A.G. Sessions Admits Feds Can't Make Sanctuary Cities Help Deport Immigrants
Executive order scaled back in attempt to satisfy courts.

Rejoice, conservatives: Federalism has been affirmed! The Department of Justice and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have admitted that they can't force local police to enforce certain federal laws.
Perhaps not all who self-identify as conservatives will be cheering this news. Yesterday afternoon, Attorney General Jeff Sessions put out a memo acknowledging that President Donald Trump and his administration generally lack the authority to punish so-called sanctuary cities by denying them federal grants.
Quick background: Trump campaigned on the promise that as president he would crack down on sanctuary cities, municipalities where authorities generally don't check whether the people who end up in custody or seek government assistance are in the country legally.
The conflict: State, county, and municipal governments are under no obligation to help the feds deport illegal immigrants. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials can send local police and jails "detainer" requests asking them to hold on to a deportable immigrant. But this is a request, not a legal order. Cities have developed their own guidelines determining how to respond: Some cooperate, some require warrants or court orders, and some cooperate only if the immigrant has been charged or convicted of serious crimes. The rules vary.
In January, Trump signed an executive order threatening to cut off many federal grants to sanctuary cities on the order of the attorney general or secretary of DHS.
There is one part of the federal code that does overrule state and municipal regulations in relationship with immigration enforcement. 8 U.S.C. 1373 forbids local governments from implementing policies or regulations that would inhibit communication between local police and federal agencies about a person's immigration status. That's it. It doesn't require that local police even check an immigrant's citizenship status in the first place. But if an officer knows that somebody is in the country illegally, a city (or county, or state) can't stop that officer from informing ICE if the officer wants to do so.
It turns out most sanctuary cities are in full compliance with federal law. When the Department of Justice started sending threatening letters to enforce the executive order, only eight municipalities and one county received them. (Granted, the list includes such major cities as New York, Chicago, and Miami.) What Sessions was demanding was that these places prove they're in compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373.
In April a federal judge put Trump's executive order on ice for now. The federal government cannot order the police in cities to simply do their bidding and use grant money as a general bludgeon to coerce compliance. Sessions' memo yesterday acknowledges the limits of federal authority here while looking for a way to salvage the executive order. The memo states that the order is merely meant to make sure that cities are in compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373 (which, again, is just about communication), and it clarifies that the only grants the government would attempt to withhold from noncompliant cities would be those from the Justice Department and DHS, not any other federal agencies.
The Sessions memo also states that the vague term "sanctuary jurisdiction" refers just to cities that refuse to comply with 8 U.S.C. 1373. That means that according to the Department of Justice, Los Angeles—which generally doesn't check to see whether its citizens are in the country legally or illegally—is not a sanctuary city. Remember ICE's March report listing crimes committed by illegal immigrants in various sanctuary cities and counties? Many of those cities and counties no longer qualify as sanctuary jurisdictions under the Justice Department's definition.
This doesn't mean Trump or Sessions still won't still refer to these communities as sanctuary cities for political purposes. But based on Sessions' own memos, there are only nine sanctuary jurisdictions in the whole country.
That's how things stand at the moment, anyway. The Sessions memo notes that future statutes could allow the Justice Department to attach new strings to grants. He could be referring to a bill introduced by a pack of Republican lawmakers last week that would expand 8 U.S.C. 1373 and the potential for the departments of justice and homeland security to control federal grant funding. Under the Davis-Oliver Act, cities would be forbidden from implementing regulations or ordinances that keep local police from complying with ICE detainer requests—and local jurisdictions that decide otherwise risk losing any federal grants related to law enforcement and fighting terrorism. (Read more about that proposal here.) If it's passed, the list of places that actually count as sanctuary cities would undoubtedly increase dramatically.
In the meantime, the Trump budget released today calls for dramatic increases in immigration control: 500 new border patrol agents, 1,000 new ICE officers, 75 new immigration judge teams, $1.5 billion more for detaining and deporting illegal immigrants, and $84 million more for increases in federal detentions.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
AG sessions can make a shoe smell.
But can he make a Bull Shot?
That man would look much better in a pickling jar.
The media shown to blow stuff out of proportion again.
"When the Department of Justice started sending threatening letters to enforce the executive order, only eight municipalities and one county received them. (Granted, the list includes such major cities as New York, Chicago, and Miami.) What Sessions was demanding was that these places prove they're in compliance with 8 U.S.C. 1373."
"Trump campaigned on the promise that as president he would crack down on sanctuary cities, municipalities where authorities generally don't check whether the people who end up in custody or seek government assistance are in the country legally."
Semi-OT, on the "seek government assistance" bit, Reason runs articles claiming that illegal immigrants are generally not a drain on public assistance resources (see for instance: http://reason.com/archives/201.....fare-state ).
If there are jurisdictions out there that aren't checking status when processing government assistance applications, how does anyone know the extent to which illegal immigrants are on public assistance?
Are there jurisdictions that don't check immigration status when processing government assistance applications?
Only Trumpistas, fhe peddlers of propaganda at the CIS and knuckle-dragging xenophobes seem to think so... Without a shred of evidence to support the argument.
Alternatively, would you show up on an immigration status check if you simply received a fraudulent social security number?
That's rampant speculation on my part, but to my recollection they do check to make sure a person is a citizen during the application process. That being said, if the kid is a citizen and the parent isn't I wager they write the check to the adult.
So what you're saying is that illegal immigration is a crime that can't really be enforced. Open Borders Libertopian's rejoice?
Los Angeles?which generally doesn't check to see whether its citizens are in the country legally or illegally
I guess a resident is now a citizen in LA. I think I'll move to LA and take advantage of their liberal handouts.
Interesting, remember back when Arizona was trying to enforce US immigration laws by attempting to deport illegals they "happened accross"? FedGov got all kinds of nasty at them, launched some ridiculous court trial and ordered them to stop.
Now, FedGov can't GET locals to help send the illegals back.
How many of the local grants, programmes, funds, etc are at least partially funded through FedGov? I'll wager nearly all are... school lunches? Yep. How about Head Start for little school kids? Sure. How about unemployment? Absolutely. Do ANY FedBux help states like California in their quest to give away free medical care to these folks? I'll lay high stakes at long odds.
WELL, then, we have a solution... Congress need to pass a new bill making it a precodition that ANYONE applying for any grant, assistance, "entitlement", etc, through any programme that derives any portion of its funding from FedBux MUST use e-Verify to assure the legal presence of the individual within the USA. EVERY application MUST have the eVerify pass code included.
Most of us want to have good income but dont know how to do that on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn huge sum, but whenever Buddies try that they get trapped in a scam/fraud so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the page. I am more than sure that you will get best result.
Best Of Luck for new Initiative!
?????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!.
?????????????????????????
????????????????????-????
Well, you'd have to be a real moron to want illegals in your country. It makes no sense. They don't integrate. A divisive country is a screwed country.
===|||=====|||== My Uncle Aiden just got an awesome red Honda Ridgeline Crew Cab just by parttime work from a home computer... more info here ????-
===|||=====|||== My Uncle Aiden just got an awesome red Honda Ridgeline Crew Cab just by parttime work from a home computer... more info here ????-
===|||=====|||== My Uncle Aiden just got an awesome red Honda Ridgeline Crew Cab just by parttime work from a home computer... more info here ????-