Movie Review: Kong: Skull Island
Tom Hiddleston and John C. Reilly join the celebrated ape for yet another CGI origin story.


Good grief, Kong again? Let's recap. 1933: The big ape makes his stop-motion debut. 1962: Side trip to Tokyo for some Mixed Monster Arts with Godzilla. 1976: Some Christmas Kong with newcomer Jessica Lange. 2005: Peter Jackson takes a fanboy whack at the never-ending franchise. There was also a Kong stage musical a few years back, but that was in Australia and let's stay focused.
Anyone who's seen all or even a few of the previous Kong movies is unlikely to be enthused anew by the latest one, Kong: Skull Island, a second feature by indie director Jordan Vogt-Roberts, who's been given an estimated $190-million to go through all the old motions once again. The movie has the usual deep monster bench—along with Kong himself, we make the acquaintance of assorted stegosaurs, brontosaurs, dive-bombing pteranodons, serpenty elasmosaurs and big frickin' tree spiders. Giant ants are also promised at one point, but never arrive. Which is too bad—there can never be too many monsters.
Humans are another matter. There are too many of them here, and some of them waste too much of our time putting in meaningless appearances—we can't keep them straight. But this isn't a movie about humans. It's a movie about computer animation, which, as always, is "state of the art" (for the moment) and, as is so often the case, both undeniably impressive and a little boring.
The story, set in 1973 this time, at the calamitous end of the Vietnam War, is familiar. A crackpot scientist (well, he's some kind of science guy) named Randa (John Goodman) is all jumped up about a mysterious island in the South Pacific—"a place where God didn't finish creation." The island has remained uncharted because it's surrounded by a "perpetual storm system"—although it's not so perpetual that Randa, after securing an infusion of taxpayer money from a soft-touch congressman, can't punch through it in a squad of helicopters on loan from the U.S. military. Randa has assembled a team that includes, among too many others, a former British special forces "tracker" named Conrad (Tom Hiddleston) and a number of U.S. military personnel (Toby Kebbell, Shea Wigham), including a cantankerous colonel (Samuel L. Jackson) who's angry about the lost war and still in the mood to kick some Third World butt, human or otherwise. Note the parable taking shape here.
There are also two women in Randa's crew, one for little reason, one for even less. Brie Larson is supposed to be an antiwar combat photographer named Weaver. Her duties here basically boil down to sharing one chaste hug with Hiddleston (it's the movie's sole breath of romance) and putting in the traditional appearance reclining in Kong's leathery palm. The other female presence is Chinese actress Jing Tian (The Great Wall), whose character is basically a cute science chick and whose name could be helpful in selling the movie in a certain very large foreign film market. (Jing's an agreeable performer, judging by what little we're shown here, but it doesn't seem she's been hired for her acting talent.)
After an overlong introductory section in which we see Randa gathering his crew and setting off in the helicopters, the story finally arrives on Skull Island. Now we get the iconic shot of Kong rising up to flick away the choppers surrounding him, and one unlucky airman tumbling down into his fang-filled mouth. There's also the giant-spider attack—which really is pretty great—and a scene in which Kong defeats and slurps down a giant squid as if he were auditioning for an Oldboy remake.
Virtually everything in the film that's worth watching is computer-generated—how excited you get about it may depend on how long you've been watching expensive CGI erupting onscreen. The picture's best non-digital attraction is John C. Reilly, who plays a twinkly, long-marooned World War II airman named Marlow, and who walks away with most of the movie. Marlow is a name out of Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness, the book that was the basis of Francis Ford Coppola's Apocalypse Now, and that film is visually referenced throughout this one—for example, in the spooky jungle compound and painted natives, the napalm inferno, the chopper-borne reel-to-reel tape deck blasting out period rock hits. (Listen up for the usual nods to Jefferson Airplane, Creedence Clearwater Revival, and so forth.)
The constant allusions to Coppola's film, and to its depiction of marauding Western imperialism, are kind of endearing: how nice to know the filmmakers' hearts are in the right place, even if the place is 38 years away. However, the director and his army-size team know that the only things we really care about—the only things we want to see and hear—are Kong's chest-thumping bellow and the mincemeat he makes out of multiple fellow monsters. One has to admit that some of the lizard-stomping action here is pretty terrific. But the scariest moment in the movie comes at the end of the credits, in the form of a promise that struck me as more of a threat. I'll say no more.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How big is that island that it can support such large beasts, yet here in the US, the largest we have is a bison?
Illogical.
Highly illogical.
From the ads I've seen, the movie has that one weird problem so many monster movies have - the big ape seems to be of variable size compared to the known size of the various objects he's interacting with. And then there's the physiological problems of supporting a land-based mammal body that size.
Giant ants are also promised at one point, but never arrive.
Ant-bait and switch?
Bait ant switch
Giant turds everywhere.
Was Vietnam a "lost war" in '73? We had won a negotiated peace by then and had withdrawn most of our combat units. It wasn't until '74 - 75 that Congress pulled the plug on our promised financial aid and air support for South Vietnam and the place began to crumble.
Hollywood history...
"1933: The big ape makes his stop-motion debut."
Loved
"1962: Side trip to Tokyo for some Mixed Monster Arts with Godzilla."
liked
"1976: Some Christmas Kong with newcomer Jessica Lange."
Loved
"2005: Peter Jackson takes a fanboy whack"
meh.
??????O just before I saw the receipt that said $7527 , I accept that my mom in-law wiz like actually making money in there spare time from there pretty old laptop. . there aunt had bean doing this for less than twenty months and at present cleared the dept on there apartment and bout a great new Citroen CV . look here.......?????????.????????????____BIG.EARN .MONEY.___???????-
Ben Stiller in a rubber tiger costume kinda ruined the film for me.
1933 King Kong was great, but 1949's Mighty Joe Young was better.
That's true.
Gorillas are racist, right?
"...both undeniably impressive and a little boring." Kind of like guitar shredders.
Most of us want to have good income but dont know how to do that on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn huge sum, but whenever Buddies try that they get trapped in a scam/fraud so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the page. I am more than sure that you will get best result. Best Of Luck for new Initiative!
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, http://www.moneytime10.com
I call fake on this review since there are no assorted stegosaurs, brontosaurs, dive-bombing pteranodons, or serpenty elasmosaurs. There was a big freakin bamboo-legged spider thing and maybe the saw-beaked pterasaurs could be mistaken for pteranodons, but you seem to have missed the giant water buffalo, stick mantis and skull crawlers. You obviously didn't see Kong and merely reviewed the trailers.
OH! and in response to it being a rehash of the old movies is obviously another clue, since Kong never gets to New York. And as for the side characters, that was a refreshing thing since when these "red shirts" die, we felt for them. The Chinese girl and the young African-American scientist are building a relationship which seems to resemble a popular couple on Youtube. They were two of the more interesting characters in the movie. And the biggest clue you missed the movie, was the rather Libertarian message of non-intervention in foreign matters. "You don't go droppin' bombs in someone's house unless you're lookin' for a fight." And I won't get into the whole psychological Jungian thing.... Really, you need to WATCH the movie you review. If the movie isn't to your taste, you should turn the review over to someone who might be interested.
just as Gerald implied I am in shock that a person able to earn $7711 in 1 month on the computer . go now??????O Big Job Big Currency
Very interesting movie, it's just like Jurassic Park. Thanks for reviewing.
Best Regards,
NinnaDiva recently posted: Watch Kong: Skull Island (2017) Online Free
All have been by now getting this website where they can have the free google play codes online so that they have the generator for codes at the store.