The Philippines' New War on Drugs Has Killed Hundreds in Just Over a Month
The bloody crackdown and rampant vigilantism is the result of a wildly popular new president's policies.


Over 400 people have been killed in the Philippines in the last month as part of new President Rodrigo Duterte's law and order regime. Though the majority have been killed in clashes with the military and police, over 150 "drug suspects" have been taken out by vigilantes, the New York Times reports.
Duterte, who as mayor of Davao City for over 20 years was nicknamed "The Punisher" after the Marvel comic book character who uses torture, murder and other extralegal tactics to battle criminals. As a presidential candidate, he said he would kill his own children if he discovered they were using drugs, mused about joining in a prison gang-rape of an attractive woman, and declared any criminal to be a legitimate target for assassination. He's also been linked to death squads allegedly responsible for the disappearance of over 700 people in a four-year period, offered a cash reward for the decapitated head of the leader of a gang of car thieves, and testified before the Senate that he would "gladly kill" rice smugglers.
The Times quotes Duterte as recently telling Congress, "We will not stop until the last drug lord, the last financier and the last pusher have surrendered or been put behind bars or below the ground, if they so wish." But critics of his policies insist that many of the slain were just ordinary poor citizens with little or nothing to do with the drug trade, and were simply summarily executed in the streets.
Also from the Times:
Critics of the president's campaign have rallied around the case of Michael Siaron, a 29-year-old rickshaw driver in Manila, who was shot one night by unidentified gunmen as he pedaled his vehicle in search of a passenger. When his wife rushed to the scene, a photographer took a picture of her cradling his body in the street, and the photograph quickly gained wide attention.
Scribbled in block letters on a cardboard sign left near his body was the word "pusher." His family members insist that he was not involved in the drug trade, though they said he sometimes used meth.
Indirectly acknowledging criticism that his policies trample over the standard judicial process, Mr. Duterte said that human rights "cannot be used as a shield to destroy the country."
It appears that Duterte's approach is proving effective at reducing crime nationwide — which has reportedly dropped by 13 percent in his very brief tenure — while over 100,000 "drug addicts or dealers" have turned themselves into the police. This was also the case when he was mayor of Davao, which went from being the murder capital of the Philippines to its safest and most popular tourist destination thanks in part to Duterte's shoot-to-kill orders to police and tacit encoragement of vigilantism.
Duterte's zero-tolerance approach appears to be wildly popular with the citizenry, as well. A poll taken just before the his landslide electoral victory showed over 80 percent of the electorate professed to having "much trust" in Duterte's ability to lead the country.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
You know who else had a bloody crackdown and rampant vigilantism as the result of a wildly popular policies...
D..d....d....donald Trump?
Insane Clown Posse?
John Wick?
Dog-killing ain't no widely popular policy.
Fuck...... Read that as "unpopular"
*goes for more coffee*
Zack Snyder's Batman?
Daenerys Targaryen?
Cersei, perhaps. King's Landing will have a lot less crime with no population....
I don't think Queen Cersei will do a whole lot that could be described as "popular."
100% approval ratings..since her constituency consists of her and FrankenGregor
100% approval ratings..since her constituency consists of her and FrankenGregor
100% approval ratings..since her constituency consists of her and FrankenGregor
And several squirrelz.
Kira?
+1 potato chip
Batman?
Paul Kersey?
Oliver Queen?
Davao is the new Times Square.
So Stop-n-Frisk does work?
The policy over there is Stop-n-Off.
"Stop n' Lop"
So John, serious question, is this NOT the logical outcome (albeit an extreme case) of your point that your principles shouldn't be stood upon in certain cases? Where the utility of not adhering to your principles brings short term benefit? I am trying to understand where you would draw the line?
This references the protester thread a few days ago...sorry folks.
Every Flip-American I've ever met has been adamantly anti-drug.
You should ask them if they're anti-alcohol too.
The Philippines is the country with the highest approval rating of the United States. Filipinos love America more than any other country on Earth, including America. This vigilante justice system isn't the worst atrocity in the world, and Duterte hasn't been showing much of the normal signs of wannabe dictators who overthrow their governments and ban opposition parties and dissent. He just really hates criminals and drugs. America should just let this play out and not cast stones.
"Yeah. I mean the country's ignoring human rights and killing people left and right for victimless crimes, but they like us, so we'll just ignore it"
Compared to all of our other 'friends", this is small potatoes, and we can't exactly point to our own drug law enforcement as a beacon of light.
Fuck off, slaver.
America should certainly leave foreign countries alone unless they harm us. The rationale you made up is a piss-poor substitute for simple principles.
human rights "cannot be used as a shield to destroy the country."
I expect to see this on Trump posters in the coming weeks.
The Constitution is not a suicide pact amirite???
"Somebody will say, 'Oh, freedom of speech, freedom of speech.' These are foolish people."
Can't shout "Fire" in a crowded theater!
Or Hillary's...
human gun rights "cannot be used as a shield to destroy the country."
Jesus.
I blame Nancy Reagan for these losers.
End the crime -- legalize.
You don't see Anheuser-Busch and Miller-Coors having drive-by shootings or turf wars.
You did see rival alcohol distribution gangs killing each other during Prohibition.
Amen!
Take note stooooopid mammals, that is how a proper overlord acts
This Duterte fellow likes to talk big, but like most wannabe overlords, I bet I can take him down with one punch.
How did shoot-to-kill & vigilantism make Davao so much safer & more attractive? Was there such a lack of prosecutions that shooting them is the only effective way? Do tourists trust vigilantes more than they trust the legal system?
Was there such a lack of prosecutions that shooting them is the only effective way?
From what I've read, their criminal justice system is horribly corrupt and incredibly slow-moving, even for the most basic prosecutions. I mean, advocating a policy of "shoot the perpetrators on the spot rather than prosecuting them" is definitely not an improvement but it is a lot easier than reforming the CJ system...
Duterte's zero-tolerance approach appears to be wildly popular with the citizenry, as well. A poll taken just before the his landslide electoral victory showed over 80 percent of the electorate professed to having "much trust" in Duterte's ability to lead the country.
This is where you get off the democracy train. A free people don't need leaders, they need public servants. Hell, Hitler and Stalin and Mao and every other tin-pot dictator has a demonstrated ability to lead a country that most of our "leaders" lack - but what kind of shitty country have you got where the retarded asshole sheep allow themselves to be led by somebody who tells them to their face they're sheep who need a shepherd? The only promise I want out of a "leader" is a promise to stay the hell out of my way and leave me alone. Let me run my own life, you run yours.
You know if we ever came up with a personal force-field type of device, we'd have a individual freedom overnight. And I bet the masses would revolt. But hopefully after its availability to render the mass madness ineffective.
In lieu of such a device, I will continue to root for and rely on the black market anti-heroes.
Up until the government develops hand-held laser weapons.
I totally agree with this. But every Christian fits that description.
Hey, can we at least applaud the president for doing exactly what he promised to do in his campaign???
His family members insist that he was not involved in the drug trade, though they said he sometimes used meth.
Fl...Florida Man? ARE YOU OK?!?!?!?
testified before the Senate that he would "gladly kill" rice smugglers.
Rice smugglers?!
Trump is our gateway drug to a guy like this. Let's not take it.
i get paid over ?79.91 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I'd be able to do it but my best friend earns over ?9185 a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I've been doing,......
------->>>>> http://www.CareerPlus90.com