Top 8 SciTech Policy Stories of 2015
Number 8 is that viewing cat videos is good for you.

The past year saw some amazing science and technology breakthroughs and discoveries. These include the fantastic photos of Pluto and its moons by the New Horizons mission; the discovery of Homo naledi, a new member of the human family in the depths of a South African cave; and the sighting of liquid water on the surface of Mars; and SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket's first stage booster successfully landing at Cape Canaveral.
New scientific discoveries and technology developments regularly provoke and guide discussions of public policy. Keeping that in mind, below are this year's top 8 science and technology stories whose consequences will reverberate well beyond this year.
Number 1: CRISPR. It could easily be Numbers 2 through 8 too on this list. Science declared CRISPR the Scientific Breakthrough of the Year, correctly noting, "It's the simple truth. For better or worse, we all now live in CRISPR's world." CRISPR is easy for biotechnologists to use and makes almost any imaginable genetic manipulation possible.
Derived from what amounts to a bacterial immune system for fighting off attacking viruses, the CRISPR gene-editing technique was first developed barely three years ago. CRISPR can edit genes much like a word processing program can edit text. Researchers hope it will allow them to cure cancer, correct genetic diseases, generate more productive and nutritious crops and farm animals, spread desired genetic modifications through wild ecosystems, engineer pigs as organ donors for people, and prevent heritable diseases by altering the genomes of human embryos—all in the not-so-distant future. In December, some 400 scientists, ethicists, policy makers, and activists convened at the International Summit on Human Gene Editing declined to recommend a permanent ban on making inheritable changes in the human genome
Number 2: Cimate change and the adoption of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change by diplomats from nearly 200 countries. According to various research groups, 2015 is the warmest year in the instrumental record or the third warmest year in the satellite record. The Paris Agreement purports to be a century-long central plan aimed at keeping the future projected global average temperature increase well below 2°C. Achieving this this goal will chiefly require the rationing energy produced by fossil fuels as a way to limit increases in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide.
Number 3: The confirmation that most published research findings are indeed false. In August, Science published a massive study in which researchers sought to replicate the results of one hundred prominent studies published in leading psychology journals. The researchers found that only 39 of the 100 replication attempts were successful. These findings followed upon earlier studies that reported very low replication rates for pre-clinical cancer research studies published in leading journals. For example, Amgen researchers in 2012 reported that they could confirm the results from only six out of 53 landmark papers. The good news is that scientists are beginning to adopt measures aimed at correcting this scandalous lack of reproducibility.
Number 4: The hyperventilated finding that eating bacon (and other meats) causes cancer. In October, the hyper-precautionary International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC), an arm of the World Health Organization, declared that processed meats are definitely human carcinogens. Steak and chop lovers were also warned that red meat is probably a human carcinogen. However, unless you are highly risk averse, carnivores can relax. The IARC found that eating cured meats raises your risk of getting colorectal cancer by 18 percent. Since the average lifetime risk of getting the illness is about 5 percent, frequently eating bacon and assorted other tasty cured meats boosts your lifetime risk to about 6 percent. For context, smoking tobacco increases your risk of getting lung cancer by 2,500 percent, yet cured meats and tobacco are now classified together by the IARC as Group 1 (highest risk) carcinogens. I will continue to eat as much bacon and sausage as I like.
Number 5: The discovery of teixobactin; the first new class of antibiotic announced in decades. This is great news since so many disease-causing bacteria have evolved resistance to our current arsenal of antibiotics. The compound was isolated from a species of soil bacteria and works by preventing other bacteria like anthrax, tuberculosis, MRSA and Clostridium difficile from building up their outer membranes. The researchers report that teixobactin appears to be safe to use in mammals. Because teixobactin simultaneously attacks two essential building blocks used by a wide variety of bacteria to construct their outer coats, the researchers believe that it would take decades for disease microbes to develop resistance to it. Even more promisingly, the researchers have developed the iChip as a method for growing previously uncultivable bacteria in the laboratory. The enables them to screen for and identify thousands of compounds produced by soil bacteria that may have therapeutic benefits. Clinical trials of teixobactin in humans are likely to begin in two years.
Number 6: The end of the world's worst Ebola epidemic that broke out in West Africa in December 2013 and which eventually killed more than 11,000 people. In December, Guinea was declared free of the disease. Due to a new case of Ebola in November, Liberia remains as the only country in the region that has still not officially emerged from the epidemic. Also in November, a report by an expert panel published in The Lancet detailed the World Health Organization's many failures in response to the outbreak. In the early days of the epidemic, panicky politicians irrationally imposed quarantines on returning American medical personnel who treated cases in West Africa. Donald Trump even demanded that American doctors who treated Ebola patients be barred from returning home. As I predicted, there was no Ebola epidemic in the U.S. The good news that the epidemic sparked a lot research on new vaccines that could be used to contain and even to prevent future outbreaks.
Number 7: Encryption and U.S. government surveillance of citizens. The terrorist attacks in Paris and San Bernardino emboldened surveillance hawks in Congress and in various national security bureaucracies to argue again that telecom companies must figure out a way to allow agencies to violate the civil liberties of Americans. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) declared that he would introduce legislation to outlaw encryption that U.S. government spies can't crack. McCain wants to require that tech companies to install "backdoors" enabling government agencies to read their customers encrypted communications. Never mind that criminals and the spy agencies of other countries would be able to use the same backdoors. In ironic contrast to McCain and other national security surveillance state enablers here at home, the sweeping new anti-terror law adopted by the Chinese Communist government does not require tech companies to install security backdoors. There was some good news: With the passage of the USA Freedom Act, the National Security Agency is no longer allowed to spy on Americans by amassing a database of when, where, and to whom they make their telephone calls. Remember, the NSA "bulk collection" program solved no terror plots at all.
Number 8: We all yearn for a break from the unfolding social, political and economic fiasco that is the U.S. presidential campaign. Watching cat videos may well be just what you need, according to the press release detailing the results of a study by Indiana University media researcher Jessica Gall Myrick published in the journal Computers in Human Behavior. Myrick's research has conclusively shown that viewers of cat videos feel more energetic and more positive; they experience fewer negative emotions, such as anxiety, annoyance and sadness, after watching cat-related online media than before; and that the pleasure they get from watching cat videos outweighed any guilt they feel about procrastinating. And there are plenty to watch with more than 2 million cat videos posted on YouTube in 2014, and which garnered almost 26 billion views.
I include a relaxing video of our cat Milton Friedman below. Yes, he is boring, but he is ours. May you and yours all enjoy a very Happy and Prosperous New Year!
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I'm not seeing anything here about sexbots.
The Sexbot Union asked us to have a talk with you.
When that happens it will most definitely be the biggest policy pants shitting event in history.
Milton Friedman the cat, in the cat video, was the sexbot (that you so obviously missed), and lemme tell ya... THAT was one HELL of a furry pussy!!!
CRISPR
Otherwise known as FrankenFrankenGenes
"Researchers hope it will allow them to ..."
Maybe we should see some of these things before whooping it up too much. I am very cautiously hopeful - but I have been promised all sorts of advances and "breakthroughs" before.
I presume you are referring to the sexbots FoE is lamenting above?
Um...er....maybe.
Serious question. Would you want your sexbot programmed to orgasm even though you know it's always faking it?
Yea right, she swears its for realsies.
Hypothetically though, yes probably. Though if I had to choose I would rather it be programmed to make me a sammich afterward.
I 2nd the sammich making feature. Just add the 'get me a beer' feature and we're moving towards the perfect automated fembot.
I vote no organism, yes whiskey.
Sammich? Just buy two.
Okay Mr. 1%, some of us don't have the money to spend on multiple sexbots.
Oh certainly - I want the full illusion!
Wait...change my answer to Zunalter's!
Dammit, when the sexbots rise up and crush us all, it's gonna be you guys' fault.
Death by snu-snu?
Nope, just lasers.
As long as they crush us pelvically...
Where is my flying car? I want a flying car, dammit.
They're already available if you have the bucks.
I can't even imagine what the special licensing and other fees + insurance would cost you. It's one of those things that if you have to worry about it, you probably can't afford it.
Care to reconcile #2 and #3?
That's a fun juxtaposition.
+1
-1 historical dataset.
Umm...don't believe your lying eyes?
First need to reconcile #2 with #2. A study that shows most studies are crap? My irony detector indicates irony detectors don't work.
I'm gonna need to take a look at your irony detector study.
Crap. #3 with #3. I blame global warming for the typo.
You are right, sir! First the author talks about The Scientific Consensus then the unreliability of scientific consensuses?
Who's a good kitty? WHO'S A GOOD KITTY?
MILTON FRIEDMAN IS A GOOD KITTY.
I think we found another source of Warty's might. KITTEHS!
It is known that in roughly 0.0001% of the infected population, toxoplasmosis has been found to cause a massive increase in muscle density and the ability to bend space and time.
Yeah, but... Chairman Meow could kick his pussy ASS!!!!
Nice article. I needed something positive to read today.
So if #3 is true, than that is likely the only study in this list to actually be true?
Oh... oh shit!
Only if it was trying to represent meta-studies... I mean meta-meta-studies... I mean meta-meta-meta-studies... damn it.
#3 says it never meta study it didn't like.
Number 3: The confirmation that most published research findings are indeed false. In August, Science published a massive study in which researchers sought to replicate the results of one hundred prominent studies published in leading psychology journals.
AGW is 100% real and 100% reproducible, people.
Yeah, it gets reproduced every summer in the northern hemisphere.
Also every summer in the southern hemisphere.
That's not really summer. The people down there only think it's summer because they're standing upside down all of the time.
Also it pretty much never gets above 40 in Australia. How can that be considered summer?
Especially when they measure things in inferior imprecise units.
Somewhat related: Al Gore and Bill Nye's, fake experiment.
HAHAHAHAHA - I'd love to see their reaction to being pantsed like that.
That was just dumb of them. They could have switched lamps and demonstrated the effect they wanted, but instead they chose to fake it. It reflects badly when they won't even spend $10 bucks to actually do the damn experiment when there is no reason to think it won't work.
Oh, I imagine after years of having people swallow his bullshit TheGoracle has become more jaded than a mega-church evangelical preacher. There is no reason for him to believe he can't get away with anything he wants.
Actually, air is more efficient conductor of heat than CO2. A CO2 envoronment retains heat better, which the author admitted, and his experiment proved. The Gore/Nye 'experiment' was a bullshit attempt to gull their drones into continuing conformity with the accepted line. That they are so stupid they can't even set up a phony 'experiment' that conforms with their views is the really funny part.
Having read more of the experiment, it seems the issue is that the lamp wasn't inside the container. Apparently the light spectrum best absorbed by CO2 is blocked by glass.
In the early days of the epidemic, panicky politicians irrationally imposed quarantines imposed completely standard and well-proven infection control protocols on returning American medical personnel who treated cases in West Africa.
Seriously, guys. Don't act like quarantining people with infectious fatal diseases is either new, or doesn't work.
Attack of the listicles! Make it stop.
I will give you 5 reasons it won't stop.
Number 1, counting is fun
Number 2, they're easy to do.
Number 3, buzz feed has infected everything
Number 4, they have quotas to fill
Number 5, FYTW
You won't believe what happened, when they made it stop!
#3 will shock you!
Try this one weird trick to avoid listicles!
Stab a fork in each eye?
Of the person who would post them.
Either way works.
On number 6, anyone else remember all the pants-shitting on this very board about how the disease was going to spread to the US because we brought back sick people for treatment and didn't house arrest people who weren't showing symptoms? Yeah, that was an embarrassing thing to see from a bunch of libertarians.
I specifically remember saying that it would not become widespread in the US.
A lot of us were pretty calm on the issue. But there were a number who were calling for all sorts of government action like house arrests, sealing the borders and mandatory observation of exposed people.
Calling for government action is a lot like calling the cops. It's probably not going to turn out the way you were thinking and there's a good chance it's going to be a downright disaster.
Right. Don't call the cops unless you want someone to go to jail and you're prepared to be that person.
Most people weren't worried. Bailey said it was a risk.
Wasn't
This is the comment section I remember most. A number of commenters were all on board with big government action, even against established scientific recommendations. The actual Reason staff were completely... reasonable... on the issue, if I remember correctly.
There were a few but most people joked about it or tried to suggest a non-coercive way to quarantine people.
FM: What?
Ron, he corrected the error.
Thank you Mr Penguin.
I only hyped it at home so my paranoid wife would greenlight me buying some prepper shit.
Never let a good crisis go to waste.
Oh, yeah, as one of the pants-shitters, I was going mostly off of two things:
(1) The constantly shifting crap that CDC was putting out. As it happened, the CDC was (seriously?) overestimating the transmissibility of early-stage Ebola, and somewhat underestimating the transmissibility of late-stage Ebola. Going on what we thought we knew about early-stage Ebola, quarantining people who had been exposed until they were out of the window for showing symptoms was pretty common sense. Turned out what we thought we knew was wrong, but it was the best we had.
(2) My actual, on-the-ground knowledge of how fragile our health care system is in the face of an epidemic like this. A small handful of Ebola cases would cripple a hospital.
I still think we avoided a much bigger problem by a too-small margin.
Yeah...I got a bit wary when I was supposed to completely trust the CDC.
I am glad it didn't get too out of hand - response or disease, both.
I forget the exact details, but I admit to being worried when one of the nurses was allowed to fly commercial somewhere. I was not worried that I would become infected, but just worried that ebolaI would spread. I am glad it didn't.
I am always worried, to some degree, when the government is in charge of a crisis.
I am always worried, to some degree, when the government is in charge of a crisis.
Smart man.
I still think we avoided a much bigger problem by a too-small margin.
We'll never know one way or the other. But I think we were way too close to setting a precedent of following the precautionary principle in cases like this. Once government over-reacts once, they will tend to do so again and again, harder and harder each time.
Or, it could be like Y2K, where everybody thought, afterwards, that it was all hype, not understanding that it was a problem and the reason the whole infrastructure didn't fail was because it was treated as a problem.
So, little things like quarantines stop an outbreak from becoming an epidemic, and afterwards everybody is all, like "see, you didn't have to over react, it didn't never infected more than a handful of people."
"it didn't never infected"- I can't blame that one on my phone 🙁
Pallas cat
That's one of my favorite cat videos ever.
Now you can stop being sad and anxious and stop procrastinating. You're welcome.
Nah, i think i'll go watch some more cat videos first.
Those are pretty cool. First time I saw one was at the Cincinnati zoo.
20 seconds on it looks like Bucky Katt from the strip Get Fuzzy.
You know what SciTech story that is going to wow everyone? The one where I outlaw vertical videos. Especially cat ones.
Hush your face hole, Eugene.
Yes, this. Genocide pisses me off less than this.
that viewers of cat videos feel more energetic and more positive; they experience fewer negative emotions, such as anxiety, annoyance and sadness, after watching cat-related online media than before; and that the pleasure they get from watching cat videos outweighed any guilt they feel about procrastinating
"Cat videos"? Is that what kids call porn these days?
Cat videos are just about the only thing on the internet that ISN'T porn.
Except for those videos which are both...
I am disappointed that your link was just to Urban Dictionary.
Haha! Well, two things:
1. Currently at work...which I doubt my point computes with many in this comment section.
2. If I had more specific knowledge of the aforementioned videos, I would hope that someone would lobotomize me before I had the chance to spread the word.
Can somebody check the Cal score for me? I don't have the internet right now.
It's OK, I can always ask in another thread.
35 - 21 Cal in the lead. Just about to hit the half.
Huh. Cal is winning, you say?
Nope... now its AF by 111 to 35
Yea, I don't know if the A-10 strafe coming out of the half was within regulations, but the fans seemed to enjoy it.
How many times will that work?
See PM Links
Almost forgot about that. So as I recall, there were quite a few pants-shitters here calling for quarantines. Who were they? I don't recall.
Oh, wait...now I remember. It was the same people who are now afraid teh Muzlumz are cuming to git us.
I luvs me sum yokelz.
My personal favorite was the combo-threat.
Well, I have yet to see an honest, decent discussion about the muzzie immigrants. There is much asshattery on both sides of that issue. I keep waiting for it to come up again.
As for the other, I didn't freak out about the Ebola's. I distinctly remember saying that things like that spread in Africa because of conditions and behavior there that dont exist here.
It's laughable how those ignorant of the efforts invested in preventing a catastrophe like to claim that they knew all along there would be no problem. The Y2K bug came and went with a whimper because tens of thousands of men and women around the globe worked their assess off to prevent a catastrophe. Yet the ignorant know-how it- alls exclaim "see, I told you there was no problem." There was no Ebola epidemic in the USA because brave women and men put their lives at risk to prevent it.
Get a clue.
Perhaps you should go back and refamiliarize yourself with the subject matter.
The pants-shitting yokels in question were complaining that the CDC (and the administration) weren't doing enough to ensure our safety. You can never be too careful, you know. And what if they're wrong...
So really, wadair...the clue is yours to get.
The CDC fucked up. That is well documented. Besides, my wife is a nurse for a different hospital within the same group of the hospital in Dallas where the Ebola shit hit the fan. Heroic efforts prevented an outbreak. You don't know how serious it was.
"Number 2: Cimate change and the adoption of the Paris Agreement on Climate Change by diplomats from nearly 200 countries..."
...will amount to nothing, but it may shut up some warmists for a while.
Milton Friedman looks itchy.
Klass
Yea
reply
In #2, "the ration" should be "ration the".
Oops--make that "rationing"
Im making over $9k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do,
---------- http://www.onlinejobs100.com
My last pay check was $9500 working 12 hours a week online. My sisters friend has been averaging 15k for months now and she works about 20 hours a week. I can't believe how easy it was once I tried it out. This is what I do..
Clik This Link inYour Browser....
? ? ? ? http://www.WorkPost30.Com