Movie Review: The Revenant
Leonardo DiCaprio and Tom Hardy in a brutal tale of survival and revenge.


Leonardo DiCaprio is an icon of human endurance in The Revenant, Alejandro G. Iñárritu's harrowing, two and a half hour survival epic. But the movie's true star is cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki, who captures the movie's vast frozen landscapes and blood-drenched battles with spectacular artistry. Lubezki has already won two Oscars—for Gravity (2013) and Iñárritu's Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (2014)—and he seems certain to be nominated once again for his work here. Without it, this grim picture might have proved an insurmountable challenge to the endurance of its audience.
The story is loosely drawn from a 2002 novel by Michael Punke, which recounts the semi-legendary tale of Hugh Glass, a 19th Century hunter with the Rocky Mountain Fur Company. On an 1823 expedition along the snowy northern reaches of the Missouri River, Glass was grievously mauled by a grizzly bear and left for dead by his fellow hunters. But he lived—a revenant returned from the valley of death—and with no weapons and little food or clothing, he limped, crawled and occasionally rode a horse some 200 miles back to the company's trading outpost to confront the men who abandoned him.
Iñárritu launches the movie with a furious attack on the hunting party by local Indians, who are understandably inflamed by this latest incursion into their homeland by rapacious white interlopers. One moment the hunters are skinning the pelts off the animals they've felled; the next, the sky is filled with flights of arrows. Lubezki's camera wades deep into the gory action (there's an arrow-to-the-head closeup that's really startling), and after nearly three dozen of the hunters have been slaughtered, it follows the survivors as they make their escape – barely -- on a primitive river boat.
Among this group are Glass (DiCaprio), his half-Pawnee son Hawk (Forrest Goodluck), good-hearted expedition leader Captain Henry (Domhnall Gleeson), and a black-hearted hunter named Fitzgerald (Tom Hardy). Returning to shore, they make their way up muddy hills and through bone-chilling waters on their long journey back to the company headquarters. Then the grizzly appears, igniting a scene of hair-raising brutality.
This huge bear is presumably computer-generated—but it's CGI at a breathtaking new level of detail. Glass, with flintlock rifle in hand, is stalking through the woods on his own; the bear, protecting its cubs, charges. It seizes the lone hunter in its jaws and whips him about like a rag doll (Lubezki moves in so close to this creature that its breath—well, "breath"—fogs his lens). The bear's enormous claws rake Glass's flesh, leaving him with exposed bones on his back and a hole in his throat. When the other hunters find him, Captain Henry has Glass strapped to a sledge to be taken along on the trip back home. Very soon, though, Henry realizes that Glass is on the brink of death. Determined to move on, he has three of the men—Fitzgerald and Hawk and a timid young hunter named Bridger (Will Poulter)—remain behind with the dying man in order to bury him when he expires. This leads to a new spasm of horror, precipitated by Fitzgerald, and soon Glass is left alone in the wilderness.
The rest of the movie focuses largely on Glass's trials and survival stratagems, with DiCaprio going all in on a quest for maximum verismo. We see the actor sucking marrow from animal bones, biting into a live fish, eating an actual raw buffalo liver. Desperate for warmth, he guts a horse and crawls inside its bloody carcass. He cauterizes the wound in his throat in an alarming way, and is forced to deal with further threats by hostile Indians and a band of wily French fur traders. He also meets a sympathetic Indian who helps tend his wounds, but then he gets chased off a cliff. When he finally makes it back to the company outpost, his pursuit of the scummy Fitzgerald begins.
The director's Herzogian determination to film almost entirely in arduous locations, using only natural light, resulted in a seven-month shoot (including a relocation to Argentina when the weather in Canada, where filming began, proved insufficiently miserable). One can only imagine the hardships the actors endured. DiCaprio, his beard stiff with ice, maintains a formidable commitment to his character—although his Glass is so preoccupied with surviving that there's no room for character development. And Hardy—nearly unrecognizable with a scruffy beard and a half-scalped head—is equally magnetic: his Fitzgerald is a disturbing emblem of mumbly malevolence.
Iñárritu mostly suppresses his inclination for arty surrealism (although one shot of a woman hovering in midair cries out to be cut). He has made a movie that's both savage and beautiful, and, for better and possibly worse, unlike any other. You'll probably be glad you saw it, but may feel no immediate need to see it again.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The film is less than the sum of its parts and I wanted to admire it more than I did. The bear attack was nightmare-inducing stuff, but the rest was weirdly lifeless and felt like it was cribbed from a thousand other movies that I've seen over the years and then forgotten about. That's may be because Tom Hardy chomped the scenery and was written exactly like you'd expect a calcuatedly multi-faceted villain to be written (see his "God is a squirrel" speech and the by-now-rote racism you can expect in Hollywood villains), but I also never felt much tension about Glass's fate. And for all its gore, the final confrontation was eye-rolling moral melodrama.
It was more an exercise put to film than anything else, and not in the same zip code as Birdman.
My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..
Clik This Link inYour Browser....
? ? ? ? http://www.workpost30.com
My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..
Clik This Link inYour Browser....
? ? ? ? http://www.workpost30.com
"Man In The Wilderness". 1971. Richard Harris. John Huston.
Good flick.
Hollywood seems to have run out of original ideas for movies, nowadays.
I knew I'd already seen this movie years ago.
re: The CGI grizzly
The (most recent?) Exorcist sequel had a horrific CGI hyena attack on a little boy that came out of nowhere. It was the first instance of brutal and convincing CGI that I've seen in film.
It was so disturbing to the local critics, who pretty much called for censorship of the dopey film.
Birdman was good but I??rritu is a 12 Step apologist. The agenda here is to 'show' that white men are no better than the natives. Survival of the fittest, all gods are created equal, etc.
I thought it was already accepted beyond any argument that natives of any kind of better than "the white man". (Just don't think about what those "natives" did to the "natives" before them.)
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.buzznews99.com
My first job out of High School was at St Paul and over the next 5 years Iearned so very much. Seeing the hospital torn down tears a small piece of my heart out. The Daughters of Charity and the doctors and staff of St Paul Hospital will always be with me.
???????????www.HomeSalary10.com
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+ http://www.buzznews99.com
Yeah, but how much will your spam-bot ninja skills or your new BMW do for you when you're attacked by a bear out in the wilderness?
My guess is you'd try offering a payment check to the bear right before he guts you.
Well, that all sounds terrific, but how hot was Tom Hardy?
"... incursion into their homeland by rapacious white interlopers."
Meaning they'd have been just dandy with an incursion of rapacious red interlopers?
Damn racists.
My first job out of High School was at St Paul and over the next 5 years Iearned so very much. Seeing the hospital torn down tears a small piece of my heart out. The Daughters of Charity and the doctors and staff of St Paul Hospital will always be with me.
???????????http://www.HomeSalary10.com
Start working at home with Google! It's by-far the best job I've had. Last Wednesday I got a brand new BMW since getting a check for $6474 this - 4 weeks past. I began this 8-months ago and immediately was bringing home at least $77 per hour. I work through this link, go to tech tab for work detail.
? ? ? ? http://www.WorkPost30.com