Indiana TV Station Claims Kids Are Ordering Cannabis Candy Online
The report also warns that the THC content of marijuana edibles is "anywhere between 70 and 100 percent."

The strangers who supposedly were trying to get your kids high by passing out cannabis candy on Halloween apparently have moved online. Or so claims WANE, the CBS affiliate in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
The headline over the WANE story—which was reposted by WRIC, the ABC station in Richmond, Virginia—warns that "dealers [are] using THC-laced 'edibles' to attract young people." Reporter Angelica Robinson claims "marijuana dealers are targeting young people," that "much of it is done online," and that "buyers order the candies online and use them to get high discreetly." Jerri Lerch of the Allen County Drug and Alcohol Consortium tells Robinson that drug dealers "tweet targeted young people about the availability of attractive marijuana products." But neither Lerch nor Robinson presents any evidence of such online commerce in cannabis candies for kids.
The genesis of the story was an incident that the Noble County Sheriff's Department last week described on Facebook as "a transaction involving suspicious lollipops" at West Noble High School in Ligonier. The post was accompanied by photographs of two cherry lollipops and the package from which they apparently came, which indicates they were made by 2 Baked Gerrls, an edible manufacturer that serves patients in Michigan, a neighboring state that allows medical use of marijuana. The statement from the sheriff's department says nothing about online sales, an idea that seems to have sprung from the combined imaginations of Lerch and Robinson.
"They're getting them through some sort of black market," Lerch tells WANE. "That could be online or on the web, or some sort of physical transaction of some kind." It is no stretch to suggest that medical marijuana products from Michigan are sold "through some sort of black market" when they are purchased in Indiana, where marijuana is not legal for any purpose. But the rest, including the teenager-targeting tweets and the websites selling THC-infused treats to high school students, sounds like speculative fiction rather than news.
Robinson compounds the deception with some bizarre scaremongering about marijuana edibles. "The small suckers could pack a big punch," she says. "Typically, edibles can contain anywhere between 70 and 100 percent of THC. Marijuana has just 17 to 30 percent."
These numbers are nonsensical. A lollipop that was 100 percent THC would not be a lollipop; it would be pure THC. Even a product that was 70 percent THC would not have the taste, consistency, or appearance of a lollipop, which consists mostly of sugar. And if it were possible to create such a thing, a seven-gram lollipop that was 70 percent THC would contain 4,900 milligrams of marijuana's main psychoactive ingredient. The label on the 2 Baked Gerrls package indicates that it contains 50 milligrams of THC, or 25 milligrams per lollipop (assuming both pictured lollipops came from the same package).
Such impossible claims about the THC content of marijuana edibles are more common than you might think. In an op-ed piece published last year, Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska, Sheriff Mark Overman averred that "'edibles,' in the form of candy, baked goods, and drinks, have [THC] levels as high as 90 percent." Now that Robinson has upped Overman's ante, we may soon see warnings that the THC content of some edibles exceeds 100 percent.
[Via Dank Space; thanks to Joshua Hotchkin for the tip.]
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Why would anyone waste good weed and weed products on kids who can't really appreciate it?
To get them hooked on addictive marijuana, the devil's weed.
+1 Reefer Madness
This is alarming. If the kids get hooked, demand rises and so will prices. Availability for experienced people who deserve good weed will decline.
War On Weed Elites!
The increased prices will encourage additional investment in production, correcting the imbalance. There will be suppliers who cater to those weed snobs with specific requirements, and suppliers who provide bulk THC to those with higher sensitivity to price. It will work out in the end.
Only if regulators and the cartels get out of the way. Chances of that approach zero in the limit. Think taxi medallions.
Maybe it's time for UberWeed.
UberWeed sounds like the Everclear of marijuana - "we pushed everything else out of the way just to get the most of a single ingredient"
/rushes off to USPTO website to search trademarks
"we pushed everything else out of the way just to get the most of a single ingredient"
Aka "wax or "shatter." Woo-boy.
Uberweed is just what these candies are! Save the childrenz!
Is there actually any money to be made selling pot kids?
A new market for Joseph Enterprises (makers of Chia Pets).
And The Clapper!
This is as bad as the fake news story from the washington compost on russian propaganda.
Yes some barely literate members of my species disseminated those.
"Suspicious Lollipop" was my nickname in college.
That's weird, mine was Cannabis Candy Online.
You're so strange.
Now you sound like my doctor.
SOME PRODUCTS MAY EVEN CONTAIN 110% THC!!!
"She was living in a single room with three other individuals, one of them was a male, and the other two, well hell, the other two were females. God only knows what they were up to in there. And furthermore, Susan, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised to learn that all four of them habitually smoked marijuana cigarettes.....reefers."
Little known fact: beyond the valley of the dolls stole that from sublime.
"The small suckers could pack a big punch,"
That's some fine viral marketing right there.
It would take over 30,000 bowls of your regular morning breakfast weed to equal the THC content contained in one bowl of New Super Colon Blow.
Jesus, Indiana TV station, the THC content of THC is barely even 100%. Math isn't THAT hard.
To be fair, no one without a bias has ever claimed local TV types are smart.
Did you know any journalism majors in college?
Kids can get as much weed as they want at school. BECAUSE IT'S ILLEGAL!
So if we make it more illegal all the kids will be stoned all of the time?
"Typically, edibles can contain anywhere between 70 and 100 percent of THC. Marijuana has just 17 to 30 percent."
Fucking numbers- how do they work?
Not very well, apparently.
Juggalo math?
If you assume that any "viewing with alarm" story out of the news media is utter pigswill, you will not be wrong often enough to matter.
5 grams of 70% pure THC? That'd be a ~ $300 lollipop*. I'm talking about the good varieties, of course. I'm sure Melonseed Ditchweed and Banana Brown would go cheaper.
* Assuming: $20/gram, 25% THC strain. 14 grams x 25% = 5 grams of 70% THC. 14 grams x $20 = $280. Then add processing costs and profit.
I'm working on a THC delivery system so potent you just rub it on your skin and are instantly high as a kite; THC infused deodorant, coming soon to a playground near you!
... need investors?
One spritz and you won't really care how you smell. One sniff, and she won't care either.
The key is DMSO. It works. Don't ask me how I know.
I'm triggered by the level of retardation that has infected my fair city. They would have seizures hearing the Michigan cheerleader jokes we used to tell.
http://abc6onyourside.com/news.....ter-crisis
We reached out to @barstoolosu on Twitter and the person who replied stated, "I did not tweet that and i'm not in that picture. There's multiple people who have access to the account but no one would like to comment."
In other words "Fuck off".
Jarod Wade, an OSU sophomore, saw the post, after the game. "I thought like you know. It's not something i want buckeyes to represent you know. I thought it was like a step too far between like the rivalry with Michigan,"
I was on the fence here but this young man's persuasive argument won me over. Also I grew up in Ann Arbor so fuck OSU.
"Typically, edibles can contain anywhere between 70 and 100 percent of THC."
Sheesh, what is *she* smoking?
So is this what all those proggies meant by an epidemic of fake news?
This may have been my favorite part: "They're getting them through some sort of black market," Lerch tells WANE. "That could be online or on the web..."
I want to research what the difference is between online and on the web, but between the telephone conversations, phone calls, and VoIP communications I have today, I probably won't find the time.
I still like Tommy Chong's advice....
Kids, if you are going to experiment with weed, there's only one thing that you really need to do....
Replace it.
Wow - HUGE penalties for something like this. Do these kids even understand how serious this is? If they get caught in Indiana, they can face the following: http://www.chjrlaw.com/indiana.....penalties/