Massachusetts Votes Against Lifting Arbitrary and Malicious Cap on Charter Schools
Democrats: Not pro-choice.


School choice reform was dealt a decisive loss in the state of Massachusetts, where voters decided not to lift a cap on charter schools.
Ballot question 2, which would have allowed local municipalities to approve new charter schools, was defeated, Politico's Caitlin Emma tweeted. As of 11:00 p.m. Eastern Time, voters had rejected the measure 62 percent to 37 percent, with 60 percent of precincts reporting. It would be impossible to close that gap.
Massachusetts law caps the number of charter schools permitted in each district. The ballot initiative would have permitted an additional 12 charters in each municipality, pending approval from local officials.
The case for lifting the arbitrary cap on charter schools is as strong as the case for charter schools themselves: giving low-income and minority parents alternatives to failing, traditional public schools is good policy. It's true that charters divert resources from public schools, but public schools are only a means to an end: providing quality education to children. If public schools aren't succeeding in this role—and it's clear they are not—voters should be willing to give families the right to try something else.
The measure was supported by President Obama's Education Secretary, John King, former Education Secretary Arne Duncan, and a host of other prominent Democrats, as well as Republican Gov. Charlie Baker and school choice advocate Jeb Bush. It was opposed by teachers' unions and Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
Some of the most outspoken opposition to new charter schools came from wealthy suburbs, where new charter schools were unlikely to appear, in any case. It seems some of the state's more privileged communities don't want to give the less fortunate more control over their own education.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The measure was supported by President Obama's Education Secretary, John King, former Education Secretary Arne Duncan, and a host of other prominent Democrats...
It's always from those on the way out the door or already gone.
Sometimes I really hate this state.
Went for Clinton in a landslide
Voted against more gambling
Voted against charter schools
Voted for increased farming regulations that will assuredly raise prices
Voted to legalize weed (yay) barely
At least I have the Patriots
It is good that schools reform the children's by which they can get the more knowledgeable information by which they can understand and get the more things perfect in their education career and which things they not like in their education career they have to change it their selves Write My Essay.
Education schooling system manipulate the students and Academic Assignment Help education should really array exams preparation.
What is FL Studio Mobile APK?
FL Studio Mobile is an Android App.Create and save complete multi-track music projects on your Android Phone or Tablet. Record, sequence, edit, mix and render complete songs.
FL Studio Mobile APK