Afghanistan

U.S. to Keep More Troops in Afghanistan Through 2017

|

U.S. Army

Once upon a time, when a Republican was president, there was a lot of mainstream interest in the status of America's wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In 2008, Barack Obama won the presidency in part by promising to end the war in Iraq and focus on the "good war" in Afghanistan. In 2012 President Obama ran for re-election claiming he had ended the war in Iraq and was ending the war in Afghanistan.

Obama had not ended the Iraq war, and after the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), he insisted the decision to end the war for which he took credit in the re-election campaign was not a decision for which he was responsible. Even in 2012 it looked like Obama was not ending the war in Afghanistan.

Since then the U.S. has blown through several timetables set by President Obama on Afghanistan withdrawal. In 2015 Obama announced 6,000 U.S. troops would remain in Afghanistan through 2017, leading Nick Gillespie to ask "What Part of Pulling Out Does Obama Not Understand?"

The not-ending of the war in Afghanistan continues today, with President Obama announcing 8,400 troops would remain in Afghanistan through next year. "The narrow missions assigned to our forces will not change," Obama insisted. "They'll remain focused on supporting Afghan forces and going after terrorists."

Obama said the higher troop levels, recommended by his military advisors, would "allow us to continue to provide tailored support to help Afghan forces continue to improve… [and] continue supporting Afghan forces on the ground and in the air."

The U.S. role in Afghanistan is not limited to training and support. A U.S. air strike in May took out the leader of the Taliban. President Obama said at the time that he hoped the Taliban would "seize the opportunity" and rejoin peace talks with the Afghan government. Instead the Taliban chose a harder hardliner as its new leader. Afghan troops, meanwhile, suffer from low morale and desertion, sometimes withdrawing from entire districts.

Last year, the U.S. hit a Doctors Without Borders facility in Afghanistan, representing the first time one Nobel Peace Prize winner (President Obama, 2009) bombed another Nobel Peace Prize winner (Doctors Without Borders, 1999). The U.S. blamed a series of errors but no one faced anything other than "administrative" charges for the incident, in which 42 people were killed.

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has called the Afghanistan war a "mistake" but has nevertheless insisted U.S. troops must remain in the country. Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee and former secretary of state Hillary Clinton has backed postponing the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. Libertarian presidential nominee Gary Johnson said he supported the withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan during the 2012 election cycle, but the war has not been a major issue in the 2016 campaign so far.

Obama heads to Warsaw this week for a NATO summit at which the alliance's nearly 15-year-long mission in Afghanistan is expected to be discussed. At the meeting NATO is also expected to agree to deploying four multinational battalions to Poland and the Baltic states. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg also highlighted that military spending by "European Allies and Canada" was expected to rise by 3 percent, or 8 billion dollars, this year. Much of the increased spending has come from Poland and the Baltic states.

NEXT: Innocent Man Must Notify the Police 24 Hours Before He Has Sex

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Through 2017? Let’s be honest. We’re never leaving.

    1. Nope. When 20% of the gross domestic product goes toward the MICC, you must have perpetual wars to keep the factories open.

      1. As long as you’re within an order of magnitude that’s good, right?

    2. We left thousands of troops in Western Europe for decades – I have no idea how many are even still there and nobody seems to give a shit either.

      Why would the Middle East be any different?

  2. Don’t expect those troop numbers to go down during the Clinton/Trump administration.

  3. I understand why we raided the place. But why did we stay? What have we accomplished in the last dozen years there?

    1. Handing out free money to warlords?

    2. But why did we stay?

      Hubris and greed

    3. What have we accomplished in the last dozen years there?

      Keeping the Taliban out of power there? Whether it was worth it, and whether that justifies what is now an indefinite commitment, is another question entirely…

    4. we defended our freedom from:

      wire taps, gropes by TSA, heavily armed civilian police forces, regulatory over reach, political corruption, and cronyism graft.

      If only 5,000 little kids had to die for that, then we have made the world a better place.

    5. But why did we stay?

      I’ve long suspected that making sure we have troops stationed permanently in Iraq and Afghanistan has everything to do with containing Iran.

      Because, let’s face it, saying we’re going to stay in Afghanistan until it becomes a peaceful, stable country and the Taliban accept pluralistic democracy is just another way of saying “until pigs fly” or “until Hell freezes over.”

      1. Cool – I can’t wait until Iran ramps up and we get to occupy it for 50+ years.

        1. Kebobs and pomegranates for everyone!

  4. President Obama said at the time that he hoped the Taliban would “seize the opportunity” and rejoin peace talks with the Afghan government. Instead the Taliban chose a harder hardliner as its new leader.

    Shocking.

    1. It’s exactly like expecting Vikings to yearn for peace talks. You’re just signaling that you don’t understand Vikings.

    2. It is amazing how stupid that guy is

      1. Just wait til he invites ISIS to a beer summit.

  5. G.W.Bush are the worst presidents ever, They asked for more spending ,increased the debt more,and have kept the country on a ‘war footing longer then any other .Hillary will be more of the same,with 15 dollar minimum wage and suing the oil companies and their ‘cronies’. That means you Reason.On another note,Itook off today and spent 5 hours mowing and trimming.I’m on my 4 beer,so,if anyone disagrees I have a out.

    1. I Forgot Obama,see,I have an out.

      1. I just assumed you were snarking on the similarities between Bush and Obama’s policies by lumping them into one. Actually, has anyone ever seen them together? I’ve been working on the theory that Obama is Steve-O from Jackass in blackface and the last 8 years have been an elaborate prank gone awry, but maybe he’s actually Bush in blackface.

    2. We were hoping your punctuation would improve with your drink, but I guess not.

  6. “What Part of Pulling Out Does Obama Not Understand?”

    “Said Ripley to the cyborg Bishop… God dammit, what was wrong with phrasing?!”

  7. I look forward to seeing the return of the anti war left, eventually.

    1. Vote Trump!

    2. +3 or 4 giant papier mache heads

  8. Like his dad, President Obama doesn’t know when to pull out.

  9. In 2015 Obama announced 6,000 U.S. troops would remain in Afghanistan through 2017, leading Nick Gillespie to ask “What Part of Pulling Out Does Obama Not Understand?”

    Is this one of those “just the tip” situations?…

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.