Gary Johnson Now Almost Certain to Get on Ohio Ballot as Independent
The issue of whether his name can be swapped in for those whose names were actually on the ballot access petition has been resolved in Johnson's favor.
Libertarian Party presidential aspirant Gary Johnson will almost certainly make it on the ballot in Ohio as an independent, Cleveland.com reports this morning.

The quest to get Johnson on the Ohio ballot, in a state where the L.P. does not have a ballot line and thus they sought the easier route of getting Johnson on as an independent, began months before the L.P. had selected its candidate, so two local Libertarians offered up their names as placeholders on the petitions, with the intention of dropping out in favor of Johnson and William Weld, as they did.
The Ohio secretary of state's office has been fighting an apparent war in the media on the totally legal practice of swapping in a new candidate for the one actually on the petitions signed, as reported here by me and Anthony Fisher.
As recently as Friday, secretary of state office spokesperson Joshua Eck was telling me they had doubts about the legality of the practice.
But this morning Secretary of State Jon Husted grudgingly gave way, while still insisting he doubts (those doubts not supported by either the letter of the law or history, as I explained Friday) that swapping practice is 100 percent legal:
In its ruling, Husted's office wrote that Ohio law doesn't specifically say whether a presidential candidate can be swapped out for another, especially when petition signatures haven't yet been verified. Monday is the deadline to certify replacements for candidates who have withdrawn or were disqualified from running in November.
But, the ruling concluded, "The law being unclear, Secretary Husted believes the spirit of ballot access should prevail" and that Johnson can replace [Charlie] Earl on the ballot.
Now the state must still certify that at least 5,000 of the 12,000 submitted signatures are valid, but the swapping barricade has been surmounted.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I've always said politicians are pretty much interchangeable.
OT:
Sexual assault epidemic in Sweden continues. Most perps are "citizens of Afghanistan, Eritrea and Somalia -- three of the four largest immigrant groups in Sweden who fall into the category of "unaccompanied refugee children".
Preferred victim are girls 14 - 16 years old. Some assaults are one-on-one, some are organized gangs.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute......l-assaults
There's more. Much more.
Link fail. No idea why.
Google Gatestone Sweden Sexual Assault. Should get you there.
WTF happened to these people? Though of Germanic, Anglo-Saxon and Scottish ancestry, I am not directly Scandinavian. But I share the religion of the people who were the fucking Vikings! By the Gods, what happened?? There are a few tough pockets of folks that join the Norweigian military, but for the most part, the Scandinavians as a people changed from some of the toughest, and meanest SOBs you could ever find, to some of the wimpiest.
The mean ones took over France, Britain, and other regions. Their descendants got themselves shot to pieces in the world wars. Just a theory.
Not Sweden.
I mean, the Vikings were pretty rapey.
No wonder they cover their women back home.
Well, good. I already experienced being registered in the only state Gary was illegal even as a write-in in 2012, it would suck to move to a state he was already on the ballot in 2012 and have him miss it in 2016.
Most of those things are phrases, not words. Where' Nicole?
It is absolutely amazing how the most logical political party (i mean, were libertarians, out belief in personal choice necessitates a distrust of unsubstantiated claims) becomes completely incapable of logic when a government decision doesn't go their way.
Ohio law is extremely unclear on this issue, Husted spelled out an extremely well reasoned, detailed, objective view of the law, and certified the Johnson swap BECAUSE the law doesn't clearly say he can't. That's just about the most libertarian, objective position possible.