The Donald Trump of Texas
Friday A/V Club: Pappy O'Daniel prepares to be sworn in.

There is precedent for this president. There was another man who leapt directly from pop culture into politics, using showmanship and populist rhetoric to draw huge crowds to his rallies while the pundits pooh-poohed his chances of winning. He was a businessman and radio star named Wilbert Lee "Pappy" O'Daniel, and he was elected governor of Texas in that state's bizarre election of 1938.
I wrote about O'Daniel in a Reason story about a year ago. With Donald Trump now assuming the presidency, it's a good moment to remember a man whose rise looks a lot like Trump's:
When it became clear that something big was afoot, [newspaper writers] argued that no one could tell whether the crowds consisted of supporters or just gawkers. Did those mobs actually agree with O'Daniel's vague platform? the pundits asked. Or were they only there to enjoy, in the words of the syndicated columnists Drew Pearson and Robert Allen, "a mellifluous radio voice that women gush over and a hill-billy band that delights both young and old"? When the Star-Telegram finally acknowledged that Pappy was attracting "larger and more enthusiastic crowds than any other candidate," it added that many members of those audiences were nonvoters and wondered whether the movement was a "bubble."
…and whose reign may well turn out to look like Trump's as well:
When re-election time rolled around in 1940…he hadn't gotten much done at all other than alienate a great deal of Austin.
That and start a newspaper. Declaring that "no recent governor has been so unfairly dealt with as the press has dealt with me," he launched The W. Lee O'Daniel News. There and on his radio show, he blamed his failures on evil outside forces—and not just the big failures. When two musicians quit his band, Pappy informed his listeners that "the gang of professional politicians" had "struck another blow at your governor." The sunny side of Pappy's populism was starting to give way to something darker.
There are some notable differences as well, starting with the contrast between O'Daniel's moralistic persona and Trump's hedonism. It's hard to imagine Pappy bragging that he grabbed anyone "by the pussy." (O'Daniel's original band, the Light Crust Doughboys, did record a double-entendre song called "Pussy, Pussy, Pussy." But that was after the group and the governor had parted ways.) Still, the parallels are pretty strong, and I've just scratched the surface of them here. To see more of them, you can read my article.
In the meantime, since it's Inauguration Day, here is O'Daniel's radio broadcast from August 3, 1941. The governor had just won a special election to the U.S. Senate, and this show went out the day before he took his oath of office:
And here, along with a nice collection of photos from O'Daniel's career, is Pappy's band playing his theme song, "Please Pass the Biscuits, Pappy":
One more tidbit for you, though this one isn't a parallel so much as it's a strange coincidence. When O'Daniel's band recorded "Please Pass the Biscuits," the singer on the record was named Leon Huff. Many years later, another musician named Leon Huff co-wrote a tune called "For the Love of Money"; and many years after that, "For the Love of Money" became the theme song for a show called The Apprentice, hosted by one Donald Trump.
(For past editions of the Friday A/V Club, go here.)
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Wow! You're right, they are exactly the same.
If Trump ends being the same, you can gloat. If he is not, will you apologize for this nonsense?
Do you know what you are exactly the same as?
Sun Tzu?
How can I talk shit to amsoc if you keep posting new stories!?
It's complete disrespect of the commentariat.
It's like they don't even know why we come here.
Remember during the money drive when they were all slobbing the knob of the commentariat; and now they don't even post links on time out of vengeful spite?
No pacing whatsoever. Then they'll dump half-hearted PM Links at 1:30 and let it bloat to 800 comments.
I think it's a little more than a strange coincidence...
Obama is blaming his supporters for all of his achievements.
Wait... is this a rerun? I swear I read this article before.
Yeah, Trump jumped from pop culture to the presidency.
I guess pop culture includes a multi-national hotel and entertainment empire.
Home Alone 2, Wrestlemania and the WWE HOF, hosting the Stuttering John Melendez vs. Crazy Cabbie fight. Trump has been apart of some truly great pop culture moments.
Going to be so much content in the Trump Presidential Library and Museum.
The idea that Trump started out as a celebrity is stupid, yet I see people joke about it all the time. Trump is not a celebrity. He was a businessman for decades before he became an actual celebrity. Ronald Reagan, Arnold, and Al Franken were purely celebrities when they entered politics.
Re: Arnold, that depends on whether you consider being Mr. Universe a celebrity. I don't.
He was a successful businessman -- and multi-millionaire -- *before* he became an actor and real celebrity. Shoulda stuck with he was good at, I say.
I guess pop culture includes a multi-national hotel and entertainment empire.
O'Daniel was a businessman too.
When O'Daniel's band recorded "Please Pass the Biscuits," the singer on the record was named Leon Huff. Many years later, another musician named Leon Huff co-wrote a tune called "For the Love of Money"; and many years after that, "For the Love of Money" became the theme song for a show called The Apprentice, hosted by one Donald Trump.
Good God how the hell did you figure out that connection.
This must be how god sees existence.
You don't write a conspiracy book without the mindset rubbing off on you. Ask him about RAND Corporation sometime.
I was going to say...
He ain't got a constituency ! Trump got a constituency!
We ain't one-at-a-timing it here, you dumb sumbitch, we're mass communicating.
MAGA:
Good. Now hopefully he can stop the half billion in our tax dollars Obama gave to the bullshit slush fund of UN family friends on Tuesday to spread socialism around.
I'm confused. How does sending blue-helmeted rapists to the world's backwaters address climate change?
I'm done. Good he for the rest of the day (at least). The pants-shitting articles have exhausted my patience for what was a once-revered website. Enjoy this idiocy for the next four years. I will likely be excusing myself for an extended period of time. I can get this stupid fucking shit at HuffPo or Salon.
"And so fare-thee-well, thou never shalt here herald anymore."
-1 ransom
Wait, come back - the next article is about Obama's drone-killings!
I love how "pants-shitting" has come to mean "anything insufficiently reverential toward our new president."
Why just define something down when you have the chance to define it all the way down?
I don't mind striking a critical tone, provided that:
1. Retrospectives are done on the predictions made when they come to pass or fail to do so
2. The same lack of reverential treatment is given towards any future President regardless of party who doesn't tow the libertarian lion
i.e. intellectual honesty
I think they're massively failing at #2. I looked at the coverage Reason gave Obama's inauguration in 2009, and I found some of these goodies:
-"Our new president is a human being, not a messiah."
-Just About the Worst?Or Is That the Best??Obama Tchotchke I've Seen So Far
-Recently at Reason.tv: Obama and the Winds of Change!
-New at Reason: Tim Cavanaugh on Barack Obama's Place in Presidential Sports History
-Now at Reason.tv: Hopes and Fears for Barack Obama's Presidency?Reason staffers sound off on government spending, regulation, foreign policy, the drug war, and more
-Recently at Reason.tv: Reason on Obama-mania
-Same Old, Same Old. Thank Goodness.
-Obama Inaugurated, Ex-Klansman Collapses
Compare that to the coverage today, and you see why people roll their eyes. Obama was the "cool kid" and it showed in Reason's coverage. Trump is a "menace" and it shows in Reason's coverage.
I phrased 2 prospectively rather than retrospectively because I know they're already applying a different standard. I'm only asking that they carry the new standard forward in a nonpartistan way.
The Man of Constant Sorrow?
You maniacs are really complaining about this post?
Just the pacing of adding new stories.
I was not referring to you, I was referring to the predictable and tedious overreaction to any negative - or in the case of this post, perceived to be negative - coverage of Donald John Trump.
Yes, them articles is misceginated! They ain't even old timey!
So does this make Corey Lewandowski, Paul Manafort, And Steve Bannon the Soggy Bottom Boys?
Corey was already one of them, but for completely unrelated reasons.
Did he sign his contract with an "X"?
He just punches it, brah. Like, his punch is his signature! It's, like, so hardcore, dude!