2017 Prometheus Award Finalists Announced
The annual prize honors libertarian-themed science fiction.

The Libertarian Futurist Society gives the annual Prometheus Award to the book it deems the best libertarian-themed speculative-fiction novel of the past year. This year's finalists:
• The Corporation Wars: Dissidence, by Ken MacLeod (Orbit)
• The Corporation Wars: Insurgence, by Ken MacLeod (Orbit)
• The Mandibles: A Family, 2029-2047, by Lionel Shriver (HarperCollins)
• The Core of the Sun, by Johanna Sinisalo (translated by Lola Rogers) (Grove Press/Black Cat)
• Blade of p'Na, by L. Neil Smith (Phoenix Pick)
For capsule descriptions of those books—and for a list of the nominees that didn't make the finalist cut—go here.
I have read exactly zero of these novels, so I won't express any preferences. But my colleague Katherine Mangu-Ward hasn't just read The Mandibles; she interviewed the author. To read that conversation, go here. I spoke with the author of those Corporation Wars books way back in 2000; to read that interview, go here. For a list of past Prometheus winners, go here. And to see what's up for the Libertarian Futurist Society's other annual prize—the Hall of Fame Award—go here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ken Macleod? The guy's a straight up socialist.
He is, but even he can't help making anarcho-capitalist futures out to be way better places to live than socialist ones.
What about anarcho-socialist societies... the ones where you're forced to leave everyone alone.
In anarcho-socialism, all means of production are owned by the state, which doesn't exist!
Nope, we're talking anarcho-socialism, and NOT anarcho-Marxism. Anarcho-socialism typically means a stateless society where there is no private ownership of property (other than personal possessions). A lot of AnSocs are Marxists, especially since Marx promised a withering of the state, but it doesn't have to be explicitly Marxist.
AnCaps assume property rights are a given, but are they really? How does a stateless society organize in the absence of government enforced property rights? You may claim such rights, but what do you do when society does not recognize such rights? Perhaps anarcho-courts will emerge, but will they recognize the same rights you do? What if society at large considers YOU to be the initiator of force by shooting a trespasser?
One reason Ayn Rand and most Objectivists are not anarchists, is because they recognize the need of the state to recognize property rights. One could imagine society self-organizing around the concept of property rights, but it's hardly a given. I can imagine some form of property-like rights would emerge in the absence of the state, but Rothbard/Tannenbaum style AnCap property rights is rather speculative.
Too bad these are books about libertarian themes that happen to contain science fiction rather than science fiction books that happen to contain libertarian themes.
I see you haven't read MacLeod or Shriver, but you've apparently read L. Neil Smith.
Just read the description for The Mandibles, and it is depressingly realistic.
?~?
I have read exactly zero of these novels,
from:
Books Editor Jesse Walker
C'mon man! Put down the twitterz and read some books!
The books editor doesn't read books; he assigns them to other people.
It's good to be the editor.
You know who else assigned work to other people?
Donald J. Trump?
You, by asking this question?
The Amazon description of The Core of the Sun gave me a good LOL.
http://www.amazon.com/Core-Sun-Johann.....of+the+Sun
The Amazon description of The Core of the Sun gave me a good LOL.
http://www.amazon.com/Core-Sun-Johann.....of+the+Sun
The Amazon description of The Core of the Sun gave me a good LOL.
WE KNOW.
WTF
this is odd.. the following "LOL" comment along with a link to Amazon (that i deleted before clicking submit) were pre-entered into my comment box.
W T ever-living F
The Amazon description of The Core of the Sun gave me a good LOL.
no, no it did not b/c i have not read the Amazon description of The Core of the Sun. fucking server squirrels acting particularly malicious lately.
Ken McLeod? I mean, all his stuff is good - but the only thing he's ever written that was 'libertarian science-fiction' was 'The Star Fraction' - and that was still socialist 'that state is withering away' bullshit.
The first MacLeod book was pretty good. It seems to be about competing AI's developing a new solar system, in a future without FTL travel or communication.
His prose is much more tolerable than many of his peers - I've found Stross, Morgan, and Banks to be unreadable. The first two are just dreadful.
I love that the Libertarian Futurist Society website looks like it hasn't changed since the last century.