Civil Asset Forfeiture

Maryland Reforms Asset Forfeiture, Mandatory Minimums

Tighter rules on seizure and looser rules on sentences for nonviolent crimes.


Jail cell
Credit: David Locke1 / photo on flickr

Though Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan vetoed bipartisan efforts to reform the state's asset forfeiture and drug laws in 2015, a new push has succeeded. Yesterday Hogan, a Republican, signed a bill that tightens the rules for civil asset forfeiture (the mechanism by which police seize and keep assets and property from people suspected of crimes) and also the Justice Reinvestment Act, which reduces the state's prison population and potentially reduces sentences for drug and non-violent offenses.  

The asset forfeiture bill, HB 336, is modest in scope, but will nevertheless improve the situation for anybody caught up in the system. It raises the standard of proof for seizing property to "clear and convincing evidence." Because asset forfeiture is often a "civil" not criminal process, officials don't generally have to prove guilt "beyond a shadow of a doubt" like they do in criminal trials, making it easier to take somebody's property than it is to actually convict him or her. In order to seize a citizen's principal home in Maryland, though, officials actually will have to get a criminal conviction. That's an additional new requirement in the law. The law also eliminates cash forfeitures for simple drug possession cases, but maintains it for trafficking arrests.

The new rules also forbid the transfer of seized cash to federal agencies unless the amount seized is more than $50,000. This is an attempt to prevent law enforcement agencies from bypassing the tighter state rules by turning to the federal Equitable Sharing Program at the Department of Justice. This federal program has looser rules than state laws, and as a result we're seeing more and more law enforcement agencies attempt to use the federal program to keep what they seize. (A pack of representatives just introduced a bill to try to make the federal rules less prone to abuse.) Unfortunately, there's an exception in the law to allow for a transfer if there's a federal warrant involved, and the Institute for Justice warns that this loophole could be pursued even more frequently to bypass Maryland's new restrictions.

The Justice Reinvestment Act is estimated to reduce Maryland's state prison population by more than 1,000 over 10 years and to save the state $80 million dollars (that will be spent on other programs). The new law allows for earlier releases of those convicted of non-violent drug offenses and thefts under $1,500. It completely eliminates mandatory minimum sentences for nonviolent drug offenses. It leaves the sentence ranges intact, though, giving judges the discretion over how harsh to be. Mandatory minimums will remain for violent drug-related crimes. It will also significantly increase the types of crimes (from nine to 50) that can be wiped from an offender's record.

Read more about the provisions of the Justice Reinvestment Act here. Both of these laws ended up a bit more modest but they could have been, but the reforms are valuable and needed. 

NEXT: Friday A/V Club: Popeye, Bluto, Daffy Duck, Snoopy, and Betty Boop Run for President

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “Asset Forfeiture Reform, making asset forfeiture fun again”

  2. Scott, what video game is that picture from?

  3. The problems with our countries corrupt justice systems will never be solved by those inside the system or even by law makers. Of course, lawmakers will occasionally make some type of token gesture like this, after the bills are sufficiently watered down. We wouldn’t have these problems if most people in society were not such statist sociopaths. In a sane society, no one would convict another citizen and let them be dragged off to prison over a victimless crime.

    1. In a sane society, no one would convict another citizen and let them be dragged off to prison over a victimless crime.

      The problem, of course is that the people who do want those people dragged off to prison don’t believe those crimes are “victimless”.

      1. That would be the statist sociopaths I’m talking about. Otherwise known as soccer moms. Ok, ok, it’s not just soccer moms, there’s also soccer dads and the Facebook crowd, ‘I just sent that marijuana junkie off to the rape cage today, he won’t be shooting my little snowflake up with that pot, look at these cute pictures of my dog’.

        1. there’s also soccer dads

          I used to be a soccer dad. Most of us were bored and sometimes didn’t show up. It was the moms all gathered at one end of the field nattering to each other, where the dads stood scattered around, hands in pockets, doing our best to minimize interaction.

  4. officials don’t generally have to prove guilt “beyond a shadow of a doubt” like they do in criminal trials

    Beyond a reasonable doubt

  5. Is that an unattributed quote or are Reason editors and Shackford SO uneducated on legal issues they think the standard for conviction is

    beyond a “shadow of a doubt”???

    Seriously !!!!!???

    This is the level of legal acumen you require of the guy who does the cop/courts beat at Reason???

    That is astoundingly ignorant

    Lol ‘beyond a shadow of a doubt’

  6. good Once placed up, you’ll discover Issue Royale in the All Apps section. Clashroyale PC Download For your comfort, we include received furthermore shielded Clashroyale on PC nice.

  7. The standard of evidence is “beyond reasonable doubt” for criminal trials, not beyond “the shadow of a doubt.”

    May I ask from whom you obtained that quote, because that is a very ignorant perception of the legal reality.

    Outside of that, the bill reads like all it is attempting to do is shove ganeral State law enforcement responsibility to the feds, by encouraging local departments to involve the FBI for federal warrants that make it even easier to seize assets.

    Remember kids, whatever a bill title tries to imply the bill will do, the bill likely does the exact opposite. This is no exception.

  8. Now, coming to the Showbox app, this is another superb app developed for movie lovers who want to get a better experience of watching movies and tv show on a bigger screen with more detailings.

  9. And one of those applications is Showbox apk app. It is one of the best online streaming application for watching Movies and TV Shows. In the starting, this application has been released for only a few of the mobiles and allows users to watch shows online.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.