2016 Republican Convention

Milo Yiannopoulos Proposed a Gay-Conservative Alliance and the Pro-Trump Crowd Loved It

'The left does not own homosexuals anymore,' said Yiannopoulos. 'We're your gays!'

|

Milo Rally
Reason

You might not have expected the crowd at a rally outside the Republican National Convention to cheer an out-and-proud gay man who bragged about his good looks and sex life. But in the age of Donald Trump, anything is possible: even a conservative Christian audience going gaga over Milo Yiannopoulos.

"The left does not own homosexuals anymore," Yiannopoulos, an editor for Breitbart and provocative campus speaker, told the crowd. "We're your gays."

"You're our gays!" someone in the crowd echoed. Others cheered.

Yiannopoulos, who affectionately refers to Trump as "daddy," argued that religious conservatives and gays should set aside their differences in order to focus on the common enemy: radical Islam, identity politics, leftism, and of course, Lena Dunham.

"Donald Trump is best placed to end the tyranny of political correctness in this country," said Yiannopoulos. "Many Trump supporters and Republicans have their challenges with the gay thing. But there's a world of difference between refusing to bake a cake and opening fire [on a gay nightclub]."

Despite Yiannopoulos's offer of friendship between gays and conservatives, the 2016 Republican presidential platform remains stunningly anti-gay—even for the GOP. It includes language in support of gay conversion therapy and asserts that a "traditional two-parent household" is best for children. It also calls for the Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage to be overturned.

In an interview with Reason earlier today, long-time Trump friend and supporter Roger Stone pointed out that once the convention is over, Trump will be free to disregard aspects of the platform with which he disagrees. Stone suggested that LGBT issues were one such aspect. Still, it's shaky ground on which to begin a gay-conservative alliance.

Yiannopoulos wrapped up his remarks by calling on Americans not to cower before radical Islam.

"Die on your feet or live on your knees," he said, before adding, "well, I do live on my knees. That's alright. As long as I'm not facing Mecca, I'm alright with you guys. I mean, I might have been by accident. I don't think God would mind, I was calling his name the whole time. I'm sorry, that was too far. Don't encourage me."

Watch a video of Yiannopoulos's speech below.

Advertisement

NEXT: Republican National Convention Devolves Into Chaos With Contentious Stop-Trump Rules Vote

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. RE: Milo Yiannopoulos Proposed a Gay-Conservative Alliance and the Pro-Trump Crowd Loved It
    ‘The left does not own homosexuals anymore,’ saiid Yiannopoulos. ‘We’re your gays!’

    I’m sure both the gays were overjoyed with Trump the Grump.

    1. My co-worker’s step-sister made $14200 the previous week. she gets paid on the laptop and moved in a $557000 condo. All she did was get blessed and apply the guide leaked on this web site.. Go Here…. http://www.trends88.com

    2. My co-worker’s step-sister made $14200 the previous week. she gets paid on the laptop and moved in a $557000 condo. All she did was get blessed and apply the guide leaked on this web site.. Go Here…. http://www.trends88.com

    3. Start working from home! Great job for students, stay-at-home moms or anyone needing an extra income… You only need a computer and a reliable internet connection… Make $90 hourly and up to $12000 a month by following link at the bottom and signing up… You can have your first check by the end of this week..
      .Go This Website…. http://www.trends88.com

  2. “asserts that a “traditional two-party household” is best for children.”

    Is that not true?

    “well, I do live on my knees. That’s alright. As long as I’m not facing Mecca, I’m alright with you guys. I mean, I might have been by accident. I don’t think God would mind, I was calling his name the whole time. I’m sorry, that was too far. Don’t encourage me.”

    How long can his gimmick go on? It’s the same damn joke.

    1. “Look at me, I’m really, really gay” does seem to be a big part of his schtick.

    2. It’s been a while since I’ve read anything on the subject, but from what I recall reading, there wasn’t good evidence that being raised by gay parents was significantly worse than being raised by straight parents.

      1. Yes, this seems to come down to “choose your study” though. Some studies show the kids being perfectly fine others showing them more likely to be abused or having emotional issues.

        At this point I’d just stick with tradition before throwing my lot with any study.

        1. I’m sure that the social scientists who do these studies are totally uninfluenced by their political views or by their fear of being shunned as bigots by colleagues, friends and family if the results come out “wrong.”

          1. Which is exactly why Milo is going around being a provocateur I suppose…

        2. Since I’m straight, I’d go with tradition because I think two parents are better. If I were gay and wanted kids, I’d give the two gay parents thing a shot.

          1. “Since I’m straight, I’d go with tradition because I think two parents are better. If I were gay and wanted kids, I’d give the two gay parents thing a shot.”

            Sadly, I don’t think the party platform has an expressed orientation.

          2. I’m fine with gay adoption, although I think it’s absurd to force any adoption agency to give kids to gay couples, as several states have begun doing. What I find horrendous, however, is gay couples intentionally creating babies, via surrogacy or sperm donation, who they know will never know their mother or father. That is cruel.

            1. I’m curious.

              Is it also “cruel” when straight couples “intentionally [create] babies, via surrogacy or sperm donation, who they know will never know their mother or father”? I mean, you know all these technologies that gay couples used were first used, and are still used more often, by straight folks, right?

              And if you just flat-out oppose the technologies, why single out gay people in your statement? We’re the small fish as far as this “cruelty” goes.

      2. there wasn’t good any evidence that being raised by gay parents was significantly better or worse than being raised by straight parents.

        I’m not sure they have enough data on 2-parent same-sex households to say anything at all

    3. What do you call the gay version of “cooning”?

      1. Poofing?

        1. Sounds legit.

          ‘Look at Paul Lynde poofing on Hollywood Squares!’

  3. “The left does not own homosexuals anymore,”

    Come on, Hit-n-runners, step up to the plate. Let’s see what we can do with this one.

    1. Why should the left buy the cow when they can get the milk for free?

      1. Why should the left buy the cow when they can get those magic beans from Jack?

    2. Obviously, Milo want to be owned by someone who will abuse and humiliate him more.

      1. But the left wants to import an endless stream of Muslims, who want to kill gays. Compared to that, “abuse and humiliation” is a wiser choice….

        1. Yup, the left is all about killing the gays.
          Yup, the left wants to “import” Muslims, which is why we need a wall on the border with Mexico. All the fucking Muslims swimming across the Rio Grande.

          1. He’s talking about Europe’s left. There’s an epic scale migration event happening over there. It’s mostly economic migrants too, only around 20% of the migrants are from Syria. Some are from Afghanistan and Iraq too, but the majority are seeking opportunity, not fleeing war.

            1. Yes, the Euro left, but the American left is also simultaneously pro-gay while wanting to import members of anti-gay Muslim cultures. It’s a contradiction they try to explain away.

              1. Yeah the overall platforms are still the same. I don’t think helping 80,000 genuine (hopefully) refugees is that big of a deal though.

                1. Look at any of the polls of Muslims regarding support for sharia law and terrorism and so forth. 80,000 means that tens of thousands (at least) are problematic. They can be helped in an Islamic country.

                  1. “support for sharia law”

                    “Sharia law” means nothing. Sharia can mean anything to anyone depending on what Hadiths the individual who “believes” in it believes. A Quranist says apostasy is a sin with no earthly punishment, because the Quranist rejects all Hadiths, the Wahhabi says apostasy is a sin with a sentence of death, because the Wahhabi accepts Hadiths that say this thing, and yet both the Quranist and Wahhabi say they believe in and follow Sharia law.

                    “Jewish law” and even “Christian law” are less nebulous terms than “Sharia law”. Someone’s answer on whether or not they support Sharia law is of no use whatsoever.

                  2. Call me crazy, but I think that’s a fairly manageable number.

          2. Ask gay peoople who had to deal with the policies of the USSR or the People’s Republic of China–I think you’ll see why the left sides so easily with Islam.

          3. I’m confused. So you say all these Mexicans are converting to Islam now? Fuck.

            1. They both start with M, so why not? Everything M is bad. except ‘Merica.

    3. “The left does not own homosexuals anymore,”

      Anymore, it’s getting tough enough just to rent them or so I’m told…

    4. Milo traveled to Berkeley, and went forth among them and demanded, “Let my people go!”

      1. +1 Gay Moses

    5. We just rent them long enough to polish our……

      monocles.

  4. I’m not sure what to think of Yiannnononopolis personally, but he’s certainly entertaining and knows how to piss off the right people.

    asserts that a “traditional two-party household” is best for children

    Well, that’s a surprise. I thought they wanted at least three: mom, dad and kid.

    I’m sure two parents is best, all else being equal. But I’m not convinced of the “traditional” part. All the children of gay parents I know seem quite well adjusted.

    1. All the children of gay parents I know seem quite well adjusted.

      Lily from Modern Family seems a little too sarcastic for a child her age, you have to admit.

  5. I know the dude is just trolling the world but he can be quite entertaining. I can always appreciate dissing the left.

  6. Political activists embrace person who praises their leader. What a crazy world we live in.

  7. I did not know you could “own” gays.
    How are they at salt mining?
    Household chores?

    1. To be fair, the Left believes they ‘own’ a lot of demographic groups.

      1. On the other hand the GOP thinks they own libertarians.

        1. You misunderstood. The GOP thinks they pwn libertarians.

          1. I feel pwnt every other day.

        2. Please. Libertarians are little more than democrats with gun rights. Your primary concern seems to be gay ‘marriage’ and legal drugs.
          I remember proud libertarian Art Bell gleefully saying he’d voted for obama. Neal Boortz once voted for George W. Bush only because he hated John Kerry more.
          You libertarians fit in better with the democrats, as the democrat party is loathe to deny you your newest bread and/or circus. As long as their elites don’t have to live anywhere near you and your money keeps them in power.
          If the human mind wasn’t too feeble to accept a true democracy, we’d have no need for government and societal rules to begin with.
          I’m gonna vote for the orange-haired dude for two reasons: One, he’s an alpha male, not some criminal, screechy, dried up old shrew and two, he’s the only one willing to fight the democrats with their own playbook.

          1. Libertarians are little more than democrats with gun rights.

            There’s the small matter of free markets and property rights, which I know you don’t give two shits about now that your Daddy Trump has told you not to.

          2. “Libertarians are little more than democrats with gun rights.”

            or Republicans with bongs

          3. Neal Boortz only claims to be a libertarian because he wants pot decriminalized. That’s about it. Art Bell knows a lot more about aliens, chupacabras, time travelers, and Major Ed Danes than politics, so I give him a pass. The Greeks, and Plato specifically, laid out the problems of a “true democracy”, and we hope to never have our Republic become that, even though it inches its way there every year. I am gonna vote against the orange rug for two reasons: my father told me never to hire a person who wears a rug, and two he probably stole it from The Dude.

    2. Very good a chores and arrangements. The right one will also excel at cooking and wine selections. They don’t take up much space, and are generally housebroken.

    3. This is why I only purchase high-quality gay orphans!

  8. Shaky ground for an alliance? Sure, but that’s common. On the Democrat side, they’ve got gays and Muslims. Talk about a shaky alliance! Not to mention Asians, who get screwed out of college slots by black-oriented affirmative action. And plenty more.

  9. I love the crowd yelling out comments in that video. funnier than Milo

  10. I spent a great deal of my youth– and some of my not youth– in the rave culture. The thing that this guy reminds me of is the gay guys that would dress up as a drag queen to get attention. There’s nothing terrible about that, but it’s worth knowing when someone is just trying to call attention to themselves. Oh yeah, they tended to not like slightly overweight women and had, to me, a mystifying objection to pussy so maybe there’s the Lena Dunham thing.

    Knowing that, why would anyone who is gay consider voting for a political party with such retrograde ideas about homosexuality or consider for one second Mr. Yiannopoulous’ absurd hyperboles about the connection between Leftists and Islamic terrorism

    1. Oh! So that’s what happened to you. Brain lesions as a result of MDMA overdosing!

      Things make a lot more sense now.

      PLUR!

      1. MDMA doesn’t cause brain lesions. Meth does. I thought libertarians knew their drugs.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Retracted_article_on_dopaminergic _neurotoxicity_of_MDMA

      2. Dude, that link doesn’t even support your claim of MDMA causing Brain lesions…

    2. The objection to Lena Dunham, even restricting it to the looks department, is a lot more than “slightly overweight.” She’s a homely potato.

      1. Every time you feed a troll, Lena Dunham films another nude scene.

        1. D:

        2. shudder

        3. *Shudders*

          That can’t be true can it!? Say it isn’t so!!!

        4. Thank you for helping my diet, if I feel tempted to eat I’ll just think of that.

    3. The thing that this guy reminds me of is the gay guys that would dress up as a drag queen to get attention.

      Um…isn’t that the whole point of being a drag queen?

      1. Um…isn’t that the whole point of being a drag queen?

        I think that accounts for between 30 and 90% of the things that were nominally “female” before drag queens ripped them off.

    4. a mystifying objection to pussy

      Also known as “being a homosexual”.

      1. Only if you conflate “objection” with “lack of interest’.

    5. “voting for a political party with such retrograde ideas about homosexuality”

      ‘Cause the other party just uses us for votes. The Democrats are TERRIBLE for LGBT rights. They, too, believed “marriage is only between a man and a woman”. They, your party, ONLY changed their tune after a midterm election when one THIRD of LGBT voters voted for the Republicans. Then, suddenly, every Democrat simultaneously and magically “evolved” on the issue. But even THEN they didn’t do jack shit for actually legalizing gay marriage. No, they waited around until the courts decided to make that their pet cause. The Democrats have done NOTHING but offer lukewarm verbal support for LGBT rights and pass often questionable anti-discrimination laws.

      Why would a gay vote republican?? Because as history has shown, YOUR party will only throw the LGBT community a bone if it thinks it is in danger of losing the gay vote!! Without that the Blue Tribe expects us to sit down, shut up, and vote Blue, while they do nothing to actually advance rights in this country, only using us bluntly as a wedge issue to grab millenial votes. If you ask me, the open disdain from Red Tribe is much more refreshing than the abusive relationship held with the Blue Tribe. But overall, both Tribes can go to hell.

      1. Thanks for pointing out why gays vote Democrat: the Supreme Court.

  11. Despite Yiannopoulos’s offer of friendship between gays and conservatives, the 2016 Republican presidential platform remains stunningly anti-gay?even for the GOP. It includes language in support of gay conversion therapy and asserts that a “traditional two-party household” is best for children. It also calls for the Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage to be overturned.

    Well, duh, it’s not ‘hot’ unless it’s taboo!

    1. It includes language in support of gay conversion therapy…

      Now, if this plank was in the Democrat’s platform, I’d assume they meant to push for legislation to have gay conversion therapy paid for under Obamacare. With the GOP i think I’m fairly safe in assuming that it’s pure symbolism.

      That’s not to say that I’m not disturbed that enough republicans believe in this witchcraft that they managed to put even a symbolic plank in the platform.

      1. Yeah, I find that particular plank far more disturbing than the other stuff. What’s next, electroshock therapy or maybe a little trepanning?

        1. Electroconvulsive therapy (“electro-shock”) is still in common use in this country. Banning particular therapies or procedures that people voluntarily seek out is a teflon-coated slippery slope. Under the language of some of the “conversion therapy” bans being put in place, for example, therapists face liability issues even counseling transgender patients on their sexual attractions. Such bans, I would presume, are the reason why the language was included in the party platform.

          1. Limiting legally, the treatments a patient might want (and I dislike the idea of parents forcing their kids into Conversion Therapy, but at some point, you have to be hands off a parent-child relationship), is hugely problematic, since an adult of sound mind might theoretically, wish to have that kind of therapy. If a mental health care provider thinks that is the best option, it should be open to the adult with full consent.

          2. California, Oregon, New Jersey and Illinois. Only states with conversion therapy bans. All apply exclusively to minors.

            Speak up if you don’t like ’em, but there’s no call to misrepresent ’em.

    2. From Frankie Boyle on “Mock the Week”, “I want to outlaw homosexuality, so I can feel dirty when I do it.”.

    3. “traditional two-party household”

      Mom’s a democrat, Dad’s a republican?

  12. This is the closest I could find to the draft Republican platform, but it’s dated the seventh, and who knows what amendments have been made since then.

    It does say that “every child deserves a married mom and dad” and that “our laws and our government’s regulations should recognize marriage and the union of one man and one woman and actively promote married family life as the basis of a stable and prosperous society.”

    Compare this against Libertopia, where there is neither marriage nor giving in marriage, or at least not so the government would notice, and this plank falls short.

    Compare this against the status quo, where the government is promoting single motherhood, divorce and gay marriage, and it’s an improvement.

    By all means let the libertarians come forward with their pleas to shrink the government and get the government out of marriage.

    Work on that third option and come up with a workable plan.

    Right now, what I see is a debate between people who think the government should *promote* man/woman marriage, versus those who think the government should promote alternative arrangements.

    And I also see libertarians who call for the government to promote alternative arrangements as a “second best option” after complete deregulation.

  13. Would anyone really be all that surprised if we found out Milo Yiannopoulos was actually straight?

    1. So homos can’t be conservative?

      Tell me, is it biological?

      1. I think the point was more about the traveling circus that is the Milo-sphere.

      2. No, I’m just saying that the straight GOP often end up really being gay. I just think it would have an ironic symmetry to it.

        1. They turn around at 68?

          1. +1 You do me, I owe you one.

          2. I think what Stevia’s referring to is all those instances of really vocal anti-gay Republican politicians getting busted for soliciting gay prostitutes or admitting they have a secret same-sex lover.

        2. “the flamboyantly straight GOP” stupid typing

        3. Of course, the elephant in the room has always been the vast overrepresentation of gay men in the Anime Nazi’s alt-Reich.

          For some folks, ‘No Blacks, No Asians, No Femmes’ is an entire 24/7 lifestyle.

        4. An *authentic* gay person would be all for Muslim immigration!

        5. Only if he were American. Him being a British Queen destroys any reason he would have to pretend.

    2. If he is, he should be given all the Academy Awards from here on out because he’s the greatest actor of all time.

      1. He is not. Sugar Free just can’t handle the idea of a gay person thinking unapproved thoughts.

        1. I’m pretty sure he just thinks it would be funny.

  14. These seem like the “it’s just a phase” type of homosexuals. The real ones will be dutifully in Filthacrapia next week.

  15. “Die on your feet or live on your knees,” he said, before adding, “well, I do live on my knees. That’s alright. As long as I’m not facing Mecca, I’m alright with you guys. I mean, I might have been by accident. I don’t think God would mind, I was calling his name the whole time. I’m sorry, that was too far. Don’t encourage me.”

    Yuck. Two things. First, sick pervert, there are kids in that audience. You deserve a walking rated X designation. Second, is it just me or am I the only one longing for the old Republican coalition of blue collar workers and rural farm workers? The new coalition of reality tv stars and libertine gay guys willing to discuss his sex life in front of 12 year olds just a’int my thing.

    1. Socialism vs Homosexuality: Another Incompatibility, or Too Many Dicks

    2. For my money you just can’t top Clint Eastwood talking to an empty chair.

      1. He lost that argument if I remember correctly.

      2. It was hilarious, because it’s completely accurate.

        1. “It was hilarious”

          Sure it was funny, but dramatic as well. I had the feeling that Eastwood was improvising before a huge audience at a decisive moment for the party. I could feel the tension in the audience. Nobody had any idea where he was going with this shtick.

  16. Facebook took this article down but left the ones bashing Trump up. Bastards.

    1. Huh, CNN has a video making sure we understand that Honor killings happen everywhere, including by Christians and Jews, in Europe and in the United States.

      1. I hear the Jews also use the blood of gentile children to make their Jew bread.

    2. I remember when Pat Robertson was in cahoots with Mugabe for diamonds. When he was called out on being involved with a thug that chopped off children’s arms in order to enslave their parents Roberts engaged in some pretty epic moral relativism.

      The left lost their shit over that, rightly calling Robertson evil personified.

      Hey lefties, have a look in the mirror.

      1. Principles are just something you adopt when they are useful as a weapon.

  17. Yiannopoulos, who affectionately refers to Trump as “daddy,”

    Well, that’s not creepy or anything. :shudder:

    1. Reminds me of the be-pony-tailed guy who asked Bill Clinton during a Town Hall in 1992 to imagine himself as our father…

  18. It also calls for the Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage to be overturned.

    The monogamy of marriage is very ungay anyway. Weddings, on the other hand…

    1. The monogamy of marriage is very ungay anyway.

      Clearly, you don’t know any lesbians.

      1. This joke seems like a long-running viral ad for U-Haul.

        1. The U-Haul joke covers the phenomenon of lesbian dating. It doesn’t even touch on Lesbian Marriage. That’s how monogamous.

  19. You might not have expected the crowd at a rally outside the Republican National Convention to cheer an out-and-proud gay man. . . even a conservative Christian audience going gaga over Milo Yiannopoulos.

    While the GOP has a loud minority of conservative Christians, ‘a GOP audience’ =/= ‘a conservative Christian audience’.

    The GOP is actually a pretty large tent that holds a spectrum of people, from right-wing fascists all the way to libertarians. The ‘conservative party’ is actually a hell of a lot more diverse than the party that claims to hold diversity as one of its major ideals.

    1. You wouldn’t know that to listen to the major media. It’s understandable they would want to paint the GOP as identical with the worst elements in it. Also that they’d cover up the worst elements of the Democratic Party.

    2. The Democratic Party’s inflexibility, proven through its continuing unwelcome attitude to both fascists AND fascist ideology, is proof of how intolerant those people *really* are.”

      LOL

      1. Yeah – except you’re deliberating ignoring that the vast majority of the Democratic Party is built by and for *left-wing* fascists and that party sure as hell doesn’t have room for libertarians or conservative Christians or, indeed, anyone who doesn’t see a ‘problem’ and reflexively think ‘the government should do something’.

    3. Come on, we all know diversity of thought isn’t real diversity. It must be crushed.

    4. While the GOP has a loud minority of conservative Christians, ‘a GOP audience’ =/= ‘a conservative Christian audience’.

      YOU HUSH UP AND IGNORE ROBBYS BIGOTED STEROTYPES OF BIGOTS

    5. The GOP is actually a pretty large tent that holds a spectrum of people, from right-wing fascists all the way to libertarians. The ‘conservative party’ is actually a hell of a lot more diverse than the party that claims to hold diversity as one of its major ideals.

      As noted in the PM links…. TIME magazine runs article lambasting Paul Ryan’s “Diversity-Lacking” Selfie

      Naturalmente…. if you actually look at Time Magazine’s editorial board, or Time Warner’s Board of Directors?… you will note that both are ~80% White Males, and have only 1 or 2 “persons of color” in either, depending on how you define it.

      Hell, if you looked at their overall staff, they don’t do much better. If at all.

      And there’s no possible way to criticize them about it either. Who will point fingers? other media orgs, who are all just as white-male as they are? The actual fault here is not anyone’s staff-makeup; the fault is throwing stones at people in the first place.

    6. There are no right wing fascists.

      Gods above, you’d think that at least here, on a liberetarian site, posters would be intelligent ehough to understand that fascism is only ‘right wing’ if your starting point is communism.

      Fascism is to the left of progressivism, to the right of communism, and way, way, way left of even the first inkling of ANYTHING right wing.

      And, no, I don’t give a damn how the Euros see it. They’re wrong.

      1. There are certainly right-wing fascists – they are the ‘traditional’ fascists that support things like state industry boards to control the economy but not the direct nationalization of left-wing fascists (communists).

        1. No. Again you confuse policies to the left of communism with policies that are right wing.

          State industry boards to control the economy are indirect nationalization and are thus left-wing. ALL nationalization is left-wing.

  20. Yiannopoulos … argued that religious conservatives and gays should set aside their differences in order to focus on the common enemy: radical Islam, identity politics, leftism, and of course, Lena Dunham.

    Well of course. Jeez…

  21. Trump Derangement Syndrome is real.

    Colbert has lost his shit. This is going to be fun.

    1. Hungry or Hunger for Power games…ironic. Doubt he’ll be saying that at the DNC. Which candidate fits the bill more there?

    2. That was the most people Colbert’s had watching him since last fall.

    3. Really? Good god.

    4. That looks staged. Proper professional security would have gone up there with 2 guys at least. And not simply escorted him off the stage and left him, but taken him all the way to the door.

  22. You can’t spell Trump without rump!

  23. BBC figured out the whole Trump phenomenon by talking to two people from Bakersfield.

    http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-36824697

  24. Afghani refugee attacks a bunch of Germans with an axe.

    Shouts Allahu Akbar. Police can’t figure out the motive.

    1. Something something common sense axe control.

      1. “Immigration is always and forever a good thing, with no downsides, you stupid yokels!” ?Cytotoxic

    2. Yes that is perplexing. Maybe the guy was just having a bad day. We really have no other examples of anything happening like that to base an opinion on.

      1. We wil probably never know…

    3. Religion of pieces.

      1. “I wanna axe you something.”

        1. That’s 40 whacked.

    4. Lutheran false flag.

    5. Ugh it was only a matter of time before my German home-away-from-home W?rzburg got in on this action.

      1. Well, to be fair, they already had quite a bit of that refugee rape action that’s all the rage right now.

        1. And they would have gotten away with it too if it wasn’t for those racist rape victims.

        2. That was largely K?ln. W?rzburg is pretty sleepy.

    6. The word is Afghan. Like the dog.

  25. Gays are probably the one group that Trumpkins don’t have a hard-on for. Disgusting that Milo would defend him. The Nazis always lose and never trust a guy with a British accent. Do people not watch movies any more?

    1. The Nazis always lose *eventually*. But until they do the ‘forces of freedom’ have certainly not won.

      1. And no matter how often they lose, there’s always another Nazi in the wings waiting for his chance.

    2. Gays are probably the one group that Trumpkins don’t have a hard-on for.

      The Dangerous Faggot Tour gets big crowds that like to shout “Trump! Trump! Trump!”

      I know it hurts the narrative, but Trump is probably the least homophobic President the country has ever had. Unless the rumors about Lincoln are true.

      1. “I know it hurts the narrative, but Trump is probably the least homophobic President the country has ever had. Unless the rumors about Lincoln are true.”

        Hey, FDR was so not-homophobic that he married a lesbian.

        1. Yeah, and he spent his earlier years entrapping gay sailors to kick them out of the navy.

  26. “Now that both the party platform and our nominee agree that gays are second class citizens, whose rights are inferior to ours, we love those people! Yaaaay!”

    This is an absolute treasure to watch.

  27. It’s too bad Milo combines salient points with all the other stuff he does. Means the salient ones continue to get overlooked.

  28. Caring at all about what another dude does with his dick is about as gay as it gets

    1. You will be made to care.

      If you refuse to care, you are a bigot.

  29. 1) asserts that a “traditional two-parent household” is best for children. 2) It also calls for the Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage to be overturned.

    1) That’s just crazy pants! Everyone knows that children thrive best with homosexual couples are parents. It’s been proven for thousands of years!

    2) Oh no! Overturn a Supreme Court ruling where the Supremes just made the whole damn thing up? If they don’t want the Supremes to just make shit up that isn’t in the constitution, next they’ll want them to follow what actually is written in the constitution, like protecting 2nd amendment rights.

  30. Okay I’m gay and even I think “traditional two-parent household” is best for children. I just don’t think it’s the government can force that to be the only type of family.

  31. Milo exists mostly to troll the left. If it wasn’t for the fact he draws a check from Breitbart, I’d swear his was a fake act trolling the right as well.

    The LP’s Starchild comes off like more of a statesman than Milo does.

  32. uptil I saw the check which had said $6115 , I didn’t believe that…my… cousin woz actually erning money parttime on their apple laptop. . there uncle had bean doing this for less than nine months and a short time ago cleared the loans on there apartment and got a top of the range Mini Cooper
    +_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.factoryofincome.com

  33. We can even create playlists of them so it will be very easy to find our videos which we like. We can also download those videos and can watch them offline. Showbox for pc

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.