Gary Johnson

Alaska's Love Affair with Third Parties

Few states are as open to alternative candidates as Alaska.


Alaska keeps turning up on lists of states where the Libertarian ticket hopes to do well, but presidential polls in that state have been scarce this year, so it's hard to tell exactly how much support Gary Johnson is getting there. FiveThirtyEight's current election projection has him taking either 9.9 or 12.7 percent of the Alaskan vote, depending on which of its models you use. But the site has only one survey from the state to work with, that poll was conducted way back in January, and Johnson wasn't in it. So we're basically looking at some mathematically sophisticated guesswork.

But if historical precedent means anything, there's good reason to think Johnson can get a decent-sized share of the vote in Alaska—and the Green Party's Jill Stein could do relatively well there too. It's clear that a nontrivial number of Alaskans are at least willing to look at minor-party candidates.

In the last half-century, few states have been as friendly to alternative presidential contenders as Alaska. On a national level, six of the last 12 elections have seen at least one independent or minor-party candidate get more than 1 percent of the vote. In Alaska, by contrast, at least one candidate has cleared that bar in every single one of those elections, and all but one of those candidates did better in Alaska than they did in the country at large. In 7 out of those 12 Alaskan presidential contests, an alternative candidate managed to top 5 percent.

This willingness to step outside the duopoly crosses ideological lines: Third-option candidates of both the left and the right have performed well in the 49th state, as have several nominees of the neither-left-nor-right Libertarian Party. Here's a quick review:

1968: In Alaska's third national election, George Wallace of the American Independent Party captures 12.07 percent of the state's vote, a little less than the 13.53 percent he wins nationally.

1972: John Schmitz of the American Party—the successor to the group that nominated Wallace—gets 7.25 percent in Alaska. Nationally he gets just 1.42 percent.

Libertarian Party

1976: Roger MacBride of the Libertarian Party picks up 5.49 percent of the Alaskan ballots. Nationally he gets only 0.21 percent.

1980: In Alaska, Ed Clark of the Libertarian Party gets 11.66 percent and independent John Anderson gets 7.04 percent. Nationally, their totals are 1.06 and 6.61 percent, respectively.

1984: David Bergland of the Libertarian Party receives 3.07 percent of the Alaskan vote. His nationwide total is 0.25 percent.

1988: Ron Paul of the Libertarian Party receives 2.74 percent in Alaska and 0.47 percent nationally.

1992: Independent candidate Ross Perot gets 28.43 percent in Alaska—less than two percentage points behind Bill Clinton. Nationally Perot lands at 18.91.

People for Ross Perot

1996: Alaskan voters give 10.9 percent of their ballots to Perot, now running under the Reform Party banner, and 3.14 percent to Ralph Nader, running as a Green. Nationally, Perot gets 8.4 percent and Nader gets 0.71.

2000: This time Alaska awards 10.07 percent to Nader and another 1.82 percent to the Reform Party's Pat Buchanan. Nationally, Nader is at 2.74 percent and Buchanan is at 0.43.

2004: Nader, listed on the state's ballot as the candidate of the Populist Party, gets 1.62 percent in Alaska and 0.38 nationwide.

2008: Nader's independent campaign gets 1.16 percent in Alaska and 0.56 across the U.S.

2012: Libertarian Gary Johnson gets 2.46 percent in Alaska and 0.99 nationally.

Along the way, Alaskans elected several third-party state legislators and a third-party governor. So this is clearly a place where people are more likely to look past the Red and Blue options, particularly but not only in years when an alternative candidate is doing well in the rest of the country. And if that ardor has cooled a bit in the last few cycles, 2016 may be a return to form: If FiveThirtyEight's projections are close to being correct, the Libertarian Party could be in line for either its strongest showing in the state since the '80s or its strongest showing there ever.

Bonus links: For more third-party history, go here. For more Alaskan nonconformity, go here and here.

NEXT: Gary Johnson and the Rise of Libertarian Centrism

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. The Alaskan love affair with third parties is directly connected to the low number of females who reside in the state. Women obviously prefer their extremism when its housed inside an established political party. Therefore, in order to increase the influence of third parties in the United States I am calling for either the banishment of women, or for women to be stripped of the ability to vocalize their political views.

    Who is with me?

  2. So we’re basically looking at some mathematically sophisticated guesswork.


  3. I grew up in Alaska. The 1990 gubenatorial election was crazy because Wally Hickel jumped in the race the day before the filing deadline and Jack Coghill, who had been Arliss Sturgulewski’s running mate on the GOP ticket jumped ship and filed with Hickel, leaving Sturgelewski with less than 24 hours to find a running mate.

    Sturgulewski herself was a bizarre choice for candidate. I worked in a museum at that time and one day she came in while I was doing a presentation. She repeated every word I said on about a two-second delay while nodding. Since we were in a small planetarium, it meant everyone had to listen to her like she was sitting right next to them. I wanted to strangle her and it convinced me that she was crazy.

  4. Thanks for that informative article.

  5. This just in: in the 12 major elections from 1872 when the Prohibition Party recorded some votes until the Dry Law Amendment was a done deal (beer a felony), the Prohibition party averaged 1.4% of the vote. So 2,059,735 votes were what it took to create a tee-totalitarian dictatorship for nearly 14 years and collapse the economy. And NOT ONE of those dry candidates ever made it to the Executive Mansion. That is the power of spoiler votes, and why voting libertarian repeals bad laws the same way spoiler votes created them.
    Nowadays communism and prohibition are clear failures, and LP spoiler votes are undoing the damage they did with nary a wasted ballot. We are the reason Coloradans and Washingtonians can let their kids stay out late without fear of the police murdering them for smelling like hemp.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.