White Teen Girl Sends Nude Photos to Black Male. Police Arrest Him for Child Porn.

Louisiana sexting case illustrates the absurdity of regulating teenagers' sex lives.

|

Levar Allen
Screenshot via KSLA.com

Another male teenager's future is in jeopardy after police charged him with possession of child pornography and contributing to the delinquency of a minor—all because he swapped sexy photos and videos with a girl. 

Levar Allen, a 17-year-old athlete at his Louisiana public school, is black. The girl, a 16-year-old, is white. Local news stories note that she initiated the sexting, and he reciprocated. 

His mother—a single mother of three—has spent thousands of dollars getting her son out of jail and fighting the charges. She thinks her son's race may have played a role in the police department's decision to vigorously punish him. 

"I think because she's white, the parents got upset that she's been doing what she's been doing," she told KSLA.com. "A little girl sent him a video, she was 16. He sent her a video and he got charged." 

New York Daily News columnist Shaun King agrees

Millions upon millions of teenagers are doing this very thing and he was selectively targeted among them, and made an example of, because he crossed a line that clearly irritated not only her white parents but white law enforcement officers as well. 

For what it's worth, the girl was also charged with sexting. But since she's under the age of 17, it's a misdemeanor. Since Allen is a year older, he's technically guilty of a felony. 

It strikes me as perfectly plausible that the young man's race is working against him. We know that the criminal justice system discriminates against blacks. Experts also suspect that black students of color are disproportionately accused of sexual misconduct and mistreated during college rape trials. Something similar might be at work here. 

But it's worth noting that anti-male bias can be as powerful an influencer as race in cases like this, where a young woman is seen as the victim—even if she initiated the inappropriate behavior. 

It's also worth noting that police intervention in these cases is absurd. Lt. Bill Davis defended his efforts using the following erroneous logic: "We had our detectives go to every high school and every middle school here in Bossier Parish and talked to all of the students about the consequences of not only sexting but how it can lead in to child pornography." 

Nonsense. There is no evidence that people who sext become involved with child pornography—which should come as a relief, given that sexting is overwhelmingly common among people of all ages. The worst consequence of sexting is the one that law enforcement agents carry out: arrest. 

If young people seeing each other's naked bodies was such a horrible crime, surely the state of Louisiana would prohibit them from having actual sex as well. And yet, it does no such thing. In Louisiana, the age of consent is 17, but people younger than 17 can consent if they are within two years of age of their partner. For people younger than 15, they can consent if the gap is three years. A 13-year-old can consent to sex with a 16-year-old for instance, but a a 15-year-old cannot consent to sex with an 18-year-old. I don't understand the logic behind such a law, but then again I don't understand the logic of criminalizing consensual sexting between teenagers who are approximately the same age, either. 

NEXT: #NeverTrump

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Sense there is zero evidence race played in role in this whatsoever, why mention it in the headline? It seems to promote a narrative that might not have any basis in reality.

    1. Sense there is zero evidence race played in role in this whatsoever,

      Other than a white person and a black person committed exactly the same crime, and only the black person was arrested.

      Honestly, it probably has as much to do with male/female as black/white.

      1. They didn’t commit the same crime. He didn’t send anything to her.

        1. Local news stories note that she initiated the sexting, and he reciprocated.

          1. Damn. I missed that. Geez. rtfa

            1. another example of male priivlidge

          2. For what it’s worth, the girl was also charged with sexting. But since she’s under the age of 17, it’s a misdemeanor. Since Allen is a year older, he’s technically guilty of a felony.

            1. It’s absurd that the kid can’t buy tobacco or alcohol because he isn’t responsible enough, but can be charged with an adult felony BFYTW.

              1. But he can join the military (with his parents permission), screw all the white girls he can get his hands on, raise a family of his own – but you send *one* dick pic. . .

                1. Yeah I mean is it such a big thing?

      2. Oops. Just saw the chick was charged. Never mind.

        1. Except he is the only one whose life is now ruined – because 17 is criminal but 16 innocence, or something.

      3. So if they were both charged what is the point of the racial angle to the headline?

        1. Robbie’s trusting the analysis of notable Wigger Shaun King who, as a New Yorker is an expert on the ethnology of NW Louisiana

          1. Robbie’s trusting the analysis of notable Wigger Shaun King who, as a New Yorker is an expert on the ethnology of NW Louisiana

            King is from Kentucky, actually. But other than that, you’re right.

            1. I knew he went to Moorehouse but I didn’t know the “Reverend King” was a church pastor in my county.

              1. You’re from KY too? I always thought you were GA, born and bred.

                1. After graduation, King was a high school civics teacher for about a year and then became a motivational speaker for Atlanta’s juvenile justice system. He was then a pastor at Total Grace Christian Center in DeKalb County, Georgia.

                  1. Ah, I see.

                    Just think…you could have brushed elbows with celebrity!

        2. I presume because this is presumed to be a common activity among our youth, yet he’s the one that got busted.

          I think that we have plenty of evidence right here in Reason‘s archives showing that pretty much anyone of any race can get caught up in this.

      4. Other than a white person and a black person committed exactly the same crime, and only the black person was arrested.

        She’s a minor, he’s an adult.

      5. If she was arrested it would not have been made public record because she would have most likely been charged as a minor. Their criminal records are withheld from public access, whereas him being charged as an adult is public record.

    2. WHYCOME DONE THEM FAGGOTS TALKED ABOUT RACE JUST CUZ THAT THERE ONES A NIGGER

      1. THEY’S AIN’T CUSINS SO IT’S MISCEGENATED

      2. Except in this case there really doesn’t seem to be any evidence that race played a factor.

        1. If we peer into the hearts of men, we can see it clearly.

          1. [breaks out scalpel, bone saw, and rib retractor]

            1. Heart-peeping is a misdemeanor in LA

        2. Yes, why would we expect a boy being mistreated by the law in Louisiana to have anything to do with race?

          1. Yes, why would we expect a boy being mistreated by the law in Louisiana to have anything to do with race?

            Gut instinct? Knee-jerk reaction? Preconception? Confirmation bias? Wishful thinking?

          2. Your insensitivity to the word, “boy,” when referring to a person of color?

            /end derp

        3. And it’s also telling that the low foreheads here are more outraged at the suggestion that racism might exist than over this boy’s life being ruined for no reason.

          1. I think the low foreheads would counter that your obsession with seeing racism everywhere actually detracts from the real injustice contained in this story. But you’re right that it is just a suggestion, instead of an argument, so you ought to forgive us cretins for not taking you seriously.

          2. Listen Warty, it’s not as if Robby made an unwarranted assumption about the motivations of a university administrator; he made an unwarranted assumption about the motivations of Louisianan police officers and prosecutors. The line must be drawn here! This far, no further!

            1. It’s all right when he’s disparaging some faggy unAmerican college, but I won’t stand by and let him besmirch the reputation of the Louisiana legal system.

              1. I can’t find one single example of anyone defending the Louisiana legal system in this thread. Everyone’s on the same page that this is an injustice. Just not necessarily the race baiting injustice you and Robby are so eager to claim it is.

                1. HM’s pointing out the hypocrisy of people on this board who freak out anytime some suggests the possibility of a racial motivation when there isn’t explicit evidence of it, but who routinely engage in or tolerate making huge assumptions about motivations in other stories involving college administrators (as well as bureaucrats, politicians, cops, etc.).

              2. No more Warty, no more fun of any kind.

          3. The “low foreheads” here (you know, like me) think that turning the narrative from

            “17 year old’s life gets ruined because of idiotic sexting laws”

            into

            “black teenager targeted by racist and selective application of laws that are not otherwise enforced”

            is missing the point.

            1. Too bad I can’t up vote something.
              The racist angle is really diminishing the real injustice.
              The racist focus makes it seem like everything would be ok if they just imprisoned more 17 year old white boys.

      3. When lacking an argument, you can always count on Warty to post some slurs in all caps. Why attack the argument when you can accuse everyone who makes the argument of being a racist, sexist and/or homophobe?

    3. Because people will be more apt to respond to and be outraged by it. It’s pragmatic.

      Narratives don’t usually have any basis in reality anyway, so *shrug*

    4. why mention it in the headline?

      I guess because his mother thought race had something to do with it?

      I don’t know about this case, but, as Robby says, I think it’s plausible. There is plenty of evidence that blacks often get worse than whites in terms of charges and sentences for similar acts.

      1. It is absolutely plausible, but the evidence presented (Young man’s mother thinks so and Shaun King is outraged) is pretty flimsy, particularly since the girl has been charged as well.

        1. Yeah, no reason to assume anything.

    5. I don’t know, maybe because Robby doesn’t think it matters that they were both busted for the EXACT SAME THING. She just gets a lesser sentence because she’s a minor.

      Race trumps all.

      And, Robby, if you’re quoting people, try not to use race fetishists–Shaun King dresses up and pretends to be black all the time, he’s not a good source for opinions that involve race–his ‘little king’ gets in the way of any objectivity.

  2. A 13-year-old can consent to sex with a 16-year-old for instance, but a a 15-year-old cannot consent to sex with an 18-year-old.

    In the former case, it’s tru luv. In the latter case, it’s conniving trickery just to get in her pants.

    Duh.

    1. What it I self -identify as a 17 yr old? Can I have sex with anyone 15 our older? Asking for a friend.

      1. Is you friend OMWC?

        1. “15 or older”. So not OMWC.

      2. Didn’t that actually happen? A 40 year old father decided he self-identified as a 6 year old girl and went to live with two ‘new’ parents and their 8 year old daughter?

        1. Found the link, I seem to remember different pictures in the article I read originally.

          http://www.mediaite.com/online…..-old-girl/

        2. I’m pretty sure 6 is below the age of consent everywhere.

          1. -1 Aisha

      3. “‘Age’ is a social construct!!!”

        1. NAMBLA lives!

  3. A 13-year-old can consent to sex with a 16-year-old for instance, but a 15-year-old cannot consent to sex with an 18-year-old.

    *confused dog head-tilt*

    1. The law must be methodical and rigidly applied! Otherwise chaos!

  4. She thinks her son’s race may have played a role in the police department’s decision to vigorously punish him.

    In Louisiana? How is that even possible?

    -jcr

  5. Looks like this guy hit the felony jackpot; after work I think I’ll walk down to the beach and pick up an eagle feather and see how my luck holds.

    Much government, anyone?

  6. At least tell me he was a jazz musician.

    1. All hopped up on the reefer, no doubt.

      1. I bet he was planning a trip to Maine, too.

  7. Well, going by his mug-shot, he’s been scared straight gay.

    When did the media start running mugshots of minors, anyway?

    1. Judging by his mugshot, he has the IQ of a turnip.

      1. What exactly is he supposed to look like? I suppose 17 year old you would be looking like a Rhodes Scholar in your mugshot for a felony for consensually exchanging nude pictures?

    2. Probably legally an adult in Louisiana.

  8. Levar Allen, a 17-year-old athlete at his Louisiana public school, is black. The girl, a 16-year-old, is white. Local news stories note that she initiated the sexting, and he reciprocated.

    For what it’s worth, the girl was also charged with sexting. But since she’s under the age of 17, it’s a misdemeanor. Since Allen is a year older, he’s technically guilty of a felony.

    Is 17 the age of majority in LA, or was he charged as an adult?

    1. Nope. 18 in LA, just like in civilized states.

      1. Which states are they?

        1. Umm, gimme a minute here . . .

          Alright, I got nuthin’. Happy now?

  9. It strikes me as perfectly plausible that the young man’s race is working against him

    Is it in this case? She also got charged, and I seem to recall a similar story posted just last week in which there was no mention of the victims’ (of our absurd criminal justice system) races. I’ll take a little more evidence with those accusations.

  10. For what it’s worth, the girl was also charged with sexting. But since she’s under the age of 17, it’s a misdemeanor. Since Allen is a year older, he’s technically guilty of a felony.

    This makes me believe race may not be that much of a culprit. It’s an unknowable at this point. This just sounds like the whole system had a hardon to prosecute someone for this type of stuff so they spread the net as wide as possible.

  11. Robbo,
    No need for the Black/White chess game. You’ve posted plenty of teen sexting tripe to know it’s not a racial thing. Come on, it’s like you’re not even trying to be a journalist. Love the hair still.

    1. p.s. – While I’m critiquing you’re skills, you’re alt-text should be “not otay”.

      1. FYI, remove all the apostrophes.

        you’re alt-text should be “not otay”.

        How deep in hell will I go if I admit I reflexively laughed at this?

        1. So deep that Eddie Murphy will no longer be “The Darkness”. Sorry for the apostrophes. *Hangs head in shame, commits sappuku.

        1. your’re*

    2. “No need for the Black/White chess game. You’ve posted plenty of teen sexting tripe to know it’s not a racial thing. ”

      Especially since the white girl was charged *in this very case* and the reason she was charged with a lesser crime is because she’s below the age of majority for charging her as an adult.

      This happens constantly to people of all races and it’s repellent because no one should be charged with this crime. I get that Shaun King’s paid to racialize fucking everything, but Reason should be a bit more skeptical of his claims given how many white people they’ve reported on for getting treated exactly the same.

      1. Right on, brother.

      2. Even worse, when Slate posted a near identical article even their commentators caught onto the fact that the girl had also been charged. I expect Reason writers to know better than to be caught by obvious race baiting headlines.

        1. Robbie’s more progressive than the typical Slate commenter.

      3. The girl getting charged could be backscatter.

  12. You can’t just let 16 year olds behave like sexual beings, dude

    1. Only concerned about the white girl, huh?

      1. With all due apologies to Irish, the Irish-is-a-racist meme never, ever gets old.

        1. With all due apologies to Irish, the Irish-is-a-racist meme never, ever gets old.

          Agreed, and Irish is one of my favorites.(yes, I have classed you all in best of categories)

        2. Dead horses just get more hilarious the longer you beat them. It’s a rule of comedy.

          1. Take it as a compliment.

            (a) We wouldn’t work the meme if anyone really thought you were a racist.

            (2) We have a hard time not running off real racists, so we have to make do with not-a-racist.

            1. R C is correct Irish, you are loved. That and I’m part Irish, so it’s like I’m showing brotherly love like a swirlie or wedgie.

              1. I said like twice, therefore I am a valley girl. Totes.

            2. I wouldn’t say that no one thinks he’s racist. There’s a handful of particularly annoying posters who will call anyone a racist at the first hint of disagreement with their assumptions. And they probably believe their own blathering too.

              1. I stand by “no one thinks Irish is a racist”. That handful of posters who reflexively call people racists aren’t thinking; they’re feelzing.

          2. Dead horses just get more hilarious the longer you beat them.

            Especially black ones, right?

      2. Even though the white girl will never see any charges?
        This is not race, it is gender. It could be a black chick and a white dude trading nudes in the most racist state ever, and the same thing would happen. Male charged and female pussypassed.

  13. The linked KSLA makes no mention of how this was even brought to the attention of the police, just that the girl was charged first (but not what she was charged with) and that Allen was arrested twice.

    I’m also unsure of how a minor contributes to the delinquency of a minor.

    1. I’m guessing it involves either parents or busybody teachers confiscating phones.

    2. I’m also unsure of how a minor contributes to the delinquency of a minor.

      That doesn’t seem so hard to understand. What I’m unsure of is what the hell “delinquency” even means. Does it just mean breaking laws? If so, isn’t the legal reasoning a bit circular?

    3. He’s minor-ish, SugarBear, minor-ish. Big difference.

    4. By sending in an average of $27?

    5. I’m also unsure of how a minor contributes to the delinquency of a minor.

      I have a feeling you are a veritable compendium of the ways a minor can contribute to the delinquency of a minor.

    6. “I’m also unsure of how a minor contributes to the delinquency of a minor.”
      It usually involves beer.

  14. Put your hands in the air
    And wave ’em like you’re just completely exasperated and powerless and can’t even

    1. This blogsite is not good for my mental health.

  15. these teenagers are morons obviously…if they had wanted to see each other naked, they should’ve just had sex. that at least would’ve been legal. of course, if they had, the guy might be looking at a rape charge right now instead. oh well, that will teach them to have “urges”.

    1. of course, if they had, the guy might be looking at a rape charge right now instead.

      Not statutory rape. They were a year apart, and “people younger than 17 can consent if they are within two years of age of their partner”.

      So they can fuck like rabbits, but they can’t send naughty pix to each other.

      1. Well yeah, what if the pix get out and circulate on the internet??? WHAT THEN?

        1. Step 3: Untold riches?

          1. Cultural Baudelairean ignominy!

            Thank God for our heroes, thanklessly fighting back against this encroaching inferno.

  16. given that sexting is overwhelmingly common among people of all ages.

    I must be hanging out traveling with the wrong crowd.

    1. I wish I could return to high school in this day and age.

      We didn’t have anything remotely close to this.

  17. the mother has more experience getting looks and such for being black than getting screwed by stupid laws, so obviously she jumps to the conclusion that it’s racist, rather than simply an overzealous intrusion of privacy by big brother. when will we learn that government doesn’t see color, it thinks we’re all less than.

  18. Lt. Davis bristled at the notion that race played any role in this case. “I have nothing to say about that. It doesn’t matter what your race, what your religion, what your ethnicity, don’t do child pornography! Plain and simple.”

    Where were you when Rotterham(-gate?) happened?

    1. In the Ark-La-Tex, not that shithole UK

    2. I don’t think anyone really believes the Rotherham rapists wouldn’t have been raping kids in China or Vietnam or Nigeria were they immigrants to those places. The race angle enters into play in the non-prosecution of the assailants and non-protection of the children due to fears by the authorities that they would be castigated as racists if they acted or that evil racist white people would initiate a pogrom if the allegations saw the light of day. The role of race in that scandal is that of anti-white racism.

      1. The race angle enters into play in the non-prosecution of the assailants and non-protection of the children due to fears by the authorities that they would be castigated as racists if they acted

        That’s the joke!

  19. RE: White Teen Girl Sends Nude Photos to Black Male. Police Arrest Him for Child Porn.
    Louisiana sexting case illustrates the absurdity of regulating teenagers’ sex lives.

    Of course he’s guilty.
    His phone received the message didn’t it?
    Everyone knows phones have a mind of their own.
    Hence Mr. Allen is guilty.
    It’s all very logical…if you’re an idiot.

    1. Lt. Davis, meet woodchipper.

    2. Probably nothing would’ve happened had he not sent 1 back of himself.

  20. Whew, I almost wasn’t sure if I should be outraged or not, but thankfully the headline was able to steer me in the right direction. Thanks Robby!

    1. Bae is like Moses.

    2. Yes, you stupid fuck, you should be outraged. You stupid fucking peckerwood moron. HE DUN FUCKED DAT DER WHAIT GURL HE GET WHUT HE DUSURV

      1. You’re so pathetic it’s almost funny. Almost. Go play in traffic.

  21. What I get from reading the internet, is that sending naked pictures of yourself electronically often leads to unpleasant results.

    1. Not necessarily unpleasant results, more instantly gratifying with potential long-term unintended consequences.

  22. We know that the criminal justice system discriminates against blacks.

    Do we know that?

      1. That fact that proportionately more blacks than whites are in jail does not equal discrimination if, in fact, proportionately more blacks than whites are committing crimes.

        1. But that can’t be a fact because it doesn’t feel good.

        2. Oh sure. There you go. Throwing simple math and logic at this complex problem.

          Common sense is supposed to be dead.

  23. my co-worker’s aunt makes $84 an hour on the computer . She has been fired from work for nine months but last month her pay was $19262 just working on the computer for a few hours. learn this here now

    ??? http://www.ReportMax90.com

  24. my co-worker’s aunt makes $84 an hour on the computer . She has been fired from work for nine months but last month her pay was $19262 just working on the computer for a few hours. learn this here now

    ??? http://www.ReportMax90.com

  25. All the publicity about sexting has only legitimized the prosecution of teens for it. It’s like, oh, I’ve heard of kids getting arrested for it, so it must be a problem. Like cops hear about cops shooting dogs and figure, that’s a thing now, must be SOP.

  26. Stupid kids act like stupid kids and end up with a mistake that’ll follow them around for the rest of their lives. What a shame.

  27. Just wait until they prosecute an LGBT couple/group under these sorts of laws! Then we’ll *finally* have us some equality.

    Just… wait…

    1. Interesting defense, in the meantime:

      “Your Honor, I did not send those dick pix to with the required prurient intent, because I identified as gay when I sent them to that girl. As a then-gay man, I had no interest in sticking it in her, and was not interested in making her want my manmeat in any way, shape or form.”

  28. I hate people who create these stupid fucking laws. May they all burn in hell.

    1. I blame Frances Willard, the original SJW.

      1. Damn, I thought that was a guy until I read down a little. Someone beat her with the ugly stick, no wonder she was mad.

        1. a dude would be “Francis”, wouldn’t it?

  29. The bias probably isn’t in race, it’s in gender. But, sadly, this won’t get any attention unless a race angle is played, so I can’t necessarily blame the mother for going that route.

    1. What bias? Should she have been busted first twice? Would that have worked for you?

      The girl was busted.

      First. As in before the boy.

      He’s just getting a harsher sentence because he’s older.

      Gender and race aren’t entering into this. The white girl was busted first.

  30. Why is reason implying that race played a role in the police decisions?

    1. It’s the cosmotarian way…FORWARD!

    2. They are not implying it, because race has nothing to do with it.
      This is all gender, it does not matter the race of the participants, no matter what only the male is ever charged. It could be a black chick and a white male in the most racist state ever, yet the guy would still be the one nailed with charges and the female let off scot free.

  31. the race element is pretty obvious. it derives from the fantasy of being raped by a nigger which adheres to many women in the country. Perhaps it’s not had much effect on the police themselves in this case, but most certainly it’s thick in the social atmosphere of the community and will certainly contribute to more trouble for the boy than he might otherwise get and possibly even the gal.

    1. It is obvious (except it isn’t). There are plenty of stories of kids of various ethnicities and racial backgrounds getting burned on this.

    2. it derives from the fantasy of being raped by a nigger which adheres to many women in the country.

      That’s an oddly specific theory. Is someone projecting?

      1. the fantasy of being raped by a nigger which adheres to many women in the country..

        Brah…

        1. I’m just saying. His username makes more sense now.

    3. interesting use of the word “adhere”. like they stick to them? Im confused.

  32. sexting is overwhelmingly common among people of all ages

    Really? I have never once done it nor has anyone I have ever known spoken of doing such.

    1. I think he meant, “common among all ages where people would still want to look at each others’ nakedness”.

      1. You’re cutting close to the bone there son. Be careful!

  33. “Local news stories note that she initiated the sexting, and he reciprocated.”

    So aparently when a chick decides to send you a pic of her snatch, you are arrested with CP charges. She has a pic of his 17 year old dick so where the fuck are her charges. While we’re on this here are her charges for producing and distributing?
    Literally everytime this bullfuckingshit happens, only the male is charged. Even when the female initiates it, only the male is charged. If this is not proof that misandry is institutional and normalized in society, idk what is.

    1. They were both charged. Your comment is derp. The real bullshit here is that actual sex would be fine, but nude pics/video are not.

    2. If you wan to see where this misandry is institutionalized and normalized, try divorce. Stick it to the man. Every time!

  34. Sorry for the apostrophes. *Hangs head in shame, commits sappuku.

    Sapporoku? Death by impaling on a large curvy beer can?

  35. I am making $89/hour working from home. I never thought that it was legitimate but my best friend is earning $10 thousand a month by working online, that was really surprising for me, she recommended me to try it. just try it out on the following website.

    ??? http://www.NetNote70.com

  36. I quit myy office job and now I am getting paid 56 Dollars hourly. How? I work-over internet! My old work was making me miserable, so I was to try-something different. 1 years after…I can say my life is changed completely for the better! Check it out what i do…UI2

    ========== http://www.reportmax90.com

  37. Laws in this country are getting ridiculous. A man in Hot Springs Arkansas robbed my Granddaughter’s bank the other day. He was caught and charged with crimes totaling life and 46 years in prison. My problem is he was carrying a hoax substance punishable with up to 6 years in prison. Now I personally could care less if they hung the SOB but these laws are getting out of hand. I could hand roll a cigarette and some cop could think it is a joint and some idiot prosecutor could charge me with carrying a hoax substance. I think we need a new law that states anyone studying law should get a mandatory 10 years in prison because they are probably corrupt by nature.

    1. Why is it that I can have sexual intercourse with a 16 year-old legally in most states, but if a 16 year-old sends me a nude photo of her (or him) I’m a felon?

  38. Before sexting it was called paying Doctor. It also led to a lot of unwanted pregnancis with sexting doesn’t.

    1. Uh, playing doctor in my day was confined to the very young and didn’t involve anything more than “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours”. It’s how little kids found out the anatomical differences between boys and girls.

      Once you got to puberty, it wasn’t playing doctor anymore.

      Damn, I’d like to be that young again.

  39. We know that the criminal justice system discriminates against blacks.

    No it’s doesn’t. Reason’s SJWs should be scribbling their garbage at Kos or some such.

  40. His true crime is being male.

  41. We’ve seen this same thing with white boys. Why is his race being made an issue?

  42. Don’t think cops anywhere go for these kinds of cases unless there is embedded SJW somewhere; doubt much of a race angle from them either (chances are there are black cops involved here…I mean Louisiana, right?). These cops are responding to the girl’s parents’ concerns, and there is probably a race-angle motivation in those quarters.

  43. til I looked at the check 4 $4775 , I did not believe …that…my mother in law actualy taking home money in there spare time on their apple labtop. . there uncle has been doing this for only about 16 months and just cleared the mortgage on there apartment and purchased opel .
    Check This Out??????? http://www.ny-reports.com

  44. How bizarre is it that having sexual intercourse with a 16 year-old is legal in most states, but receiving nude photos on a smart phone is a felony. The world’s gone crazy.

  45. Damn, I was feeling the race narrative until you guys quoted Shaun King. Thanks for ruining the fun, Reason.

  46. Start working at home with Google! It’s by-far the best job I’ve had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $7028 this – 6 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.
    +_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.social36.com

  47. Um, no. When the law gets involved in sex!anything, it’s usually the male, if any, that comes out worse.

    It’s not the race, mom; it’s the gender.

  48. If you want to control people, punish them. If you want to punish people, convict them. If you want to convict people, define non-criminal acts as criminal. Do whatever it takes.

  49. I’ve made $76,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student.I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money.It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it.

    Open This LinkFor More InFormation..

    ??????? http://www.selfcash10.com

  50. my roomate’s mother-in-law makes $70 /hr on the laptop . She has been out of a job for eight months but last month her check was $16850 just working on the laptop for a few hours. original site

    ? ? ? ? http://www.ReportMax90.com

  51. Knowing what I know and believing what I believe about the police state humans in America are living in, I *think* when he said “…the consequences of not only sexting but how it can lead in to child pornography.” he meant that _legally_ it’s a flag for police to go through with deep scrutiny into the guy’s texts (once they get a warrant, the warrant is for all the texts) and search for any young-looking girls. Though I agree with you, we are used to hearing police talk about “gateway drugs” and such nonsense, the thing is the cops are being trained _hard_ as to how to go for the jugular and pile on as many charges as possible. As far as the police are concerned, they work for the state, county or city prosecutor, not for the public.

  52. I’m making over $9k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do…. Go to tech tab for work detail..

    CLICK THIS LINK===== http://www.cashapp24.com/

  53. Most of us want to have good income but don’t know how to do thaat on Internet there are a lot of methods to earn money at home, so I thought to share with you a genuine and guaranteed method for free to earn huge sum of money at home anyone of you interested should visit the site. More than sure that you will get best result.OI3..

    ====== http://www.CashPost7.com

  54. til I saw the draft which was of $6881 , I didnt believe that my mother in law had been realy taking home money part-time on their laptop. . there best friend has done this 4 only twelve months and at present took care of the mortgage on there condo and got a top of the range Subaru Impreza . Learn More ….

    Click This Link inYour Browser….

    ?????? http://www.Reportmax20.com

  55. SEx is personal right for everyone. By the way if you need any beautiful bed partner, Then contact with Kenya Escort . I think they are the best for keeping you relax and tension free.

  56. http://nairobidivas.net is the #1 call girl site in Nairobi, Kenya.

  57. This is really bad. 1st its not the man’s fault and 2ndly its a which lady sending nudes to a black guy.

    https://www.nairobidivas.net for safari escorts, call girls in Nairobi & escorts in Nairobi.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.