Gender and Pay

Wage gap shrinks

|

In January, President Barack Obama announced rules requiring companies with over 100 employees to report data on their gender pay practices—part of a plan to equalize male and female pay. A new study for the National Bureau of Economic Research, conducted by two Cornell economists, delves into the latest data on, and provisional explanations for, such pay differentials.

It finds the measured gap has shrunk considerably: Female wages were roughly 64 percent of male wages in 1980, but that figure had grown to 82 percent by 2010. The gap narrowed more in lower wage percentiles than the top one, leading the authors to conclude that "developments in the labor market for executives and highly skilled workers especially favored men."

Because of the huge gains in higher education and work experience for women since 1980, the share of the wage gap that can be explained by men having more "human capital" had shrunk to 8 percent by 2010, compared to 27 percent in 1980. The particular occupation and industry choices women make (or are presented with) now explain half the existing gap.

Women are less willing to work very long hours, the authors find, which also plays a significant role. But parts of the gap remain unexplained by obvious factors like these, which "suggests, though it does not prove, that labor market discrimination continues to contribute to the gender wage gap." Since that unexplained gap is decreasing, that suggests, but doesn't prove, that such discrimination is decreasing as well.

NEXT: Victims of Communism Day

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. Just because 100% of the gap can’t be explained by the factors being examined, doesn’t mean the unexplained cause is institutional sexism.

  2. It would be helpful perhaps to also check out Harvard Economics Professor Claudia Goldin’s interview with the great Freakonomics site, where she notes that the gap is much smaller than the fallacious stats cited by the enthusiastic accusation machines writing for Salon et al (the alledged statistic in which women are making 79 cents per male dollar for the same work.) The vigorous identity politics of the Democratic Party understandaly endorses such fakery in order to attract women voters, but it is doubtful that even Obama himself fully believes the gap is 21 per cent!

  3. good Today open up the Showbox Apk record on your Computer. Kodi APK your video play-back from the ease and comfort of you couch. Kodi Download nice.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.