"There is nothing immutable about the way the two parties currently line up"
The Economist documents the fractures within the Republican and Democratic Parties.
This Economist article is well worth reading. A snippet:
There is nothing immutable about the way the two parties currently line up. Republicans used to be the big-government progressive party, formed in opposition to slavery and pushing to remodel the South after the civil war; they have also been the small-government party, not only now, but in opposition to the New Deal in the 1930s. Democrats were once the small-government party, opposing those who wanted a more powerful federal government and defending the interests of white southerners against Washington; now they are famous as the big-government party, pushing federal anti-poverty programmes in the 20th century and government involvement in health care in the 21st.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"There is immutable about the way the two parties currently line up"
"As it has been since the dawn of the Republic, so shall it be until the final night falls."
Nick forgot a word in the title.
Well, yeah, but not an important one. What could be less important than nothing?
He accidentally the whole headline.
He a word.
Nothing is missing from the headline
"This headline absolutely as written"
There is just so much immutable. Lots of it. Tons really. When I'm president, immutable will be on everyone's dinner table. Everyone will be able to have immutable. It'll be great.
Truss
Up
Vtle
Whigs
I see a flaw in the excerpt even without reading the article. Republicans "have also been the small-government party, not only now, but in opposition to the New Deal in the 1930s."
There is no small-government party now. Not R, not D. The L is just a line somewhere down on the ballot next to the Greens and the Constitution Party. No one gets elected to government with the express intention of eliminating government.
Eliminating or reducing? Because, once again, Margaret Thatcher.
Yes, even today's bloated UK government is doing less than it was before Modern Day Attila in Drag showed up.
Margaret Thatcher, UK PM 1979-1990. Sorry, my "no one gets elected" statement was also modified by "now." Or at least I was thinking now. If we go 1932-1945, I know someone else who ran for election and subsequently completely eliminated his own government......
No, no! It is "You know who else ran for election and eliminated his own government?"
It's all relative. But no major party has been truly for small government in any absolute sense for a very long time.
Not just "small" government. "Smaller" government.
Indeed. When small decreases in the rate of growth are called "cuts" and "austerity", we're in trouble.
Canadians, New Zealanders, and, yes, even Americans have shrunk government.
It is always the same except when it is different.
A better explanation here
Sometimes the same is different, but mostly, it's the same.
These mysteries of life -- that just ain't my thing.
"I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat." - Will Rogers
No.
I read half-way but the Economist article is complete shite.
"the Economist article is complete"
That's redundant.
You know, we laugh at "more labels" but damn if they weren't helpful.
And re: alt-text, my interpretation is that no matter what is the "new wine" (Roosevelt's Progressive Politics, if I'm reading it right), "old bottles" are broken so it spills out anyway. And yes, it also references the 'old wine in new bottle' saying.
Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved
That still doesn't answer my question:
Where can I buy wine in five gallon bottles like that?
Good God man, that clearly predates Necessary and Reasonable Government Regulation. 5 gallon wine? Madness! I bet you also want a box of 500 cigars and a 6-pounder cannon to go with it!
a box of 500 cigars and a 6-pounder cannon
Oh, hell yeah.
Good thing this country is so much more free than it was back in the day, amirite?
The biggest you are going to find is 15.0 L Nebuchadnezzar bottle which is eauivalent to twenty standard 750 ml bottles.
Pikers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidelberg_Tun
That is not a glass bottle.
I wonder if you could go to a winery and have them fill a carboy for you? Or would you have to go all the way up to buying your own barrel?
Aw, Wikipedia. Where any idiot with a calculator is less likely to get reverted than someone who actually knows what they're talking about.
Alternately, I don't know who took the time to compute the volume of a giant vat to the nearest ten-thousandth of a gallon, but they should find a different hobby.
58,573.8125 gallons is a conversion from 221,726 litres.
Doesn't take much time and the ten-thousandths of a gallon come free when you do the conversion.
HEY BOK AND PAYNE, YOU PAYING ATTENTION HERE!
The Repubs being the party of small government is laughable. Smaller than the Dems want maybe but certainly not small. As far as I can tell, the Dems use the power and force of government to steal from people and give the gains to favored groups. The Reps do the same, they just give the gains to different groups. Deep down, there's little difference.
Nothing is missing from that sentence