Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Donald Trump

Trump Reversing Record Number of Regulations

President signs four more Congressional Review Act rollbacks, bringing total number to seven…or six more than all his predecessors combined

Matt Welch | 3.28.2017 5:15 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Whitehouse.gov
(Whitehouse.gov)
Warren G and Nate Dogg obviously ahead of their time. ||| GW Regulatory Center
GW Regulatory Center

President Donald Trump's big moves today on energy/climate policy, assessed in detail by Science Correspondent Ronald Bailey below, are far from his only deregulatory heaves this week. On Monday, for example, the president signed into law four regulatory rollbacks presented to him via the Congressional Review Act (CRA), or three more than were enacted between 1996-2016 combined.

The previously obscure CRA, which Scott Shackford wrote about at length in January 2015, gives Congress 60 working days to reverse any new regulation added to the Federal Register. (That's congressional working days, so in fact the 115th Congress has had the ability to pick off any unwanted Obama-administration reg enacted after mid-June of last year.) The only successful deployment of the CRA prior to Trump came in March 2001, when President George W. Bush signed out of existence a controversial November 2000 Clinton administration rule requiring employers to prevent ergonomic injuries in the workplace. The unified Republican Congress of 2015–2016 presented five CRA rollbacks to President Barack Obama, and he vetoed each one.

President Trump now has seven CRA notches on his belt, and more coming his way. The latest, as summarized by USA Today:

* The "Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces" rule, which barred companies from receiving federal contracts if they had a history of violating wage, labor or workplace safety laws. That regulation, derided by critics as the "blacklisting" rule, was already held up in court. […]

* A Bureau of Land Management rule known as "Planning 2.0," that gave the federal government a bigger role in land use decisions. The rule was opposed by the energy industry.

* Two regulations on measuring school performance and teacher training under the Every Student Succeeds Act, a law Obama signed in 2015 with bipartisan support.

The other three CRA reversals so far have been a Security and Exchange Commission rule requiring publicly traded resource-extraction companies to disclose payments made to foreign governments, a Department of Interior framework governing stream runoff of coal mining operations, and a Social Security Administration policy (covered by Scott Shackford here) to share the names of people it classifies as having a mental illness with the federal gun database in order to deny them access to weapons.

Other Trump deregulatory activity has included:

* His January 30 executive order requiring agencies to identify two existing regulations to kill each time they promulgate a new one.

* His February 24 executive order instructing each agency to appoint a Regulatory Reform Officer, who will head up a task force that suggests regulations to euthanize.

Speaking of late entertainers…. ||| Quickmeme
Quickmeme

* His appointment to the Supreme Court of Neil Gorsuch, a judge most famous for his criticism of excessive deference to regulators.

* His appointments to the Cabinet critics of and reformers to the departments they now head, including Education's Betsy DeVos, Energy's Rick Perry, Transportation's Elaine Chao, and Health and Human Service's Tom Price.

* His nomination of drug-approval-process critic Scott Gottlieb to head up the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and his three paragraphs in the State of the Union Address talking up FDA reform.

* His appointment to head up the Federal Communications Commission regulation skeptic Ajit Pai.

There is no doubt that the early Trump presidency has made deregulation a priority. It remains to be seen how much Congress will share that appetite, and how much the administration's efforts will be constrained or counterbalanced by Trump's own meddlesome proclivities into other areas of individual and corporate behavior.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Cruz: Republicans Cannot Drop Health Care, Should Focus on Free Market Solutions

Matt Welch is an editor at large at Reason.

Donald TrumpRegulation
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (42)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Palin's Buttplug   8 years ago

    All pissy little regulations.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   8 years ago

      That's not what I'm hearing in the media.

    2. Fatty Bolger   8 years ago

      lol

    3. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

      So? Pissy little regulations need to be eradicated too. Maybe more.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    It remains to be seen how much Congress will share that appetite...

    Without an expansive Executive Branch bureaucracy, running our day-to-day lives falls to Congress. They can't possibly be on board with that.

  3. Jerryskids   8 years ago

    Ha! I actually saw somebody making the argument that the CRA was an end-run around Chevron with the implication that Congress is illegitimately interfering with the executive-branch agencies authority to make laws, as interpreted by SCOTUS, which makes it the Supreme Law of the Land. Congress' authority to even create the executive-branch agencies and delegate their legislative authority to them was a highly dubious proposition if you ask me, but to claim that the executive-branch agencies' authority is higher than Congress' authority? You're on drugs.

    1. Vapourwear   8 years ago

      Stupid's a hell of a drug.

    2. Robert   8 years ago

      It would be unconstitutional if it weren't for the fact that its products are acts of Congress. Some characteriz'ns of the CRA don't make that clear. The CRA just enforces a procedural rule on Congress making it easier for them to get out such legisl'n. They're still bills.

  4. Adans smith   8 years ago

    So,the comments working now? I see the comment count has been down.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   8 years ago

      Working-ish.

  5. Stormy Dragon   8 years ago

    a Department of Interior framework governing stream runoff of coal mining operations

    You'd think landowners downstream from coal mines would have the right to not get toxic waste dumped on their property without permission, but apparently that's crazy commie talk.

    1. Careless   8 years ago

      Summon coase!

    2. mpercy   8 years ago

      You'd think that people living downstream from EPA worksites would have the right to not get toxic waste spilled on their property without permission, but apparently that's crazy anti-government talk.

      Yeah, the EPA was supposed to be remediating the toxic waste from earlier mining but they certainly made the situation worse, not better.

      As for the people downstream, they do have a right to sue if someone dumps toxic waste on their property.

      The Navajo nation has sued the EPA. People are suing the TVA for their coal ash spill. There are also a number of on-going lawsuits against the government for their failure to enforce environmental laws. And there are several lawsuits pending against actual coal mines.

    3. Bra Ket   8 years ago

      Well since coal mining wasn't invented in 2016, nor was it unregulated up until that time, I think a little more analysis is needed to predict the actual impact of having or not having a particular coal mining regulation that was passed last year.

  6. SIV   8 years ago

    There is no doubt that the early Trump presidency has made deregulation a priority.

    LIBERTARIAN MOMENT

    1. Robert   8 years ago

      Looks longer than just a moment from here. This is going to last a while.

      1. Hank Phillips   8 years ago

        4 million votes last a good while when they cover the gap in eleven states.

  7. SIV   8 years ago

    There is no doubt that the early Trump presidency has made deregulation a priority.

    LIBERTARIAN MOMENT

  8. Rufus The Monocled   8 years ago

    You had me at 'overturning Obama'.

  9. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

    Q: Why did Bailey stop manscaping?

    A: He found out Mrs. Bailey does not believe in Shaved Ron Deference.

    1. Matt Welch   8 years ago

      I can't believe I'm the first to golf-clap.

      1. anon   8 years ago

        have time to golf clap but no time to fix broken ass comment system? Come on, Matt. PRIORITIES! Your indentured servants are getting uppity.

  10. GLEEMORE?   8 years ago

    Hey, as long as Trump allows oil companies to just spew their shit everywhere without some regulator raising a finger every couple of years I'd say that's progress. Cutting the EPA's budget by 2.6 billion and then raising the DOD's budget by 60 billion is just more libertarian winning. And we've won sooo much, lately.

    1. GILMORE?   8 years ago

      Is there some reason you continue to use a handle to look like mine? I'd thought you'd stopped that and moved on to one of the other ones.

  11. KalkiDas   8 years ago

    But but but the world'th coming to and end and global warmin'th going to kill uth

  12. KalkiDas   8 years ago

    can he:

    1. get rid of the shitty non-vented gas cans?
    2. get rid of ethanol or at least let you guy gas without ethanol other than avgas?

    1. Matt Welch   8 years ago

      He was pro-ethanol on the campaign trail, so the main hope for the anti-ethanol people around him is that the previous mandate will fall apart on its own, due to not hitting targets or something.

    2. ThomasD   8 years ago

      I consider the shitty non-vented gas cans to be a form of market protection for the makers of brass fittings.

  13. Migrant Log Chipper   8 years ago

    Even a blind squirrel.....

    1. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

      I don't think that metaphor works. Trump doesn't seem to be doing things blindly. We may not agree with his priorities, but he isn't just flailing about.

  14. anon   8 years ago

    What I got from this was that Congress worked 60 days in the last 6 months, for which they were compensated roughly $125k (just kinda guessing since I last looked maybe 5 years ago at actual pay rates).

    Which means we pay these motherfuckers way too much to make our lives hell.

    1. anon   8 years ago

      my bad, 9 months. 60 days in 9 months.

      Worst part? I wish they worked less.

      1. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

        Read PARLIAMENT OF WHORES. Congresscritters work almost constantly. They may only meet in Congressional session a few days a month, but the out of session workload is heavy.

        Now, WHAT they work on IS often a problem.

  15. LarryA   8 years ago

    bringing total number to seven?or six more than all his predecessors combined

    What a high bar. He should be revoking in job lots.

    1. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

      Probably not too practical. Each reg is a bit of agency turf, and the agency in question will fight bitterly for it.

      Get the Washington establishment accustomed to the idea, and it may pick up speed.

  16. vek   8 years ago

    And THIS is the kind of shit I was hoping might ACTUALLY happen after I found out he won. I didn't vote for him, but crossed my fingers he would follow through on this part of his campaign rhetoric. If he really keeps going shit canning tons of useless regulations and rejiggers the tax code like he's talking about all the other mess of him being president will have been worth it. Plus the liberal tears. Those are pretty awesome too. Haha.

    According to his previous talk he's planning on total slash and burn, and the way he has started out is not bad, so I'm just gonna keep my fingers crossed.

  17. vek   8 years ago

    And THIS is the kind of shit I was hoping might ACTUALLY happen after I found out he won. I didn't vote for him, but crossed my fingers he would follow through on this part of his campaign rhetoric. If he really keeps going shit canning tons of useless regulations and rejiggers the tax code like he's talking about all the other mess of him being president will have been worth it. Plus the liberal tears. Those are pretty awesome too. Haha.

    According to his previous talk he's planning on total slash and burn, and the way he has started out is not bad, so I'm just gonna keep my fingers crossed.

  18. x'); DROP USER Tony;   8 years ago

    "Sure, he is the antithesis of everything we believe in every other area...but he's cutting a few regulations! So worth it!"

    1. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

      Shrillary was/is ALSO the antithisis of everything we believe, and she wouldn't have done this, so we are,coming out ahead.

      A little.

  19. Hank Phillips   8 years ago

    None of this really has much to do with the current Republican Prohibitionist Figurehead. The LP 328% increase in votecount has every pious looter prohibitionist pawing through the LP platform for additional issues to take off the chessboard. These same considerations led to the legalization of gay rights--something only the LP has had the guts to defend for decades. Declines in aggregate religiosity track declines in perceived Congressional infallibility, and both figures spur Organized Mysticism to seek a firmer purchase on the reins of government and its sinecures by all possible means--even at the cost of greater freedom! The article inadvertently shows 4 million Libertarian spoiler votes in action repealing bad laws. Not one of those vote was wasted.

  20. tuwuremos   8 years ago

    just as Gerald implied I am in shock that a person able to earn $7711 in 1 month on the computer . go now>>>>>>>>>>> https://qr.net/eyGRuC

  21. Stephen54321   8 years ago

    The Department of Defense has more regulations than just about everybody else. The soldiers are doubtless looking forward to not having as many of those pesky things around to muddy the waters and screw everything up. Once they are no longer forced to obey their officers and NCOs market forces will be able to take over. They'll be free to sign on with whichever (military) company or battalion offers them the most money and the best booty. (That's "booty", not "bootie", although I'm sure they'll get some of the other as well once Trump kicks all those namby-pamby equal opportunity regs to the nearest exit.)

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!