Royal College of Physicians: Vaping Can 'Prevent Almost All The Harm From Smoking'
The British medical group endorses e-cigarettes as a harm-reducing alternative to the conventional kind.

Last year British Public Health recognized the harm-reducing potential of e-cigarettes, and today the Royal College of Physicians followed suit. I summarize the 500-year-old medical society's conclusions in my latest Forbes column:
In 1962, two years before U.S. Surgeon General Luther Terry released his famous report on the health hazards of smoking, the Royal College of Physicians (RCP) covered the same subject in a report that went further than Terry's, linking cigarettes to cardiovascular disease as well as lung cancer and chronic bronchitis. Today the RCP issued another landmark report that should inspire imitation in the United States, endorsing e-cigarettes as a harm-reducing alternative to the combustible, tobacco-containing kind.
"Large-scale substitution of e-cigarettes, or other non-tobacco nicotine products, for tobacco smoking has the potential to prevent almost all the harm from smoking in society," the RCP says. "Promoting e-cigarettes…and other non-tobacco nicotine products as widely as possible, as a substitute for smoking, is therefore likely to generate significant health gains in the UK."
The same is true for the United States, where public health officials tend to view e-cigarettes with fear rather than hope. The RCP report carefully addresses the concerns raised by critics of vaping.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
*polite clapping*
I thought Forbes had relented on the anti-ad block crusade.
But chlorine in the water is causing cancer!
*something a coworker told me yesterday*
Take a piss in his swimming pool.
Oh, they just want to thin the herd of burdens on their national healthcare system by lulling Limey fag-smokers into a false sense of security. Then when everyone dies off from vaping and secondhand vapor, the NHS won't have to spend any money.
But vapers don't risk the cancer and respiratory illnesses tobacco users so richly deserve! They're evil-doers escaping the righteous punishments of karma. How the hell can I feel smug and superior to them if they don't get sick and die from doing things I don't approve of?
How the hell can I feel smug and superior
You could become a libertarian.
They engage in vice!!!
*self-fagellates back with leather whip whilst kneeling on broken pottery shards*
We do have to endure the "we get it Bro, you vape" stupid fucking memes.
I quit my office job and now I am getting paid 56 Dollars hourrly. How? I work-over internet! My old work was making me miserable, so I was to try-something different. 1 years after...I can say my life is changed completely for the better! Check it out what i do...LW4
========== http://www.Buzzmax7.com
In September my cousin tried Effer for the very first time.
Now his voice is horse. It's June.
As he shrinks, his voice may become a Shetland pony. Pray for him.
It's a sign of the times.
OK?? [is *too* "written in an English script"!]
"It's June."
I know there is a time change from USA to Japan, but that is ridiculous.
Pardon my ignorance, but what is 'Effer'.
I thought this was settled.
WHY ARE THE ROYALERS OF PHYSICIANISTS EXREMISTS??!
If the nannies say it's bad, IT'S BAD.
Yeah, but it still looks like smoking which only those icky poor people do. Let's ban it anyway or tax it to within an inch of its life.
BECAUSE SCIENCE!!!
Fucking Deniers.
We've got some summer camps for you.
My aunt is a smoker so I'm really trying to get her to switch to e-cigarettes since she has already had one type of cancer and could possibly have another.
Cool story.
*spasms*
BAN IT!
/sarc
Vapers should be fed feet first into woodchippers.
Why is that, exactly?
Head first position is reserved for smokers and federal judges.