Sex-Trafficking Rescue Op in Virginia Netted Fewer 'Pimps' Than Initially Advertised But More Prostitution and Drug Arrests
The biggest outcome of this costly and time-consuming FBI mission seems to be the arrest of 30 adults on old-fashioned vice charges.


During a recent joint effort aimed at stopping sex-trafficking in Virginia, FBI and local law-enforcement agents allegedly nabbed 12 "pimps", including 10 in Virginia Beach, one in Norfolk, and one in Chesapeake. Press releases and TV newscasts heralded this work, along with the recovery of three "child sex trafficking victims," as an unmitigated success. But emerging details paint a less rosy picture.
Pressed by The Virginian-Pilot in October, an FBI spokeswoman said two of the Virginia Beach suspects had been released without charges "after further investigation found that they were not actually involved with the prostitution activities." And a Norfolk police spokesman told the paper that its "suspected pimp" was actually only charged with gun and drug possession—bringing our total down to nine pimp arrests.
Of these remaining nine indivduals charged with pimping or sex trafficking, two are juveniles.
And what about the three "children" police "rescued?" One, a 16-year-old who was allegedly coerced into selling sex by several men and women in their early 20s, "got away by telling the accused pimps that a family member had just died," according to Virginia News Channel 3. She went to police on her own accord, prompting a SWAT raid on a Virginia Beach Econolodge.
Another victim, age 17, was willingly working in prostitution when she was arrested by police. No information has been provided about the third teen.
The Virginia efforts were part of the FBI's annual "Operation Cross Country" (OCC) initiative, which is ostensibly aimed at recovering "child sex trafficking victims." In practice, however, the annual operation works more like a nationwide prostitution sting, with cops largely targeting adult sex workers and their clients. Virginia's efforts present a fine example of this.
In the course of this year's OCC, the FBI helped Virginia vice squads arrest at least 30 people for prostitution, drug possession, and other non-violent or petty offenses.
In Hampton Roads, six people were arrested and charged with nine offenses, including prostitution, probation violations, and solicitation of prostitution. In Chesapeake, six people were arrested, resulting in five prostitution charges, two narcotics possession charges, one charge for possession a firearm while simultaneously possessing narcotics, one charge of marijuana possession, one charge of driving on a suspended license, one charge of providing a false ID to avoid arrest, and two more drug possession charges.
Norfolk Police Vice and Narcotics division teamed up with the FBI to arrest 18 people for 28 crimes, including (for women) 17 prostitution charges, six outstanding warrant charges, one marijuana possession charge, one cocaine possession charge, and one count of providing false information to the police and, for men, one count of pandering and one of using a vehicle for prostitution.
So where does this leave us for this year's Operation Cross Country in Virginia? With the combined power of FBI agents and four city police departments, just nine people—including two minors—have been arrested for anything that comes close to sex trafficking, and even these charges may be a stretch (since pimping-related offenses don't necessarily imply that force or coercion were used). One of our three victims, one turns out to have chosen prostitution (and been arrested for it), while another would have been found without the OCC stings, since she came forward to police. The biggest outcome of this costly, time-consuming human-trafficking "rescue operation" in Virginia seems to be the arrest of 30 adults on old-fashioned vice charges.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
ENB, the name of that paper is The Virginian-Pilot. You ommitted the "n" at the end of Virginian.
Thank you
ENB is free to do what she wanted with clouds of her own, nah nah nah-nah.
She's gotta be careful with the Pilot, though, or else Kerry Dougherty might write mean things about her.
Dougherty is a cop-sucking, pro-WOD, POS. She's done a couple of op-eds for a local publication and I've called her out on her hypocrisy and idiocy.
But thanks for that, Citizen. I wasn't aware of her history outside of her op-eds. A real piece of work, that one.
Ed stole ENB's 'n' and placed it in his alt-text.
Elizabeth's knuckles are going to omit your nose from your face.
Sounds like a success to me!
Depends - just how many were Syrian refugees?
Shouldn't it be "fewer" pimps? No one is allowed to hurt my feelings if I am wrong.
Yes. It's fewer.
I don't understand why professional writers can't remember that.
It's an ENB trademark.
It is true. No matter how many times you guys point this out to me, I am clearly going to continue making this less/fewer mistake. Abandon all hope now, please.
There's always electroshock therapy, Elizabeth. Look at how well it worked for Nicole. She doesn't even drool any more. Well, not much.
If you measure it, use less. If you can count them, use fewer.
Less sugar means fewer calories.
If you can count them, use fewer.
Even the arresting officers can't count them correctly!
I see it and hear it used so frequently that I begin to doubt myself and think that like "less" has become the new "heighth."
OMG, haven't seen that one for years, Crusty. Thanks. No geezer.
I'm an old fuddy-duddy who disapproves of colloquialisms (this sentence is going on my internet dating profiles).
When Elizabeth's knuckle sandwich is done with you two, you're going to have fewer teeth.
She'll get less lip back after that.
FUCK THEM WE HAVE CHAMPAGNE
I don't get it.
See today's article on Charlie Hebdo.
The biggest outcome of this costly, time-consuming human-trafficking "rescue operation" in Virginia seems to be the arrest of 30 adults on old-fashioned vice charges.
One might also wonder whether there was any asset forfeiture going on. Follow the money.
Take that, terrorism threat!
By their powers combined, they are CAPTAIN NANNY!
"got away by telling the accused pimps that a family member had just died,"
So even the one juvenile who was held against her will, got away by essentially lying to her boss.
"I don't think I can suck his dick today (cough, cough). I am not feeling too well."
Man, i hate it when my part of the world shows up in a Reason post.
Obama focusing on gun control for his final year:
http://www.washingtontimes.com.....medium=RSS
Guess he really wants to give his fellow Dems a hand in winning their elections!!
I can't wait for all the stories lamenting how racist America is because all those Republican held state legislatures gerrymander the tar out of future redistrictings, and yet none of those stories will notice how President Obama's War Against Down Ballot Democrats resulted in their slaughter.
I much prefer the picture of the hands cuffed behind that fine ass in a skirt.
Go on...
this