Trump's Schwarzenegger Problem
Celebrity politicians who rely on public affection can come unglued when it fades.

January marked the first time in American history that a president-elect launched a Twitter feud with his celebrity replacement on a reality TV show.
"Wow, the ratings are in and Arnold Schwarzenegger got 'swamped' (or destroyed) by comparison to the ratings machine, DJT," Donald Trump tweeted after the 2017 debut of Celebrity Apprentice, the show he long hosted before obtaining new employment. "So much for being a movie star…But who cares, he supported Kasich & Hillary."
Schwarzenegger, who governed California from 2003 until 2010, had indeed backed Ohio Gov. John Kasich in the GOP primaries, and then anti-endorsed Trump in the general election for a reason dripping with irony: groping allegations.
"For the first time since I became a citizen in 1983, I will not vote for the Republican candidate for President," the former Mr. Universe said in a statement last October, the day after a tape emerged of Donald Trump bragging about how his celebrity status allowed him to "grab" women "by the pussy" without fear of being refused.
Schwarzenegger, you will recall, was accused of far more than just bragging about having his way with the ladies: Days before his first gubernatorial election, the Los Angeles Times published testimonies from a half-dozen women that he had groped and humiliated them, accusations that prompted the actor to apologize and concede that he had "behaved badly." Within hours of the Terminator's self-distancing from the GOP nominee, Trump supporters were circulating images of Arnold pawing the nether regions of a babe on his lap.
Still, anyone who has watched the classic documentary Pumping Iron could have predicted that Schwarzenegger would find a clever way to respond to Trump's Celebrity Apprentice taunts. Sure enough: "There's nothing more important than the people's work, @realDonaldTrump," the new host tweeted out. "I wish you the best of luck and I hope you'll work for ALL of the American people as aggressively as you worked for your ratings."
Get to the chopper!
In any B-grade action movie, this is the part where the antagonist says, "We are not so different, you and I." For in fact Trump and Schwarzenegger have even more in common than hosting the same television show, taking the same unusual career path from celebrity to executive office, and surviving the same type of sexual allegations.
Each man was a rank outsider in the field he would come to dominate: the bodybuilder with a thick accent in Hollywood, the Queens hustler in Manhattan real estate and high society. Each would live their lives surrounded by liberal Democrats, including sometimes at home. And each exceeded skeptics' expectations at nearly every step, in large part due to a conscious cultivation of consumer fan bases.
It's that last commonality, as applied to politics, that provides the cautionary tale. For Schwarzenegger's connection to and reliance on "the people" ended up derailing his governorship, and Trump is already exhibiting signs that popular affection may be his Achilles heel as well.
It's hard to remember now, but the California governor came into office quoting Milton Friedman and vowing to "blow up the boxes" in Sacramento. He hoped to use his populist appeal to route around the Democratic legislature. In November 2005, he called a special election to vote on eight propositions that would have reduced the power of public sector unions (à la Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker half a decade later), capped public spending, and more. After an intense and expensive campaign—including one year of the governor being dogged at each and every public appearance by union protestors, while his popularity plummeted—all eight propositions failed.
The people had spoken. Hasta la vista, Uncle Milton.
From then on, as Los Angeles magazine would later put it, "Schwarzenegger lurched 180 degrees to his left." Bullet-train boondoggles, state-run stem-cell institutes, tax increases, emissions ratchets, mandatory sexual harassment training—it was Democratic wish-list time. The governator left the state with roughly the same godawful fiscal mess he had promised to clean up.
Trump has already demonstrated a reality-bending obsession with popularity since becoming president. His press secretary's first act was to berate journalists for not believing the administration's bogus claims about the size of the audience at the inauguration. Within days the president was vowing to investigate his own groundless claim that as many as 5 million people voted illegally last November.
And if his popularity continues to dive? Stick around!
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Trump's Schwarzenegger Problem."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Your pic reminded me of this. (I haven't had my coffee yet)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWHNA_j7h5A
It's that kind of dedication -- posting before caffeinating -- that won you the First Comment of the Weekend.
You are a credit. To something.
That looks like the best movie I've never seen.
I've linked to that video in the past around here.
Don't try and steal his thunder.
Meh. I feel like an asshole today.
It's okay, **I've** linked to that video before.
Bullet-train boondoggles, state-run stem-cell institutes, tax increases, emissions ratchets, mandatory sexual harassment training?it was Democratic wish-list time.
Remember, California, when I said I would blow up Sacramento first? I lied.
Yeah, populist appeal isn't all it's cracked up to be, as governing as you and they believe the majority wants seldom works out well. If you know what you're doing, you can trust that the positive results of unpopular decisions will carry you through the next election. But if you're unsure or dumbing your way through governing on the wave of chanting rally masses, then the outcome will be good for no one but the opposition.
Does California read this blog? I heard that it got tired of all the TDS and defected to a fresher, bouncier site, where mere commenters are elevated to the status of Writers and there are contests and live bands and balloons and hot dogs on weekends.
Well I think we already knew that Trump was going to be a big government meddler. Also, not that hard to predict that his desire for popularity would give us a Clintonian finger in the wind ruler. We're going to end up with basically the same government we've had since the end of the cold war. I'm really discouraged by the recent military developments in the Middle East but can't say I'm surprised in the least. The Sessions pick I think is a pretty good indicator of where we are headed unfortunately. GOP of course showing their big gov creds with their pathetic health Care bill.
So Arnold didn't stick to his principles; if he had any to begin with.
You can't be all quoting classical liberals and libertarians and then pull a 180 like he did without having a weak principled and intellectual position to begin with.
I understand you have to compromise but Matt describes it as if he caved.
The way I remember it was that Ahnold agreed to the boondoggles, tax increases, and other libtarded stuff to get concessions for other sensible things. He was a Rand Paulist before Rand Paul. Of course, you go along to get along and before you know it, you're completely indistinguishable from the enemy.
Didn't Arnold send Donny a tweet that mentioned a news article with a title like this "Arnold releases tax records"? I'm not a tweeter so I don't have the tweet. The author doesn't seem to like Arnold, but I'll assume the author simply 'forgot' about this tweet.
zzzzzzz
??????O..?????????.Do You want to get good income at home? do you not know how to start earnings on Internet? there are some popular methods to earn huge income at your home, but when people try that, they bump into a scam so I thought i must share a verified and guaranteed way for free to earn a great sum of money at home. Anyone who is interested should read the given article...
????????????____BIG.EARN .MONEY.___???????-
In any B-grade action movie
Arnold wouldn't know what does on in those.
I'm not sure what you understand what B-Grade means. The only one of those Arnold appeared in was that Hercules in New York movie.
I personally think it's telling that the events foretold in The Running Man will transpire in 2019, during Trump's presidency.
Sadly without Richard Dawson.
"And if his popularity continues to dive? Stick around!"
This is the second (or maybe) third time I've heard about Trump's popularity diving on Reason.com. It seems a pretty tenuous claim.
Trump took office on Jan 21st with a low 41.8 favorability rating. As of March 8th, it's 42.6.
That's still low, but it's clearly not dropping and it's certainly not 'diving'. This is Reason, correct, not Salon.
http://www.realclearpolitics.c.....-5493.html
If anything, shouldn't Trump have the opposite of the schwarzenegger problem? The intense hatred of him can't burn forever.
Do you remember Bush? I don't think people stopped hating him until they had to whine about this election.
just as Gerald implied I am in shock that a person able to earn $7711 in 1 month on the computer . go now??????O Big Job Big Currency
What drivel. And you want me to be a consistent supporter of Reason? Ha. As long as you publish things I can read on a supermarket tabloid, I will refrain.
Why would a sane publisher try very hard to get very good libertarian essayists for Reason?
It only seems reasonable.