That Time an Undercover FBI Agent Told One of the 'Draw Mohammed' Shooters to 'Tear Up Texas'
And then showed up on the scene right before the attack


One of the FBI's favorite tools for nabbing would-be terrorists is a sting: The bureau finds a mark, stokes his interest in carrying out some sort of attack, draws him into a plot, and then arrests him. Every time one of these busts hits the press, I wonder how long it will be before we learn about a perp who takes the FBI's encouragement to heart but decides to launch or join a separate plot that the government doesn't control.
I had that on my mind as I read 60 Minutes' report on the Garland, Texas, attack of May 2015. In that incident, two men tried to shoot up a draw-Mohammed contest; fortunately, local police prevented them from killing anyone. "Not only had the FBI been monitoring [one of the gunmen] for years," 60 Minutes recounts, but "there was an undercover agent right behind him when the first shots were fired."
The shooter in question, Elton Ibrahim Simpson, had been the target of a previous FBI operation, in which an informant recorded him talking about wanting to fight overseas for Islam. That wasn't enough to send Simpson to jail—he got three years' probation instead—but the discovery that his mosque had spies in it did drive him away from the temple. The alienated Simpson and his roommate then reached out to ISIS about carrying out some sort of attack at home.
But ISIS wasn't the only organization that Simpson was in touch with. "After the trial," his attorney told 60 Minutes, "we found out that they had had an undercover agent who had been texting with Simpson, less than three weeks before the attack, to him 'Tear up Texas.'" The report continues:
The man he's talking about was a special agent of the FBI, working undercover posing as an Islamic radical. The government sent attorney Dan Maynard 60 pages of declassified encrypted messages between the agent and Elton Simpson—and argued "Tear up Texas" was not an incitement. But Simpson's response was incriminating, referring to the attack against cartoonists at the French magazine Charlie Hebdo: "bro, you don't have to say that…" He wrote "you know what happened in Paris… so that goes without saying. No need to be direct."
But it turns out the undercover agent did more than just communicate online with Elton Simpson. In an affidavit filed in another case the government disclosed that the FBI undercover agent had actually "traveled to Garland, Texas, and was present…at the event."…And this past November, Maynard was given another batch of documents by the government, revealing the biggest surprise of all. The undercover FBI agent was in a car directly behind Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi when they started shooting.
Was it incitement? Judge for yourself. From the affidavit:

The FBI wouldn't speak with 60 Minutes, aside from an emailed statement denying that its agents had advance knowledge of the Garland plot. So we don't know their answers to the questions the show says it would have liked to have asked: "Did you have more communications with Simpson? How is it that you ended up coming to Garland, Texas? Why are you even there?" That isn't the first time the FBI has declined to talk about the topic. The bureau refused to answer some questions on the subject from the Associated Press earlier this year—and when a Daily Beast reporter inquired about the "Tear up Texas" text last August, an FBI spokeswoman just hung up the phone.
In the best-case scenario, the text was just one irresponsible but ultimately uninfluential remark to a man who was already ready to shoot people. But that would still raise the question of just why exactly anyone thinks this sort of encouragement should be a part of any police investigation. In the meantime, it wasn't an undercover G-man who stopped the plot; it was the local cops in Garland, who were there because they realized that this was the sort of event someone might try to attack.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
In an alternate universe this would be damning for the FBI. But in this universe those in charge of the incitement probably got special rewards.
How many terrorist attacks did you design, plan and then stop?
Exactly.
Obama said over and over that the cops do stuff like this, and he was right!
not to get all tinfoil hat, but seeing that a lot of plots seem to originate with the FBI, i get real curious when they start shooting people, like the boston bombers friend... in the middle of a sit down interview.. just stinks to high heaven
Incitement -> Plots -> Attempted Terror -> National outrage -> Publicity -> More Budget -> Incitement
It's the Circle of Strife, man.
Elton Ibrahim Simpson
FBI Director: Who is that ambitious go-getter on monitor #4?
Assistant Director: That would be, uh, Simpson, sir...
"And I had on a vest of dynamite, which was the fashion at the time."
"I didn't have any white sticks of dynamite, because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones."
"Brazil" is a documentary.
And 1984 is a government training manual.
In ways that go way beyond just the terrorism stuff.
Assuming the affidavit is accurate, that's not incitement. He's trying to clarify the guy's intentions, not encourage him to act.
I've seen many people describe the two guys who got killed as victims because that evil bigot dared to show pictures of Mohammed. It is insane.
We must have endless sympathy for islamic murderers.
Obama said over and over that the cops encourage this sort of thing, and he was right!
Thanks squirrels!
I thought that was Jerry Lewis w J.E. Hoover. So what are the Tongue-in-Cheek Awards?
Remember, Edith Efron wrote for TV Guide.
So, 60 Minutes on one side and the FBI on the other; two notorious clusters of liars.
Is there some reason we should believe any part of this?
It's called a false flag, like 9/11.
Of course, this isn't new. Not at all.