Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Germany

Refugee Rape Mobs on New Year's Eve Were a Hoax, Say German Police

Reports of mass New Year's Eve sexual-assaults by refugees in Frankfurt, Germany, are "completely baseless."

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 2.15.2017 9:52 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | SKA/HSS/AEDT/WENN/Newscom
(SKA/HSS/AEDT/WENN/Newscom)
SKA/HSS/AEDT/WENN/Newscom

According to German tabloid Bild, a "rioting sex mob"—composed largely of Arab refugees—wreaked havoc on the city of Frankfurt during this year's New Year's Eve celebrations, groping and sexually assaulting dozens of women. The story quickly made an international splash. Now police say it's "completely baseless," an invention of Frankfurt restaurant owner Jan May and a woman identified as Irina A.

The original report claimed that at least 50 men, mostly thought to be refugees from Middle Hessia, overtook May's restaurant and others in a shopping area of Frankfurt known as the Fressgass. The men allegedly began robbing patrons, reaching under women's skirts, and worse in a sexual-assault free-for-all.

On Tuesday, Frankfurt police confirmed to the Frankfurter Rundschau that Irina had not even been present in Frankfurt on New Year's Eve. And interrogations of other witnesses led police to doubt the story in its entirety. They now believe the accusations were "without foundation" and "there were no… attacks by masses of refugees."

"Masses of refugees were not responsible for any sexual assaults in the Fressgass over New Year," police said, according to English-language Euro paper The Local. "The accusations are completely baseless." May and Irina are currently under investigation by police for making up the incidents, the paper says.

Meanwhile, Bild—a publication accused by Germany's left of routinely stoking anti-immigrant sentiment—published a statement on its website Tuesday saying the paper "apologizes expressly for the untruthful article and the accusations made in it. This article in no way met the journalistic standards of Bild." On Twitter, Bild Editor-in-Chief Julian Reichelt apologized and said there would be consequences at the paper.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Orange Coast College Suspends Student for Recording Professor's Anti-Trump Rant

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

GermanyFake NewsImmigrationRefugeesMediaMoral PanicSexual AssaultRape
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (48)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. John Titor   8 years ago

    According to German tabloid Bild, a "rioting sex mob"

    Well way to make it sound fun, Bild.

    1. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

      "rioting sex mob"

      Good band name.

  2. WakaWaka   8 years ago

    You wrote 'this year'. The original story I read was from two years ago. Was the one from two years ago false too or just this year's? Or were they both false?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/artic.....rants.html

    1. Mr. Flanders   8 years ago

      There are videos, one of the victim was a journalist too.

    2. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

      I'm pretty sure the story from 2 years ago is confirmed and true. "This year" or "this New Year's Eve" to me implies that this supposedly happened on December 31, 2016.

      What I can't figure out though is why a restaurant owner would make up a story about a mob of "at least 50 men" coming into his restaurant and sexually assaulting and robbing his patrons. Seems like something like that getting out would be bad for business and wouldn't be something that he would want to be widely publicized.

  3. Crusty Juggler - #2   8 years ago

    I still believe it.

    1. DenverJ   8 years ago

      +1 alternative facts

  4. american socialist   8 years ago

    I didnt even hear about this (fake) story until reason mentioned it today

  5. Fist of Etiquette   8 years ago

    Looks like someone got a phone call.

  6. Rhywun   8 years ago

    The story quickly made an international splash.

    First I'm hearing of it.

    1. WakaWaka   8 years ago

      She's purposely conflating the actual attack that occurred two years ago with the false one that occurred this past year

      1. lap83   8 years ago

        Unless it's just laziness, either way she needs to clarify

      2. Bill Dalasio   8 years ago

        I'm not sure if it's purposeful. But, it is confusing.

        1. WakaWaka   8 years ago

          You're right. I shouldn't have written purposely.

      3. Mr. Flanders   8 years ago

        I think its just an oversight/laziness. I was surprised not to see the article mention the actual attack that happened two years ago, at least to differentiate this fake story from the actual incidence that happened to be similar.

        1. WakaWaka   8 years ago

          That's true. We shouldn't expect her to retread a different story. I just thought it was confusing when I first read it

      4. commodious rebrands   8 years ago

        during this year's New Year's Eve

        Technically incorrect, but not much.

      5. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

        She's purposely conflating the actual attack that occurred two years ago with the false one that occurred this past year

        I don't think so. She says "this year's New Year's Eve" which I would have assumed most people would interpret as being December 31, 2016. Perhaps she should have stated the specific date instead, but I don't see any deliberate attempt to conflate the two here. I guess anyone can see deliberate malfeasance in any story if they look hard enough.

        1. Zeb   8 years ago

          I guess anyone can see deliberate malfeasance in any story if they look hard enough.

          And a number of commenters here apparently take that as a personal challenge.

          1. Microaggressor   8 years ago

            The thing is, I wasn't even aware there were allegations in 2016. So I assumed she was talking about the 2015 incident. Since I was reading the story quickly and not picking apart every detail, and my memory of those details from the previous incident are fuzzy, that was the conclusion I came to until I opened the comments. If I didn't open the comments, I would thus believe the 2015 Cologne attacks were made up.

            How many other people did too?

            The hallmark of MSM fake news is being technically correct, while misleading readers so that the majority come out believing things that are technically incorrect. I'm just wondering, how far does this fall on the spectrum? ENB could have written a single sentence for clarity but chose not to, and that's not to say it's deliberate, but an oversight with far reaching effect. And how big of a difference would that have made to the average reader interpretation?

    2. GILMORE?   8 years ago

      The story quickly made an international splash.

      First I'm hearing of it.

      Me too. It seems odd to need to "debunk" an event no one in America has ever heard about before.

      A quick Google search for "news years eve sexual assaults" limited to the first week of this year.... the stories i see most widely reported happened in Austria: BBC + Reuters covered them, as did a few US news outlets (Time, IBT)....

      Strangely, the story far more covered in US news (NYT, CNN, USA Today) happened in Bangalore, India, and from what i can tell was also later determined a hoax.

      I don't see a single mention of any "Frankfurt" assaults by anyone - either in European or US media - mentioned in that first week in 2017

      1. GILMORE?   8 years ago

        *every one of those stories also references the 2016 assaults in Cologne the prior year. For clarity, i assume.

      2. GILMORE?   8 years ago

        Searching specifically for "Frankfurt sexual assault" during the same period (first 2 weeks of 2017) still finds nothing in any English-language news sources.

        Instead, you get more reports of incidents elsewhere; e.g.

        - teens molested in Dresden, Germany;
        - The (always dubious) UK Sun claiming attacks in Hamburg, elsewhere (the Express reports the same)
        - a very widely reported story about a "mob of migrant men burning down germany's oldest church"... which was a ridiculous exaggeration of some people shooting off fireworks, and immediately debunked in US press.

        but i still don't see any "international splash" about New Years sex-mobs in Frankfurt

        1. Microaggressor   8 years ago

          The only story that made an "international splash" were the 2015 Cologne attacks. ENB should remove that sentence and clarify if she doesn't want to appear to be deliberately conflating the two.

          1. GILMORE?   8 years ago

            (shrug) i wouldn't hold your breath.

            I think what's actually more interesting about the issue is that there were multiple other stories that WERE reported in the UK/EU media (both exaggerated and real) during the same period, but which were mostly ignored in the US press

            meaning, there's substantially less frothing-hype about "Euro Refugee Rape Gangs!" in the media now than there was in the aftermath of the Cologne attacks, even considering that there were a few substantiated examples of similar events. (e.g. Dresden, Hamburg, etc)

            I mean, if FOX is downplaying stories about muslims burning down churches.... i think 'right-wing media hoaxes' are probably losing popularity.

  7. DenverJ   8 years ago

    Nick Cannon "white people so racist! What? It's a joke meant to bring us all together! Man, America's Got Talent No Sense of Humour, amiright?"

  8. Propaganda Czar   8 years ago

    So how does this discredit leaked internal docs and the many independent claims of sexaul assaults by refugees?

    This is one discredited report for a specific town in Germany. It's hardly worthy of the headline written.

    1. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

      The wikipedia article is talking about the 2015/ 2016 New Year's Eve assaults. Apparently this is something that supposedly happened "this New Year's Eve". As in 2016/ 2017. That does seem to be causing a lot of confusion. Perhaps ENB should update the post to clarify.

  9. Ken Shultz   8 years ago

    Are we talking about New Year's 2016 or New Year's 2017?

    ENB's post doesn't say--but it should.

    1. Cynical Asshole   8 years ago

      "This year's New Year's Eve" as in 2017, I think. Covered ad-nauseum up-thread.

      1. Zeb   8 years ago

        Unless she has a time machine and is reporting on what will happen at the end of this year, it's pretty damn obvious, I would have thought.

    2. Zeb   8 years ago

      Not sure why this is causing so much confusion. It is very unlikely that "this new years eve" refers to 31 December 2017, so it is pretty easy to conclude that it refers to the most recent one.

  10. Hyperion   8 years ago

    Consider that German police are taking their marching orders from Angela Merkel and she has an interest in protecting her decision to allow 1 million refugees into the country. For what it's worth.

  11. Grand Moff Serious Man   8 years ago

    Taggart: We'll work up a number 6 on 'em.

    Hedey Lamarr: A number 6? I'm not familar with that one.

    Taggart: Well that's when we ride on in to town a whoopin' and a hollarin' and beating every single thing to within an inch of its life. 'Cept the women, of course.

    Hedey Lamarr: You spare the women?

    Taggart: Naw, we rape the shit out of them at the Number 6 Dance later on!

  12. Agile Cyborg   8 years ago

    A peculiar screed considering not one of the accused suffered injustice or reprisal as a result of said rumor.

    I guess one could presume some microscopic local recoil about migrant Islamic mobs bothering vulnerable ladies, but that concept doesn't have to be rumored- it exists as truth in all Muslim countries where women are placed on the same level as dogs and atheists.

    ENB, I understand wool mittens, wrought iron, and vintage hats aren't free but jesus z christ...

  13. The Immaculate Trouser   8 years ago

    I'm familiar with the Cologne assault story. Hadn't even heard of this one. As fraudulent stories of all kinds are fairly common and hardly newsworthy, what about this one makes it worth posting as news?

    Because unless this fraudulent story should also impact how we see the Cologne reportage or other confirmed stories of refugee misbehavior (and I don't see why it should), I don't see the point.

  14. Free Society   8 years ago

    Anyone notice how Reason jumps on this story when it proves false, but they didn't bother reporting on the sex assaults in the 15/16 New Years until quite some time after the event had already been widely reported on everywhere else.

    refugees from Middle Hessia

    That's where these "refugees" are "from" huh?

  15. MarkLastname   8 years ago

    Trumpertarians: "fake but accurate!"

  16. Bacon-Magic <3 Hayek   8 years ago

    ENB, please clarify this article.

    1. Microaggressor   8 years ago

      At the very least, remove the sentence "The story quickly made an international splash" which has been shown to be false and only serves to further conflate the stories.

  17. LoneWaco   8 years ago

    it turns out the japs didn't attack pearl harbor on dec 7th.

    in 1942.

  18. Bacon-Magic <3 Hayek   8 years ago

    Still no clarification? ENB is usually on top of her game...

  19. Fuck You - Cut Spending   8 years ago

    I always believed it was a hoax until the government told me it was a hoax.

  20. Bacon-Magic <3 Hayek   8 years ago

    This article still needs an update.

  21. Sevens   8 years ago

    Two different events, two different years. The one in Cologne (2015/2016) was the big one, and remains true. The one in Frankfurt (2016/2017) was not said to be of anywhere near the same scale, and appears to be debunked, now.

  22. wingnutx   8 years ago

    The police would never lie to you.

  23. Bacon-Magic <3 Hayek   8 years ago

    This article still needs clarification. Don't be a hack.

  24. vek   8 years ago

    No clue on this particular incident, which I haven't even heard about. But I agree with the comment above about WHY would a restaurant owner make up a story about incidents at his place? Doesn't seem good for business. So it makes one wonder why he would say it, and also how there are multiple other witnesses, all to be disbelieved. He concocts a plan to make his business sound like a rape cage, and then convinces multiple other patrons to all go along with his story??? Doesn't make sense.

    ALSO on this issue, I honestly am going to (generally speaking) have to side with the general public on their accounts of stuff like this happening over and above what an official government spokesman/employee says on the subject. The governments in Germany/Sweden etc are in SERIOUS damage control mode and have been caught red handed trying to manipulate and downplay the number of incidents. Obviously not every incident reported by people will be true, or as severe as it was reported, but citizens have less reason to make this stuff up than governments do to cover them up. Benefit of the doubt goes to the normal man on the street in this instance for me.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Florida Used a Nationwide Surveillance Camera Network 250 Times To Aid in Immigration Arrests

Autumn Billings | 6.19.2025 5:30 PM

ICE Insists That Congress Needs Its Permission To Conduct Oversight

Joe Lancaster | 6.19.2025 4:45 PM

We're 8 Years Away From an Automatic 23 Percent Cut in Social Security Payouts

Jack Nicastro | 6.19.2025 4:30 PM

Texas Legislators Say They Are Protecting Free Speech on Campus by Banning 'Expressive Activities' at Night

Jacob Sullum | 6.19.2025 3:20 PM

Los Angeles Is Beating Trump by Not Punching Back: Dispatch from L.A.

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.19.2025 3:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!