Media Outlets Sue for Details on San Bernardino Terrorist IPhone Hack
FBI refuses to publicly reveal security vulnerability.


Does the American public have the right to know how the FBI hacked into an iPhone being used by San Bernardino terrorist Syed Farook? Or maybe put it a different way: Does the American public have the right to know when the federal government uncovers a security vulnerability that makes it possible to hack into their tech devices?
Those questions are at the heart of a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit by several media companies filed today against the Justice Department.
Previously, the Department of Justice got significant public attention trying to force Apple via court order to assist them in breaking into Farook's phone to find out if there was any evidence connected with his deadly mass shooting in San Bernardino or potentially other planned attacks. Apple resisted the court order, warning that such a move had the potential to weaken the security of its phones.
As a court confrontation reached its climax, the FBI backed down. The FBI was able to figure out a way, through an independent party, how to break into the phone. Now the question is whether the FBI can legally conceal that information and the vulnerability they exploited from the public. The Associated Press, Vice, and Gannett are teaming up for a lawsuit. From TechCrunch:
The news organizations involved in the lawsuit argue that the vulnerability is of considerable public interest and should be disclosed and that [FBI Director James] Comey's own comments reflect that.
"Moreover, the FBI's purchase of the technology — and its subsequent verification that it had successfully obtained the data it was seeking thanks to that technology — confirmed that a serious undisclosed security vulnerability existed (and likely still exists) in one of the most popular consumer products in the world," the lawsuit states, adding that "there is no lawful basis" for information about the purchase to be kept secret.
White House spokesperson Josh Earnest told USA Today, "I am confident that the Obama administration will comply with the law," and that the administration has "tried to be as transparent as possible" about the situation. "Given the sensitive nature of the information, we've been quite limited in what we can discuss openly," Earnest added. Apple has not commented on the lawsuit.
The conflict highlights the government's tendency to prize the ability to break into devices and computers in order to engage in surveillance over the citizens' right to privacy, even though such a mindset could result in Americans' data and communications being more vulnerable to hackers and intruders. Andrea Castillo wrote about the problems with such an attitude here.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
RE: Media Outlets Sue for Details on San Bernardino Terrorist IPhone Hack
There is such a thing called the US Constitution.
It's what the police forces in our state, local and federal government sometimes uses for toilet paper.
That's because they don't have enough money in their budget to purchase real toilet paper.
You know who else can't purchase real toilet paper?
Does the American public have the right to know how the FBI hacked into an iPhone being used by San Bernardino terrorist Syed Farook? Or maybe put it a different way: Does the American public have the right to know when the federal government uncovers a security vulnerability that makes it possible to hack into their tech devices?
No, no it doesn't actually.
I knew that phone would be hacked in 15 minutes... which means that the whole subpoena thing was an attempt to set a precedent for when it takes the FBI more than an hour.
OT: oops. Moderate FSA that we've been backing threaten to slaughter us special forces in al rai
http://www.independent.co.uk/n.....11666.html
We just need to bomb them until they love us. It worked so well in Iraq and Afghanistan.
How ironic.
Speaking of "stuff the government would prefer you not ask about"...
...what ever happened re: the details of the Orlando shooting which the FBI tried to keep on press-lockdown?
I heard they'd released more details of the 911 calls, but i don't know if that meant a wider range of disclosure of previously-gagged info as well.
*the gossip on the "infowars/truther/conspiracy-retard"-side of the interet is that "no one was killed until the cops went in" - and this was being credited, for whatever reason, to Judge Napolitano.
(which i think is demonstrably false - there were people killed in the first few seconds afaik - but there were certainly a lot of questions about how the police responded, and if it might have actually resulted in far more killed than necessary)
They're still releasing shit about San Bernardino.
Maybe the FBI lied when they said that they successfully hacked the phone in order to give themselves a face saving way to back down from the subpoena?
Black Magic Specialist where you can get the answer for all your concerns like dark magic evacuation, tragedy in service, marital relationship problem or various other problem that has actually occurred as a result of dark enchantment impact and so on black magic professional baba has all the explanation for your issue.