Infrastructure

Is California Infrastructure About Taxes or Priorities?

Legislators and activists target governor's focus on bullet train and Delta tunnels

|

In his State of the State address last month, California Gov. Jerry Brown said he wants to pass new taxes to pay for the state's backlog of infrastructure maintenance: "Our overall state-deferred maintenance is staggering, estimated to total $77 billion… That means at some point, sooner rather than later, we have to bite the bullet and enact new fees and taxes for this purpose. Ideology and politics stand in the way, but… the roads must be fixed."

Brown's critics wonder why he won't "bite the bullet" and pull the plug on two controversial large-scale infrastructure projects that have an estimated tab that exceeds that $77 billion figure. If he believed the state's crumbling roads and bridges were such a priority, why doesn't he focus on that problem rather than on a $68-billion high-speed rail project and a $15-billion ($25 billion including related environmental projects) plan to drill tunnels under the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, they ask?

The projects might be useful but few call them essential. The bullet train to connect Los Angeles to San Francisco is unlikely to come close to the promised 2-hour-40-minute travel times given the latest plan would have trains share commuter tracks as they enter the crowded suburbs of both metropolitan areas. Backers have struggled to conform to the funding and cost promises made in the 2008 Proposition 1A  ballot measure authorizing initiation of the project, which has emboldened those who want another public vote.

The twin-tunnels project doesn't promise to necessarily bring more water to Southern farms and cities, but rather hopes to create a more reliable supply of water by protecting the endangered Delta smelt—and thereby reducing the need to occasionally shut down the pumps at Tracy to protect them. It's a more fundamental issue than the rail line, but tunnel foes have argued instead for a less-costly plan of shoring up the levees that currently hold back the Sacramento River water as it makes its way through the estuary to the water pumps.

A number of legislators are not only asking about the governor's infrastructure priorities, but proposing ways to redirect scarce resources from these big-ticket items toward the basics. Two prominent Republican officials, Sen. Bob Huff of Diamond Bar, the former minority leader, and Board of Equalization member George Runner of Lancaster, have proposed an initiative that would redirect most of the currently authorized bond proceeds from the rail project toward water storage. It seemed like a political poke in the eye of the governor, but it might get legs as Central Valley rail critics in particular get energized by the idea.

Two Democratic legislators representing Delta-area districts, Assemblywoman Susan Tallamantes Eggman of Stockton and Sen. Lois Wolk of Davis, have introduced legislation that would require California voters to approve in a statewide ballot initiative the tunnel plan. Currently, the governor says no vote of the people or Legislature is necessary to move forward on it.

An independent voter measure, by Stockton farmer Dino Cortopassi, is called the "No Blank Checks" initiative. Currently, California voters must approve any projects funded through general-obligation bonds, which is debt backed by taxpayer dollars. Cortopassi's initiative would also require a statewide public vote for $2-billion-plus government projects funded by revenue bonds. Such bonds are funded through tolls and fees. These typically are used for bridge and toll-road projects and – no surprise here – for the tunnel project Cortopassi opposes.

Cortopassi has been funding political messages about the state's budget situation in newspapers across the state  (including the Union-Tribune), so it seems likely he has the funds to champion his measure, which already has qualified for the November ballot. This will be a bigger problem for the tunnels than the Eggman/Wolk measure given the latter has little chance of getting through the Legislature and no chance of getting the governor's approval.

Recent polls give aid and comfort to opponents of the rail and tunnel projects. According to a poll late last year by the Stanford University-based Hoover Institution, 53 percent of likely state voters would support that Huff/Runner measure to redirect rail funding, while only 31 percent would oppose it. The tunnel project was a close call, with roughly a third of voters in support, opposition and undecided. The poll also found voters opposed by a two-to-one margin one possibility for raising transportation taxes—a tax on miles driven.

There's no doubt the governor has an uphill battle in funding his infrastructure priorities. Virtually every political interest group in California—business leaders, unions, Republicans, Democrats—agrees on the need for increased infrastructure spending. But the devil—or at least the ideology and politics—always is in the details. It's probably time for the governor to make a more persuasive case for his priorities.

NEXT: Bernie Sanders Promises to Reduce Prison Population, Misses the Simple Solution of Not Messing With People

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. The government prioritizes funding to cause the most pain to get voters to approve more revenue. Look at the usual school and transportation funding battles. There is never any other place to cut.

    1. It is strange how the first thing on the chopping block is always emergency services, but there’s no way one of the dozens of “paraeducators” could ever be lived without.

      1. It doesn’t have to be critical services. All they have to do is shutdown popular services. Close an unstaffed park, cut back the frequency of trash pickup, stop running school busses, … When people complain the government demands more revenue to resume the services.

  2. How about this:

    Every citizen who had a net tax payment in the previous year is regarded as a government shareholder. Every budget proposal must be approved on a line-item basis by the government shareholders. Any line must get at least 2/3rds of all eligable shareholders voting positively on it to be funded. A non-returned vote is counted as a vote against all lines.

    Any given shareholder can complain that any given line is ‘too vague’ and if at least 10% do so, that line cannot be funded, regardless of the outcome of the vote on it, but may be resubmitted when it is made clearer what those funds are supposed to be used for, provided it hadn’t recieved too many ‘no’ votes.

    That way, the decision about how monies are spent is made by those whose money it is.

    1. Your proposal makes about as much sense as the chess played on Star Trek.

      I like it.

      1. You know that the Federation was a socialist government?

        1. It is also one of the most cheerily spun dystopias in science fiction. It is a culturally stagnant quagmire filled with people hiding behind a mask of false happiness pretending that common humanity such a grief does not exist and common sense gets berated out of people to make room for technical hyper-specialization.

          1. And it’s completely possible that all but Bones has died too many times to be counted.

        2. Because it is sustained by a magical source of limitless energy.

    2. Hey, UCS, not too bad! You should submit that to Obama, who’s alway open to good ideas.

    3. Easy proposal to kill. “You racist, sexist asshole! You just completely disenfranchised huge groups of those struggling to get by, which disproportionately affects blacks, young people and single mothers!”

      How about this: we include all citizens, not just taxpayers, we keep the “abstain = no” convention, and then we count on non-taxpayers to be nonparticipatory in the complicated budgeting process, and thus inadvertently vote for spending cuts.

    4. UnCivilServant|2.12.16 @ 7:55AM|#
      “How about this:

      Every citizen who had a net tax payment in the previous year is regarded as a government shareholder. Every budget proposal must be approved on a line-item basis by the government shareholders. Any line must get at least 2/3rds of all eligable shareholders voting positively on it to be funded. A non-returned vote is counted as a vote against all lines.”

      Alternatively, no representation without taxation.

  3. I’m not the type to rag on people about the way they talk, but 4 to 8 years of Bernie’s accent would be tough.

    1. As opposed to 4 to 8 years of Hillary’s head bobbing and cackling?

  4. Damn this AUSTERITY!
    When will the Republicans end their cruel hegemony over California and its finances?

  5. Up to I looked at the draft which was of $7319 , I be certain …that…my neighbour was like they say realie receiving money part time at there labtop. . there moms best frend started doing this less than and just paid the mortgage on their apartment and bought a gorgeous Lexus LS400 . site here……..

    Click This Link inYour Browser….

    ???? ? ? ? http://www.Wage90.com

  6. instead of raising taxes they could use the gas tax as its supposed to be used, fix roads, instead of being used in the general fund.

    1. Why? Your proposal makes too much sense!!

  7. just before I looked at the bank draft 4 $4970 , I accept …that…my father in law was like they say actualie making money in there spare time from their laptop. . there great aunt had bean doing this for less than thirteen months and at present paid the mortgage on there condo and purchased a brand new Volkswagen Golf GTI . check out here….

    Clik this link in Your Browser
    ????? http://www.Wage90.com

  8. cash right now… Get more time with your family by doing j0bs that only require for you to have a computer and an internet access and you can have that at your home. Start bringing up to $6694 a month. I’ve started this j0b and I’ve never been happier and now I am sharing it with you, so you can try it too……

    http://www.alpha-careers.com

  9. til I looked at the draft which had said $8465 , I accept that my friends brother was like trully making money in their spare time on their apple labtop. . there aunt haz done this less than 1 year and recently cleard the loans on there house and bought a gorgeous Saab 99 Turbo . view ….

    Clik this link in Your Browser
    ????? http://www.Wage90.com

  10. Neither. It’s about crony capitalism and rent seeking.

  11. The technology is so developed that we can watch videos, live streaming, TV serials and any of our missed programs within our mobiles and PCs. Showbox
    All we need is a mobile or PC with a very good internet connection. There are many applications by which we can enjoy videos, our missed programs, live streaming etc.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.