Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Trump Accuses Obama of Wiretapping Him; 7 in 10 Americans Say U.S. Losing 'National Identity'; Pro-Trump, Anti-Trump Protesters Clash in Berkeley: A.M. Links

Ed Krayewski | 3.6.2017 9:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | White House
(White House)
  • White House

    The FBI reportedly asked the Department of Justice to refute claims President Trump made on Twitter about President Obama wiretapping Trump Tower.

  • Seven in 10 Americans say the United States is losing its "national identity," according to a new Associated Press poll.
  • Anti-Trump protesters clashed with pro-Trump protesters in Berkeley and at least ten people were arrested.
  • Lawmakers in California have filed FOIA requests for Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities in the state.
  • A Sikh man in Washington was shot by someone who reportedly told him to "go back to his country"—the third such attack in the last 10 days.
  • Turkey President Recep Erdogan said Germany was acting like the Nazi regime after the government canceled local pro-Erdogan rallies.
  • North Korea fired more missiles into the ocean, with three landing in Japanese waters.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Trump's New, Less Objectionable Travel Ban Expected Today

Ed Krayewski is a former associate editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (261)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    The FBI reportedly asked the Department of Justice to refute claims President Trump made on Twitter about President Obama wiretapping Trump Tower.

    This has got to be the most boring palace intrigue yet.

    1. Rufus The Monocled   8 years ago

      Hello.

    2. Jerryskids   8 years ago

      It's a giant turd you gotta poke through to find one little golden kernel of truth. Which of course will triumphally be waved aloft as proof indisputable of all charges. The FBI and the Treasury Department got an order to look at server traffic in and out of Trump Tower investigating possible financial misdealing with Russian banks? Yep, Obama personally tapped Trump's personal phone. As if you can't just follow Trump's twitter feed and get the exact same information.

      1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

        Oh yeah, and of course it's just an amazing fucking coincidence that the two FISA requests just happened to come after it was clear Trump was the republican candidate for president, and that one of the targets of the request was his original campaign manager.

        1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

          What FISA requests?

          1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

            Can't you do some research on your own so that you have some clue of what's going on in the world?

            1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

              Sorry, infowars.com is blocked by the sanity filter in my brain.

              1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

                It was reported on by your beloved New York Times.

                Feel free to piss off though, you horse's ass.

                1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

                  Oh yeah, because I make fun of your idol, I must love the NYC. Good one, molestic pissident.

        2. Ron   8 years ago

          its interesting that on NBC this morning the former big wigs were denying there were FISA request when a simple google shows that there were successful FISA request, but they were for the campaign staff only but Trump was the lead of the Campaign so yea they did.

          1. Fascist loofa-faced shitgibbon   8 years ago

            "Google shows...'

            What does that mean?

  2. DanO.   8 years ago

    When One President Smears Another

    Trump had no evidence on Saturday morning when he smeared his predecessor, President Barack Obama, accusing him of ordering that Trump Tower phones be tapped during the 2016 campaign. Otherwise, the White House would not be scrambling to find out if what he said is true.

    Just contemplate the recklessness ? the sheer indifference to truth and the moral authority of the American presidency ? revealed here: one president baselessly charging criminality by another, all in a childish Twitter rampage.

    The Times reported on Sunday that the F.B.I. director, James Comey, was so alarmed by Mr. Trump's fact-free claim ? which implicitly accused the F.B.I. of breaking the law by wiretapping an American citizen at a president's behest ? that he was asking the Justice Department to publicly call it false. In other words, the F.B.I. director was demanding that Justice officially declare the president to be misleading the public.

    You know it's getting bad when we can't even trust Mark Levin and Breitbart.
    https://tinyurl.com/jchswmd

    1. Rufus The Monocled   8 years ago

      The mendaciousness of progressives is astonishing.

      THEIR ENTIRE CAMPAIGN WAS BUT ABOUT SMEARING TRUMP WITH UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS.

      The Russian hacking thing, in addition to being unsubstantiated, is MORE dangerous because it agitates for confrontation NEEDLESSLY.

      1. DanO.   8 years ago

        UNSUBSTANTIATED CLAIMS

        He isn't a conspiracy-theorizing, narcissistic, thin-skinned, petty, vindictive, delusional-paranoiac with a too-long red tie that points directly at his penis?

        1. Rufus The Monocled   8 years ago

          That's not nice to talk about Obama that way.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

            His tie was blue.

            1. Zeb   8 years ago

              And his penis isn't where you would think.

              1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

                It's in a Ziploc baggie in Michelle's purse.

                1. $park? don't care bout yo mom   8 years ago

                  Ziploc baggie? Now that's classy.

                  1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

                    I thought ziplocs were only for storing daily supplies of lube.

                2. Careless   8 years ago

                  President Missile?

        2. Zeb   8 years ago

          Well, he is most of those things. I guess the democrats finally got the adversary they deserve.

    2. Red Rocks Baiting n Inciting   8 years ago

      The amusing thing about this particular scandal is 1) There were newspaper articles just last week that were practically bragging about how the Obama administration spread out reports about Trump-Russia connections throughout the various intelligence agencies, and 2) we've known since 2013 that the US government is spying on every US citizen already--it's not like devoting a little more effort to Trump would be considered out of bounds by them.

      What was even better was the "Obama spox" passive-voiced denial, which brought up fond memories of his claims that he never learned about anything scandalous in this administration until he read about it in the morning paper.

      1. Red Rocks Baiting n Inciting   8 years ago

        Does that mean Obama actually ordered a wiretap of Trump's phone or that one even took place? No. What this is emblematic of, though, is the deep state's "palace coup"-style tactics against him--it's not like these guys are making any secret of the fact that they're trying to undermine his administration with neo-McCarthyite tactics, using only the flimsiest of evidence to make their case. Look how desperately goofs like Memory Hole latched onto the Sessions-ambassador meeting as something completely out of bounds, despite the fact that Senators meeting with foreign ambassadors is a relatively common occurrence. Or the "Russians hacked the election!!" line that was fed by reports that didn't reveal much of anything in the way of proof that the Russian government had leaked the DNC and Podesta emails to Wikileaks.

    3. Fascist loofa-faced shitgibbon   8 years ago

      "The Times reported on Sunday that the F.B.I. director, James Comey, was so alarmed by Mr. Trump's fact-free claim "

      The Times is one of the news agencies that reported the wire-tapping of Trump. Now they are referring to such a report as fact-free. Bizarre.

  3. Bee Tagger   8 years ago

    Anti-Trump protesters clashed with pro-Trump protesters in Berkeley.

    That's what you get when you have a flag with 2 primary colors on it.

    1. Rich   8 years ago

      Indeed.

    2. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

      Actually, the story seems to suss out to "Anti-Trump thugs attack Pro-Trump rally, get arrested."

  4. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    North Korea fired more missiles into the ocean, with three landing in Japanese waters.

    Japan never even thought about using missiles to hunt whales.

    1. $park? don't care bout yo mom   8 years ago

      Fuck you darphin! And fuck you whare!

      1. ThomasD   8 years ago

        So lacist.

  5. Bee Tagger   8 years ago

    Seven in ten Americans say the United States is losing its "national identity," according to a new Associated Press poll.

    It is going to have a hard time voting if it doesn't find that national identity.

    1. Rich   8 years ago

      Nice!

    2. Rhywun   8 years ago

      These polls are getting more abstract every day.

    3. Deep Lurker   8 years ago

      I blame "multiculturalism." It's a meme-weapon, a pernicious idea deliberately designed and deployed to destroy the national identities of wealthy western nations.

      The old immigration deal was that immigrants either assimilate or else peaceably and cheerfully accept a second-class status. In return, the unassimilated get tolerated, and the assimilated get adopted as full members of the American Tribe. When it worked, it made America great (to coin a phrase). When it broke down, it gave us some major headaches, with the long-time refusal to accept blacks as full members of the American Tribe being perhaps the worst of these.

      In any case, the deal was based on the old wisdom of si fueris Romae, Romano vivito more; si fueris alibi, vivito sicut ibi ("if in Rome, live in the Roman way; if you are elsewhere, live as they do there.") But "multiculturalism" took a wrecking ball to the deal. And now people are finally responding: "If the deal is off, then the deal is off." It's not the best response - that would be to drive a stake through multiculturalism and bury it at a crossroads - but it's an understandable response.

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

        Fuck off, slaver. I will adopt whatever culture I want.

        1. Careless   8 years ago

          I will adopt whatever culture I want.

          You realize that's exactly how you lose a national identity, right? I mean, I'm not telling you no to do it, but I'm saying you're not disagreeing with him

          1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

            I don't recognize the validity of that concept.

            1. Red Rocks Baiting n Inciting   8 years ago

              I don't recognize the validity of that concept.

              Oh please. Try practicing concepts like respect for property rights or the right to bear arms in your average third-world shithole. You really think these things, and their preservation, aren't a product of culture or identity?

              "I DO WHAT WANT" sounds cute on South Park. It doesn't really apply to the real world, which is why anarchists are viewed as a joke.

      2. Marty Feldman's Eyes   8 years ago

        The old immigration deal was that immigrants either assimilate or else peaceably and cheerfully accept a second-class status. In return, the unassimilated get tolerated, and the assimilated get adopted as full members of the American Tribe.

        Not really, the old immigration deal was that first generation was ghettoed, second generation transitioned and by third generation no one can tell the difference except for what they think of as their childhood comfort food. And perhaps the color of their skin.

        The idea that back in the day people came here and immediately discarded the way they dressed and learned english as fast as they could is a myth. Some did, some didn't.

        Also, maybe that applies in Europe, where there actually are nations (and where, say, the French seemed to have done their level best to not integrate newcomers), but the U.S. was never a nation in the proper sense. Our national identity is made up of whatever people want it to be, and that makes it not really national- Tennessee compared to Minnesota, or Seattle compared to Spokane might as well be different countries.

        1. Rhywun   8 years ago

          Seattle compared to Spokane might as well be different countries

          This is absurd. Seattle and Spokane have far more in common than each does with any other country. A visit abroad will make that immediately obvious.

          1. Marty Feldman's Eyes   8 years ago

            Yeah, maybe bad example. I'll try again- "Seattle has more in common with Vancouver than it does with St. Maries, ID"

        2. Azathoth!!   8 years ago

          Yeah, that's right--because in Tennesee the shop at Target--but in Minnesota, they shop in Target. Totally different. Why, McDonalds in Spokane has 'egg mcmuffins'--but in Seattle they're 'egg mcmuffins'. See the difference?

          It is to the credit of the ideals of the United States that America, as vast as it is, has managed to create an overarching culture that IS so cohesive out of so many disparate parts.

          It is sad that so many are so blind to this today.

          But that, alas, has always been the goal of the multiculturalists. Because in voluntary unity, there is a strength greater than anything that's come before.

          And they desperately want to take that from us.

      3. Not a True MJG   8 years ago

        You should write a history book.

    4. Marty Feldman's Eyes   8 years ago

      The Onion is jealous they didn't come up with that one before you did.

  6. Kauzig Kristen   8 years ago

    Happy Day of the Dude. Abide.

    1. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

      I shall pee on a rug to celebrate.

      1. Kristen Abides   8 years ago

        It's not a celebration if it's something you do every day!

      2. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

        That rug really tied the day together, did it not?

        1. Not a True MJG   8 years ago

          Fuckin' A.

        2. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

          "That rope really tied the date together." - Crusty

    2. Not a True MJG   8 years ago

      No.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    Turkey President Recep Erdogan said Germany was acting like the Nazi regime after the government canceled local pro-Erdogan rallies.

    You know who else acted like a Nazi regime?

    1. DanO.   8 years ago

      Who?

    2. Kristen Abides   8 years ago

      Nazarbayev?

    3. Rich   8 years ago

      Prince Harry?

    4. Get To Da Chippah   8 years ago

      Every Republican administration?

    5. $park? don't care bout yo mom   8 years ago

      My wife?

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

        Hawt.

    6. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

      The nail salon lady?
      "Cucumber water for customer only!"

  8. Rich   8 years ago

    The FBI made the request because such wiretapping would be illegal, since the President cannot just order the eavesdropping of a U.S. citizen's phones

    "It's not illegal if the president does it."

    1. DanO.   8 years ago

      Ever heard of Nixon?

      1. Rich   8 years ago

        Wasn't that a camera brand or something?

        1. DanO.   8 years ago

          You're thinking of Ivanka.

      2. Kristen Abides   8 years ago

        fa?ce?tious
        f??s?SH?s
        adjective
        treating serious issues with deliberately inappropriate humor; flippant.

        1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

          Interesting factoid: facetious is one of only two words that has all the vowels in alphabetical order.

          1. CPRM   8 years ago

            but never 'y'

            1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

              You responded facetiously.

    2. Fascist loofa-faced shitgibbon   8 years ago

      Why is a wire-tap needed when every bit of communication is captured and saved already?

      1. Ship of Theseus   8 years ago

        Because it's not.

  9. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

    Anti-Trump protesters clashed with pro-Trump protesters in Berkeley and at least ten people were arrested.

    Pro-Trump protesters in Berkeley? Talk about being out of your element. You'd be more likely to find SugarFree in church, or Warty not doing squats, or Mikey reading.

    1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

      I read more in a month than you probably do in a year, at least as long as we're not counting Playgirl magazine.

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        Not true, but it takes you a whole month to get through The Cat in the Hat? Keep working at it, little guy, you'll get there. Did you know there's a sequel?

        1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

          You're way out of your league son. Keep entertaining me though. It's part of the reason why I stick around at this dump.

          1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

            I know i'm out of my league, but sometimes it's diverting to slum it down here in the single-digit-IQs with you.

          2. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

            For real, though, does that mean that you'll go away if i stop reminding you how stupid you are? Because that is a hell of a tempting offer.

            1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

              The way things are going around here, in a few more months the only ones left here will be you two and three or four other cucks perpetually circle-jerking each other.

              1. $park? don't care bout yo mom   8 years ago

                They didn't let you in at coolkidstable.com, did they? Poor little guy.

                1. American Memer   8 years ago

                  Why do the cool kids need a stable?

              2. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

                Was that a yes? Because i'm serious. You leaving would be a decent first step towards Hit'n'Run recovering a measure of its former okay-ness.

                1. $park? don't care bout yo mom   8 years ago

                  Why Mikey will never leave.

          3. $park? don't care bout yo mom   8 years ago

            Donald Trump, is that you?

        2. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

          Dude, the Cat In the Hat is a deep book that describes the apprenticeship process in the Western esoteric tradition.

          1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

            Okay, but Mikey's lips still move when he reads it.

    2. DanO.   8 years ago

      Or Ken S. limiting a response to fewer than 500 words.

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

        Unpossible!

  10. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    A Sikh man in Washington was shot by someone who reportedly told him to "go back to his country"?the third such attack in the last 10 days.

    Thanks a lot, Heller decision.

    1. Jerryskids   8 years ago

      A Sikh man was shot, you say? See? I todjya Obama was lying about them Death Panels!

      1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

        This whole story is Sikh.

    2. Rhywun   8 years ago

      Adblock-blocked on their crappy website but if there's some Indian pogrom going on why hasn't the American MSM latched onto it? This is the first I'm hearing about it.

    3. Drave Robber   8 years ago

      Demand for independent Khalistan on the rise, Shikha outraged.

    4. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

      Of course, while highlighting this story Reason naturally completely ignores the one about the guy making the threats against synagogues and Jewish organizations turning out to be an Obama-loving black radical disgraced member of the media.

  11. Jerryskids   8 years ago

    C'mon, man, don't leave us hanging! Where's Robbie's review of the new Switch? Too busy still playing it?

    1. Lord Rollingpin   8 years ago

      Oh! Good call.

  12. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

    The FBI reportedly asked the Department of Justice to refute claims President Trump made on Twitter about President Obama wiretapping Trump Tower

    Has Comey publicly made such a request, or is it still anonymous sources claiming something?
    And why doesn't Comey just issue his own denial instead of asking for one from a third party?

    1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

      The cat is out of the bag, so it's ass-covering time now.

      I can just imagine how many deep spook types were furiously going around deleting and destroying evidence over the weekend.

    2. Fatty Bolger   8 years ago

      I wonder if he's deliberately putting the DOJ in a bind.

      1. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

        My first thought was that he knows they 'can't' disavow it since they initiated the FISA request.

        My second thought was that it's bullshit since he's not quoted directly and instead it "anonymous officials" putting words in his mouth. The original,NY Times article is written deceptively to create the impression that they're quoting Comey directly when they aren't.

    3. MikeP2   8 years ago

      It's only "anonymous sources" putting words in Comey's mouth. However the NYT and others are doing every bit of wordsmithing they can to make it look like Comey himself has refuted Trump.

      The fake news is appalling.

    4. Fascist loofa-faced shitgibbon   8 years ago

      "The FBI reportedly"

      I'm am getting very tired of the word "reportedly", allegedly.

  13. Rich   8 years ago

    A Sikh man in Washington was shot by someone who reportedly told him to "go back to his country"?the third such attack in the last 10 days.

    I suspect all of these attacks on Sikhs are by hateful morons who mistake Sikhs for "Muslim terrorists".

    1. spqr2008   8 years ago

      Yep. I think the FBI and ATF need to spend more of the money they waste tracking racist groups promoting the cultural differences between Muslim Turbans and Sikh turbans.

    2. Zeb   8 years ago

      Seems likely. Sikhs need some kind of educational campaign. Maybe "We're not Muslim, you stupid assholes!"

  14. Stormy Dragon   8 years ago

    It's literally pay to play at Mar-a-Lago

    If you pay $200,000 a year to the company Donald Trump owns, you too can have access most weekends to the president and his top officials. As an alternative, your organization could cut a $150,000 check to bring in a couple of hundred people who will have a chance to schmooze with the president and cabinet officials. Foreign moguls and dignitaries welcome.

    1. Idle Hands   8 years ago

      I will consider Donald Trumps presidency a success if he ends up in pinstripes.

      1. KerryW   8 years ago

        I don't think the Yankees would be interested in him.

    2. Red Rocks Baiting n Inciting   8 years ago

      In this case, it's major corporate organizations instead of left-wing billionaires, foreign countries and Hollywood celebrities.

    3. Zeb   8 years ago

      This is going to be fun.

      I have this odd suspicion that people are going to completely ignore actual questionable things like this, though, and keep on freaking out about completely stupid and/or made up shit.

    4. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

      Hey, he is just being a shrewd businessman, unlike that whole Clinton Foundation pay-for-play scheme.

  15. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

    She's 17 and Needs Birth Control. Do We Turn Our Backs?

    This is health care at its best, preventing diseases and averting teenage pregnancies, all while saving public money. Yet clinics like these across America are in peril because of myopic Washington politics.

    Let's be clear: This isn't about the government paying for abortions. That's already mostly banned. This is about paying for birth control and cancer screenings when the provider has some connection, even a remote one, to abortions.

    About two-thirds of the women and girls who come to these clinics don't have any other health care provider. They're people like Amanda Bowden, 33, who comes annually to the Maine Family Planning clinic in Augusta to get birth control pills and a checkup.

    I asked her about the effort to cut funding for clinics like these, and she said: "You're not taking away abortion services. You're taking away my health care."

    1. Get To Da Chippah   8 years ago

      Make birth control pills OTC, and then fuck off.

      1. Red Rocks Baiting n Inciting   8 years ago

        Funny how this was supported by the left until Republican senator Cory Gardner proposed it in a bill, and then all of a sudden the "relationship between a doctor and their patient is sacrosanct! So many health concerns!" despite the fact that no one I asked could offer any evidence that OTC birth control was causing a health crisis for women in the countries where it was offered.

        1. Zeb   8 years ago

          And I'm sure that in quick visits to the Planned Parenthood clinic to get birth control, the doctors there do an in depth medical history and really get to know each patient so they can appropriately deal with all of those health concerns.

        2. Marty Feldman's Eyes   8 years ago

          Funny how this was supported by the left until Republican senator Cory Gardner proposed it in a bill,

          That was all about the fact that if it's OTC it won't be covered by insurance.

          1. Red Rocks Baiting n Inciting   8 years ago

            That was all about the fact that if it's OTC it won't be covered by insurance

            That was what the freak-out centered on, yes. Democrats were simply couching it in terms of healthcare consultation and toxicity dangers as cover.

          2. ThomasD   8 years ago

            Not necessarily. There are plenty of drug products that have both OTC and Rx Only versions - omeprazole being one example.

            More specifically, with an OTC product it's not so much the drug in it, as the packaging on it (directions for use.)

            If oral contraceptives get OTC status I'd expect to see a fair number of parallel product lines.

    2. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      That's already mostly banned.

      There's a big difference between "mostly banned" and "all banned." "Mostly banned" is "slightly permitted."

    3. Rich   8 years ago

      She is 17 years old, has an alarming itch "down there"

      The beginning of this article is almost SugarFree-esque.

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        Wasn't that also the beginning of at least three Motley Crue songs?

      2. Karen24   8 years ago

        My younger son needs a name for his new heavy metal band. I'm going to suggest "Alarming Itch."*

        *He plays classical guitar and has formed a band with two other students in his guitar class. So far they can't determine roles, since no one plays bass or drums. Look forward to the new trend in boy bands -- three lead guitars and a drum machine.

        1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

          Hey, get four more guitarists and you've got the Eagles.

          1. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

            I had a rough morning and I hate the fucking Eagles, man.

            1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

              Get the fuck outta my cab!

        2. Juice   8 years ago

          Nah, that's a name for one of those "new" "indie" bands that sound like everyone's hanging out clapping in someone's bathroom.

          1. Karen24   8 years ago

            That's a fair description of what they sound like so far. They are proof that fifteen-year-olds are too young to make any decisions and also that a group composed of three really talented kids -- they call got the highest score at UIL solo contest and are beloved of their teacher -- does not necessarily mean the band is three times as good.

    4. $park? don't care bout yo mom   8 years ago

      "You're not taking away abortion services. You're taking away my health care."

      I'm sure she has an excellent reason for not paying for it herself.

      1. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

        At thirty-three years old she should.

      2. Meh.   8 years ago

        ^^^ I was just logging on to say this... but also, if these clinics really cared about keeping their funding to provide healthcare to women, and if it was only "a remote connection" to abortions, wouldn't the most beneficial route to be to just cut their abortion services? It annoys me when people try to pass these abortion clinics off as the only viable source of healthcare for women.

    5. Not a True MJG   8 years ago

      Do We Turn Our Backs?

      Is she hot?

      "You're not taking away abortion services. You're taking away my health care."

      It can be both!

  16. Rich   8 years ago

    Mysterious UFO 'the size of Jupiter crashes into sun' captured in bizarre images from Solar Observatory spacecraft

    Conspiracy theorists believe the images - of huge transparent group of rings - could prove that giant extra-terrestrial spaceships exist in our solar system

    and that they influenced the US presidential election.

    1. Rhywun   8 years ago

      Alien Darwin award winner

    2. John Titor   8 years ago

      Bahaha, they sourced fucking Pravda, that's hilarious (Pravda has basically embraced it's 'we were bullshit propaganda' history and now publishes a ton of crap on UFOs, cryptozoology, etc.).

    3. Cyto   8 years ago

      They can't be serious, right? This is like the WWE. Everyone knows it is a goof - and then there's a couple of borderline folks in trailer parks who can't tell the difference.

      Cool diffraction artifacts though.

  17. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

    Why won't Reason cover this?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?: The (Mostly) Safe Golf Cart

    The Consumer Product Safety Commission estimated that in 2015, nearly 18,000 golf cart-related injuries nationwide required emergency room treatment to people of all ages.

    In 2016, The Villages had 94 rescue and emergency medical service incidents involving golf carts, with 70 involving injuries, said Edmund Cain, fire chief for The Villages' Public Safety Department. The department says it does not track fatalities and could not provide data on the nature of the injuries.

    We need stronger golf cart regulations!

    1. Rich   8 years ago

      "States that are allowing golf carts on public roads are turning back the clock on 50 years of vehicle safety progress."

      I have *never* seen a golf cart on a public road. Riding lawn mowers, yes.

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        I saw a dude booking out of a parking lot onto a busy six-lane road on his Rascal.

        1. Rich   8 years ago

          "Booking out"?

          *Canadian* Citizen X, eh?

          1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

            You take that back, Rich. You take that back right now.

            1. John Titor   8 years ago

              ONE OF US, ONE OF US, ONE OF US...

            2. Rich   8 years ago

              😎 I take it back!

          2. Rhywun   8 years ago

            So... "Canadian" is the same language used in eighties John Hughes movies?

            1. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

              Shermer, Illinois was a crazy place.

      2. Rhywun   8 years ago

        I hear there are even states that allow horse-drawn buggies on roads. We are turning back the clock on 100 years of vehicle safety progress.

        1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

          What's next, people walking?

    2. Jerryskids   8 years ago

      nearly 18,000 golf cart-related injuries nationwide required emergency room treatment to people of all ages.

      Nearly a dozen of them did not involve alcohol.

      1. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

        Jer, it's all elderly folk and/or their grand kids driving, which is why we need better golf carts that pass rigorous government safety standards.

    3. The Last American Hero   8 years ago

      For those not in the know, The Villages is a sprawling retirement community. The notion that is it full of golf carts on "public roads" is no more odd than people that live in gated golf course communities using golf carts to get to their neighbor's house or the clubhouse.

      1. Mickey Rat   8 years ago

        What happens in The Villages stays in The Villages. You do not really want to know, anyway.

        1. Fascist loofa-faced shitgibbon   8 years ago

          M Knight Shamalamadingdong should do a documentary.

    4. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

      My friend knows a lawyer whose business is nothing but golf cart accidents in the Villages.

  18. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

    Neon-Blue Wine Gives Spanish Start-Up a Regulatory Headache

    "None of us really liked normal wine, which comes with too many norms, such as whether you can take it with ice or not," said Taig Mac Carthy, one of the co-founders of G?k. "So our goal was clearly to offer something to people looking for a wine that was a bit more fun and crazy. The trouble is that we are trying to revolutionize an industry that has worked for centuries without making any change ? and they control the rules of the game."

    Under the European Union's oenological regulations, whatever is not specifically authorized is considered illegal ? and blue is not an approved color.

    A project like that of G?k, Mr. Ben?tez said, is "a laudable corporate initiative, but you have to respect the rules of the game, and they are for everybody."

    1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      such as whether you can take it with ice or not

      SOMEBODY'S never been to a sorority mixer.

      1. Not a True MJG   8 years ago

        At some dinner last year, I saw (what looked like) a ~40 year old trophy wife order a glass of white, and then proceed to load it up with ice. Like, ice to the top of the glass. It was a surreal moment in my life.

    2. Eternal Blue Sky   8 years ago

      Blue is not a creative color

    3. Rich   8 years ago

      whatever is not specifically authorized is considered illegal

      What could *possibly* go wrong?

      1. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

        Brexit?

        1. Rhywun   8 years ago

          The onerous EU-directed haggis regulations were not allowing more "creative" versions into the market.

          1. Chipper Morning Wood   8 years ago

            If I wanna make my haggis out of goat lungs, why is the EU standing in my way?

    4. Juice   8 years ago

      Romulan Ale? Did the crew come back to save the whales?

      1. Mickey Rat   8 years ago

        No, they apparently shot the Klingon Chancellor.

    5. Zeb   8 years ago

      Maybe if you don't like wine you should just drink something else.

      1. Mickey Rat   8 years ago

        Why do they need to call this beverage "wine"?

  19. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

    BTW, why are people on the media having fits of outrage over the accusation of Obama's wiretapping? He wiretapped some senate offices, James Rowan of Fox and some AP reporters. For months the media have been insinuating a Trump-Russian connection based on leaked secret info from spy agencies. In one NY Times article, such information collection was even called "wiretaps".

    1. Cyto   8 years ago

      I've really been amazed at the rapidity of the self-delusion on the part of the media.

      Not only were they targeted directly in the form of the AP, they have also reported on the Obama administrations months-long preparation for sabotaging the Trump administration after the handover of power. And now they feign shock that anyone would ever dare suggest that such a thing could happen. It is really weird.

      Obama said Fox News was not a news organization shortly after taking office. Yet we pretend that not only did this never happen, we pretend that Trump's feud with the media is proof that he his Hitler reincarnated and it is a uniquely evil Trump thing to do that could never have happened before.

      I get being opposed to Trump. Even worrying that he might be a little unhinged. But at the same time we know that other bad actors have not only been on the stage, they are openly bragging about it. I'm not sure how you can pretend that Trump is a nutty conspiracy theorist for suggesting things that Obama administration folks have been bragging about in the NYT.

  20. DanO.   8 years ago

    Is Trump Officially Insane Yet?

    Mark this in your calendar: March 4th was the day the 45th President Of the United States finally went certifiably insane. It appears the "source" of the rumor that has sent Trump into a tailspin of paranoid delusion is none other than the far right hate site Breitbart.com and human boil/conservative shock jock Mark Levin. Trump's ludicrous claims will no doubt rile up his supporters who hang on his every word, but it further alienates him from the Washington establishment and every sane citizen in America. The spectacle of the President of the United States going on a completely unhinged Twitter rampage against his predecessor in the early hours of the weekend isn't just embarrassing, it is humiliating. Trump is single handedly destroying America's image around the world, and the only people who can stop him are too spineless to do their job.

    http://thedailybanter.com/2017.....tap-claim/

    1. Rich   8 years ago

      the only people who can stop him are too spineless to do their job.

      Maybe they're insane, too. Ever think of *that*?

      1. DanO.   8 years ago

        They know exactly what they are doing. Their eventual testimony will be riveting.

        1. Rich   8 years ago

          You mean "Under advise of counsel, I respectfully invoke my Fifth Amendment right ...."?

          1. DanO.   8 years ago

            I'll settle for that. As a start.

            1. Lord Rollingpin   8 years ago

              +1 Lois Lerner

    2. american socialist   8 years ago

      It first came about from louise mensch, the guardian and new york times about the tapping

    3. Marty Feldman's Eyes   8 years ago

      Trump is single handedly destroying America's image around the world,

      Yeah, I'm sure that the victims of our Middle East Forever War thought we were just peachy, but Trump's twitter rampage is what's making them skeptical of our sterling reputation.

  21. Rich   8 years ago

    North Korea fired more missiles into the ocean, with three landing in Japanese waters.

    Just wait until one of these missiles takes out a Japanese fishing boat. *Then* we'll have an international incident!

  22. american socialist   8 years ago

    Trump's claims over the weekend using media sources (he can say it wasn't classified info) have put the dems in an awkward postion

    Do you?

    1. Push the russian connection angle about contacts with trump which would validate the tapping claims bringing team blue into the fray as well

    or

    2. Bury the russian angle and collusion by saying the tapping is not true which would thus throw water on the whole russian connection fire. How can you prove the russian angle if there was no intel gathering in first place?

    Especially if nothing was found in 1 if wire taps happened, that would be bad for team blue.

    1. Jerryskids   8 years ago

      Given that the NSA can potentially be "wire tapping" anybody, I'd say there's pretty good odds Trump wasn't the only candidate getting spied on. Hillary had a server-of-interest, as well as a sext-addicted acquaintance whose phone was being scrutinized by the FBI. And who knows what the CIA comes across when they're spying on the spies who are spying on us?

      1. Cyto   8 years ago

        Don't we just take it as axiomatic that the NSA is wiretapping not anybody, but everybody?

  23. Ken Shultz   8 years ago

    "The FBI reportedly asked the Department of Justice to refute claims President Trump made on Twitter about President Obama wiretapping Trump Tower."

    They're obsessing about the question of whether Obama wrote an order, which is beside the point. The fact is that the FBI and CIA sent a report about the contents of the wiretapping to the White House while Obama was campaigning for Hillary Clinton.

    Why were the contents of those wiretaps sent to the White House in October? Did Obama or someone else in the White House request them? Was that information shared with the Hillary Clinton campaign? Did Obama make any public references to the contents of the wiretap during the last part of the campaign?

    The fact is that the FBI and NSA are specifically prohibited by name from campaigning by the Hatch Act, and there is more than enough evidence to justify an investigation into their campaign activities.

    1. Rich   8 years ago

      It's quite a mess, isn't it, Ken?

      1. Ken Shultz   8 years ago

        The intelligence services are obsessed with torpedoing Trump's attempt to coordinate foreign policy with Putin on everything from ISIS in Syria to Iran. They're defending their turf, their fiefdoms--like any bureaucracy, they don't want to share responsibilities.

        Meanwhile, the military would rather invade Syria themselves. Meanwhile, Neocons like McCain would rather invade Syria themselves.

        The selective leaks to the press about Sessions and Trump, the initial investigation itself during the campaign, it's always been about pulling the rug out from under Trump's attempt to coordinate with Putin like FDR coordinated with Stalin during World War II.

        We've built up this gigantic intelligence infrastructure that didn't exist in the same way before 9/11. The NSA alone has some 35,000 employees now. If Trump doesn't do something to reign them in, our presidents may lose the ability to set policy without their approval.

        They'll just keep raining pain on them in the form of covert investigations of the president's associates during campaigns, selective leaks to the press, etc. until the president stops doing what he's told. Trump better make an example out of somebody, or it's gonna be a long four years.

        1. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

          Plus, it's a big part of this season's plot of Homeland.

        2. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

          We might already be there.

          1. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

            http://thehill.com/homenews/ad.....-community

            "Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you," Schumer told MSNBC's Rachel Maddow.

            "So even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he's being really dumb to do this."

            1. spqr2008   8 years ago

              The correct response to this is to cut the HQ budgets of the NSA and FBI in half. That'll make them pay attention and behave better, and as a side bonus, cut the dead weight.

            2. Cyto   8 years ago

              What is funny about that quote is that Trump is simultaneously crazy for taking on the intelligence community because it is obvious that they will get him back and crazy for suggesting that the intelligence community has been used to get back at him.

              I'm reminded of the famous cases of reporters like Nellie Bly going undercover in an asylum. Once inside, no behavior or words could dissuade those in charge. Everything was further proof of insanity. Such is the power of motivated reasoning.

            3. Griffin3   8 years ago

              So, Ms Maddow thinks the proper thing for a president to do is to *knuckle under* to the intelligence community's wishes? Explains a lot, it does.

    2. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

      Hillary tweeted about a connection between Trump and "Russian Banks" in late October, which was the basis for the 2nd FISA request that was approved. Someone in Obamas administration was sharing classified info with Hillary's campaign.

      http://www.thegatewaypundit.co.....-election/

      1. american socialist   8 years ago

        Yea so i am thinking the dems are going to want this buried as i don't see a good conclusion for them. I suspect it won't turn up that trump is colluding with the russians while they will be implicated for spying on him

        1. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

          You'd think,it's the kind of story that libertarians would like be to cover, abuse of power and transparent coordination between the government and media.

          But no. Doing so might upset the cocktail party circuit, so it's going to be ignored here.

          1. CatoTheChipper   8 years ago

            Let's see: does TowerGate have anything to do with pot, transsexual rights, undocumented Mexican or terrorist immigrants? No? Then it's of no interest to the Reason cocktail party circuit.

        2. Juice   8 years ago

          Problem is that Trump first acknowledged this thing over Twitter. He should have held a big press conference and said he was going to make a big announcement and launch an investigation. The MSM finds shit like that much more credible for some reason. Makes it seem official. Makes it seem real.

    3. Juice   8 years ago

      These would all be questions the MSM would ask if they weren't in the tank for the Democrats.

  24. John   8 years ago

    Protesters didn't clash in Berkeley. Pro Trump supporters were attacked. Saying the "Clashed" is like saying hippies and Hell's Angels clashed at Altamont.

    http://twitchy.com/brettt-3136.....ump-rally/

    This is appalling shit. Shame on reason for soft peddling it.

    1. american socialist   8 years ago

      The tolerant and loving left.

    2. Rich   8 years ago

      It doesn't help, either, that the thugs wearing black hoodies and scarves over their faces and bullying people into silence call themselves "anti-fascists," or antifa for short.

      "Antifa"?

      *** facepalm ***

      1. Rhywun   8 years ago

        Sort of like "inflammable" and "flammable" mean the same thing.

      2. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        In order to bash the fash, one must become the fash.

      3. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

        They're facetious fascists.

  25. John   8 years ago

    If it is the case that Obama didn't use the NSA or FBI to spy on the Trump campaign, why doesn't anyone involved give a straight denial? Instead of just saying "It didn't happen", we get Clapper saying "He can deny it" and Obama saying "The Whitehouse didn't order it", ?

    1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      "Let me be clear, uh, all i did was, uh, say it would be nice if someone, um, wiretapped Trump."

      1. Fatty Bolger   8 years ago

        "Who will rid me of this troublesome candidate?"

    2. Ken Shultz   8 years ago

      Even if Obama didn't order it, sending the contents of the wiretap to the White House looks like a violation of the Hatch Act.

      The NSA, CIA, and FBI are all specifically banned from campaigning activities by the Hatch Act. If they sent this information to the White House while Obama was campaigning for Hillary, then their activities should be investigated regardless of whether Obama ordered the tap request.

      1. John   8 years ago

        The White House can order a FISA tap without going to the court. It also can go to the court and get a warrant. So when the White House says "it didn't order it", that technically does not rule out the possibility that it happened but was "ordered" by the FISA court not the White House. Again, if it didn't happen, why not say so in clear and certain terms instead of narrow ones?

        1. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

          Then there's also the possibility that they are just lying about it.

        2. Ken Shultz   8 years ago

          I might even amend my statement to, "If the White House didn't order the tap, then that makes the CIA's, the NSA's, and the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign even worse."

          They repeatedly pushed for warrants to investigate the Trump campaign of their own accord--and the rubber stamp of a FISA court even shot down their first request?

          Relative to the Hatch Act, that makes it even worse if they were operating without any direction from the White House.

          1. John   8 years ago

            In many ways, yes. But I don't believe for a moment the FBI and CIA did that of their own accord and without direction from the White House or at least the Lynch DOJ.

          2. John   8 years ago

            Also, every FISA application is signed off by DOJ. The FBI does not seek FISA warrants. The DOJ does.

            1. Ken Shultz   8 years ago

              My point is that there's enough to justify a full investigation of the security services.

              Put some pressure on those bureaucrats, and there should be a trail of CYA memos all the way up the chain of command.

              Bureaucrats don't violate the Hatch Act of their own accord without covering their asses to their superiors somehow. For goodness' sake, even Monica Lewinsky was smart enough to keep the dress.

              1. John   8 years ago

                I think there is. I worry there will not be for two reasons. First, a lot of Republicans like those services and would not want to see them damaged even if they deserved it and were doing the bidding of Democrats. Second, if Obama was spying on Trump, I wonder how many establishment Republicans knew about it and did nothing.

                1. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

                  I seam to recall several points during the campaign where the Never Trumpers claimed that some hidden info on Trump was going to be released that would kill his campaign.

                  One of those points was in June, after the primaries ended and before the convention.

                  The other was in October - with some supposedly lethal October surprise.

                  The FISA requests were in June and October.

                  Coincidence?

          3. Memory Hole   8 years ago

            Damn, we're finally getting someone here! Empower a special prosecutor. Set the truth free and lets see who's full of shit!!

            1. Lord Rollingpin   8 years ago

              Tulpa, Tulpa's full of shit.

      2. Griffin3   8 years ago

        It depends on your definition of "order it".

  26. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

    Gee, Trump thinks Obama tried to stack the deck for Hillary. What a crazy guy. I mean, it's not as if Obumbles ever went outside the strict limitations of the power of his office.

    Of COURSE Obama had Trumps phones tapped. That's exactly what a reasonable person would expect on Progressive to do for his chosen successor. The real story here is that in spite of every dirty trick in the Democrat playbook, Trump won the general eledtion.

    Think about that. And then consider; how big a landslide would he have won if the playing field had been even slightly level?

    1. John   8 years ago

      Obama tried to help the Congressional Democrats in 2010 and 2014. How did that workout? Obama did everything he could to help Hillary in 2016. How did that workout? Now he is trying to destroy the Trump administration. Given Obama's track record, I am betting on Trump winning re-election in a landslide and finishing out two terms as one of the most successful Presidents since World War II. I say that not because of any belief in Trump, but because of Obama's incredible record of having a reverse Midas touch.

      1. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

        I'm with you on that. And in the process Obama will continue his long performance as the most potent source of embarrasment in the Black communist, and the cement his place in history as an even bigger post-presidental pest then Jimmy Carter.

  27. C. S. P. Schofield   8 years ago

    Oh, and I'm not saying Trump would have won in a landslide but for Democrat dirty tricks to say Trump,is super popular. I'm saying it's a measure of how tired the voters are of these Political Class Business As Ususal rat bastards.

  28. american socialist   8 years ago

    I think trump with those tweets is smarter than he lets on. He has been known to say stupid stuff before without proof so i don't think it will be paid attention to....but it appears to have thrown a wrench into the dem narrative and is now on a boomerang back to them

    1. MikeP2   8 years ago

      Agreed. There were reports about wiretapping and FISA warrants coming out months ago. Trump waited and then with a couple tweets created an absolute firestorm around this. Dem mouths were talking about "transcripts" and investigations just last week....now they are desperately backpedaling.

      1. american socialist   8 years ago

        Yea like which direction do they go?

        If they were tapped and nothing was found to bring about further investigation...really bad situation for the dems. I suspect they will want to bury the russian nonsense

  29. mad.casual   8 years ago

    Seven in 10 Americans say the United States is losing its "national identity," according to a new Associated Press poll.

    And the other 3 are just afraid of being portrayed as white nationalists.

  30. MikeP2   8 years ago

    Didn't some Dem congress critter proclaim over the weekend that "there were transcripts" of conversations between Trump's people and the Russians. And then desparate backpedal away from "transcripts"...because....ya know...that would confirm the whole wiretapping thing.

    This is huge. The loops the MSM is jumping through to quote "anonymous officials" in breathless front page articles is amazing. Particularly since there was broad public acknowledgement of investigations and the FISA warrants back in January and earlier. The NYT themselves are re-writing their own publishing history. absolutely amazing.

  31. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

    Our elected president is being undermined by the intelligence community, and I am so outraged that I am going to comment on the internet.

    1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

      Good heavens!

    2. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

      What a shock that you Obama-loving gayboys are perfectly cool with your messiah using the apparatus of the state against your political enemies.

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        Some idiot on the internet sure read between your lines, Crusty.

        1. John   8 years ago

          The troll infestation is out of control.

          1. DanO.   8 years ago

            You should Tweet about it if it's serious. What's good for the Cheeto...

            1. John   8 years ago

              So they haven't even given you talking points about this. You probably ought to wait until you have some before saying anything. Or did they just tell you to post retarded nonsequiturs in lieu of talking points?

              If they wanted retarded nonsequiturs, they certainly go the right man for the job.

        2. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

          Keep it between the lines.

    3. mad.casual   8 years ago

      Our elected president is being undermined by the intelligence community, and I am so outraged that I am going to comment on the internet.

      *Launches off on clich?d quest to bring down the intelligence community.*

    4. DanO.   8 years ago

      If your outraged opponents outnumber you in long-winded, repetitive defenses of the President who they don't support but oddly defend tooth and nail, does that mean that the president is not a paranoid, grasping crybaby who is prone to tantrums precipitated by far-right conspiracy theorists?

    5. Juice   8 years ago

      Our elected president

      lol speak for yourself

  32. american socialist   8 years ago

    Yep. Trump may be actually playing 3d chess lol!

  33. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

    Some dem douchenozzel was just on MSNBC saying that it's outrageous how Trump engages in fear-mongering instead of coming clean about his shadowy Russian connections.

    1. american socialist   8 years ago

      Sounds like this dem is projecting!

    2. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

      Another salutary effect of this whole clusterfuck is that it's exposing some so-called "civil libertarians" as the total fakers that they really are. I always knew that Glenn Greenwald was a completely dishonest piece of shit, but I read that Rep. Amash of all people was defending Obama's actions while at home in his district over the weekend.

      If that's really true, I have to say it's pretty disappointing. I honestly thought he was a straight shooter and the real deal.

      1. Citizen X - #6   8 years ago

        "Salutary," huh? Looks like someone finally figured out that a thesaurus isn't a prehistoric animal!

  34. american socialist   8 years ago

    Glenn Greenwald has a good article this morning on the Dems desire for russian conflict. Can someone link it? It was over 50 characters and i don't know how to do those

    1. Meh.   8 years ago

      < a href="link goes here"> text goes here < /a>

      Just remove the spaces before the first "a" and before the slash 🙂

      1. John   8 years ago

        is this the link

        1. american socialist   8 years ago

          It is on home page top of page. democrats now demonize the same russia policies that obama long championed

          1. John   8 years ago

            So this one

    2. John   8 years ago

      Why would anyone want a Russia conflict? Have they really gone that insane?

      1. spqr2008   8 years ago

        Because they see Putin as an autocrat and the heir to the people that brought down the one true ideology? That's the only thing I can see those red diaper babies on the left being really upset at Russia for. Either that or because Trump doesn't want to go to war with Russia over their hacking of both partys' e-mails and only succeeding at getting the Dems side penetrated (so much for the party of technology and science).

        1. John   8 years ago

          I am starting to think they have decided radical Islam is the way to destroy the west and thus want the two major western powers in conflict so that they do not unite and defeat radical Islam. I know that is crazy, but these people are nuts.

          1. spqr2008   8 years ago

            I don't know how that would even work out, because the next arms race Russia and the U.S. and China could have is in space, and if you develop Kinetic Energy Weapons, the next thing you know, we're taking out Mecca, Medina, and Qom in response to Terrorist attacks, and using Close Air support KEWs in ground combat operations against third world countries that are harboring terrorists. I guess if the radical Islamists manage to take over Europe it could help them somehow, but I'm not seeing it. And BTW John, have you read Tom Kratman's Caliphate ?

          2. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

            It sure seams that way.

      2. MikeP2   8 years ago

        Perhaps one should wonder about the intentions of the owners of the Dems.

        Who are the money men and what do they want?

        how else to explain why there has been a complete news blackout about the ongoing smoldering/shooting war between the two biggest land armies in Europe - Russian/Ukraine? Shouldn't this be of interest....to somebody?

      3. John Titor   8 years ago

        Only foreign nation that you can really demonize without being seen as racist, lacks industrial and economic ties to the U.S. like China, 'white' (we apparently count Slavs as white now) with a growing Christian population that is targeting minorities the Democrats want to please, successor to the last great leftist ideology that failed horribly, their leader managed to drive circles around Obama in numerous issues despite being at a severe disadvantage and suffering for it (sanctions are rough, but Putin definitely comes off the 'winner' in scenarios like the Crimean annexation and the 'Red Line' speech about Syria).

        In short, they're easy to make into the horrible Other because they fit into Democrats' hate categories.

    3. Sevo   8 years ago

      Moonbeam's choo-choo, collateral damage account:

      The "Transbay Terminal" is one of those glorified gov't jobs programs, supposedly to act as the north terminal of the choo-choo in downtown SF. It was already $300M over budget in 2013 ( http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/.....685647.php ), definitely more than that now, since a local proggy changed the rules and the first developer told 'em to stuff it.
      Now it turns out 'way worse for the long term ( paywalled, headline here http://www.sfgate.com/search/?.....ery=matier ).
      The operating costs were to be paid by the huge crowds just dying to get to someplace they don't want to be in Los Angeles at a much later time than the were promised on the choo-choo that is looking less and less likely ever to be built. The crowds were guessed to be 100,000/day. Really.
      So in addition to the ever-mounting construction over-runs, we taxpayers will be on the hook for what is now guessed to be $20M/year to keep it clean and "to keep the place from becoming a giant homeless camp", which is beginning to sound like its highest and best use.

      1. Sevo   8 years ago

        Oops.
        Not meant as reply to am soc.

        1. Sevo   8 years ago

          Oh, and just saw this:
          "Now comes word that the project's costs have grown another $150 million"
          http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/.....486433.php
          May 2014 in addition to the $300M

          Plus:
          "The cost of the Transbay Terminal project was supposed to cost roughly $1.6 billion, but that has since ballooned to $2.3 billion and now the city of San Francisco is considering a proposal to bridge that gap."
          http://abc7news.com/traffic/sf.....-/1288402/
          April 2016, so there have been yet more dollars down that hole.

          Kinda leaves you wondering what the actual numbers are...

    4. Fatty Bolger   8 years ago

      Interesting. For months I've been asking the question - why agitate for hostility with Russia? Greenwald thinks it's being done to whitewash western neo-liberal policy failures. Another potential answer to add to the list.

  35. american socialist   8 years ago

    Hillary brought up the connection of Trump tower to Russian banks at the end of october. If there were no taps, were they lying about that connection in first place? Or were they tapping which would vindicate trump and apparently nothing has turned up?

    Either way not a good look for the dems.

    1. John   8 years ago

      The Democratic talking point that "if Obama did tap that is even worse for Trump because that means a judge found probable cause to believe there were ties to Russia", might be the dumbest and most desperate talking point I have ever heard. There is so much wrong with that. First, probable cause means, "there is reason to think there might be something there" not that there is. And since they would have tapped and found nothing, that vindicates Trump. Second, only a Prog could be dumb enough to claim that just because a judge signed off on it, that makes it okay.

      1. american socialist   8 years ago

        Yea which would go against their "trump is lying that obama ordered it" talking point. haha they don't know what to do

        1. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

          It also goes against their claim that the criminal justice system is corrupt (yeah I know that FISA isn't part of that, but its all the same to the average person).

    2. spqr2008   8 years ago

      I love the Obama Spokesperson's response to the allegations: "A cardinal rule of the Obama administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the Department of Justice,"... "As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false." Yes, President Obama never ever ordered surveillance on any suspected leak receiving reporters, or, in the one absolutely proven, indisputable case, Anwar Al-Awlaki.

      1. John   8 years ago

        As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen.

        But we know the FBI and NSA did as a matter of practice. And we also know the White House knew about this and didn't do anything to stop it.

        What they are saying here is "we left the dirty work to the FBI and NSA", as if that somehow makes them look better. They are flat out saying "we set it up so we would have plausible deniability."

    3. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

      Hillary's tweet revealed inside information, which is itself a violation of several national security laws.

  36. DanO.   8 years ago

    This place seems a little less superfluous and glib lately. It's nice. What happened?

    1. Fatty Bolger   8 years ago

      This happened

  37. MikeP2   8 years ago

    WP reported months ago that Mike Rogers, head of NSA, visited Trump at Trump tower one week after election.

    They also reported that the were calls for Obama to dismiss Mike Rogers because he made this trip without notice to his superiors...i.e. Clapper.

    So....what did Adm Rogers tell Trump on Nov 17th?

    1. Fatty Bolger   8 years ago

      Interesting, had not seen that before.

      In a move apparently unprecedented for a military officer, Rogers, without notifying superiors, traveled to New York to meet with Trump on Thursday at Trump Tower. That caused consternation at senior levels of the administration, according to the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal personnel matters.

      The NSA is under the DoD, so wouldn't his superiors be the SecDef, followed by Obama?

  38. DanO.   8 years ago

    I had to run some errands. Did the president provide the evidence yet for his not-insane spying charges?

    1. MikeP2   8 years ago

      He doesn't need to. The press was reporting on the FISA warrants and transcripts months ago.

      Trump just needs to wait for people to do their homework on prior NYT articles, the rampant quotes from "unnamed officials", and public statements from people like Clinton on this very topic during the election.

      Trump just lit the fuse to the fireworks. Now he's ducking down, covering his ears, and giggling like crazy waiting for the fun to begin.

      1. Zeb   8 years ago

        9-dimensional chess.

        1. MikeP2   8 years ago

          I wouldn't go that far. But it certainly doesn't look like just some "unhinged tweet".
          The FISA warrants and taps on Trump Tower have been openly discussed for months in the press. Clinton made reference to the taps in the campaign.

          Trump's timing on this is interesting. He "didn't just learn about it". It was released now for effect.

          1. VG Zaytsev   8 years ago

            Trump just found out about it while he was catching up on old issues of the NY Times.

          2. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

            The Deep Spook State apparatus is in open warfare with him with no sign of calling a truce. Maybe he's finally decided that enough is enough and it's time to start fighting back.

            Seriously, wouldn't you if you were him?

      2. DanO.   8 years ago

        He doesn't need to.

        Yes, he does.

        1. MikeP2   8 years ago

          Why? The evidence has already been published. Clinton herself described the FISA wiretaps back in October.

          NYTs themselves published reports of the surveillance as did a number of other media outlets as well as various congresscritters and Obama admin officials.

          1. Fascist loofa-faced shitgibbon   8 years ago

            That's not "evidence"

        2. Red Rocks Baiting n Inciting   8 years ago

          There were plenty of articles about surveillance being done and intel reports diffused throughout the intelligence community as recently as last week. Trump going off about "Obama tapping his phone" would be the presumed conclusion for these kinds of operations, considering the President is supposed to get briefed about these sort of activities from time to time.

          The bigger conversation to be had here is the idea that the government should be allowed to spy on anyone and everyone, and whether this is the logical end for intelligence bureaucracies that can be weaponized by the chief executive. You really want Trump doing a "spoils system" for the FBI, CIA, etc. and using it in the manner that the Obama administration did?

  39. LoneWaco   8 years ago

    Be careful Obama. It's the coverup that will get you. Better to sacrifice Jarrett now than go down with her, and this Trump fellow is smarter than you.

  40. DanO.   8 years ago

    Is it recipe time yet?

  41. LoneWaco   8 years ago

    So how is the Obama administration and his minions throughout the government spying on Trump different than the Watergate burglary?

    It isn't different.

    1. Domestic Dissident   8 years ago

      The official line in the end will be "Trump is a horrible, no good, awful human being, and he and his people were talking to the Russians, so it was justified in this case."

      This is the entire reason why Obama's minions in the government and the media have been hammering the "Russian influence" bullshit so hard almost from moment he won the election. These people are no fools, as soon as he won they knew they were screwed and it was only a matter of time until this story blew up and went public. So they knew right away they needed to manufacture some plausible-sounding pretext to justify Obama's despicable Nixonian behavior.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Add $2.4 Trillion to the Deficit

Eric Boehm | 6.4.2025 5:05 PM

Anti-Israel Violence Does Not Justify Censorship of Pro-Palestinian Speech

Robby Soave | 6.4.2025 4:31 PM

Belated Republican Objections to the One Big Beautiful Bill Glide Over Its Blatant Fiscal Irresponsibility

Jacob Sullum | 6.4.2025 2:50 PM

A Car Hit and Killed Their 7-Year-Old Son. Now They're Being Charged for Letting Him Walk to the Store.

Lenore Skenazy | 6.4.2025 1:30 PM

Everything Got Worse During COVID

Christian Britschgi | 6.4.2025 1:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!