Reason Weekly Contest: Scare Los Angeles
Last week's winners revealed.


Welcome back to the Reason Weekly Contest! This week's question is:
Los Angeles public schools were closed on Tuesday in response to a threat that was identical to one that New York received and did not consider credible. What threat would shake Los Angeles but not New York?
How to enter: Submissions should be e-mailed to contest@reason.com. Please include your name, city, and state. This week, kindly type "LA THREAT" in the subject line. Entries are due by 11 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday, Dec. 21. Winners will appear Dec. 25, a Christmas present to our readers, right here at Reason.com.
In the case of identical or similar entries, the first one received gets credit. First prize is a one-year digital subscription to Reason magazine, plus bragging rights. While we appreciate kibbitzing in the comments below, you must email your answer to enter the contest. Feel free to enter more than once, and good luck!
And now for the results of last week's contest: With students on campuses mulling whether "God bless you!" after a sneeze constitutes a microaggression—the jury seems to be out—we asked you to come up with the next phrase to be outlawed on campus.
THE WINNER:
"See you later!" Microaggression toward blind people.
"Yeah, I hear ya." Same toward the deaf. -- Billy, Morro Bay, CA
SECOND PLACE:
"Master's Degree" -- Ed Perovic, Winnetka, IL
THIRD PLACE:
"Trigger warning" Mocks those with a fear of firearms. -- Jim Noble, Boulder Creek, CA
HONORABLE MENTIONS:
"How are you doing?" This phrase is ableist in that it assumes the askee is capable of doing things, and it also assumes that not doing things is negative. Especially offensive to people in vegetative states and the coma community. -- Jeff Seidman, North Hollywood, CA
"Excuse me" implicitly demands that someone must accept my privilege and forgive me.
"Oh, brother" forces patriarchal gender norms by excluding non-brother-conforming individuals, naturally implying a shared experience unattainable by sisters, mothers, daughters, or womyn of any relational description. -- Abel G., Juneau, AK
"University administrators have announced that the word 'freedom' should no longer be used on campus, because the term 'dom' may be triggering to those who have escaped abusive BDSM relationships." -- Jay Cornell, San Francisco, CA
"Good job!" and "Nice work" are both examples of "workism"—the assumption that anyone can do well if they just try hard enough. -- Christopher P. Brown, Idlewylde, MD
New Campus Rules:
To protect students from microaggressions, students are no long allowed to say which state they are from, as some state histories may cause others to trigger.
Spades, Euchre, Rook, and many other trick-taking games are banned, since some of them use a "Trump." The reasons for this are obvious. -- SimonJester
PCU will be discontinuing the use of the term "Undergraduate." We've found that this term marginalizes persons of shorter stature, and implies a lesser worth for students who have not yet graduated. -- Chuck G., Santa Clarita, CA
"Get bent you servile, fascist, life-hating, Stalin-fellating dogfuckers. And Merry Christmas." -- Colin Blake, Boston, MA
"I think." -- Eugene Spagnuolo, NY
"Freshman" -- J Jenkins, Olsburg, KS
"Thank you for your service." Service is a sexual term and unacceptable. -- Lawrence Lebin, Mill Hall, PA
AND FROM THE COMMENTS:
The "good" in good morning is a subjective term. The recipient may, in fact, not be having positive feelings about the moment. Additionally, it is not the speaker's place to instruct recipients on his or her or [insert acceptable pronoun here] feelings about the time of day. Speakers should refrain from greetings including good.
Wait, commentariat… greeting people is unacceptable. Why are you forcing an interaction with someone, maybe they just want to be left alone. You think you have a right to their attention. These acts of violence must stop.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Transfat IEDs
Your title, I think it's backwards.
I think so too.
The question is phrased backward, more likely.
Maybe the title was correct, but the question was not.
Meaning, we already know LA school-districts wet pants over internet hoaxes... what should soils the undies of NY's?
- ISIS Reveal New "Bagels of Mass Destruction"
- Syrian Migrants OK Says NY; Demands Screening & Ban of Uber Drivers
- Al Qaeda Threat to Destroy Subway Tunnels Ignored; MTA Emergency Work on Tunnels Over Weekend Causes Mass Hysteria
etc
Syrian Migrants OK Says NY; Demands Screening & Ban of Uber Drivers
Threadwinner.
- DeBlasio Approves Deal to Convert SoHo to WalMart
This question is triggering to the residents of earthquake prone LA.
+1
To scare Los Angeles: Plastic surgeons are using trans-fats.
To scare New Yorkers: Uber drivers drink 20 oz soft drinks.
"We're ending the MTA subsudies, and all operations must be covered by ticket prices"
wait....
Who are we supposed to be scaring?
We're libertarians, we scare everybody.
*puts on official libertarian ski mask*
*pssh*, you wish you were scary. You're the laughingstock of the political spectrum.
Stop that. We are so totally relevant and threatening.
Yup
http://cutecaptions.com/images.....onster.jpg
Scare Los Angeles: Whole Foods is going out of business.
Scare New York: Yes, it's true. The light at the end of the tunnel is New Jersey.
To scare LA: 'Scattered showers expected this afternoon'
This one is already banned in some venues.
What threat would shake Los Angeles but not New York?
Since we already know the answer to that, shouldn't the question be vice versa?
I think maybe we're supposed to come up with what would scare New Yorkers
City folk or upstaters?
If it was LA that crapped its drawers, I am thinking it should be NYC - another big city.
"As part of the upstate prosperity initiative, all welfare recipients will be required to perform three months of agricultural labor per year to qualify for benefits."
Deep Dish Pizza
You mean casserole?
yes
*narrows gaze, reaches for Giordano's menu*
We never said it wasn't food, just that it's not Pizza.
I keep hearing this about LA over reacting and NY did not.
As I recall the LA school board received the threat just after the school buses had gone out to pick up the kids but had not started arriving at the school yet. They did not have time to evaluate the threat, it was a real 'OH SHIT!" moment.
Under those circumstances they made the right call. The criticism is unwarranted.
Also, any words other than curses for a place where the average person thinks that government should decide how much soda they can have or whether they can shake salt on their food is unwarranted.
" where the average person thinks that government should decide how much soda they can have or whether they can shake salt on their food is unwarranted.'
apparently you missed the part where a majority of residents opposed both those (attempted and failed) regulations.
Surely we should stereotype all southerners by their worst politicians as well?
"Boo!"
What do I win?
A shiv between the ribs.
Modern day New York? I somehow doubt it.
It was from me for mistaking a startle for a scare.
To scare Los Angeles : Our fly over will make a stop in Grand Forks ND.
To scare NYC : Our fly over will make a stop in East Grand Forks MN.
Worse: ...and you will have to change planes
Scare LA: The NFL has announced that the Giants will be moving to Los Angeles.
Scare NYC: Reaon HQs is moving to NYC?
NYC Dweller: Who?
Fair point, but they should be scared.
City of 8m people. HQ of Fox News. probably more "die hard republicans" in NYC than in Montana (by raw #)
NAMBLA could move in next door to the Black Panther Party HQ, who was already on the same floor as Jews For Jesus.... and I doubt anyone in NYC would so much as blink.
I was going to try and think up a joke about someone belonging to all three organizations at once, but I thought better of it.
What would happen if Citizen's United opened an office there?
I'm not sure, but I bet it would involve some weird stuff with the space-time continuum.
NYC Dweller: Who?
Magazine that writes negative things about Hillary Clinton coming to NYC.
Better?
Nobody needs a magazine with more than three articles.
Really, though why would NYC be skeert of a magazine that is, by weight, much more hostile to Repubs than Dems.
"What threat would shake Los Angeles but not New York?"
Drunk Yanees fans?
What shakes Los Angeles but not New York? Dallas, Houston and San Antonio.
Driving in snow