Celebrating Our Independence—From the Export-Import Bank

It's been a sweet two years with a hobbled Export-Import Bank. Now lets get rid of it entirely.

|

Boeing 737-8 MAX N8704Q at Farnborough Airshow 2016
pjs2005/Wikipedia

This week, we not only celebrate our country's independence from the British but also celebrate the second anniversary of our freedom from the Export-Import Bank.

In an imperfect environment where cronyism—that's the unhealthy relationship between government and businesses—runs rampant, the fact that Boeing, General Electric and other giant manufacturers haven't been able to benefit from taxpayer-backed loans for the past two years is a huge victory. For the first five months of that period, the bank's charter had actually expired —but even since it was renewed, it hasn't been able to extend loans above $10 million.

President Donald Trump wants to restore the bank's full lending power, but it's actually time to slay the beast. That's what Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich.—alongside Republican Reps. Dave Brat of Virginia, Ken Buck of Colorado, Michael Burgess of Texas, Scott DesJarlais of Tennessee, Walter Jones of North Carolina, Jim Jordan of Ohio, Raul Labrador of Idaho, Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Tom McClintock of California—wants to do by reintroducing a bill to terminate the Ex-Im Bank once and for all. Within 30 days of the bill's passage, the agency would have to stop accepting new loan applications.

Though there was no doubt that the top 10 beneficiaries of Ex-Im would survive without the government perk—they benefited from 65 percent of the bank's activities—it's worth wondering what has happened since July 1, 2015.

First, companies on the top 10 beneficiaries list haven't been doing any better or worse without Ex-Im. Take Boeing, for example. It is the No. 1 beneficiary of the bank and has continued to prosper and sell commercial planes all over the world. No surprise here, because 90 percent of Boeing planes were sold without any help from Ex-Im.

Boeing's market cap has also grown from $99 billion in June 2015 to roughly $120 billion. Though I can't say that Boeing wouldn't be even richer and bigger with full Ex-Im support, it's clearly doing well. It's also the case that it's not the role of the federal government to prop up the profits of private giants with subsidies.

The company has been doing well against its competitor Airbus, in part because of the European maker's problem selling its A380 superjumbo. And in the end, this is what this business is all about. If you make a plane that no one wants to buy at a given price, no subsidies will change that.

In addition, Airbus hasn't been able to soak in as much in subsidies as usual, either, because the U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office has launched a criminal investigation into the dealings of Airbus because of allegations of bribery, fraud and corruption. It shows that the world will continue to produce commercial planes even if Airbus and Boeing sales aren't subsidized by taxpayers.

That's because the foreign airlines that received Ex-Im's cheap loans could typically get credit and find lenders without an Ex-Im guarantee, could afford to buy planes without the subsidies, and didn't decide to buy a plane based on the existence of the subsidies.

U.S. exports in general don't seem to have been affected by the end of Ex-Im, either. Monthly trade numbers from the U.S. Commerce Department show a downward shift in U.S. merchandise exports beginning in January 2015—six months before the bank's charter expired. The slowdown also seems to affect service exports, which would indicate that Ex-Im funding was not the explanatory variable.

Also, the 2017 data, when compared with the data from the same period in 2016, show exports rebounding without any change in the status of Ex-Im. As my colleague Dan Griswold, the co-director of the Mercatus Center's Program on the American Economy and Globalization and the who gave me this data, noted, "the bottom line is that U.S. export growth was decelerating beginning in 2012 and has picked up again in 2017, driven mostly by global growth rates. The Export-Import Bank's status was simply not a factor."

This isn't too surprising. Economists have shown that export subsidies do very little to affect the balance of trade. It's time we secure our full independence from the Export-Import Bank by ending it. But until that happens, we can still celebrate its dormant state.

NEXT: Florida judge strikes down one procedural aspect of Florida 'stand your ground' law -- but the basic principle remains

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Sadly, I can only think that Dracula lies in a dormant state all day long, too, but you just know there’s no getting rid of him permanently, there’s always a Renfield around somewhere willing to revive him.

    1. In this case, an Elizabeth War-Renfield.

      1. I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

        This is what I do… http://www.onlinecareer10.com

      2. I’m making over $7k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life.

        This is what I do… http://www.onlinecareer10.com

    2. I’m glad to read of this news, but still, why is it still in business at all? At least de Rugy tells us the names of 10 honest GOP politicians, who truly believe in free markets.

      Sad to see that Trump wants to revive it. Especially in light of his comments about stupid trade deals (maybe he’s just pretending – probably wishful thinking on my part). How smart is it to subsidize foreign competitors of US businesses, by allowing them to buy our products at a discount courtesy of the US taxpayer for their businesses?

      On one hand Trump deregulates. On the other hand, he speaks of subsidizing foreign competitors of US businesses for the benefit of some other US businesses. On the other hand he rails against stupid trade deals. I wonder if he can tell the difference, or if he’s just conning crony capitalists in DC.

  2. The incestuous relationship between government and Multinational Corporations has gone on far to long.

  3. How about tackling cronyism that’s bigger than a gnat – like oh idk rigged interest rates that are transferring money from the working poor to billionaires.

    Or would that offend the donor class a bit too much?

  4. I found a great site that focuses on stay at home mom’s complete guide to gaining a serious amount of money in very little time. While being able to earn an passive income staying home with your kids. If you are someone who needs more money and has some spare time, this site is perfect for you. Take a look at…

    follow this link?..????????????

    Trump”s New Opprunuties See Here

  5. Do you need a quick loan with a relatively low interest rate as low as 3%? We offer business loan, personal loan, home loan, auto loan, student loan, debt consolidation loan e.t.c. no matter your credit score. With the track record that we have we can ensure you get the best of our service, we are proud to say that we help hundreds of thousands of people out there,that can’t get help anywhere in the country, we can proudly, say that we extended our business and it is as follows,Fast Approved Loans, Bad Credit Welcome..Loan Offer up to R780,000
    Apply for a loan of up R599, 000. We offer a large list of different loan For more information please contact us today via Email:hardyloancompanyfirm122@gmail.com

  6. Do you need a quick loan with a relatively low interest rate as low as 3%? We offer business loan, personal loan, home loan, auto loan, student loan, debt consolidation loan e.t.c. no matter your credit score. With the track record that we have we can ensure you get the best of our service, we are proud to say that we help hundreds of thousands of people out there,that can’t get help anywhere in the country, we can proudly, say that we extended our business and it is as follows,Fast Approved Loans, Bad Credit Welcome..Loan Offer up to R780,000
    Apply for a loan of up R599, 000. We offer a large list of different loan For more information please contact us today via Email:hardyloancompanyfirm122@gmail.com

  7. Dear Sir/Madam, This is to inform you that our company is presently offering loans to interested persons at an affordable rate with the help and assistance from Marcus Financies LTD. We Offer Long And Short Term Loans to individuals and companies.Do you need a LOAN for Business or you need a personal Loan. You can apply for a fast loan here and get it with ease. We can raise up to 500 Million United States Dollars to finance different kinds of projects. For more details regarding our LOAN offer,you are advised to contact our office today via Email below.hardyloancompanyfirm122@gmail.com

  8. I’m glad to read of this news, but still, why is it still in business at all? At least de Rugy tells us the names of 10 honest GOP politicians, who truly believe in free markets.systole and diastole blood pressure and Life source blood pressure monitor thanku

  9. Trump wants to revive it. Especially in light of his comments about stupid trade deals
    types of fade haircuts
    (maybe he’s just pretending – probably wishful thinking on my part). How smart is it to subsidize foreign competitors of US businesses, by allowing them to buy our products at a discount courtesy of long hair with bangs and layers the US taxpayer for their businesses?

  10. Trump wants to revive it. Especially in light of his comments about stupid trade deals
    types of fade haircuts
    (maybe he’s just pretending – probably wishful thinking on my part). How smart is it to subsidize foreign competitors of US businesses, by allowing them to buy our products at a discount courtesy of long hair with bangs and layers the US taxpayer for their businesses?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.