Every year a conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation, issues its Index of Economic Freedom, in which it ranks countries based on how well they respect property rights, levels of government spending, regulatory efficiency, and trade freedom. In the latest report the U.S. falls into the category of "mostly free." The Heritage Foundation researchers note in the supplement on Economic Freedom in the United States:
Global economic freedom has reached record levels, but America is moving in the opposite direction. With losses of economic freedom in eight of the past nine years, the U.S. in 2016 has tied its worst score ever in the Index of Economic Freedom, wiping out a decade of progress that had seen the U.S. rise as high as fourth place in the annual rankings for 2007.
In 2016, U.S. ratings for labor freedom, business freedom, and fiscal free- dom have flagged notably, and the regulatory burden is increasingly costly. Worse, government favoritism toward entrenched interests has hurt innova- tion and contributed to a lackluster recovery and sub-par income growth.
Heritage
As a result, the United States is only the 11th freest economy in the 2016 Index, trailing comparable advanced economies such as Australia, Switzerland, New Zealand, Canada, and even the United Kingdom. The U.S. remains mired in the ranks of the "mostly free," the second-tier economic freedom status into which it dropped in 2010.
Heritage
The U.S. is the only country to have recorded such a sustained loss of eco- nomic freedom in recent years, and the causes of the decline are clear. The overall U.S. score decline over the past decade is 5.8 points on the Index's 100- point scale.
Substantial expansion in the size and scope of government under the Obama Administration, including through new and costly regulations in areas like finance, health care, and the environment, has hit wide swaths of the econ- omy, affecting almost every American in some way and reducing opportunities for non-governmental production and investment. The growth of government has been accompanied by increasing cronyism that has undermined the rule of law and perceptions of fairness.
Here's hoping (faintly) that Election 2016 might improve the scores in the future.
Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com
posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary
period.
Subscribe
here to preserve your ability to comment. Your
Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the
digital
edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do
not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments
do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and
ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
"The Darien Scheme was an unsuccessful attempt by the Kingdom of Scotland to become a world trading nation by establishing a colony called "Caledonia" on the Isthmus of Panama on the Gulf of Dari?n in the late 1690s. The aim was for the colony to have an overland route that connected the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. From the beginning the undertaking was beset by poor planning and provisioning, divided leadership, lack of demand for trade goods, devastating epidemics of disease, and failure to anticipate the Spanish Empire's military response. It was finally abandoned in March 1700 after a siege by Spanish forces, which also blockaded the harbour.[1]
As the Darien company was backed by 25?50% of all the money circulating in Scotland, its failure left the entire Lowlands almost completely ruined and was an important factor in weakening their resistance to the Act of Union (completed in 1707). The land where the Darien colony was built is virtually uninhabited today."
The organizers of Caledonia had planned to rely on trade with local Indians to keep their colony supplied. To that end, they packed their ships with something that they thought the natives of tropical Panama would be sure to love: thick woolen stockings.
"Global economic freedom has reached record levels, but America is moving in the opposite direction."
I'm willing to bet the entire western world, except for a few holdouts, is going in the wrong direction and most of the gains come from dictatorships ending in the third world. Africa's gotten much freer in the last 10 years even though most of those countries are still towards the bottom of the rankings.
If Australia weren't so shitty on guns, I'd love to move there. Maybe we should move to Australia en masse and try to get Leyonhjelm elected PM! Who's with me?
"The U.S. is the only country to have recorded such a sustained loss of eco- nomic freedom in recent years, and the causes of the decline are clear. "
Uhhh, I'll take the Obama administration for 500, Alex!!
"Substantial expansion in the size and scope of government under the Obama Administration....has hit wide swaths of the economy.....reducing opportunities for non-governmental production and investment. The growth of government has been accompanied by increasing cronyism that has undermined the rule of law and perceptions of fairness."
No, you don't get it-- Bernie's for the people and stuff! It will be different this time. Duuuuhhh. Where's my handout?!!!!
USA! USA! USA!
A single tear falls from a bald eagle's cheek.
ROCK, FLAG, AND EAGLE
Rocks crushes eagle?
econ- omy?
innova- tion?
free- dom?
What secret country are you from, Mr. Bailey?
One of those commie countries no doubt.
Apparently, he is from some country that doesn't talk about Donald Trump. What a weirdo.
CERTAIN- LY not a coun- try whose inhab- itants want to kill all hu- mans.
"Hey baby, wanna...kill all humans?"
Yes, but how do we rank on the more important Mercantilism Scale? I bet our rating has climbed steadily!
As soon as we set up a few more puppet regimes it will all be good.
Look here, Victorian England conquered the world using that philosophy, so shut the fuck up and make with the state-chartered export companies.
Let's do our best to avoid the Scottish experience with state-chartered companies.
"The Darien Scheme was an unsuccessful attempt by the Kingdom of Scotland to become a world trading nation by establishing a colony called "Caledonia" on the Isthmus of Panama on the Gulf of Dari?n in the late 1690s. The aim was for the colony to have an overland route that connected the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. From the beginning the undertaking was beset by poor planning and provisioning, divided leadership, lack of demand for trade goods, devastating epidemics of disease, and failure to anticipate the Spanish Empire's military response. It was finally abandoned in March 1700 after a siege by Spanish forces, which also blockaded the harbour.[1]
As the Darien company was backed by 25?50% of all the money circulating in Scotland, its failure left the entire Lowlands almost completely ruined and was an important factor in weakening their resistance to the Act of Union (completed in 1707). The land where the Darien colony was built is virtually uninhabited today."
Fucking Scotsmen!
That's my ancestors you're dissing there, homey.
But yeah, they fucked up bad.
You're all just some variant of Mick, right? What's the fuss?
Fuck you, Epi. I'm also Welsh and Scottish. Basically anyone who's had limey boots on their necks for the last 400 years is in some way related to me.
I'm also Welsh and Scottish.
Dude, I said "just some variant of Mick". That covers all that.
I'm also Welsh and Scottish.
So you can't dig up enough coal for your family to eat because you're too drunk?
The organizers of Caledonia had planned to rely on trade with local Indians to keep their colony supplied. To that end, they packed their ships with something that they thought the natives of tropical Panama would be sure to love: thick woolen stockings.
No, no, JJ. The most important scale is the Banana Republic/Cronyism scale.
See the Hillary article next.
Don't worry, Trump is gonna make Murika great again.
"Global economic freedom has reached record levels, but America is moving in the opposite direction."
I'm willing to bet the entire western world, except for a few holdouts, is going in the wrong direction and most of the gains come from dictatorships ending in the third world. Africa's gotten much freer in the last 10 years even though most of those countries are still towards the bottom of the rankings.
We're number 1 1.
/derp
We won't truly be free until we have comprehensive climate change legislation and single payer health insurance.
Hilariously, UK, which has both, is one spot ahead of US, so you may be onto something!
Anyone notice that Socialist Utopia Denmark is right behind the US at #12?
I don't know why Bernie's trying to turn us into Denmark! We're already there!
If Australia weren't so shitty on guns, I'd love to move there. Maybe we should move to Australia en masse and try to get Leyonhjelm elected PM! Who's with me?
I'd gladly move to the land of Yvonne Strahovski.
So...LA?
I'm partial to Adelaide Clemens.
That's it. I'm moving to Canada.
Re the title: Duh
"The U.S. is the only country to have recorded such a sustained loss of eco- nomic freedom in recent years, and the causes of the decline are clear. "
Uhhh, I'll take the Obama administration for 500, Alex!!
"Substantial expansion in the size and scope of government under the Obama Administration....has hit wide swaths of the economy.....reducing opportunities for non-governmental production and investment. The growth of government has been accompanied by increasing cronyism that has undermined the rule of law and perceptions of fairness."
No, you don't get it-- Bernie's for the people and stuff! It will be different this time. Duuuuhhh. Where's my handout?!!!!