Great News: Researchers Grow Part Human/Part Pig Embryos
It is totally ethical to grow human organs in pigs

Nearly 120,000 Americans are on the organ transplant waiting list. Wouldn't it be great to grow made-to-order human organs suitable for transplant in pigs? In today's Cell, researchers associated with the Salk Institute for Biological Studies report achieving the first step toward that goal. They created induced pluripotent human stem cells that the researchers injected into pig embryos which were then implanted into the uteruses of sows where the embryos were allowed to develop for four weeks. Testing the embryos, the researchers did detect that the human stem cells had begun to grow and differentiate into different kinds of precursor cells including those for heart, liver and neurons. The process was inefficient, possibly due to developmental differences that arose over the course of evolution between humans and pigs. Nevertheless, the researchers concluded, "Ultimately, these observations also raise the possibility of xeno-generating transplantable human tissues and organs towards addressing the worldwide shortage of organ donors."
The Washington Post notes that this success worries some folks who "think there's a symbolic or sacred line between human and animal genetic material that should not be crossed." In fact, back in 2009 some bioconservatives in Congress introduced legislation that would have outlawed some aspects of this type of research. One of the sponsors of the bill, then-Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.) declared, "This legislation works to ensure that our society recognizes the dignity and sacredness of human life. Creating human-animal hybrids, which permanently alter the genetic makeup of an organism, will challenge the very definition of what it means to be human and is a violation of human dignity and a grave injustice." Wrong.
As I explained earlier, it is totally ethical to grow human organs in pigs:
Are such experiments really somehow inherently "damaging to our sense of humanity" or in violation of "something sacrosanct"? Nonsense. To make such claims is to confuse human organs and human DNA with human beings. A heart or liver is not a person, whether or not it is grown in a pig. And Human DNA is just the instructions on how to make a human body; it isn't a human body or brain.
To people worried that growing human organs animals somehow violates human dignity, bioethicist David Shaw asked the right question: "Is it dignified to let people suffer and die when we could use this new biotechnology to provide them with organs that will let them live long and happy lives?"
Congratulations to the Salk team.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Jews and Muslims hardest hit.
This is why bioethicists pull down the big bucks.
Um...pigs hardest hit.
It is totally ethical to grow human organs in pigs
Sure, everyone is always in favor of saving Hitler's brain, but when you put it in the body of a feral hog... oh, suddenly you've gone too far.
Actually, a feral hog with near human intelligence would make a great guard animal.
Blackwater has been hiring feral humans with porcine intelligence since its foundation.
Obligatory
+1 anguished oink
Even more obligatory
Even more obligatory
Dr. Moreau squeals with delight
So does Aginor the Forsaken.
The Washington Post notes that this success worries some folks who "think there's a symbolic or sacred line between human and animal genetic material that should not be crossed."
Ever been to Tijuana?
Nothing is sacred if God is dead.
Don't be such a boar.
He's trying to sow dissent.
What about porcine dignity?
Obligatory Winston's mom joke.
Back away from the trough.
These pigs would necessarily have a brain, the cells of which contain both human and pig DNA and genes.
What's the line at which these brains cross from being pig brains with human DNA to human brains with pig DNA?
When they start running for office.
Yes, I for one object to making pigs dumber.
To people worried that growing human organs [in] animals somehow violates human dignity, bioethicist David Shaw asked the right question: "Is it dignified to let people suffer and die when we could use this new biotechnology to provide them with organs that will let them live long and happy lives?"
"If that is God's will, sure!"
Gee, that's almost as irrational and harmful to human well-being as the ban on selling organs, which is the only reason this technology is being considered.
I mean, yeah, it's definitely an incentive, but even if people could sell each other their organs all willy-nilly, they'd still be unhappy about the immune-rejection situation.
Do you want orcs? Because that's how you get orcs.
A brazen and unabashed force of evil that could unite all mankind in its shared hatred for? I'd love some orcs. Currently hatred and violence is only reserved for other people and animals.
The orcs are all rep and no results. I've seen a half dozen dwarves and a hobbit or two hold their own against them in combat.
I'll have a new heart, french cut the pork chops, smoke the bacon with apple wood and maple cure those hams.... win win, Well except if you're the hog.
Will they be self- cooking?
2/3rds of the way to ManBearPig?!!
PuppyMonkeyBaby is not that far off.
What does this have to do with growing organs? A chimeric organ is still going to trigger your immune system.
The correct path is being pursued by at least one company. Delete the genes that trigger immune rejection. Then use pig organs.
This chimerism doesn't get us there.
UNLESS you are going to put a few pig stem cells in every human fetus so that it will tolerate a future pig transplant. That would work.
BJ: The organs wouldn't ultimately be chimeric - just composed of the human cells derived from the donor who needs the transplant. See my earlier article: Nakauchi is now working with Pablo Ross, a developmental biologist at the University of California, Davis, to create human-pig and human-sheep embryos to see if the technique can produce human organs. The genes for generating specific organs are disabled and human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are injected into pig and sheep embryos. Induced pluripotent stem cells are adult cells that have been genetically reprogramed to an embryonic stem-cell-like state. Once reprogrammed, iPSCs can grow into different types of cells and tissues. For example, reprogrammed skin cells would be able to differentiate into liver cells or heart cells.
I see another good application of this chimeric tech?
Suppose anti-obesity research never really gets there? We never get to a decent shed-the-pounds pill, w/o bad side effects (like phen-fen, recall that?).
So then let's just keep munching our excessive rations of Purina People Chow, and other delicacies, enjoy life to the hilt, and just put ON those pounds!
But, the pounds now go to our chimeric "pork bellies", which we can periodically trim off, make some bacon, and chow down some more!!!
Are you hungry?
Could they make my hair or toenails taste like bacon?