Colorado's Tough New Forfeiture Law Provides Real Police Oversight, Transparency
Governor signs bill requiring police to report seizures and making it harder for cops to bypass state rules.

Colorado just made it harder for police to take and keep people's stuff without proving they've committed a crime, and the state is making sure that citizens know when and how such seizures are happening.
Civil asset forfeiture is the mechanism by which police and prosecutors seize the property of people suspected of crimes. The key word here is suspected: For your property to be taken, you needn't be convicted or technically even charged with a crime. Since police get to keep the forfeited property, they have a financial incentive to try to take assets with no real evidence of criminal activity. Frequently, for example, the authorities will insist that travelers carrying large amounts of cash must be involved with the drug trade; police then attempt to keep the money even when they can't prove any underlying drug ties.
Last week Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper signed some significant reforms to this system. The new law doesn't eliminate civil asset forfeiture, unfortunately; police still don't need to a secure a conviction to seize property. What this new legislation does do is make it much easier for citizens to know how Colorado's cops use their asset forfeiture tools. The law requires law enforcement agencies to regularly report what they have seized, where they took it, and how they've spent the money they thus acquired. Furthermore, all this information will have to be made public in a searchable online database. That will help track whether police are abusing their authority or targeting particular areas for forfeiture. (Check out C.J. Ciaramella's data-centric reporting earlier today showing how Chicago police seem to be targeting poorer communities with forfeiture efforts.) These requirements come with teeth: Agencies that don't keep up with their reporting requirements will be fined and can end up losing half of what they've taken.
But wait, there's more! The new law also makes it harder for Colorado law enforcement to bypass the rules by turning to the Department of Justice.
Through the "equitable sharing" program, local law enforcement agencies have been able to partner with the feds on busts and run forfeiture through the Department of Justice, skipping state rules entirely. The Department of Justice has laxer rules and allows police to keep more seized property than the State of Colorado allows. That might be why, according to the Institute of Justice, Colorado law enforcement agencies received four times as much money and assets—totaling $42 million—under the federal forfeiture program as under the state's own program from 2000 to 2013.
Under the new rules, law enforcement agencies in Colorado may not turn to the federal asset forfeiture program for any seizures worth less than $50,000. That threshold is a huge deal. Asset forfeiture defenders like to portray the system as a way of going after the funds and assets of major drug dealers and crime lords. In reality, most of the targets are lower-level people (or completely innocent ones). The Institute for Justice calculated that 92 percent of all forfeitures Colorado has run through the federal program were worth less than $50,000. Colorado is the seventh state to set up rules reining in local police's power to bypass state-level forfeiture restrictions by turning to the feds.
The Institute for Justice has now named Colorado the top state in the country for transparency in how asset forfeiture is used to take property and how that money is spent. The institute has given Colorado an A- for transparency and tracking of forfeitures. It's the only state in the A range.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"The law requires law enforcement agencies to regularly report what it has seized, where they took it, and how they've spent the money they thus acquired."
Wow, such giant strides forward.
/sarc
I assume that's half of what they've reported to have taken. If they haven't kept up with the reporting requirements, then how does the state know they're being honest about how much they've taken?
Some small portion of people whose property has been stolen by cops will check the database and sue when their theft isn't listed. It will only take a few of those and suddenly half the cops take disappears.
Baby steps.
I still don't understand how any court could approve these thefts under the fourth amendment. I know their arguments, that the property is being accused, it's civil not criminal, yada yada yada. FYTW.
It still doesn't pass the 4th. How any judge or lawyer could say so with a straight face is beyond me.
And what's worse, the property can't really take the case to the Supreme Court.
...and how they've spent the money they thus acquired.
Funds are fungible, and that MRAP needs a new cappuccino machine.
Interesting take on SCOTUS and asset forfeiture.
http://rare.us/rare-politics/c.....orfeiture/
I'm unconvinced at this point, considering existing SCOTUS precedent, but IJ seems hopeful.
Still not enough, without conviction this is just not what a free country should be allowed to do.
https://www.jobschat.in
SSC cpo admit cardso
Bank of Maharastra Part time sub staff admit card
TNPSC Assistant geologist admit card
ADCC Bank admit card
Odisha Judicial Service admit card
Mppkvvcl office Assistant admit card
TNPSC degree College Lecturers admit card