woman tell him he can't speak for all women!
Near the center of her universe.
Donations to the Clinton Slush Fund, er, Foundation have dried up so she's having to make up the losses by pimping a hilariously clueless, self-justifying manifesto.
What a treasure--every time the left shows signs of starting to move on from her loss, she inserts herself into the national conversation again and rips the scab off anew.
Best part of the article:
Yeah, most losing Presidential candidates retire from the spotlight with grace and dignity, not whore themselves out for more shekels. So Hillary's setting new standards in that regard as well.
"ourselves"
I have a feeling she begrudgingly added this part
Wow what?
Oh, you're already a fucking victim like most people here.
Newsflash hotshot: Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot, not a purveyor of cosmic truth.
Just because you freaks don't understand that 1984 is a cautionary tale, not a how-to guide, doesn't mean you have to be so bitchy.
Authorities are our only defense against authoritarianism.
Most people read 1984 as a cautionary tale.
Politicians read it as an instruction manual.
So, the writer of her book uses inappropriate analogies from "1984" as well as "Game of Thrones".
Then torture was to make the victim believe what the leadership's Party line is today unquestioningly rather than his own senses or what the Party line was yesterday, you idiot.
Congress is considering yet another internet-censoring bill to address supposed sexual exploitation, this time in the name of stopping "sextortion" and doxxing.
The biography of the person who wrote the linked opinion piece:
Is that what the new Jason Statham movie, The Coordinator, is about?
BCA finishes Damond investigation, hands it over to county attorney
The investigation took two months.
Blue Lives Matter too, fella, and so do police unions.
So with the cops in jail for the murder, how long do they have to wait to get a trial?
Oh, wait.
"A California cop was caught on video stealing cash from a hot-dog vendor while issuing him a citation."
The linked article at The Washington Post contains the following statement:
"The money seized was booked into evidence".
https://tinyurl.com/ycuezqrg
Booking evidence of a crime is not "stealing". It isn't even asset forfeiture.
When we're right about something, there's no need to be intellectually dishonest. Intellectual dishonesty is usually evidence of being wrong. Why would someone who's right be intellectually dishonest unnecessarily?
Some people don't know the difference between right and wrong--that's one explanation. Some people don't know the difference between intellectual honesty and intellectual dishonesty. That's my guess here.
Even worse, other people don't care what the difference is between them. They think it's okay to cry wolf--because wolves are bad--but that's horseshit when the world is teeming with real wolves. Why not pick a real wolf and cry wolf about one of them?
You're bitching to people who constantly bellow about taxation being theft, so, piss into the wind if you want, guy.
I guess Ken isn't your favorite pet.
So Obama finished with you I see.
Hi Tulpa!
Are you feeling ok?
That's usually 3 paragraphs worth of material for you.
If you don't know the difference between the idea that taxation is like theft and saying that someone caught a cop on camera "stealing" something, then you might be one of those people who doesn't know the difference between intellectual honesty and intellectual dishonesty.
Oh, and another difference--taxation can't sue your employer for libel.
Perhaps the biggest difference between saying that "Taxation is theft" and that "A California cop was caught on video stealing cash from a hot-dog vendor" is that taxation really is like theft--because there was no crime involved in legitimately earned money. Conversely, a cop booking cash into evidence isn't "stealing" at all. It just isn't.
It's not stealing, it's borrowing.
I'm not sure what the distinction you are seeing here is. Collecting taxes is a legal activity too, just like seizing cash from people selling hotdogs without a license. If taxation is theft, then so is taking money from someone who is doing nothing to harm anyone for the "crime" of failing to pay off the government so he can sell hotdogs without interference.
Taxation is taking money from people who haven't committed any crime. That's theft.
Taxation really is theft.
Booking evidence isn't stealing. Even money that's been stolen from some robbery victim should be booked as evidence.
Booking evidence is not theft.
Really, it's not hard to understand. You're being willfully obtuse.
Taxation for the purposes of redistribution, social engineering or funding progras the government has no authoriy for is stealing.
Was that booking before or after the video went viral? Did the vendor receive a receipt for his property?
Exactly dan and the video never showed the cop putting the "evidence " into an evidence bag
Booking evidence of a crime is not "stealing".
That depends on whether legality determines morality.
No it doesn't.
The evidence of the "crime" was the 4 bucks the cop saw the vendor take for selling a delicious bacon dog to a willing customer.
The stealing refers to extracting 60 bucks from the vendors' wallet.
Stealing is a strong word, because (assuming the cop books it all into evidence and doesn't take a tip), the accused can get it back in California, eventually, if their appeal is successful. Tough when it's your last 60 bucks though.
If you took all the money in my pockets against my will and locked it up for a few months while we determined how I earned it, which term is more accurate -- stealing or safe-keeping?
The money taken was booked as evidence.
It was not stolen.
You're making the issue of asset forfeiture look ridiculous.
Asset forfeiture is more like theft. They take your money regardless of whether you're convicted of a crime.
Booking evidence is neither asset forfeiture nor theft.
The money in question was booked as evidence. It was not stolen by a cop.
"'Monkey selfie' lawsuit finally settled after two years and a banana boat full of puns"
[...]
"On Monday, Slater and the animal rights group reached an agreement out of court. As part of the settlement, Slater will donate 25 percent of proceeds from sales or usage of the "monkey selfies" to charities in Indonesia that protect crested macaques, considered a critically endangered species."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news /animalia/wp/2017/09/12/monkey-selfie-lawsuit- finally-settled-after-two-years-and-a -banana-boat-full-of-puns/? utm_term=.c5194ad4cd18
OK, he probably figured it was cheaper than the legal fees, but WIH standing did PETA have to bring the suit to begin with?
Juggalos are gathering in Washington this Saturday.
Some new developments in the story that the Obama momma media (including Reason) don't want you to know about: it turns out that Imran Awan was banned from the House of Representatives after fruitlessly attempting to hide a secret server that was illegally connected to the House network from investigators.
Whoa, I'm surprised the DNC didn't have him bumped off.
He had the goods on them.