Sperm Apocalypse: Are You Just A Quarter of the Man Your Father Was?
Danish researcher claims that plastics and cosmetics are emasculating.

In the early 1990s, Scandinavian researchers published a meta-analysis of sperm count studies in which they concluded that the number of sperm men were producing had fallen by half since the 1930s. The decline was allegedly the result of men being exposed to trace amounts of synthetic chemicals in plastics and pesticides that mimic estrogen. Greenpeace launched an anti-chemical campaign with the clever slogan, "You're Not Half the Man Your Father Was" and also claimed that the chemicals were shrinking average penis size as well.
The claim of sperm decline was just recycled by andrology researcher Niels Jorgensen at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology's annual meeting in Lisbon last week. Jorgensen provoked a spate of anxious news articles when he asserted that exposure to cosmetics, sunscreen, and varoius plastics was reducing human sperm production. In fact, Jorgensen was merely reporting the findings of a study that he had published back in 2012.In that 15-year study involving nearly 5,000 Danish men he supposedly found that only 25 percent had good sperm quality. That figure is evidently the source of the claims being made in the media.
What's really interesting is that Jorgensen's 2012 study had actually reported:
"Fifteen years monitoring of semen quality in men of the general population indicated a slight increase in both median sperm concentration and total sperm count."
That's right sperm counts among Danish men are not declining, but actually increasing from 45 million to 48 miliion per milliliter between 1996 and 2010. The World Health Organization's latest sperm quality reference limits were set by measuring the amount of sperm produced by recent fathers in six different countries. The lower limit (5 percentile) for sperm count is 15 milion per milliter. The Mayo Clinic also uses the WHO reference limits noting:
Normal sperm densities range from 15 million to greater than 200 million sperm per milliliter of semen. You are considered to have a low sperm count if you have fewer than 15 million sperm per milliliter or less than 39 million sperm total per ejaculate.
Eyeballing Jorgensen's data, it looks as though more three quarters of his subjects produced sperm in amounts higher than that.
A 2013 meta-analysis of 35 major studies found no overall decline in sperm quality. From the abstract:
Allegations for a worldwide decline in semen parameter values have not withstood scientific scrutiny. Methodological flaws in an influential 1992 paper are summarized here, and studies that have been published since 1992 are reviewed. Of the 35 major studies of time trends in semen quality reviewed here, eight (a total of 18 109 men) suggest a decline in semen quality; 21 (112 386 men) show either no change or an increase in semen quality; and six (26 007 men) show ambiguous or conflicting results.
So no sperm apocalypse, after all.
Bonus Monty Python song "Every Sperm Is Sacred" from The Meaning of Life below.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What if the sperm bank threw a donation drive and nobody came?
It went in spurts, but then demand went limp and....
I'm hungry.
Ewwwwww! (NTTAWWT)
I'm still here, so ther will always be a way to procreate.
I believe my track record is similar to yours.
I'll not curse another generation to live on this spinning rock
I'm thinking you are the counter example of this nonsense...or Banjos is REALLY FRIENDLY to strangers.
I only have two and they were 5 years apart. You have like 78 or something.
But yours do have cool names.
My mom and dad had 11 kids, but I said fuck that (or not, I suppose) and only have 2 kids. My wife is a little older and was getting impatient when she didn't get prego right away. I got tested and I am proud to say I am in the 200 million SPM club.
Sperm Apocalypse: Are You Just A Quarter of the Man Your Father Was?
I believe, in this circumstance, the judges also would've allowed "Spermpocalypse"
For a second, I thought you wrote "circumference."
"Frylock, I know what sperm and bacteria is. What I'm saying is, will he come to life if I put this magic hat on his head."
That's right sperm counts among Danish men are not declining, but actually increasing from 45 million to 48 miliion per milliliter between 1996 and 2010.
Uh, I think the bigger issue is that Danes are spurting jizz in the milliliter quantities. How much sperm should a teaspoon contain? I'm asking for a friend.
chemicals were shrinking average penis size as well.
This is intolerable.
And irrelevant. As long as the man I'm currently with is adequately endowed I could give two shits about what the "average" is.
But think of all the partnerless women (and gay men). The common good demands we do something about shrinking penis size.
There atta be a law against shrinking penises. I demand my congressman get right on that.
Would it help, my Lady, to know that those chemicals are responsible for increasing average tongue lengths?
You don't need a law, you need a Nigerian shaman!
Why don't YOU "get right on that?" (snicker)
Such as flood my television and my inbox with "remedies"?
Define "adequately".
Enough so I can feel him. One never likes to ask or be asked "Are you in yet?"
And it makes that man's junk more impressive.
The construction of the sentence, or the penis size?
Yes.
Jesus. If my swimmers were four times stronger, women would get pregnant sitting on a couch I spakned it on.
This.
While I know guys who've had trouble conceiving; I know just as many, if not more who have a batting avg. between .500 and 1.
4 times more potent and it becomes like a radioactive effect where prolonged exposure will result in pregnancy.
My batting average is 1.
3 kids. Pulled the goalie once each time.
God I hope Grandpa wasn't 16X as potent as I am. If he was, it's a good thing he's dead. He'd have had to sext with a condom on.
Fucking Danes. Attention-seeking morons.
I picture my sperm swimming like little Nemo.
Down a dentist's sink?
Ewwwwwwww!
More like all lame and crippled in the water.
Well now - math.
My dad made 4 of us kids. I made 3.
So - 75% as mannish. I'm good with that.
Hmm. My husband's dad made 3, and my husband made 5, so my husband is 160% more manly than his father.
bitchin!
Does this mean Greepeace may have actually misrepresented the scientific data?
I'm confused about the timeline here. About the first early '90s study referenced it says "since the '30s," but do all the other studies go back that far? Because while we are certainly exposed to more plastics compared to the '30s, we may not be compared to the '90s. E.g. I think polyester clothing is less popular than it was a few decades ago.
"Sperm apocalypse." Sounds like the title of a bukkake video.
Or a nukkake video.
Or a, yes, band name.
Or even an excellent nom du comment.
I'm curious. When these studies are done over time do they control for the aging of the population? Danes in 2015 live longer, and so a random sample would have an average age that is higher, which should lower counts.
I am more than willing to donate my strong sperm to Danish sperm banks if they allow me to personally know my end customers...
Direct deposit only!
And this is the point where someone says substantial interest penalty for early withdrawal?
My ex-HS sweetheart wishes I was just a quarter of the man my father was, in terms of sperm count, if you know what I mean.
I've gone back to my regular handle, before someone stole it.
That is all. Carry on.
I bet I jerk it 4 times as often.
Only the mother is for sure -- nowadays not even her.
Waiting for the study of libertarian men showing they are 8% more potent.
I'm up for that study. They can even measure me too. Let's upstage these fuckers. And show how big and potent we are.
Maybe that's why these other folks want to disarm and control everyone and engage in protracted conflict. They probably suffer from smallpenisitus. Next they'll make breast and penis reduction mandatory.
And libertarian women have bigger boobs. 28E or 30DD here.
Yeah, well, it only takes one.
Actually, that's apparently untrue. Evidently there's some teamwork involved.
The trouble with epidemiology is that the data are inherently poor quality- ethically, one cannot do a study with actual controls, and meta-studies just compound the noise. So we're subjected to lots of conflicting and confusing studies, exacerbated by reporting from people who are not (and cannot be) specialists. Ron has not done any better in this, I'm afraid.
A link to the actual paper would be nice, or is it buried in all of the links to breathless newspaper coverage? I'm particularly interest to see if they are finding that D5 is the culprit and how they come to that conclusion. D5, like BPA, has a not-terribly-high estrogen receptor binding affinity, but is often cited in studies because of its pervasiveness.
This will be the down fall to the greatest country on the planet. too many leaches think they are entitled to other peoples earnings. ????? http://www.Workweb40.com