Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Violence

Several Deaths Reported at Community College Campus Shooting in Oregon (Updated: Obama Comments)

From seven to fifteen reported dead.

Scott Shackford | 10.1.2015 2:42 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Michael Courtney | Dreamstime.com
(Michael Courtney | Dreamstime.com)
Credit: Michael Courtney | Dreamstime.com

There is very little being reported right now and we'll avoid speculation. Police have responded to mass shooting at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg Oregon.

We have seen reports that between 7 and 15 people have been killed. KATU in Oregon is reporting the situation live here. Their Twitter account is here.  They are reporting that the shooter is "down."

Updated (4:45 p.m. eastern): At a press conference, the Douglass County sheriff would not provide casualty numbers but said there was a single shooter, the shooter and deputies "exchanged gunfire," and the shooter is now dead. Oregon Gov. Kate Brown has described him as a 20-year-old male.

Updated (6:40 p.m. eastern): President Barack Obama spoke on the shootings, calling, as he does in these situations, for more gun laws.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: NYPD To Document Nearly All Instances of Force

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

ViolenceBreaking NewsOregon
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (420)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Lee G   10 years ago

    Let's all jump to conclusions

    1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      I'll break out the mat.

      1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

        "Could be"!

      2. Gilbert Martin   10 years ago

        Make that a trampoline.

    2. WTF   10 years ago

      See what happens when you let in a bunch of military-age Syrians? SEE?

      1. Marshal   10 years ago

        Good one!

      2. OneOut   10 years ago

        I'd like to check out his medicine cabinet.

    3. Palin's Buttplug   10 years ago

      IT'S A MUZZIE/TEABAGGER!

      Got all the premature conclusions covered.

      1. Swiss Servator   10 years ago

        And you are just praying to Cthulhu its a PEANUTGOLDBUGTEAHADIST.

        1. Lee G   10 years ago

          Just somebody who voted for BOOOOOSSH

          1. rocks   10 years ago

            Either that or it was the gun's fault.

      2. OneOut   10 years ago

        Has anyone heard from Tony today ?

        Just wondering.

      3. Suicidy   10 years ago

        Maybe it was Wilbur Whately. He didn't bring the Necronomicon back on time, and they took away his library card. So he flipped out.

    4. Contrarian P   10 years ago

      I'll take "this confirms (insert bonehead theory here) that I've been saying all along. Congress must act now!!!" for $1000 please, Alex.

      Oh, and Turd Ferguson.

    5. Al Sharpton   10 years ago

      MOAR WHITE ON BLACK HATE CRIME!!!!!

      1. OneOut   10 years ago

        #blackOregoncommunitycollegestudentslivesmatter

    6. CatoTheYounger   10 years ago

      Ban guns.

      1. plusafdotcom   10 years ago

        And what's that old story about repeating actions over and over and not getting any results?

        Maybe someone should ask BO why he's been speechifying the same drivel so many times with No Measurable Positive Effect..?

        Such a Motivator For Change!

        Not.

    7. EndTheGOP   10 years ago

      There's only one way to stop this madness. Prosecute the family members of these wack-jobs for not reporting these sickos to the proper authorities. The vast majority of these family members know their offspring and relatives are dangerous nut-jobs, yet nothing can be done until the sickies do their damage.

      In the 40s, 50s and 60s we used to institutionalize the mentally ill but then the Liberals said "You can't lock these people up, they didn't do anything." So we let the whack-jobs out to roam the streets and live under our bridges and get a hold of guns and kill us. Sounds like another socialist plot to me.

      This is insane. We deserve the fucked-up society we have.

  2. Illocust   10 years ago

    Great, now we get to hear journalists asking every candidate about this for the next couple weeks.

    Sorry if I'm sounding callous. It's a bit like if a large demographic want to ban private cars, so every single six pile car up in the nation got reported on the national news. Bad shit happens to innocent people, but I'm more likely to slip and break something in the bathroom or kitchen than be on either side of a violent encounter with a gun.

    1. Dr. Fronkensteen   10 years ago

      +1 No one need more than 4 cylinders.

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        Only professionals should be allowed to handle one ton death machines. What if someone slams on the breaks in front of you? You might panic and swerve into an innocent bystander on the sidewalk. Professionals unlike your average person are trained how to handle these stressful situations.

        1. Sigivald   10 years ago

          I'm not sure you can buy a car as light as one ton anymore...

          1. Illocust   10 years ago

            More reason to ban modern cars. When cars were first allowed to drive freely on our roads they were mere lightweight slow model-T's. The current death machines couldn't have been anticipated by the legislatures of the time. We can not hold our citizen's safety hostage to an anachronism of history.

            1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

              Nicely done, IIIocust.

          2. waffles   10 years ago

            2016 Mazda Miata is about 2300 lbs. I'm not sure about the Smart Fourtwo, but that barely qualifies as a car.

          3. Gilbert Martin   10 years ago

            You can but they come with pedals to crank instead of an engine.

      2. MichaelL   10 years ago

        I like my 8 cylinder SS Monte Carlo! It is a gas! It is a little difficult, driving it. It wants to spin the tires, too easily, especially when it is wet! And, it shuts down 4 cylinders, at speed, to get 28 miles/gallon, estimated. Can't wait to get my 4 cylinder turbocharged car to replace it, in the future!

    2. Suicidy   10 years ago

      You're even less likely if you avoid 'gun free zones'. The irony of that fact, well, it's palpable.

    3. kint   10 years ago

      I see your point, but the analogy isn't apt. If there was a driver who drove through a crowd of people and killed many of them, and this happened over and over, then the analogy is apt. Shooting is an intentional act to kill. What you're describing is an accident.

      1. Jay Dubya   10 years ago

        yes all analogies must use criteria that are identical in all ways. context is irrelevant to analogies. and dont even get me started about similes!

    4. Mr. Smacky   10 years ago

      (six pile car up) < six car pile up

  3. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

    Brace yourselves. Gun grabbers are coming.

    1. Restoras   10 years ago

      We've been surrounded by them for years.

    2. WTF   10 years ago

      They always do.

    3. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      I'm avoiding Derpbook, Twitter, and... well, everywhere except here for the next several days.

      1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

        That is probably wise of you.

      2. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

        I avoid those pretty much every day.

        1. Res ipsa loquitur   10 years ago

          Racist !!!!1!

    4. Drake   10 years ago

      It wasn't a gunfree zone already?

      1. Sigivald   10 years ago

        Sort of.

        Colleges in Oregon can't prohibit licensed concealed carry, but can (and usually do, IIRC) ban unlicensed mere possession or open carry.

        Of course, I'd bet a dollar that the shooter was not a permit-holder...

        1. OneOut   10 years ago

          The lone security guard was unarmed.

          OR SO I'VE BEEN TOLD.

          1. Juice   10 years ago

            They are at all the community colleges around here. It makes no sense.

    5. Krokko   10 years ago

      And by "coming," of course you mean ejaculating all over their televisions at the thought of climbing on top of a pile of dead bodies and grieving family members to call out their moral inferiors.

    6. Eric   10 years ago

      Brace ourselves for what?

      Somehow, the NRA has managed to equate guns with apple pie, Jesus Christ, and the Statue of Liberty's glorious bunghole. No one is grabbing shit. and I think that most Americans have conceded the fight.

      1. Remnant Psyche   10 years ago

        The anti-2nd Amendment crowd is a lot like the anti-abortion crowd. Neither issue will move the way the respective sides want them to move in America, but they just can't shut the fuck up about them. To their detriment.

      2. Contrarian P   10 years ago

        Brace ourselves for another endless round of near hysterical bleating about "common sense" gun regulations that wouldn't have done a damn thing to prevent the tragedy that's being exploited and thinly veiled insinuations that by opposing them we approve of and endorse mass murder. Look, it's ok to believe that if we just had more laws violence like this would be prevented. I can understand that belief, even if I think it's completely wrong. One can utterly disagree with someone and still respect the person. It's the self-righteous smugness it takes to stand on the graves of the innocent dead and the blatant appeals to emotionalism I can't stand.

        And yes, the same applies to the NRA people who laughably insist their rifle is protecting them from radical Islamists. The odds that any of them will ever see a terrorist other than the likes of Salim Abu Aziz are worse than the lottery, lightning, and Tony voting Republican.

  4. Trump-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

    Awful to hear. Heartfelt prayers and condolences to the families of the victims and of the shooter, all of whom have a difficult time ahead of them.

    ....

    Can we politicize this now?

    1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      Too late. The other side already has.

      1. Eric   10 years ago

        Read down before you climb off your high horse Nikki.

        1. Frankjasper1   10 years ago

          But but but mommy they do it too!

  5. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

    How many more times does this have to happen before we finally get serious and do something?

    1. Restoras   10 years ago

      Given the number of times this has happened, and nothing has been done, never.

    2. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      Repeal Dodd-Frank? That's something.

    3. GILMORE?   10 years ago

      "" do something""

      THIS SOUNDS LIKE THE BEST PLAN YET

    4. Brett L   10 years ago

      Finally my dream of online only college will be realized!

    5. Sigivald   10 years ago

      Do something...

      Like what?

      "Something" is not a policy or even a serious suggestion.

      ("Something must be done. This is something. Thus this must be done." is the worst form of that.

      But "do something!!!!" is not serious either.)

      1. Christophe   10 years ago

        Your sarcasm detector is broken.

    6. Contrarian P   10 years ago

      I just did something. I took a sip of my iced coffee. I feel better already. And yes, I'm serious. Finally.

    7. waffles   10 years ago

      I blame the feminization and slutification of society. Our society needs to embrace positive masculine role models to prevent these tragedies. Therefore, effective immediately, GI Joe and He-man will be put on every major network for 90 minutes a day.

      1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

        Of course, waffles, we must have reasonable fun laws, such as the ones recently passed in Springfield. He-Man should wear a shirt, obviously, and the GI Joe characters should fight crime/enemies using the types of firearms available in the founders' times when they use guns at all.

        Perhaps Skeletor could be re-envisioned to address bulimia and/or anorexia....

        1. LarryA   10 years ago

          GI Joe should have A-Team type assault weapons. Full-auto, never need reloading, and never actually hit anyone.

    8. OneOut   10 years ago

      What would you have us do ?

    9. Haskell_Hunter   10 years ago

      I agree, we should do something about this. We should stop restricting firearm rights and allow people the right to protect themselves no matter where they are on America's soil.

  6. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    The supervisor on the radio feed that Warty posted is a fucking idiot. The worst I've ever heard. Ever.

    1. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

      The reporter I was just listening to thinks rounds= magazines.

      1. Loki   10 years ago

        Mentioning "clips" will probably really confuse the hell out of them.

        1. Free Society   10 years ago

          No one needs a clip that holds more than seven magazines.

          1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

            Seven magazines, or ten Readers' Digests.

            1. Rich   10 years ago

              Bartender, I'd like to get the next round!

              *** reconsiders ***

              Never mind.

            2. PapayaSF   10 years ago

              Wouldn't that be four Readers' Digests, because they're condensed?

            3. Kevin Sorbos Manful Locks   10 years ago

              No sensible subscription needs to have 12 magazines for home reading.

        2. Brian   10 years ago

          Practically no mass shootings are committed with double-barreled shotguns.

          I propose a two-barrel minimum gun law.

          For the children.

          1. Sapient Mulch   10 years ago

            I propose a two-barrel minimum gun law.

            Excellent!

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqDCCTCYTNI

      2. Suicidy   10 years ago

        On a related note, I just extended my subscription to Car & Driver magazine for only $4 per year for three years!

    2. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

      The other people seem calm and capable though, Playa.

      Oh - thanks Warty.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Yes, it's almost like watching The Office. Everyone is doing a great job in spite of the buffoon in charge.

        He just asked for a body count from the hospital over the air. That's a big no-no. The fire department pays for his fancy cell phone for a reason.

  7. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

    As firearms are banned on its campus, I'm certain that this could never happen at my institution.

    1. Lee G   10 years ago

      Is that Mulatto U?

      1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

        Partially.

        1. Lee G   10 years ago

          Partially Mulatto, is that a tautology?

          1. hamilton   10 years ago

            I believe "octoroon" covers it.

            1. Lee G   10 years ago

              I always find it amazing that 1) people ever thought skin color really mattered and 2) it is so powerful that a 1/16 genetic heritage was enough to not only talk about but come up with a specific name for.

              1. SugarFree   10 years ago

                One Drop rule. Tracing lines told you who could still be owned or not. In some places octoroons were freepersons.

              2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

                It also served as fodder for a whole genre of 18th century art (Casta paintings), which remind one of Pokemon breeding charts.

                1. Lee G   10 years ago

                  It's like a recipe book for racists.

                  My father's side of the family is melungeon. I always figured it was a slang term for mulatto, although a lot of them would claim to be descended from the Portuguese.

                  1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

                    Melungeons are tri-racial.

                    1. Lee G   10 years ago

                      My cousin had his DNA tested to see where our Y chromosome came from. Turns out it was the Indus Valley. Best guess is that there were some Spanish Moors who came up from Florida/Caribbean along the Appalachians and mixed with the Indian, European, and slave populations.

                    2. Long Woodchippers   10 years ago

                      I;d guess Indus Valley (Pakistan) would come from Gypsies who migrated to Europe in the Middle Ages. DNA testing and language analysis has shown them to be connected to India

                    3. Suicidy   10 years ago

                      Those Moors probably did a lot of rapin' of the indigenous savages back in the day.

                  2. Long Woodchippers   10 years ago

                    African/European/Native American describes most of Puerto Rico

                    1. Lee G   10 years ago

                      Awesome. I'll make that claim next time I see him. That should get his panties in a twist.

              3. Illocust   10 years ago

                From my understanding it was a way to justify keeping the increasingly white slave population after importing fresh slaves became illegal.

    2. Mark6   10 years ago

      Musta forgot to ban murder on their campus!

  8. Slammer   10 years ago

    Why can't these fuckers ever just commit suicide? I hate them.

  9. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    And of course they're doing a room to room search now even though they already have the shooter.

    Never miss a chance to play GI Joe!!!!

    1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

      Oh come on now. It's a possibility-albeit small-that there is/was an accomplice. If there was ever a time for the cops to 'get active' it's when there's a campus shooting in progress or just happened. Beats those fucks who stood around with their thumbs up their bums like at Columbine.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        An accomplice who is unarmed and just sitting quietly in class? Seems like a good reason to point guns at hundreds of students who have already been terrorized!

        1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

          No, an accomplice who helped shoot these people. Neither you nor I can rule that out, and ruling it out is worth some GI Joe police action. I think getting shot by a hypothetical accomplice is just a tad worse than the sight of GI Joe cops.

          1. Mark6   10 years ago

            Without knowing the if or who of accomplicism what/whom are the cops searching for in their room to room adventures?

            1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

              A maniac who is pointing his gun at people for no good reason.

      2. cavalier973   10 years ago

        The shooter is a pasty. Check the photographs of all the people running toward the grassy knoll.

        1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

          A "pasty"? Interesting..

        2. Loki   10 years ago

          A pasty with or without tassles?

          1. cavalier973   10 years ago

            It's. A Cornish dish of beef and taters wrapped in a fried pie crust.

            1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

              Don't forget to put some onion in there!

              1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

                That's what she said!!

        3. lafe.long   10 years ago

          mmmm... meatpie

    2. H. Protagonist   10 years ago

      I've got a friend from high-school who's on campus, in lockdown according to her FB.

      Ugh.

      1. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

        Hope your friend stays safe.

      2. OneOut   10 years ago

        What religion is she ?

    3. megamucho   10 years ago

      Never waste an opportunity to blow a dog away.

    4. Ron   10 years ago

      they are also taking the sheep i mean the students to a different location so that they can do what i don't know instead of saying okay go home now.

      1. jace   10 years ago

        Don't they test everyone for GSR?

      2. Sapient Mulch   10 years ago

        Mandatory counseling.

  10. Palin's Buttplug   10 years ago

    OT:

    Fiorina: 'We must be prepared' to use force on Russia

    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-.....-on-russia

    1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

      If she were to be elected I'm confident that the Valkyries would be quite busy for some time.

    2. WTF   10 years ago

      Any potential adversary must believe we are willing to use force against them, idiot. How do you think deterrence actually works?

      1. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

        Like gun free zones?

      2. Lee G   10 years ago

        "I believe we must tell the Russians that we will conduct [and] we will secure a no-fly zone around anti-Assad rebel forces that we're supporting," she said on Fox News's "Hannity."

        She's being more specific here and advocating for the US to take an active role in the Syrian conflict in opposition to Russia. That's not the same as the deterrence I think you're referring to.

        1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

          This is bad, and she is bad for thinking that. Although Russian intervention is probably NOT aimed at getting rid of ISIS, so that is bad as well.

          1. Entropy Drehmaschine Void   10 years ago

            MMMMMM'KAY?

        2. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

          Well, yes, she's basically saying, "we won't let Russians bomb our proxy to preserve their proxy." That's exactly how deterrence works.
          Because right now, Russians are sparing ISIS and bombing non-ISIS rebels. Which makes sense, US and friends have been hitting ISIS as hard as they could, not much Russians can do there.
          Now, you want to argue US should have no proxy and should support Assad, that's different. Won't get you far with Republicans, but maybe different parties should offer different policy options.

          1. Lee G   10 years ago

            I would argue that it's a rats nest and the only policy worth pursuing is ISIS containment. Opposing Russia isn't going to help that.

          2. Long Woodchippers   10 years ago

            I agree.

            It's important to maintain US credibility. We come in and back a rebel group against Assad, but then as soon as the Russians back Assad should we say to our proxies, "Sorry, it's been nice knowing you!" because we don't want to poke the Bear?

            Maybe we decide this fight isn't worth the risk - but which groups are going to want to ally with us in the future when we show this level of commitment, and will the Bear begin to push us even harder because they've seen our fecklessness in previous confrontations?

            1. Lee G   10 years ago

              The credibility was ruined when we decided to back a disorganized, terrorist connected, group of rebels in the first place. It was a bad idea from the beginning.

              Are you saying that because it's now an even worse idea because of Russia's involvement that we need to double down?

              1. Long Woodchippers   10 years ago

                True.

                I was speaking more in generalities than this specific situation. I did say this may not be the fight we want to pick.

          3. OneOut   10 years ago

            "Now, you want to argue US should have no proxy and should support Assad, that's different. Won't get you far with Republicans, but maybe different parties should offer different policy options."

            Republicans ?

            I thought it was the Lightbringer who drew the line in the sand. I though Clinton/Kerry said Assad must go ?

            Silly boy. The Republicans are in Congress and Obama has a pen and a phone. And a State dept. and a military to boss around. Congress ? What the phuc do they have to do with anything ?

          4. OneOut   10 years ago

            "Now, you want to argue US should have no proxy and should support Assad, that's different. Won't get you far with Republicans, but maybe different parties should offer different policy options."

            Republicans ?

            I thought it was the Lightbringer who drew the line in the sand. I though Clinton/Kerry said Assad must go ?

            Silly boy. The Republicans are in Congress and Obama has a pen and a phone. And a State dept. and a military to boss around. Congress ? What the phuc do they have to do with anything ?

      3. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

        "How do you think"

        He doesn't.

      4. Palin's Buttplug   10 years ago

        Why sabre-rattle against some idiot who is willing to do your dirty work?

        1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

          Russia is not going to go after ISIS that hard. ISIS helps legitimize the Assad government. Not to say that one should sable-ratter here but don't get your hopes up for a Putin-cleansing of Syria.

    3. OneOut   10 years ago

      "Fiorina: 'We must be prepared' to use force on Russia"

      Meh.

      If she really wanted to act tough she would have drawn a red line in the sand and threatened Putin that if he crosses it there will be a price to pay. It worked for Obam.......oh.. wait a minute.

  11. Antilles   10 years ago

    These shooters should do everyone a favor and shoot themselves first. Then again, if they did that they wouldn't get all the attention (posthumously) that they felt denied during their life.

    1. Antilles   10 years ago

      And don't forget the manifesto! I have a manifesto but no one wants to read it. But if I go out and kill a bunch of people then the masses will scramble to get a copy in an attempt to understand me. In this environment I'm surprised there aren't more of these shootings...

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        I'm starting to wonder if we should provide a public place to commit suicide. An eight story monument that you can jump from for example. If you commit suicide using it a loud speaker will play a one minute speech by you after you hit the ground, and an up to one hundred page manifesto can be made available to print in a nearby gift shop. A set amount of the proceeds from sales of your manifesto will go to the cause or person of your choice.

        It's a spectacle that gets your message out. You can get revenge on people by claiming they are the cause of your death in your one minute speech, and most importantly it doesn't involve killing other people.

        1. Free Market Socialist $park?   10 years ago

          I'm in, you pick the place then tell me where to send money.

        2. Antilles   10 years ago

          Interesting idea. But I suspect that over time people would become numb to it, so crazy people who have to up the ante to get the attention they desire. Plus it's hard to imagine that being allowed since there's so much opposition in this country to Assisted Suicide. But if your proposition were ever on a ballot, I'd vote for it!

          1. Illocust   10 years ago

            Oh people will definitely become numb to it over time, but it will act as a tourist attraction because humans are both curious and morbid. The people doing these sorts of killings are crazy enough they don't realize they are hurting their causes, so they are probably crazy enough not to understand the difference between tourist and convert crowds.

            The anti-assisted suicide thing is the main problem I see. I can't figure out a way to get around the current legal framework. Not unless I piggy backed off a crisis like the current one. Catch people while they are thinking about how they wish the bastard just offed himself, and they won't think about people pressuring them on their death beds.

            1. Remnant Psyche   10 years ago

              NOW you're thinking like a progressive! 😉

        3. Harvard   10 years ago

          Nah, a reality show. The Ultimate Reality Show. Useless fuck could drone on and on about how disaffected he is until they hit a hard break. Perhaps a panel that mocks him by rating his sincerity 1 - 10. Then he can dynamite himself in front of millions. Slow Mo would be a plus. American Psychiatry Assoc. could be a sponsor. Or Ruger maybe.

    2. DarrenM   10 years ago

      Then again, if they did that they wouldn't get all the attention (posthumously) that they felt denied during their life.

      I don't think they would be in a condition to care.

  12. Lee G   10 years ago

    I'm just glad that there's now something to distract from the Dunham thread.

    1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

      I'm on the live news feed from the local tv station. They've now got a student from the college on the phone. He just told them how he had been on his way to the "Lie-berry" when he first saw activity on campus.

      1. Remnant Psyche   10 years ago

        What? He's an Ebonics major.

  13. Lee G   10 years ago

    OT: You can now Yelp your friends (or anybody else)

    Imagine a database that allows you and everyone you know to be ranked, classified and reviewed by someone you've dated, worked with or befriended, without their consent.

    Welcome to Peeple, described by the founders as a "positivity app." When it launches in November, Peeple will allow users to rate and search human beings in the same way we rank and file restaurants, hotels, and car services on scores of other apps.

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      That idea is idiotic and I only give whoever came up with it 1 meowmeowbeenz.

      1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

        The people who came up with it are really upset that people are saying mean things about them on the internet now. The lulz are pretty epic.

        1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

          JUDGE NOT, LEST YE BE DOWNVOTED ON YOUTUBE

          1. Swiss Servator   10 years ago

            *slow clap*

      2. mad.casual   10 years ago

        It would be better if it were limited to the context of the other sites.

        mad.casual - A Langham Hotel-style intellect with an Ed Debevic's personality at a Budget Rent-a-car price.

    2. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      -1 Lee

      1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        "Is known to repeat his opinions over and over again, as if we didn't appreciate his wit the first time."

        1. Lee G   10 years ago

          I have a new mouse now and have left those days behind me.

          1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

            I know! Stop telling us!

            1. Lee G   10 years ago

              I CAN'T. I NEED TO EXPRESS MYSELF.

              *starts Vogueing*

              1. OneOut   10 years ago

                Say it again Lee.

    3. Trump-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

      I'm really surprised it too this long.

    4. Restoras   10 years ago

      Awesome. We can start with Congressmen.

    5. hamilton   10 years ago

      I saw that this morning and thought it would be awesome to have that for H&R commenters. I mean, the wiki really hasn't been updated in a while.

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        That could be entertaining. Especially if you can only update with reviews of commenters that consist of memes they have spawned. So essentially, John, Warty, and Nicole.

    6. Warty   10 years ago

      "Nicole: the worst"

    7. Dr. Fronkensteen   10 years ago

      Well we already know who would be rated the worst.

    8. Illocust   10 years ago

      Yeah, this will totally not end up a place for exes to bitch and falling outs from high school to be rehashed. I see this either fading in two months or becoming a tool to inform your in group who is in the out group.

    9. Antilles   10 years ago

      Actually, I think this concept is brilliant. Perhaps people will be more considerate if they know that their mistreatment of others could come back to haunt them.

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Fuck off.

        1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

          Irony?

        2. Antilles   10 years ago

          Ah...the first person I'm gonna rate!

      2. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

        Or, people will just shun all human contact since there's no way of keeping crazy exes from posting crazy, made up bullshit.

        1. Trump-o-Matic 5000   10 years ago

          ^This. I've been delving further and further along that path since the Facebook was introduced in 2005.

          1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

            My wife has absolutely refused to have anything to do with Facebook since it was created, for exactly this reason.

            She thinks anyone who goes in Facebook is nuts. She gets pissed if anyone posts a picture with her in it on Facebook, and asks that they not identify her if they have posted something.

            But she also has a strange belief that she has online privacy since she doesn't go on Facebook.

            1. BillEverman   10 years ago

              Yeah, she asked me to ask you to stop talking about her on here.

        2. Antilles   10 years ago

          I said I like the concept. But as with many things the execution will likely fall short. Sometimes I forget there are crazy and/or lying people among us.

        3. Suthenboy   10 years ago

          What? Are you nuts?

          The best way to get the real truth about any man is to ask his ex-wife. Everyone knows this.

          1. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

            You misspelled "bartender".

    10. Brett L   10 years ago

      I eagerly await enough assets to accrue in my down-rankers plus one stupid hiring manager eilling to blame my not getting a job based on my down-ranks to make me live on my own island rich.

    11. lap83   10 years ago

      I don't think of yelp as a source for restaurant reviewers so much as a source for pompous reviewers

      "I've eaten all over the world and I just love this type of currently trendy ethnic cuisine, so I was surprised to find a restaurant serving this style of food in this otherwise podunk town. I hope I never have to come here again, but if I do at least I know of one place I can be seen without dying of embarrassment"

      I imagine a database for ranking people would be similar, with reviews telling more about the reviewer than the one being reviewed.

      1. lap83   10 years ago

        bleh *source for restaurant reviews

      2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

        I don't think of yelp as a source for restaurant reviewers so much as a source for pompous reviewers

        Yes, thank you! You can tell that some of these assholes have had a life-long dream of being a restaurant critic for the NYT or something similar....and now they get to indulge in some wish-fulfillment.

        1. lap83   10 years ago

          Exactly

          Google reviews is much better. You don't have to wade through a long paragraph of BS to get to "my sandwich was tasty" or "my sandwich came with extra cockroaches". The reviews are straight and to the point.

  14. rts   10 years ago

    Take the following the usual grain of salt:

    Apparently the shooter posted on 4chan last night

    Police radio traffic of the incident

    1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

      Wtf are they even talking about with this "Beta" stuff?

      I sort of understand it in the context of pajama boy, but not the way they're using it.

      1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

        It's PUA-speak. Alphas are jerks and go around impregnating ladies who then get betas to raise their children. Betas are losers who white-knight for women because they think "being nice" is the way to get laid, as opposed to the real way, which is "being a dick."

        1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

          This is true. When I have sex, I single-mindedly concentrate all of my focus into my genitals. I am my dick. Be the dick, and nothing more than the dick.

        2. GILMORE?   10 years ago

          pppt. they're both wrong. The way you get laid is to be good looking, funny, and fantastic in bed.

          poor kids. someone needs to kick their ass and teach them some self respect.

          1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

            You get laid by teasing a woman with low self-esteem about her hair, weight, clothes, and intelligence. Also, I am not saying you hit her if she gives you any trouble, but a smack or two is okay.

            1. rocks   10 years ago

              Just remember to use a stick that is no wider than your thumb. Need to stay on the right side of being legal and all.

          2. Illocust   10 years ago

            Being a quick witted dick can make people you interact with superficially like you. A friend of mine got really misanthropic after finding that being a funny asshole to people he didn't like made him very popular with them in high school.

            So they aren't wrong, being a dick can get you laid. It's just the people it will get you laid with generally live off of drama, and are too stupid to build anything long term with (second part is my opinion, first part is why they like being with someone who is a jerk to them).

          3. SugarFree   10 years ago

            I've done pretty well with just funny...

          4. lap83   10 years ago

            "good looking, funny, and fantastic in bed."

            Does this person even exist?
            It reminds me of the fast/cheap/good Euler diagram - "pick two"

            1. Illocust   10 years ago

              I'll take good looking and fantastic in bed. I'm terrible with word play, and it feels like I'm not holding up my end of the conversation when I talk with someone who is good at it.

            2. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

              I am surprised none of you have claimed that you would take a person who is just good looking and use your charms and smooth moves to create a fantastic lover who perfectly suits your desires.

              1. lap83   10 years ago

                "use your charms and smooth moves"
                a bullwhip is faster

                1. Illocust   10 years ago

                  Ah lap83, your one of those deviant BSDM freaks I keep hearing about on my granny's cop shows. Trying seduce impressionable young women into your evil libertarian ways.

                  1. lap83   10 years ago

                    I'm actually (straight) female, so hopefully the comment comes across less psychopathic because people usually just assume that women aren't psychopaths, not that I'd use that to my advantage or anything... *shifty eyes*

              2. Sapient Mulch   10 years ago

                I am surprised none of you have claimed that you would take a person who is just good looking and use your charms and smooth moves to create a fantastic lover who perfectly suits your desires.

                "But they said we couldn't have sex with those robots!"

      2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        In the context of the Santa Barbara virgin shooter.

    2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      The police radio traffic is embarrassing. They had maybe 3 officers that responded right away. The rest of the cowards were trying to close out other calls or weren't answering their radios. Shameful.

      1. Mark6   10 years ago

        Hey, Dunkin' Donuts requires your undivided attention

    3. Sigivald   10 years ago

      "The Northwest". Yeah, I'm totally convinced that must have been THE GUY.

      Because The Northwest is so specific.

      (Interesting question: How many posts like that come up on 4Chan that can never be tied to anything?)

      1. Long Woodchippers   10 years ago

        but it was posted yesterday, with the OP saying he was going to shoot up a community college.

    4. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      CNN seems to confirm

      Investigators are examining social media postings made by a man, thought to be in his late 20s, who they believe is the suspect in Thursday's shootings at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Oregon, a source with knowledge of the investigation told CNN. The night before the attack, the alleged shooter appears to have had a conversation with others online about his intentions, the source said.

  15. SugarFree   10 years ago

    In an attempt to distract myself from the news, I offer that today is #askanarchivist day. I'm available if you have any archives/preservation related question.

    1. See Double You   10 years ago

      How do you resolve complex disputes without someone ultimately deciding, and how do you enforce that person's decision?

    2. cavalier973   10 years ago

      Why can't I find a copy of "Monsieur Beaucaire" starring Bob Hope?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        It is available on DVD from amazon in a double feature with Where There's Life.

    3. See Double You   10 years ago

      Whoops. I read that as "ask an anarchist" day.

    4. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

      What is the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?

      1. cavalier973   10 years ago

        What do you mean, African, or European swallow?

      2. Lee G   10 years ago

        More importantly, what is SF's favorite color?

        1. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

          Plaid?

        2. SugarFree   10 years ago

          Royal purple. Which is an ironic choice for a libertarian, I realize.

          1. Lee G   10 years ago

            Is that because of the line of synthetic lubricants they produce?

            1. SugarFree   10 years ago

              No, the association with monarchical systems of government.

    5. cavalier973   10 years ago

      The first Star Wars novel had a quote from something (possibly a book) called "The Journal of the Whills". Where can one find this journal?

      1. Caput Lupinum   10 years ago

        Here

    6. Restoras   10 years ago

      What's the best way to organize my digital photos?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Whatever really works for you. We generally go by date if it is available, considering how complex any sort of subject ordering can become.

        Make sure to use the .tif format when possible. To date is it most stable and lossless format known, and migrate to new storage media when it becomes widely-used.

    7. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

      How does one write description for famous lionized white dudes that doesn't ignore inequities of race, gender, and class?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        [withering stare]

      2. Sigivald   10 years ago

        Why do those inequities matter in a description of that dude?

        Answer that question, answer yours.

        1. Lee G   10 years ago

          *whoooosh*

          1. Christophe   10 years ago

            Nicole's deadpan sarcasm is just one of the reasons she's the worst.

    8. rts   10 years ago

      I have an old 5.25" floppy disk that contained my grandfather's life story that he dictated to me when I was a kid. I took it to one place years ago to get the data off but they were unable. So I've always wondered about digital archiving.

      How do the pros deal with digital archiving? Do they move everything to the latest greatest tech whenever it comes out, or how do they decide when and to which media to move data to? How do the determine how many copies to keep?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Migrate, migrate, migrate. Widespread usage is usually the standard, like the march from floppy to ZIP disks to CD ROM to DVD ROM.

        Three copies on any physical format, two onsite, one offsite. I keep my personal digital back-ups on USB drives, one of which stays in a safety deposit box. I have a Mac at home, so I partition the drives and keep Apple OS and Windows format copies. (Large archives now keep digital material in server vaults that back themselves up in different locations around the world.)

        As for the 5.25, I'd contact the archives at the nearest state university. They often keep legacy equipment for just that purpose. If they won't help you, they are probably just assholes. Try another. But also keep in mind that media was quite unstable. Even a weak magnetic field might have corrupted it.

        1. In League with the Dark Ones   10 years ago

          The Computer History Museum keeps a variety of old machines for that purpose if your local university doesn't have the equipment.

        2. Long Woodchippers   10 years ago

          I have several MP3s on my iPod that started off as vinyl records in the 70's and 80's, then migrated to cassette and finally MP3

        3. OneOut   10 years ago

          "one of which stays in a safety deposit box. "

          Hillary ?

    9. Caput Lupinum   10 years ago

      What is done to preserve old documents made with caustic inks, such as iron gall ink?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Iron gall ink is an inherent vice and there is a very little that can be done. Some institutions have tried interleaving buffered paper in hopes of neutralizing some of the acid in the ink, to little effect iirc. If possible, given the paper/parchment etc, some will wash the documents in deionized water and sodium bicarbonate to neutralize and stabilize the damage (this is also done with ground wood pulp documents with high lignin content.) This is an incredibly complex process and not something you should do at home. (And it usually is followed up by light encapsulating the document in Mylar, something that requires some very pricey equipment.)

        The "good" news is, all the ink usually does is eat away only the paper/parchment it is directly applied to, so the document is still readable, as such, since the shapes of the letters remain.

      2. Granny Weatherwax   10 years ago

        Iron gall inks do not work well on paper, so most documents written in oak gall ink are on parchment. The key to preserving parchment is absolute humidity control and keeping exposure to oxygen to a minimum That said, degradation of the ground from the ink is incredibly slow and a new document written in iron gall ink on parchment can reasonably last 1000 years or more. See Book of Kells

    10. Illocust   10 years ago

      At what point is something considered old enough to fall under your purview? Also, how do you decide what is important and what is not?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Institutions will generally collect anything that falls within their collection development policy, and of any age.

        Archives are generally run to focus on primary resources (letters, photographs, business records, etc.)

        Secondary resources (books, periodicals, government publications) are usually the purview of libraries. When those materials are of an age, a fragility or become rare, they become the responsibility of a special collections department. While special collections and archives are often housed together or even share staff or access points, they serve different functions.

        Deciding what is important is one of the hardest things to quantify and regularize. Archives generally err on the side of taking/retaining too much rather that too little. And every institution is different. In that way, I often describe archivists as "anti-librarians."

        1. OneOut   10 years ago

          Sugar you are reminding me of the charater on Friends who dinosaur bone collector or something. I've had a rough day and can't remember the exact term.

    11. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      How is anarchivism functionally different from anarchism?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        We are much better organized.

        1. Lee G   10 years ago

          Zing!

    12. Charles Easterly   10 years ago

      "I'm available if you have any archives/preservation related question."

      Very well, SugarFree.

      How much damage is done annually to the American forest by the spruce bud worm?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        I'm in a different movie, man.

    13. Free Market Socialist $park?   10 years ago

      What is the ideal medium for preserving fart stench? Sometimes I let the really horrific ones go when there's nobody else around to enjoy it. I'd like to be able to capture the experience for release in a more populated area.

      1. Lee G   10 years ago

        Silica aerogel

      2. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Ambergris.

      3. In League with the Dark Ones   10 years ago

        MythBusters did a segment on flatulence where they collected farts using an submerged inverted jar filled with water to collect farts. You could use that method.

        1. R C Dean   10 years ago

          Gawd, but I love this forum. You guys are the best worst.

      4. Mindyourbusiness   10 years ago

        Special delivery to the Clinton Campaign headquarters...

    14. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      Actually, I do have a question, though not very interesting. I've done some work with libraries over the past year, archiving old Umatic and beta tapes. I think we did it for NYU and another library, but both asked for a compressed version (DVCPro) and a 10bit, uncompressed version, all transferred using that bagit procedure.

      So... what up with that? Is the uncompressed version there to ensure future compatibility, in case DVCPro is dropped from future media players? Or is it for stability purposes, like what you said about tif files? If you have the space, and your whole purpose is maintaining integrity for decades down the line, I understand going with uncompressed video. But 225 mbit/s for something compressed to videotape in the 80s looks like such overkill.

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        We have a tendency to go for overkill in digitization.

        Archives and libraries both have a bad tradition of early adoption of technologies before they have been optimized. For example, when the mass digitization projects of photographs began, the prevailing standard was set to scanning everything, regardless of physical size, at 300 dpi. This was settled on mainly due to digital storage costs and millions of work hours were put into scanning photographs with not very good scanners into a substandard format to produce files that were barely usable just a decade later. So here we are, scanning them again, which is a lot of wear and tear on the original objects. Hence, the overkill.

        1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

          I see. That's what I figured, really. Tanks.

        2. OneOut   10 years ago

          But job security !

    15. Warty   10 years ago

      How are you still alive?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Black magic and super science.

    16. Warty   10 years ago

      Why are you still alive?

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        I'm not done yet.

    17. HolgerDanske   10 years ago

      In an attempt to distract myself from the news, I offer that today is #askanarchivist day. I'm available if you have any archives/preservation related question.

      Have you ever used a particle accelerator to read/scan a manuscript that was erased and overwritten?

    18. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      I have a friend, let's call him Not Crusty Juggler, who wants to know if it is possible to infiltrate Warty's dungeon for a randy doomcocking and still make it out alive?

    19. OneOut   10 years ago

      "In an attempt to distract myself from the news, I offer that today is #askanarchivist day. I'm available if you have any archives/preservation related question."

      Do women find archivists super sexy and throw their panties at them like they did Elvis ?

      I'm thinking of something to do in my retirement other than "Get Off My Lawn".

      Thanks Archivist .

    20. Kevin Sorbos Manful Locks   10 years ago

      What are your thoughts on microfilm? Specifically, what sort of role should/will it play in preserving future documents?

  16. See Double You   10 years ago

    The Brady Campaign will get richer, but that's about it, thankfully.

    1. Free Market Socialist $park?   10 years ago

      Doesn't he make enough money as the greatest quarterback ever already?

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        I deflated your joke.

  17. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    Does anybody need to read a non-straight news story about this? I mean, we know exactly what every news/politics website will write about this and what their commenters will say.

    1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      A person with mental illness who somehow fell through the cracks obtained a weapon, or weapons, legally (or illegally, the details don't matter), and carried out a grudge because they are a person who is mentally ill.

      It is just so sad, sad enough that politicians and activists are going to fuck it dry.

      1. Sigivald   10 years ago

        *Slow clap*

  18. Loki   10 years ago

    Gun free zone? If so, it looks like their magical gun free zone signs are defective. When is someone going to hold those sign manufacturers accountable? /sarc

    1. Drake   10 years ago

      More and bigger signs are definitely in order. Clearly the shooter didn't see them.

    2. mad.casual   10 years ago

      Hilariously, one showed up at my local grocery store. I wondered to myself, 'How could a business that *should* be otherwise so publicly accommodating, get away with this?'

      Upon closer inspection, the fine print (fine black print on clear glass so... nearly invisible) on the sign reads that it's applicable to employees and business associates only.

      Nice Trick!

  19. Will4Freedom   10 years ago

    I'm sorry to hear this news. My thoughts to the survivors and family members of the victims.

  20. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    The media is the worst.

    1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

      Nicole has been bested.

      1. Just say Nikki   10 years ago

        Oh I think not.

        I mean, I don't even know why anyone complains about the media doing that. It's their job. Peeps want the reporting, after all.

        1. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

          You are right, you are still worser.

          All of the requests on the same page shines a light on the seediness that is that industry. I mean, at least lie and say you hope they are safe before you ask for the interview.

      2. Swiss Servator   10 years ago

        Worsted, rather?

    2. Restoras   10 years ago

      This is Jack's complete lack of surprise.

    3. Lee G   10 years ago

      I remember when Andrew Cunanan murdered Versace. At the time I was renting a room from a friend who had gone to school with Cunanan. We had multiple phone calls a day from "journalists" who wanted interviews or to buy his old yearbook. IIRC, it was mostly Hard Copy and Inside Edition types.

    4. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      It is funny / disgusting to see it all lined up like that, but what do you expect? They got a job to do, and only 140 characters for their pitch.

      1. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

        Can't they just file a ghoul report, I mean a pool report?

    5. Long Woodchippers   10 years ago

      So how do these produces from ABC and CNN found these accounts so quickly? Do they have bots set up to scan the web for keywords such as "students are running everywhere"?

  21. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    2nd Active Shooter in One Day

    1. Swiss Servator   10 years ago

      "The Associated Press 7:29 a.m. EDT September 14, 2015"

      *narrows gaze*

      1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

        well.... I SAW THE STORY ON THE SAME DAY

        which is almost the same thing.

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          Mandatory grief counseling.

  22. toolkien   10 years ago

    http://www.davidcolarusso.com/deaths/#.Vg2Iy_lVhBd

  23. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

    The campus is a gun free zone.

    How did someone get a gun into a gun free zone?

    1. Lee G   10 years ago

      I blame the lax Virginia gun laws.

    2. Sigivald   10 years ago

      Note that, while it's probably irrelevant to the shooter, Oregon campuses cannot, because of preemption, ban licensed concealed carry.

      So they're not strictly gun-free zones.

    3. Restoras   10 years ago

      I'm sure Tony can answer that for us.

  24. Social Justice is neither   10 years ago

    I grew up there and I can't think of a more depressing place. A mass shooting there doesn't surprise me one bit.

    1. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

      Why is it depressing? Is it the economy?

      The parts of Oregon I've seen were beautiful.

      1. Lee G   10 years ago

        You've never been to Portland I take it.

        1. Ken Shultz   10 years ago

          I didn't think Portland was bad. I must have been in the good part of town. Anyway, it's not like it's back east or something.

          I've hiked a nice chunk of the PCH through Oregon. I still think...about the most beautiful beach I ever saw was in Oregon.

          Forests and waterfalls. Snow covered mountains and wildlife. World's best pinot noir. Awesome Shakespeare Festival.

          I was thinking maybe it was a logging town that went bust or something. That's still my first bet.

          1. Sigivald   10 years ago

            Roseburg's only depressing if you have to live there and look for work or enjoyment...

        2. Juice   10 years ago

          I thought Oregon was fucking sweet. Even Portland, although I preferred Eugene and Corvallis. (Those were the only places I went.) I liked Corvallis because it was so small and quiet but not like a small town in the South or even on the East Coast. It was totally laid back with $3 microbrew pints and $2 ones on Monday.

      2. Jingles   10 years ago

        Roseburg's notable for being along I-5 and... that's really about it.

      3. Social Justice is neither   10 years ago

        The economy has been in the toilet for the last 30 years. I think right now it's holding on through welfare, unemployment and weed...so things might turn around soon.

        The mix of "poor" california retiree and small town hick/redneck that manages to pull out the worst in each.

        The insular and proud of it view of the world. Most people I grew up with couldn't fathom moving more than 5 miles away, high school guidance counselors recommending the local community college to kids with enough credits to graduate from said college. Just hearing a town of 17K people called "The City".

        It's pretty but unless you're an outdoor all the time type of person there just isn't anything there.

    2. Suthenboy   10 years ago

      Never been up there myself, but I get the notion that a lot of crazies move there. For a few decades they seemed to have more than their fair share of serial killers.

  25. Jordan   10 years ago

    No doubt the Ban Boner crowd is at full mast right now.

    1. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

      My wife, whom I love dearly, had a great take here:

      I patiently wait to find out what thing we can find to blame this one. Was the shooter wearing blue sneakers? Blue sneakers should be banned so this doesn't happen again!

  26. mad.casual   10 years ago

    OT: Homophobic Pizzeria Inadvertently Caters a Gay Wedding

    So, if there ever was a question about it, at least with some, being about nothing but trophies; let it be laid to rest. Sometimes the difference between 'Do you hate gay/SJW people?' and 'Are there gay/SJW people you hate?' is subtle and sometimes, it's not.

    1. GILMORE?   10 years ago

      They specifically said they didn't care if the gayest people in gaytown ordered their pizzas to go. Just that they'd be "uncomfortable" with participating in a gay wedding.

      a la Vegans and Muslims not being comfortable at a pig-roast.

      I really don't get why so many people think lack of affirmation is a hate-crime.

      1. Lee G   10 years ago

        If you don't fully agree with me on everything that my group has determined to be right and good, then you're against me and everything that is holy.

  27. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Prediction: The shooter recently passed some mental health screening that would have blocked him from legally having a firearm if only we had common sense legislation banning the mentally ill from legally having firearms and he had failed the screening.

    1. Mark6   10 years ago

      See 11f on the NICS form. It's already covered by law

      1. swillfredo pareto   10 years ago

        See 11f on the NICS form.

        Just use the standard S-1798 and write in "pizza" where it says "machine gun".

  28. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

    I believe in Doing Something, so long as it's a smart something.

    For example, how many mass shootings are at honky-tonks? They're full of inebriated good old boys - shouldn't there be more mass shootings there?

    1. Restoras   10 years ago

      shouldn't there be more mass shootings there?

      They aren't gun-free zones, in all likelihood, so no.

      1. Sigivald   10 years ago

        More importantly, drunk dick wants to shoot one guy he has a sudden problem with, not "everyone at the bar because his life sucks".

        Someone looking to kill a bunch of people isn't going to pick a bar, so much, especially one where there's a good chance at least someone behind the bar has a weapon.

        People who want to kill lots of other people choose places where they can achieve that.

        1. Tony   10 years ago

          So what you're saying is that with people able to carry guns in so many places, the really good targets for mass shooters are the remaining places, like schools and theaters.

          Obviously the country will never be rid of mass shootings until every kindergartner is packing.

          1. Jordan   10 years ago

            Hmm. The last time I went to an elementary school - which admittedly was a long time ago - there were adults there.

            1. Restoras   10 years ago

              But were they government approved adults, Jordan? Because in Tonyland, only government knows best, and only adults that work for the government can be trusted with (insert anything here).

              1. Long Woodchippers   10 years ago

                The teachers work for the govt, let a few of them carried concealed, and they don't have to advertise which ones.

                Don't rely on the 300 lb resource officer posted outside the office. He will be the first target.

          2. Hyperbolical (wadair)   10 years ago

            You exaggerate, of course. Nonetheless, if you want to get attacked, then disarm yourself and advertise that fact to the world. Or, you could do the opposite and reduce your chances of suffering such an attack. It's not exactly rocket surgery.

          3. OneOut   10 years ago

            Curious about how many VIPoliticians who will be surrounded by armed bodyguards will be saying that we shouldn't be allowed to own guns ?

  29. Suthenboy   10 years ago

    Christ, this makes me sick. I know they are bat-shit insane, but the perpetrators of these kinds of things are no less than pure evil. Fucking worthless cowards.

    I can't imagine what the parents of the murdered are going through right now.

    I have to ask. Is the school a gun-free zone?

    The gun grabbers will start their shrieks and emotional appeals any moment now. Those people are equally as evil and make me sick also.

    1. Tony   10 years ago

      You're the one who just fucking politicized it, so shut up.

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        No, Tony, he's simply pointing out the inevitable. Like predicting rain during monsoon season in Indonesia.

      2. Lee G   10 years ago

        Brady Centers Twitter feed yields:

        Our thoughts are with the entire Roseburg community as they are the latest to be impacted by a uniquely American tragedy.

        Coalition to stop gun violence twitter

        If you feel absolutely sick about the #UCCShooting, pick up the phone & call an elected official who backs the NRA. And give them an earful.

        1. See Double You   10 years ago

          They just want a "conversation," not to force their anti-gun hysteria onto peaceful gun owners.

        2. Akira   10 years ago

          Our thoughts are with the entire Roseburg community as they are the latest to be impacted by a uniquely American tragedy.

          Yep, mass shootings never happen in countries where they have mandatory registration, "assault weapon" bans, safe storage laws, and no concealed carry whatsoever.

      3. Lee G   10 years ago

        More CSTGV twitter

        Physically sick contemplating another mass shooting? Vow to fight the NRA & their legislative lackeys w/ everything you have. #NotOneMore

      4. Brian   10 years ago

        I encourage the democrats to really go Pure Gun Control 2016.

        They should embrace that.

  30. Dr No   10 years ago

    I blame things which didn't do it, as well as people who didn't do it.
    Which will form the basis of my solution to it eeeever happening again.

  31. EvilWayz   10 years ago

    Gun Free Zone strikes again. Expect 10% increase in gun sales tomorrow.

  32. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

    Eternal Memory

  33. Warty   10 years ago

    What a shitshow. Here. This should cheer everyone up.

    1. Al Sharpton   10 years ago

      That is a statistically unlikely number of blondes.

      1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        Sorority, dude.

    2. GILMORE?   10 years ago

      That story had a link to another story...

      ..whereupon i thought to myself = "I really want to party with THIS GUY"

      "Homer's night on the town
      If you drank a shot with the Knights mascot on Sept. 20, you were basically harboring a fugitive

      Joe Gillespie woke up at the bottom of a BB&T Ballpark stairwell with no idea how he got there. It was hours after an event he attended in the venue, and it didn't seem like the beginning of what would be one of his "top three nights of all time."

      That is, until he began searching for a way out and came across the dressing room for Homer the Dragon, the Charlotte Knights' mascot. He spent the next five hours of that Sunday morning carousing around Uptown Charlotte as Homer, posing for pictures and getting free drinks wherever he tore up the dance floor. By Monday, Gillespie was in jail and the story, complete with a mullet in a mugshot, went viral shortly after."

    3. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      I'm glad the hot brunette didn't disappoint me. She's just eating her ice cream and checkin' her phone every now and then. I'll imagine she's reading War and Peace or something.

    4. This Machine   10 years ago

      God Bless America. That is all.

    5. mad.casual   10 years ago

      This should cheer everyone up.

      Is the hot dog/pretzel rod to the face thing deliberate? I assume at college age it's deliberate, but the deadpan 'look at me having a good time!' expressions are too hard to read. Apparently, I'm too old to tell when a girl/woman is doing something suggestive because it's humorous or because she doesn't know any better.

      1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

        All the bitches crave the pretzel rod, bro.

        1. mad.casual   10 years ago

          Were their some licking the ketchup from between their fingers and I missed it?

    6. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

      Do they even *know* they're at a baseball game, or did they just wander in by mistake?

    7. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

      Selfies are stupid, but still beat watching baseball.

  34. Suthenboy   10 years ago

    Just looked over the 4Chan link.

    The majority of those fucks seem to be supportive of the shooter. It is hard to tell if they take him seriously or not, but God, why would anyone even blow hot air about something like that?

    I am guessing misfit kids who blame the world for their own shortcomings and probably have a touch of crazy in them as well.

    1. Lee G   10 years ago

      It's the internet.

    2. Sigivald   10 years ago

      In other words, "4chan users".

      (That and "4chan is trolls".)

    3. Warty   10 years ago

      It's nothing new.

      "I stood up in a social studies class -the teacher wanted a discussion -- and said I could never kill anyone or condone anyone who did kill anyone. But that I could, on some level, understand these kids in Colorado, the killers. Because day after day, slight after slight, exclusion after exclusion, you can learn how to hate, and that hatred grows and takes you over sometimes, especially when you come to see that you're hated only because you're smart and different, or sometimes even because you are online a lot, which is still so uncool to many kids?

      After the class, I was called to the principal's office and told that I had to agree to undergo five sessions of counseling or be expelled from school, as I had expressed ?sympathy? with the killers in Colorado, and the school had to be able to explain itself if I ?acted out?. In other words, for speaking freely, and to cover their ass, I was not only branded a weird geek, but a potential killer. That will sure help deal with violence in America."

      1. Illocust   10 years ago

        Oh fucking hell. Murder fantasies of between 1 and 4 people you personally know I can understand. They could have possibly done enough to you to justify your hatred. Anymore than that and you are a narcissist blaming innocent people for shit they didn't do (unless you are literally in a concentration camp or warzone).

        1. mad.casual   10 years ago

          Murder fantasies of between 1 and 4 people you personally know I can understand.

          At a frustrating time in my life a female co-worker with a background in forensics said knowing this fact about me put her at ease. She explained how the profile (at the time) was always white guy, 20-40, above average education, little or no family/personal life, etc., etc. and that I fit to a 'T'. The thing that set me apart is that the neighbors and co-workers were always surprised when they went off and, if the police showed up and said I went on a rampage and murdered someone she wouldn't be at all surprised and would probably suspect that the victims most likely did something to deserve it.

          I might nudge the number a little higher than 4 if we're talking total, but sincerely fantasizing to murder more than a person or two at a time is not at all unheard of.

      2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

        Because day after day, slight after slight, exclusion after exclusion, you can learn how to hate, and that hatred grows and takes you over sometimes

        See?!?!? Microaggressions are real!

        1. Long Woodchippers   10 years ago

          I told my daughter about the few times I was bullied from 6th grade on up. I identified the properly responsible person and used my fists.

      3. Jordan   10 years ago

        That doesn't strike me as that outrageous. I can definitely see how severely bullied kids could snap.

        1. Akira   10 years ago

          I think there are two issues to take into consideration here:

          1) When two kids fight, most teachers will punish both kids equally, even if one kid had been bullied by the other for weeks and weeks.

          2) 99% of teachers and 90% of parents will tell kids that the solution to bullying and teasing is "just ignore them and they'll stop". That NEVER works. Zero percent success rate. They do it even worse because they know you'll just put up with it. I'm all for the non-aggression principle, but... Sometimes, the only solution is to give that bully a good crack in the jaw.

      4. Notorious UGCC   10 years ago

        "Because day after day, slight after slight, exclusion after exclusion, you can learn how to hate, and that hatred grows and takes you over sometimes, especially when you come to see that you're hated only because you're smart and different"

        Sounds like a supervillain origin story. You know, when the bad guy has the hero in a dungeon and is just shooting the breeze about how come he *the villain) became so bad.

        "And then, the Fuhrer personally trained me, and I became an embodiment of ultimate evil, ha ha ha! But enough about me, what's your favorite deep-dish pizza?"

  35. XM   10 years ago

    Oregon expanded background checks on online and private gun sales in August.

    I suppose the background check will cover personal vendettas and grudges.

  36. See Double You   10 years ago

    Bring on the Facederp!

    Just fucking horrified about UCC and also just already tired about the non-conversation that will follow.

    By "conversation" you mean "disarm or else."

    1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      Just fucking horrified about UCC

      Yes, the use of "fucking" as an intensifier has convinced me that your feelings of horror are genuine and not a convenient pretext to socially signal and self-justify your ideological biases.

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        Also, she should that the Uniform Commercial Code isn't all that bad.

      2. lap83   10 years ago

        +1 fucking love science!

        1. Lee G   10 years ago

          Speaking of which, as much as I'm interested in The Martian, I don't think I can sit thru a movie with Matt Damon blurting out lines like "I'm going to science the shit out this"

          1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

            YEP. That is seriously the only reason I'm avoiding it. I generally like Ridley Scott, it's getting good reviews, it's supposed to be a fun adventure; but I can't stand a grown, accomplished man using 'science' as a verb.

            1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

              Ridley Scott hasn't made a decent movie in decades. If this one doesn't suck then it is completely because it was more or less written for him.

    2. Lee G   10 years ago

      How can you be tired about a non-conversation?

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        She's tired of the fact that she can't force her personal preferences on people like us. Not yet, anyway.

        At this point, it is only lobbying by certain special interest groups (here, the NRA) that prevents the U.S. from going full Eurotyranny.

        1. Lee G   10 years ago

          I read that as Eurotranny the first time.

  37. Juvenile Bluster   10 years ago

    From my friend who gave me the "Imagine" quote yesterday...

    Yeah. And these mass shootings are so unlikely when compared to all the other ways somebody can be killed that we really don't have to worry about [His kid's name] or [My kid's name] getting shot to death at school. I mean who even cares about 10 or 20 students? There's nothing anybody can do thats preventative that won't greviously harm everybody else's freedoms. I mean really. Why care? People have all these statistics to prove their side already and they're all obviously wrong. Nobody really knows anything. Best leave it all alone.

    I can't even.

    1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

      "There's nothing anybody can do thats preventative that won't greviously harm everybody else's freedoms."

      Well he hit the nail on the head there.

      1. See Double You   10 years ago

        I know he's saying that facetiously, but I wonder if he would have such an attitude toward his preferred freedoms.

        1. MJGreen - Docile Citizen   10 years ago

          Hey! His preferred freedoms are the important ones, OK? After all, the modern man doesn't need a gun.

  38. XM   10 years ago

    Anyone know who the shooter is?

    1. rts   10 years ago

      It's Reddit, so take with salt: here you go.

      1. XM   10 years ago

        Holy cow, the kid looks creepy.

        1. OneOut   10 years ago

          It's obvious this dude is a freak.

          That hair is sooo Beiber 2012.

          Doesn't he know the Beb has evolved ?

  39. XM   10 years ago

    Hotair.com is reporting that the shooter allegedly asked the students to state their religion.

  40. Arisuka   10 years ago

    "Oregon Gov. Kate Brown has described him as a 20-year-old male."

    No mention of race? No pic of the perp plastered all over the media? Hmmm. Must be one of those protected groups.

    1. OneOut   10 years ago

      The local dead tree rag The Houston Chronicle does this on a daily basis.

      A typical crime story will read something like this. "Police are advising people to be on the lookput for two males in their mid twenties . When last seen fleeing the scene one was wearing a black t-shirt and red sneakers while the other wore blue jeans and white sneakers. Police advise the suspects should be considered armed and dangerous and if spotted you should call 911 immediately and do not try and apprehend the suspects yourself.

      I shit you not. It has become a running joke around town. They are owned by the same group that owns the liberal Boston Herald or whatever so that should explain their liberal attitude towards race. "Maybe if we don't say the boys (ooops racist I know ) are black no one will think that ".

  41. ErnieLane   10 years ago

    Just another mass shooting in a gun-free zone. When will leaders learn?

  42. Richard Rider   10 years ago

    And yet again, a protracted shooting of many people by a madman in what is surely a "gun free" zone. Is anyone EVER going to figure out the correlation?

    BTW, in Utah, you can pack heat on campus. Indeed, Utah PUBLIC SCHOOL teachers can carry -- it's been so for over a dozen years. No firearm incidents of ANY kind -- in college or at a public school.

  43. Richard Rider   10 years ago

    Finally! A barbaric yet humane strategy to combat these senseless shootings by madmen
    by Richard Rider

    All right. Enough is ENOUGH! And I'm not kidding. It's time we take REAL steps to end these senseless tragic random shootings.

    No, not more gun control. And not even more guards everywhere. Instead, I propose we put an end this madness a different way. It's time for a radical new approach. A barbaric but painless solution.

    We have to understand that such premeditated killers don't seem to fear death. Indeed, they seem to welcome it -- often ending their own lives. So we need to go at this a different way -- a way to deter them from a fear of what happens AFTER they die.

    Here's my plan: Publicly announce that from this time forward, any such killer (bomber, shooter, or whatever) will have his body BADLY mutilated. Remember, I'm talking BARBARIC.

    Start with cutting off penises and testicles (almost all such shooters are guys). Announce that these body parts will be jammed in the deceased shooter's mouth.

    Furthermore, gouge out the eyes. Pull out all teeth. Slash the face to ribbons. Cut off all fingers and toes. Smash the elbows and knees.

    There, that ought to do it. And oddly enough, I'm convinced this post-death retaliation will work on at least some of the shooters.

    (continued)

  44. Richard Rider   10 years ago

    (continued)

    These shooters crave the attention they get by their despicable act. Complain all you want about the avalanche of press coverage -- these killers are going to get the attention they crave. It's the price we pay for a (relatively) free press, and I can live with that.

    But it's likely these wackos don't crave the thought of being mutilated -- even if they are crazy. And even after death.

    I know, I know -- it's too ghoulish an idea to even seriously consider. It's better to keep doing what we've been doing -- cleaning up after the killings in the (usually) gun free zones, wringing our hands as usual.

    But is the status quo really better?

    I think not. For me, the only question is whether or not grisly pictures of the mutilated killer should be posted on the Internet. For now, I'd say "no" -- but only because it would be hard to keep kids from seeing them.

    Besides, posting such photos is probably not necessary anyway. Merely threatening to carry out such an horrible act (and following though on the next shooter's body) should put a real damper on this aberrant behavior. I think a frank discussion with psychiatrists would find that I'm correct in this.

    At the very least, it's time to consider this mutilation alternative. Remember, no one is killed, tortured or otherwise physically harmed. It's a terrible idea -- except when one considers our current useless policies.

    1. Sapient Mulch   10 years ago

      Publicly announce that from this time forward, any such killer (bomber, shooter, or whatever) will have his body BADLY mutilated. Remember, I'm talking BARBARIC.

      Start with cutting off penises and testicles (almost all such shooters are guys). Announce that these body parts will be jammed in the deceased shooter's mouth.

      Furthermore, gouge out the eyes. Pull out all teeth. Slash the face to ribbons. Cut off all fingers and toes. Smash the elbows and knees.

      "These job postings almost write themselves!"

      /job services employee

      1. Richard Rider   10 years ago

        I would prefer to give first choice for the mutilation job to the relatives of the victims. I favor contracting out government work whenever possible -- especially to someone who will do it for FREE.

        1. OneOut   10 years ago

          Too bad we can't consult Ruyard Kipling on this matter. He wrote a poem about this very thing concerning the women in Afghanistan.

          Something about advising the young British soldiers to save their last bullet for themselves.

  45. CatoTheYounger   10 years ago

    Could a libertarian case be made for gun control?

    1. Suthenboy   10 years ago

      Yes.

      Poor control means you are a poor shot and therefore unable to competently defend your inherent rights.

    2. SIV   10 years ago

      No but dickheads callng themselves libertarians have proposed it. See Cato's Robert A Levy.

  46. Michael Murray   10 years ago

    Let me guess, just like every other murder spree but one, it's a gun free zone. There is another great progressive idea that has worked SO well.

  47. Rockabilly   10 years ago

    According to The Federalist

    Umpqua Community College, the site of the mass shooting, is a gun-free zone.

    http://thefederalist.com/2015/.....n-control/

    Maybe the shooter can't read ?

    barry is calling for 'common sense' gun control. I translate it to be communist sense gun control - AKA confiscation.

  48. AD-RtR/OS!   10 years ago

    How could this happen in a Gun Free Zone?

    1. JeremyR   10 years ago

      Maybe they should change it to a bullet free zone?

  49. Pulseguy   10 years ago

    President Obama is absolutely right on. I'm so tired of you Teathuglicans saying otherwise.

    We need laws right now making it illegal for people to kill and shoot others.

    1. Jackand Ace   10 years ago

      Exactly.

      1. Sevo   10 years ago

        Jack, you been pwnd. And busted.

        1. OneOut   10 years ago

          True dat.

          What we need a 5 more.. no 10 more, maybe 20 more laws making it illegal to murder people amd bigger signs saying "This is a Gun Free Zone".

          Maybe it's the signs fault. Maybe if they said This is ABSOLUTELY a Gun Free Zone....and in BIG letters...big RED letters because big red letters mean business.

          That's the ticket.

          I still want to look through this guys medicine cabinet.

          1. Sevo   10 years ago

            "What we need a 5 more.. no 10 more, maybe 20 more laws making it illegal to murder people amd bigger signs saying "This is a Gun Free Zone"."

            Dunno if it's still there or those with some intelligence have ripped it down, but there was a sign on I-80 between SF and Sacto: "Davis is a nuclear-free zone!"
            I wondered how the kept the atoms organized

          2. Sevo   10 years ago

            Oh, and:
            "I still want to look through this guys medicine cabinet."
            Jack's? Naah; standard depressants. That's all it takes to swallow Obo's comments whole.

    2. Richard Rider   10 years ago

      I'm AMAZED that no one thought of this before!

  50. XM   10 years ago

    They should have revealed the identity of the killer by now. Was it the "egg man" or not?

  51. Jackand Ace   10 years ago

    The Presidents comments were right on point. It's insane that we accept these occurrences without any attempt at reducing gun violence. He called for stricter gun laws, Scott? Good for him. It's typical? Not as typical as the constant mass shootings that occur here. Shame on you all for accepting it all so willingly.

    1. Alan@.4   10 years ago

      EXACTLY what steps or actions would you propose or push were you positioned to do any such thing. No generalities please.

    2. Sevo   10 years ago

      Jackand Ace|10.1.15 @ 8:14PM|#
      "...Shame on you all for accepting it all so willingly."

      Yeah, shame on us for not being 'concerned' like oh-so wonderful Jack!
      Why, most of us here were practically cheering him on, weren't we?

    3. OldMexican   10 years ago

      Re: Jackass Ass,

      The Presidents comments were right on point.

      If the "point " is to ghoulishly score political points before the victims are even identified, then you would be right.

      It's insane that we accept these occurrences without any attempt at reducing gun violence.

      It is clear we need more mellow guns, because these are quite rowdy.

      Asshole.

      It's typical? Not as typical as the constant mass shootings that occur here. Shame on you all for accepting it all so willingly.

      So many that you actually need two (count them: 2) hands to count. them!

      Do you even believe your own BS, Jackass?

    4. Hyperbolical (wadair)   10 years ago

      It's insane that we accept these occurrences without any attempt at reducing gun violence.

      There have been many attempts to reduce and mitigate murder by gun. They haven't worked. Some of the recent mass murderers got their guns illegally. Laws don't work against the lawless. More laws will not make up for that fact. Common Sense Gun Control? is already enacted, but has had little effect. If doing the same thing while expecting different results is a definition of insanity, the doubling down is double insanity. Yet progressives continue to propose the same doubling down every time a senseless mass murder is committed. And they continue to blame those who disagree with them for the murders even though their solutions have failed.

      Shame on you all for accepting it all so willingly.

      Nobody is "accepting it all so willingly." That's just your response to disagreement. You accuse those who disagree with you of callousness to shut down conversation while many progressives who use your same silly tactics are calling for a conversation about common sense gun control. If you progressives want a conversation you can have it, but you must be willing to listen and to accept that your past attempts have failed and that doubling down will not produce a solution. Otherwise you don't deserve the time of day.

      1. Michael Ejercito   10 years ago

        Has martial law been tried?

    5. OneOut   10 years ago

      Considering that most of the mass shooters are liberal leaning nutjobs, and not conservatives, perhaps your side could quit the name calling and personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with the liberal position on issues ?

      No one can deny that the personal attack method of denigrating comes directly from the modern day Democrat Bible "Rules for Radicals".

      Stop your tribe from inspiring these boderline mentals Jackland and maybe fewer of them will go off the deep end in the future.

      That would be doing something , no ? Even the guy you elected to what is supposed to be the most dignified office in the world spouted a "TeaBagger" crude insult on TV.

    6. XM   10 years ago

      Oregon expanded background checks on private and online gun sales, and the campus was a gun free zone.

      So.........

    7. Michael Ejercito   10 years ago

      Mexico has stricter gun laws.

  52. Alan@.4   10 years ago

    My first attempted disappeared, I'm stubborn so I'll try once more.

    From what I've seen/heard, little information re the shooter other than the following:

    1. He was a 20 year old.
    2. Supposedly, at one point, he inquired into the religion of some who became victims.

    As to comment from Obama, the usual comparisons between this country, and other nations. Also, some generalities regarding the need to "do something", heaven knows what, however given his past comments and the record of his expressed desires and executive antics, draw your own conclusions. Things might become clearer, more interesting when, if more information becomes available.

  53. wolff   10 years ago

    I make up to $90 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $40h to $86h? Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now i am hoping i could help someone else out there by sharing this link... Try it, you won't regret it!......

    http://www.HomeJobs90.Com

  54. mpercy   10 years ago

    Obama didn't even wait until the bodies are cold before he started in politicizing their deaths.

    Meanwhile:

    Rank City
    30 Baton Rouge, LA
    29 Youngstown, OH
    28 San Bernardino, CA
    27 Oakland, CA
    26 Barberton, OH
    25 Poughkeepsie, NY
    24 Cincinnati, OH
    23 Petersburg, VA
    22 Wilmington, DE
    21 York, PA
    20 East Palo Alto, CA
    19 Jackson, MS
    18 Wilkes-Barre, PA
    17 Birmingham, AL
    16 East Point, GA
    15 East Chicago, IN
    14 Compton, CA
    13 Baltimore, MD
    12 St. Louis, MO
    11 Harvey, IL
    10 Newark, NJ
    9 New Orleans, LA
    8 Trenton, NJ
    7 Detroit, MI
    6 Flint, MI
    5 Saginaw, MI
    4 Chester, PA
    3 Gary, IN
    2 Camden, NJ
    1 East St. Louis, IL

    1. Sevo   10 years ago

      m, how about some info on the 'rank'?

      1. geo1113   10 years ago

        I have been to towns 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, and 25. I wouldn't live in any of them. Is that the information you seek?

    2. Richard Rider   10 years ago

      I assume this city ranking is "gun deaths per 100,000" or some such, with "1" being the worst.

      Nothing correlates perfectly with such a list, but the characteristic that gives the best statistical correlation is likely the percentage of blacks in a city. There are DEFINITE exceptions, but overall the correlation is pretty high. But nobody wants to talk about that.

      1. geo1113   10 years ago

        Racist!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      2. Sevo   10 years ago

        Richard Rider|10.1.15 @ 10:38PM|#
        "I assume this city ranking is "gun deaths per 100,000" or some such, with "1" being the worst."

        That might be true, or it might be towns with roses bought on Valentine's Day.
        I'm going to avoid the conclusion-jumping event until mpercy gives us some idea.

        1. Richard Rider   10 years ago

          Sevo, given that it's statistically likely you don't follow this issue or peruse the relevant data, your decision is a wise one. I have some passing familiarity with these matters, so I can intelligently speculate as to the criteria used in these city rankings.

          Here's a bit more on the black thingy:

          Blacks constitute about 13.1% of America's population.
          quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html

          Yet when it comes to crime, the FBI reports that in 2012 blacks committed:
          49.4% of all murders
          32.5% of all forcible rapes
          54.9% of all robberies
          34.1% of all aggravated assaults
          28.1% of ALL crime
          http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-
          the-u.s/2012/crime-in-the-
          u.s.-2012/tables/43tabledatadecoverviewpdf

          Are whites a major murder threat to blacks? Of course not. 90.8% of all murdered blacks are killed by other blacks. The remaining 9.2% black murder victims were killed by ALL other races, or "unknown" -- which doubtless includes some additional blacks.
          fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/
          2011/crime-in-the-u.s.-2011/
          tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-6

          NOTE: I had to fiddle with the links to get past the spam filter. An intelligent person can "connect the dots."

    3. Harvard   10 years ago

      My hometown has fallen to 6th? The two best things we ever did was make Buicks and shoot people and ferkin Saginaw is ahead of us?

  55. Kratos   10 years ago

    I love Obama and Us
    http://www.mytricks.in/

  56. EndTheGOP   10 years ago

    There's only one way to stop this madness. Prosecute the family members of these wack-jobs for not reporting these sickos to the proper authorities. The vast majority of these family members know their offspring and relatives are dangerous nut-jobs, yet nothing can be done until the sickies do their damage.

    In the 40s, 50s and 60s we used to institutionalize the mentally ill but then the Liberals said "You can't lock these people up, they didn't do anything." So we let the whack-jobs out to roam the streets and live under our bridges and get a hold of guns and kill us. Sounds like another socialist plot to me.

    This is insane. We deserve the fucked-up society we have.

  57. JayJayTheTooth   10 years ago

    Reason, you know I love you, but "But not us! We'd never politicize a tragedy!" is so obviously implied in that 6:40 PM update.....keep it real.

  58. Free Market Socialist $park?   10 years ago

    +1 Chinese have a lot of hells

  59. Suicidy   10 years ago

    According to the late Gary Gygax, there are 666 layers of the Abyss. And I'm sure the shooter was chaotic evil. So he should end up there. Unless he makes a 20 on that d20.

  60. Dark Lord of the wood chipper   10 years ago

    Indeed!

  61. Overt   10 years ago

    +6 Demon Bag

  62. Sigivald   10 years ago

    Wasn't easy.

  63. GILMORE?   10 years ago

    re: these misanthropic beta-boys

    I have a suspicion that a lot of these kids are only-children.

    or at least are boys that never had brothers.

  64. Crusty Juggler   10 years ago

    Gil, you are in Brooklyn, you are surrounded by them. They come out from Iowa to finally be themselves.

  65. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

    What's wrong with not having siblings?!?! That's the best part of my life!

  66. See Double You   10 years ago

    I'm tempted to do that myself, but I like to keep a pulse on what's happening with my proggie acquaintances.

  67. Jordan   10 years ago

    I had to block posts from Being Liberal, Occupy Democrats, etc in order to make Facebook bearable.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Superman Is About the Anti-War Vibe Shift

Matthew Petti | 7.18.2025 5:23 PM

Why Are Students Using AI To Cheat? Maybe Because They Shouldn't Be In College At All

Emma Camp | 7.18.2025 4:00 PM

Although Meth Is Irresistible, The New York Times Says, Addicts Often Prefer Small Cash Rewards

Jacob Sullum | 7.18.2025 1:45 PM

ICE Is Shipping Detainees to Hawaii as Bed Space on the U.S. Mainland Fills Up

Autumn Billings | 7.18.2025 1:24 PM

Federal Judge to Trump on FTC Commissioner Firing: No, You Can't Fire Whomever You Want

Jack Nicastro | 7.18.2025 11:45 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!