If We Release More Prisoners, Will There Be More Crime?

This article originally appeared in print under the headline "If We Release More Prisoners, Will There Be More Crime?."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
When did the states begin releasing prisioners, in CA for example? The stats are from 2009-2014 but did all the states start releasing them in 2009?
This graphic looks like a whole lotta stupid from start to finish.
"the states that saw the largest reductions in prison populations"
- Might want to specify whether those reductions were from people released *because of the change in guidelines*, and not just, you know, because fewer people were committing crimes, fewer getting arrested, fewer getting found guilty.
- Did you notice that the US average (10 in program states plus 40 other states not in the program) showed a *greater* reduction in violent crime than the program being touted? Ooops.
- It's not the US average that is the relevant comparison statistic, but the average of the states not in the program, which must be even better than the -15.3 for the average as a whole.
- And then again, averaging percentages across states, instead of aggregating across states and taking a percentage, is probably a mistake.
- Also, even calculating as you indicate, how do you get a -13% average when all states except NY are below (more negative than) -13%?
Who knows? Maybe you did something sensible, but the failure to communicate something meaningful leaves me with little confidence that you calculated something meaningful.