Campus Crime Alerts Now Come with Trigger Warnings
Preventing offense is more important than promoting safety.


If the purpose of a campus crime alert is to warn students about a dangerous person or situation, and the purpose of a trigger warning is to deter students from consuming information that might bother them—well, aren't the two things in conflict?
And yet, the University of Iowa saw fit to add a trigger warning to a campus-wide email about a sexual deviant on the loose. Do administrators want to protect students' bodies or their feelings?
According to The Daily Iowan, a man was spotted trying to videotape a female student while she took a shower in a dormitory bathroom. A police officer fought the man, but he escaped. The university's public safety department then sent out an alert prefaced by the following disclaimer, according to The College Fix:
Trigger Warning: This warning addresses a report of sexual misconduct. Resources are available on and off campus to provide assistance. Contact RVAP for 24/7 support at (319) 335-6000 or at http://rvap.uiowa.edu/.
What followed was a description of the incident and instructions to students to contact the authorities if they had any information about the perpetrator. But if officials actually wanted students—victims of sexual misconduct, in particular—to be aware of the potential threat, they shouldn't have warned them not to read it. As The Tab's Matt McDonald wrote:
If there was a miscreant with an iPhone skulking around my campus trying to perve on unsuspecting freshmen, I'd want to know about it. I'd want to know my campus police force are working to keep me physically safe – not warning me off important information for fear of offending me.
If an email about an active investigation is important enough to send to a whole college, don't send it wrapped in cotton wool. If people need to know, tell them.
Quite right. Do administrators want safe spaces for their students, or do they want them to actually be safe?
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Who will warn the warners?
Indeed. These university students are, I am constantly told, the "leaders of tomorrow". How the bloody hell can they be leaders if they are so fragile they cannot be warned of danger?
It's like we've fallen into the bizarro world.
We need a reset - plague, alien invasion, meteor strike, anything.
Question: did the perp look like Anthony Edwards? What about Booger?
We have bush!
That sounds like a job for President Trump!
As an Iowan, I actually didn't realize UofI was this bad. Hopefully it is just the administration doing this showing their colleagues in other schools that they can be retarded too. I mean hell. The wrestling team got up on stage with trump a few weeks back and nobody cared..
Your "this weird trick kills Erectile Dysfunction" ad could use a trigger warning.
"Do administrators want safe spaces for their students, or do they want them to actually be safe?"
They want safe spaces for themselves. Protected from the SJW mob.
These kind of stories trigger my gag reflex.
If you still have one of those, then you haven't been here long enough.
If you do not have one of those, call me.
*dials Crusty; hopes he won't be like Warty*
Be prepared to go where no man has gone before.
*in Kevin Cosgrove's voice*
OH MY GOD! OHHHH!!!!!
I had to look up who that was, and then I laughed. You are terrible! Well done.
I'm vying for the worst today.
Huh. I was honestly expecting it to be a trigger warning because it included a racial description of the alleged perpetrator. Or have we already crossed that threshold where physical descriptions are verboten?
We haven't gone full Sweden yet.
Not quite, but we're almost there.
We are there at the University of Minnesota, where crime alerts no longer contain the (apparent) race of the (alleged) perpetrator because "African American" appeared too many times.
Well, we did see a german victim of rapefugees actually apologizing to other rapefugees that her report of the incident resulted in people saying nasty things about them.
All descriptions shall be verboten. Warning messages shall state: "Be on the lookout for an organism."
Fuck you. Rocks are people too.
Shit. Time for my reeducation.
"Be on the lookout."
FIFM
What about those with no eyes!
be on the lookout for a description!
Alt-text: "Trigger warning: cold water."
I missed the language where the students are "warned ... not to read it."
It seems that "t[r]igger warning" has evolved to become just the latest incarnation of "reader/viewer discretion advised"; just why we're supposed pretend boilerplate text is equivalent to shitting in the Pope's mouth, I couldn't tell you.
It's not quite pontifical defecation, but it's ridiculous nonetheless.
No doubt, but every time Soave posts one of his "Hey! Look at those ka-ray-zee college kids" posts, it unleashes a torrent of Jeremiads lamenting the impending death of Western civilization within the comments.
That's a good point. But it's so irresistible.
And also makes me alternately glad I got out of school when I did and sort of wish that I was there now so I could fuck with these people.
Maybe it was read by the other half of Jonny Scrum! You need to converse more with your other Jonny Scrum-half so you guys can get on the scrum page.
I'll admit it' I lol-ed.
I'm officially triggered.
Listen, if you are going to send out a trigger warning with a rapey term like "sexual misconduct", then you better put a trigger warning on the trigger warning.
"Trigger warnings" are to inform people of what follows so they can make an informed decision of whether to consume that information.
"Crime alerts" are to inform people of what has happened so they can make an informed decision for their own safety.
I don't see the conflict. A "crime alert" with a "trigger warning" is still a message that people can ignore or not (their choice) to make an informed choice on their own behavior. An extra line at the start (the "trigger warning" part) does nothing to make anyone less safe, and gives people that choose sufficient context to read or dismiss the rest.
Why is this a problem?
Dude, why didnt I ever think of that?
http://www.Anon-Net.tk
Videotape? Like 8mm?
Sounds like we have a pervert and a hipster on the loose.
Resources are available on and off campus to provide assistance.
Are people expected to know what sort of "resources" and "assistance" this vague phrase refers to?
The technology is so developed that we can watch videos, live streaming, TV serials and any of our missed programs within our mobiles and PCs. Showbox
All we need is a mobile or PC with a very good internet connection. There are many applications by which we can enjoy videos, our missed programs, live streaming etc.