Thomas Massie

Rep. Thomas Massie Irked That GOP-Dominated House Rules Committee Killed Amendments to Defund D.C. Gun Laws


Despite today's sit-in by Democrats in the House of Representatives advocating some action to further restrict Americans' Second Amendment rights, today Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) says that he very much doubts any new anti-gun action will issue from a Congress with both houses controlled by Republicans.

Thomas Massie

But this week he's more worried about pro-gun action that House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.) and his leadership team seems reluctant to get to the floor. Despite an initial promise of continuing an open process for allowing amendments to come to the floor for a vote, Ryan changed his tune and now has a "structured" process whereby the Rules Committee can prevent amendments from making the floor. Massie complained about this change to Huffington Post earlier this month.

Massie this week saw the Rules Committee choke two of his proposed amendments to the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act intended to prevent the District of Columbia from damaging its citizens Second Amendment rights. Massie is pretty sure that's just because leadership thinks it can't help and only hurt certain possibly vulnerable Republican House seats in November to put its members on record on the matter.

The amendments would have defunded D.C. efforts to enforce gun-free zones and its permit requirements for concealed carry in the District.

As of this morning, Massie had not been told there was any parliamentary errors in the way they were crafted; he has reason to believe they just got smacked down because the Rules Committee, which is 9-4 Republican, didn't want to make the House think about them.

Massie two years ago "offered an amendment that was far more sweeping, it defunded all of D.C.'s gun control, every single law" and it got to the floor under an open rule. It "passed overwhelmingly," 241-181, although the bill it was attached to was eventually abandoned in total. (Massie can't be sure, but he think that amendment passing might have prodded a U.S. District Court to finally act later that same month on overturning D.C.'s total ban on public carry of weapons, a case that had been languishing mysteriously for years.)

A disappointed Massie worries that "the legislative agenda in the House is driven by a desire to protect maybe half a dozen members in swing seats" who are "incidentally the least conservative members of the Republican conference."

While some think post-Orlando is a bad time to openly debate measures like Massie's, he believes the opposite. "The Senate got their votes, and no one was hurt over there. This would be a great opportunity to talk about how background checks don't work and how gun-free zones make us less safe. We should be having [such] votes."

Massie regrets that he sees leadership believing it's "better if we are not on record at all on certain issues." He admits many of his colleagues might actually prefer such a "paternalistic system" that "protects them from votes on issues people care deeply about." He doesn't think even greater majorities for the GOP would make Ryan back down on killing open rules for amendments; "once someone grabs power, rarely do they let go of it. This is an autocratic power grab even [former speaker John] Boehner didn't succumb to or partake in."

It irks Massie to see Republicans being timid about pursuing things like his amendments, since "we are sometimes too timid, and the Democrats are never timid."

NEXT: Saying 'On the Other Hand' Got a Student Reported to the Campus Bias Police

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Massie is pretty sure that's just because leadership thinks it can't help and only hurt certain possibly vulnerable Republican House seats in November to put his members on record on the matter.

    Congressman Massie has zeroed in on the motivations of House leadership.

  2. Exhibit 1,824 in why I care not a whit if the Republican Party is vaporized this year.

    They're good for nothing that I care about, so why should I care about them?

    1. ... but, but, but, if we don't vote for a lizard, the wrong lizard might get in!!!!!!!!!!

    2. By vaporized, what do you mean? There have been primary challenges on some RINOs in the last few years, but it seems like you're predicting something more devastating.

      1. The worst-case scenario of the NeverTrumpers (Hillary landslide, loss of House and Senate) or

        GOP rigs convention, Trump not nominee, GOP base revolts en masse, GOP loses Presidency, House, and Senate. Damage continues downballot.

        Either way, GOP finished as a major party that anyone gives a shit about, and is eventually replaced as the other half of TEAM PURPLE by a new party.

        That kind of vaporized.

        1. I am a long term optimist and short term pessimist, and that bears out in your worst case vaporizing. I think Hillary is far worse than Trump in the Mao &gt Stalin &gt Hitler &gt Mussolini way, but in the long run, it just doesn't matter. Heller and McDonald being decided 5-4 is a sure sign of the moral bankruptcy of our "leadership".

          1. I'd argue that moral bankruptcy of leadership comes from the moral bankruptcy of the general electorate, or at least sustained by the population's stupidity/ignorance/ambivalence.

            1. I blame it on coercive government, because it attracts the worst kind of parasites. You can't fix human nature any more than you can prevents mice wanting to come inside a warm house, but no one in their right mind would design a house with no doors and special scent holders to attract the damned critters.

              1. Was it Heinlein who said, "Power doesn't corrupt, it attracts the corruptible" ?

  3. Good man. I very much believe in the "put your name on it" philosophy of government; if a law sucks or sounds bad or is inconvenient for your reelection, bring it to a vote anyways and either vote yes or vote no.

  4. my step-mum just bought a new cream Toyota Highlander only from working off a pc... browse around this website


  5. my step-mum just bought a new cream Toyota Highlander only from working off a pc... browse around this website


  6. I left my office-job and now I am getting paid 98 usd hourly. How? I work over internet! My old work was making me miserable, so I was forced to try something different, 2 years after...I can say my life is changed-completely for the better! Check it out what i do...

    =======> http://www.CashPay60.Com

  7. uptil I saw the bank draft four $8760 , I be certain sister woz actually bringing in money part time from there labtop. . there neighbour had bean doing this 4 only about eighteen months and resently cleard the depts on there home and bourt a top of the range Chrysler ....

    Clik This Link inYour Browser....

    ? ? ? ?

  8. Whose side are these Republicans on, or is the answer all to obvious??

  9. before I looked at the draft saying $9453 , I have faith that my mother in law woz like truley erning money part time at there computar. . there mums best friend haz done this 4 less than 14 months and just repayed the dept on their apartment and purchased a brand new Honda . read here .....

    Please click the link below

  10. before I saw the bank draft which had said $9426 , I didnt believe brother woz like actualy earning money part-time at there labtop. . there uncles cousin has done this 4 less than fifteen months and by now repaid the dept on there place and got a great new Mini Cooper . read the full info here ...

    Clik This Link inYour Browser??

    ? ? ? ?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.