Letter to the Editor
Dear Mr. Friedlander: In reply to your recent note "Hope you enjoy our article on your operation", I didn't enjoy it. I rarely do enjoy badly written, illogical, unfair, irresponsible articles.
I thought it might be of some interest to you to know that the "T" you have on your cover is a copy-righted insignia; copyrighted by the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. A word to the wise may be sufficient.
Now, getting away from the MBTA article and its logo; good luck on your enterprise. Though I cannot agree with your logic, I certainly can applaud your energy and ambition to put out a periodical, and, I hope as you mature the content will improve.
Joseph F. Malone
Director of Public Information, MBTA
In logic, sir, an institution supported by forcible extraction of tax money from innocent citizens has no right to copyright status. Copyrights are an expression of the sacredness of individual rights. As long as it is government-owned, the MBTA will be a denial of those rights. The MBTA's copyright is merely another of the many Alice-in-Wonderland contradictions-in-terms inherent in the welfare state.—ED.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Letter to the Editor."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"I rarely do enjoy badly written, illogical, unfair, irresponsible articles."
And rarely do I enjoy badly written sentences from a bumbling authoritarian.
For fuck's sake, does Reason not even proof-read articles that have been scanned in with OCR before proudly posting them to the website?