CRISPR Gene-Editing Is Scientific "Breakthrough of the Year"
"If scientists can dream of a genetic manipulation, CRISPR can now make it happen"

Every December, Science lists the most significant scientific discoveries and advances of the previous year and declares one as the Breakthrough of Year. This year's winner is the fantastic gene-editing technology CRISPR. As I reported earlier:
Derived from what amounts to a bacterial immune system for fighting off attacking viruses, the CRISPR gene-editing technique was first developed barely three years ago. CRISPR can edit genes much like a word processing program can edit text. Researchers hope it will allow them to cure cancer, correct genetic diseases, generate more productive and nutritious crops and farm animals, spread desired genetic modifications through wild ecosystems, engineer pigs as organ donors for people, and prevent heritable diseases by altering the genomes of human embryos—all in the not-so-distant future.
Science's Breakthrough article notes among other things that researchers have created…
…a gene drive that, unleashed in a lab population of mosquitoes, spread genes that prevent the insects from harboring malaria parasites. Weeks later, working with another malaria-carrying mosquito, Burt and colleagues reported the same thing with genes that rendered the females infertile and could quickly wipe out a population. Debates are now erupting over the benefits and ecological risks of releasing such insects into the wild—and whether gene drives could also thwart invasive species such as Asian carp and cane toads, or combat other animal-borne pathogens such as the one causing Lyme disease.
In other labs, researchers harnessed the technique to create a growing menagerie of genetically engineered animals and plants: extramuscular beagles, pigs resistant to several viruses, and wheat that can fend off a widespread fungus. Longer-lasting tomatoes, allergen-free peanuts, and biofuel-friendly poplars are all on the drawing board. Depending on how it's wielded, CRISPR can do its work without leaving any foreign DNA behind, unlike earlier techniques for genetically modifying organisms, which poses a challenge for regulations based on the presence of foreign DNA. …
The biomedical applications of CRISPR are just starting to emerge. Clinical researchers are already applying it to create tissue-based treatments for cancer and other diseases. CRISPR may also revive the moribund concept of transplanting animal organs into people. Many people feared that retroviruses lurking in animal genomes could harm transplant recipients, but this year a team eliminated, in one fell swoop, 62 copies of a retrovirus's DNA littering the pig genome. And the international summit saw many discussions of CRISPR's promise for repairing genetic defects in human embryos, if society dares to cross what many regard as an ethical threshold and alter the human germline.
In short, it's only slightly hyperbolic to say that if scientists can dream of a genetic manipulation, CRISPR can now make it happen. At one point during the human gene-editing summit, Charpentier described its capabilities as "mind-blowing." It's the simple truth. For better or worse, we all now live in CRISPR's world.
Better, I think.
The whole Science Breakthrough of the Year article is worth your attention. For more background see my article on the human gene-editing biotech summit earlier this month that will likely turn out to be far more historically consequential than the Paris climate change conference.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't agree this should be happening. Did any of you see the movie Splice? That was awful.
I thought that was a documentary, originally titled Weekend At Epi's
You mean they EDITED the movie? The horror!
Finally, tastes great and less filling.
Rich people will get it first - so BAD!
We don't know how it will effect our enviroment - so, BAD!
Does anyone really need to live past 80?
- jackoff Bio-ethicist conmen
Yeah, you can predict how most "bi-ethicists" will come down on an issue simply by figuring out which side of an issue will cause human misery.
bio ethicists. I have to assume their sexuality is not material to their ethical views.
Also the Precautionary principle means we should never, ever do anything new whatsoever !!!!!!!!!!!!!
No one needs a CRISPR.
There's one in my fridge, but I'm sure I'm using it wrong.
jackoff Bio-ethicist conmen
AKA, luddites.
If they're not willing to give animals the ability to talk then they're not worth taking seriously.
That sheep is never going to say "I love you".
I thought that was the upside of banging sheep.
How about a kitty with the personality of a dog, science?
Just get a Savannah cat.
How about a kitty with the personality of a dog, science?
Had a fuzzball just like that until recently; little dude hung out with the (big) dogs, ate their food, pushed them around, would even sit and give you a high-five with his paw on command.
I had a big orange tabby cat one time that was like also. He followed me around everywhere, would play fetch, and even loved to ride in the car and take baths. He also had this strange habit of climbing trees and wouldn't come down. He would sit up there and cry until I got the ladder and got him down. That was his cat coming out I guess.
I'd rather see a dog with the personality of a cat.
They're called chihuahuas.
Except most cats don't bark all the time and bite people's ankles.
I love cats, they're the perfect pet for a libertarian, independent and totally resistant to you trying to get them to do anything at all against their will.
"CRISPR can edit genes much like a word processing program can edit text. Researchers hope it will allow them to cure cancer, correct genetic diseases, generate more productive and nutritious crops and farm animals, spread desired genetic modifications through wild ecosystems, engineer pigs as organ donors for people, and prevent heritable diseases by altering the genomes of human embryos..."
...All for just $19.99!! and if you act now, we'll throw in the 'SuperMutant Cleanup Kit', absolutely free!!!
Yes, but if we can save just one chillin from evil CRISPR terrorists, we have to ban it.
So my wife and I can finally have what we want? B cups while she's exercising and D cups when I want to play with them?
*Opens mouth to mention better solution, realizes Brett L's wife prioritizes 'exercise' significantly higher than 'breast play with husband', shuts mouth.*
Yes, I borrow them, he owns them.
She! I mean she! A he with lady parts doesn't require CRISPR
The technology is already being attacked by the ban boner crowd. So it has to be great.
Eugenicists have a new tool.
Yeah, I'm wondering how long it's going to be until we have bio weapons targeted at certain genetic markers.
If we wipe out the billions of males who aren't me - then I'll get laid!
+ Gattica
Good. We can build better people without slaughtering them.
I want my tomatoes to glow in the dark. I don't know why, but it sounds cool. Also, blue tomatoes that taste like strawberries. And a talking cat who often quotes Bastiat and doesn't shed. That will do for starters.
The cat: "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else."
Me: Good kitty, here's some more tuna.
Lions the size of house cats? I'd totally let a pride roam my yard and prey on the squirrels.
Upsize it to about the size of a large dog and teach it to eat squirrels and proggies. Perfect pet.
Apparently, cheetahs have been pets for a long time. And you can use greyhounds to socialize them. Anything bigger than that is a mountain lion/panther and will eat you.
Cheetahs are dangerous. A Savannah is the perfect pet if you want a large cat that acts more like a dog. Maine Coons are pretty cool also. I wouldn't trust a cheetah.
Yes, I really should have classified them as least dangerous but still a bad idea to keep as pets. I'm pretty sure any prepubescent child looks like a fat slow bag of dinner to them.
Wouldn't the cat have to talk with a French accent?
No French accent on my cat! He needs to talk like a real Murkin!
I imagine the NO GMO!!!!! crowd will be agin' this.
They've already commenced shitting their pants.
I for one welcome the Gattaca-esque future where genetic inferiors are limited to janitorial roles.
With this technology, it's only a matter of time before you have GMO people protesting GMO's.
"Hold my beer while I genetically engineer the precautionary principle out of the human race."
Mmmm.....crispier.....
I can just see some of our finest congress critters on the floor pontificating on this next great menace to the children.
Senator Derp: "Why I was just on one of them libertarian sites the other day and you know what they're plotting to do with this CRISPR? You think ISIS is a threat? Wait until those libertarians get their hands on this stuff!"
How can they do this?!
There's still a week left and my new (BOOOOM!!!)
CRISPR can edit genes much like a word processing program can edit text.
The horror!
It looks like you're trying to splice two exons. Would you like help?
-Get help splicing DNA.
-Just continue splicing without any assistance.
-Don't ask this question again.
Yeah, right, just anyone can sit down and start creating mutant humans. Only idiots in the media and congress critters actually believe bullshit like that. Of course they also think that someone is going to make a nuke in their garage.
Um...yes, indeed, that is...impossible!
*hides centrifuge, whistles innocently*
CRISPR can edit genes much like a word processing program can edit text.
So I assume we are agreed that John shouldn't have access to one?
We already have enough fat chicks without him genetic-engineering more.
Enough with the fucking chit chat. Repair all the replication errors in my DNA - I want my 21-year-old body back now.
ARMIES OF CLONED HITLERS! CAN'T YOU PEOPLE SEE THE DANGER????
An army of cloned Hitlers wouldn't be dangerous at all. Hundreds of crazy egomaniacs failing at any sort of coordinated action. Like Hilary and the Donald trying to share the Oval Office.
Anyone else think of Grindr and Tindr every time you see CRISPR?
I think of Crispin Glover but I'm weird that way.
Have they found the nympho gene? If so, I would like place an order
I'd go more for just equalizing male and female sex drives (preferably in the more sex direction). Probably just figuring out how to make female orgasms as easy to achieve as male ones would get us most of the way there.
Nymphomania isn't all it's cracked up to be.
Your order of a perfect clone of Hillary Clinton with said gene inserted will arrive by Fed Ex shortly.
...a gene drive that, unleashed in a lab population of mosquitoes, spread genes that prevent the insects from harboring malaria parasites. Weeks later, working with another malaria-carrying mosquito, Burt and colleagues reported the same thing with genes that rendered the females infertile and could quickly wipe out a population.
But what will this do to the birds?? /rachelcarson
There are many kinds of mosquitos, not all of which transmit malaria.
Why does no one have any consideration for the malaria parasites?
The editing-enzyme is error-prone. This technology is not yet practical.