Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Cleveland Police Reform Detailed, Weather Deaths in Texas, Oklahoma, Mexico, and India, Supreme Court to Take Redistricting Case: P.M. Links

Scott Shackford | 5.26.2015 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | pquan / photo on flickr
(pquan / photo on flickr)
  • To protect and BLAM! BLAM! BLAM!
    Credit: pquan / photo on flickr

    The settlement deal between the City of Cleveland and the Department of Justice on law enforcement abuse there requires, among other things, the police to stop pistol-whipping people in the head and firing warning shots. I think even cop shows know police aren't supposed to do those things.

  • A federal appeals court refused to lift a block on President Barack Obama's executive action to shield millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally from deportation. States have filed suit, saying the president's move is unconstitutional. The courts seem to be agreeing so far.
  • At least six have been killed in storms and flooding in Oklahoma and Texas, including a teen returning home from prom. At least 30 people are reported missing in Texas. The death toll for a tornado in Mexico is at 14.
  • On the other side of the world, more than 1,000 have died from extreme heat (well above 110 degrees) over the past week in India.
  • The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge about Texas' redistricting plan, focusing on whether districts should be set up based on total population or total registered voters in the area.
  • Free-range parents in Maryland have been cleared of neglect charges for letting their children walk home from a nearby park along, but they still face some other charges.
  • The secret trial of a Washington Post journalist accused of espionage in Iran began today. He faces 20 years in prison.

Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and don't forget to sign up for Reason's daily updates for more content.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Cleveland Police Settlement with DOJ to Include 'Exacting' Use of Force Rules, Like Offering Medical Assistance and Prohibiting Retaliatory Force

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (225)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    The secret trial of a Washington Post journalist accused of espionage in Iran began today.

    Obama is envious.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Hello.

      HOVER CRAFT!

      http://yhoo.it/1J3lJhm

      1. Ted S.   10 years ago

        Now I'm free to see the world!

      2. db   10 years ago

        Meh. It's full of eels.

        1. Ted S.   10 years ago

          I like eels.
          Except as meals.
          And the way they feels.

          1. Dweebston   10 years ago

            Not a fan of unagi sashimi, then?

            1. db   10 years ago

              I fucking love unagi.

              1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                Are you familiar with Genki Genki?

                Trigger Warning: everything

                1. db   10 years ago

                  Ummmm, nope.

            2. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

              Ummmm...haven't had that since my last trip to Ichi Umi.

              1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

                Isn't that where the Edmund Fitzgerald went down?

                1. Swiss Servator, Kaffee bitte!   10 years ago

                  *narrows gaze*

    2. db   10 years ago

      The sad part is when I read the headline for this I assumed the prosecution was being done by the US government.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    I think even cop shows know police aren't supposed to do those things.

    If they're not on FX.

    1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

      Yeah, you don't beat with the pistol. You beat them with a phone book, no bruising.

      1. Furburguesa   10 years ago

        Always from the neck down

      2. R C Dean   10 years ago

        I thought it was a bag of oranges?

        1. TwB   10 years ago

          A bag of Valencia oranges, yes. You beat the person with them, then eat the oranges afterward. Everybody but the beaten guy wins.

      3. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

        Unless you're Omar, then that phone book saves you from a stabbing.

        1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

          Phone books: A Sword and a Shield (sort of).

          1. db   10 years ago

            I honestly never considered that Neil Peart wrote this about phone books.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    A federal appeals court refused to lift a block on President Barack Obama's executive action to shield millions of immigrants in the U.S. illegally from deportation.

    Which let him down, his pen or his phone?

    1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

      The Cleveland Browns?

      1. Swiss Servator, Kaffee bitte!   10 years ago

        His Cleveland Browns pen http://shop.clevelandbrowns.co.....-Grip_Pens

        His Cleveland Browns phone?
        http://sportsnationcases.com/p.....1036241371

    2. Homple   10 years ago

      "States have filed suit, saying the president's move is unconstitutional. The courts seem to be agreeing so far."

      Courts? Courts? We don' need no steenking courts.

  4. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

    I'm mostly familiar with the application of Nash to economics and political science. I keep hearing about his influence on biological evolution. Who has done the most interesting research with regards to evolutionary Nash equilibria?

    1. BigT   10 years ago

      Isn't this just a dolled up Mexican standoff?

  5. rts   10 years ago

    Simon Fraser University embraces bitcoin for buying textbooks

    A British Columbia university is now accepting the digital currency bitcoin at all of its bookstores, a move that staff claim is a first for Canadian post-secondary schools.

    Simon Fraser University has also announced that automated bitcoin vending machines will soon begin operating on campuses in Burnaby, Vancouver and Surrey.

    1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      I wouldn't mind getting paid in bitcoin as well.

      1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

        Is this a solicitation?

        HM: Internet Gigolo?

        1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

          Don't hate the player, hate the game.

  6. Steve G   10 years ago


    Fired Portland police officer commits suicide by train

    I don't enjoy this story one bit, but I do enjoy the post of a FB friend of mine who was an academy classmate of his. Apparently even cop tributes must get passive voice.

    An academy mate who's life was traumatically altered because he was an officer during a time of overwhelming policy, procedural and equipment changes

    Emphasis added.

    1. R C Dean   10 years ago

      Apparently even cop tributes must get passive voice.

      The bad grammar is just a bonus.

    2. SugarFree   10 years ago

      There are some Tulpas on that thread, sucking some of the coppiest dicks in America.

    3. mad libertarian guy   10 years ago

      Wait, what?

      He was traumatized because they told him he had to do his job a different way with different stuff?

  7. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    ...but they still face some other charges.

    I mean, authorities put too much effort in not to come away with something.

  8. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

    NYT accidentally explains why subsidies on the federal exchange are illegal.

    1. Ted S.   10 years ago

      I asked in another thread, but where are the comments on the NRO? They don't show up in my browser, and the list of links doesn't show them either.

      1. Rhywun   10 years ago

        I think it's Diqus, which means a 50/50 chance the comments won't work at all.

        1. Ted S.   10 years ago

          I think it's Diqus,

          That's a John-level typo. 🙂

          I tried a different browser, and was getting a Javascript error, which might have something to do with it.

          1. grrizzly   10 years ago

            Where's John? What happened to him?

            1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

              Yeah. Where is he?

              1. Free Society   10 years ago

                I was also thinking the threads have been missing a certain intellectually contorted soconitarian. Hope he's okay. When he resurfaces, we'll have to run some Ideological Turing Tests to make sure it's not a different sockpuppet.

        2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          You're being too kind too Disqus.

        3. Fabi   10 years ago

          Biggus Diqus?

      2. grrizzly   10 years ago

        At the end of each NRO post on the left there's the "View Comments" link.

        1. db   10 years ago

          What's an NRO?

          1. Root Boy   10 years ago

            The ghost of WF Buckley

          2. Swiss Servator, Kaffee bitte!   10 years ago

            The National Reconnaissance Office.

          3. Pathogen   10 years ago

            Neocon Republican Orifices

      3. Ted S.   10 years ago

        And it seems to be one of those goddamn neverending pages that adds more when you get to the bottom and is in general a nasty memory hog, possibly even worse than H&R (but not as bad as Nicole).

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          This is why you're everyone's favorite browser/web-design grumpy old man.

          Have you considered Lynx?

        2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

          Because loading 800 comments page by slideshow-like page is better?

      4. MJGreen   10 years ago

        At the end of a piece there is a "VIEW COMMENTS" button in light grey text.

        1. MJGreen   10 years ago

          Jesus, I needed to refresh...

          And yeah, Disqus sucks, etc. etc.

        2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          MJGreen: Self-Harm Enabler.

        3. Ted S.   10 years ago

          I've also got my browser set to use a battleship gray background by default, since I find that easier on the eyes.

          (Yes, I know you all think I'm weird.)

          1. mad libertarian guy   10 years ago

            A gray background is demonstrably easier on the eyes.

            I'm not about to dig up stuff I researched years ago, but suffice to say I did days of searching when I was at the end of my first semester in grad school and couldn't see a damn thing after writing 4 30 page papers in about a week.

            Light gray background, with very dark gray text is best.

    2. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      I wonder if this will be the case where they realize that they can't sneer an argument out of court. Without even considering the long-term impacts, SCOTUS killing the subsidies would be a sight to behold in terms of liberal/progressive vitriol reaction.

      1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

        I don't know. One thing about the NYT story is that the claims it make about "drafting errors" were not, in fact, argued.

        1. PBR Streetgang   10 years ago

          I'm probably remembering wrong, but in the first O-Care case, didn't the Sol Gen. office fail to make the argument the ultimately prevailed, i.e. "its really IS a tax"? I thought Virilli at oral argument specifically said that was not what he was arguing, but that was still what Roberts hung his hat on.

          1. Root Boy   10 years ago

            True on both. Nobody is argueing drafting errors since it was added, not left out and yes, I think it's true the SG never argued that the penaltax was a tax. John Roberts invention (though everybody knew it was a tax).

            1. R C Dean   10 years ago

              I think it's true the SG never argued that the penaltax was a tax.

              I'd have to check the briefs, but I think they did make this argument. I know it was in circulation, anyway.

              Everybody treated it as a throwaway, yeah-right kind of argument, right up until Roberts needed a pretext to switch his vote.

      2. JW   10 years ago

        Congress will just go back and change the language, adding that bill on as a rider to a welfare spending bill or something that Obama won't dare to veto.

      3. Andrew S.   10 years ago

        Whatever happens in this case and the gay marriage cases, I can't wait for all the tweets towards @SCOTUSBlog blaming them for it.

        1. Root Boy   10 years ago

          MSM is already shoving out articles saying, oh dear this is bad for the GOP, what will they do to fix this mess. I think Pelosi said the same thing.

          Fuck, if I was in Congress I'd say your move Obama or introduce the repeal bill again, but I think the dipshits in charge will try to buy votes by extending subsidies.

      4. Juice   10 years ago

        SCOTUS killing the subsidies would be a sight to behold in terms of liberal/progressive vitriol reaction.

        The sight to behold will be the market crash that follows the decision. The right thing to do is kill the subsidies, but I'm so so worried about muh retirement accounts.

    3. Paul.   10 years ago

      Was that a "mistake," the product of changing political circumstances? Maybe. Does that matter? Nope. From a historical or political perspective, it is certainly interesting to ask why the various proposals that made up Obamacare were smooshed together so incompetently. But such a question should be irrelevant to the Supreme Court.

      I guess we have to wonder if the Supreme Court will see this as a mistake and then do the usual gap-filling with the legislation.

      1. R C Dean   10 years ago

        There's oversights, which I guess the Court can fill.

        Then there's amendment of enacted statutory language, which the Court shouldn't ought to do.

        Of course, the word "mistake" is ambivalent. It could mean they made an inadvertent drafting error. Or, it could mean they intended to set it up that way (according to Gruber, who was there) and in retrospect that has turned out to be a mistake because they miscalculated that states would respond to the incentive.

  9. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a challenge about Texas' redistricting plan...

    Well, let's define our terms, gentlemen. Are we talking about redistricting or are we talking about reapportionment?

    1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

      We now interrupt this public affairs programming to bring you a football game.

    2. R C Dean   10 years ago

      Definitely redistricting. Could be reapportionment, if subtracting the non-voters leads to a House seat going from one state to another.

      This is a fascinating case. It seems to point up an inconsistency between "every representative should have the same number of people in their district" and "every vote should count the same."

      If you live in an area with a crapload of non-citizens/non-voters, then your vote will count for more under the "every representative should have the same number of people in their district" theory, as there are fewer people that can vote in that election.

      OTOH, under the "every vote should count the same" theory, if you live in an area with a crapload of non-citizens/non-voters, that representative will represent more people.

      Kind of a conundrum. It'll be interesting.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Forced voting. Do I have to think of everything?

        1. Rich   10 years ago

          And don't forget to force *kids* to vote, too.

      2. Juice   10 years ago

        The constitution clearly states that the districts will be apportioned according to population, not numbers of voters, or even numbers of citizens. Just plain persons.

  10. Paul.   10 years ago

    The secret trial of a Washington Post journalist accused of espionage in Iran began today.

    You know who else uses secret trials and secret evidence?

    1. Xeones   10 years ago

      Cersei Lannister?

    2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      The authors of the Disposition Matrix?

    3. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Hector Berlioz?

      1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

        ?? Is there a secret message in the Symphonie Fantastique or something?

        1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCMnj33q55c

          1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

            Damn, that is some impressive obscure music knowledge.

            And your interest in black dykes is noted.

    4. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

      Secret Squirrel?

      1. Longtorso, Johnny   10 years ago

        Now we know where he hides his nuts. He couldn't keep his squirrel secret.

    5. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

      If I told you, I'd have to try you in an undisclosed location for the crime of *redacted*

  11. iCarl   10 years ago

    Bitcoin mining on a 55 year old IBM 1401 mainframe: 80 seconds per hash

    Heh.

    1. Juice   10 years ago

      OMG! It used germanium chips? That's why it was was rented for $2500/mo in 1960. Jesus.

  12. Longtorso, Johnny   10 years ago

    The Science Is Settled, Bitches!

    An Epidemic of False Claims
    False positives and exaggerated results in peer-reviewed scientific studies have reached epidemic proportions in recent years. The problem is rampant in economics, the social sciences and even the natural sciences, but it is particularly egregious in biomedicine. Many studies that claim some drug or treatment is beneficial have turned out not to be true. We need only look to conflicting findings about beta-carotene, vitamin E, hormone treatments, Vioxx and Avandia. Even when effects are genuine, their true magnitude is often smaller than originally claimed.

    The problem begins with the public's rising expectations of science. Being human, scientists are tempted to show that they know more than they do. The number of investigators?and the number of experiments, observations and analyses they produce?has also increased exponentially in many fields, but adequate safeguards against bias are lacking. Research is fragmented, competition is fierce and emphasis is often given to single studies instead of the big picture....

    1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

      Four year old link?

      Not that anything has changed in my necks of the woods...

      1. Longtorso, Johnny   10 years ago

        Came up today on SlashDerp.

    2. OldMexican   10 years ago

      An Epidemic of False Claims ?The problem is rampant in economics, the social sciences and even the natural sciences, but it is particularly egregious in bio[-]medicine.

      "But not Climate Science, no! Because Science is Settled!"

      1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        On top of this, up until a few years ago, the entire academy of "climate scientists" was blondes with big breasts and dimples who were studying to become "meteorologists", aka TV weather girls.

    3. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      Supporting the null hypothesis just isn't sexy.

    4. Enough About Palin   10 years ago

      False positives and exaggerated results in peer-reviewed scientific studies have reached epidemic proportions in recent years.

      Does this mean that The Golden Girls might not have turned a generation of men into gays?

      1. Longtorso, Johnny   10 years ago

        DENIER!!!!!!!! Burn the heretic!!

  13. Ted S.   10 years ago

    Baby Peggy, and the other surviving silent film stars

    Well, Peggy, now 96-year-old Diana Serra Carey, was the only star, making millions and being washed up by the time she was 10 thanks to her family spending all the money. If you can find it (I don't know if it's on any of the streaming services), watch the documentary Baby Peggy: The Elephant in the Room.

    Baby Peggy in Captain January

    1. Slammer   10 years ago

      Thanks Ted, this article is fantastic. Will watch the movie later

  14. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

    BREUUUUUUUUNNNNNNNIIIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGG!

    "After wages of abstinence fades away for the silliness that it is, we are then told to look towards risk. You see, the capitalist doesn't just put capital in and get passive income out. There is at least some chance that they don't get passive income out and may even take losses. Indeed, the compensation of capital investment directly relates to the risk that such a thing will happen.

    As I pointed out earlier, this argument also is not compelling. Under capitalism, two people taking on identical risks (e.g. equities with the same risk profiles) do not receive identical compensation for doing so. In fact, that is integral to the whole idea of risk. Compensation on the basis of risk is no different, on an individual deservingness level, than compensation for lottery winnings. In both cases, money is put into the system with some level of risk of loss (in the lottery winner's case, huge levels of risk) and then, if you are a lucky one, you get a bunch of money out. This compensation is not based on individual desert (whether productive or otherwise); rather, it is based on the exact opposite of it: randomness and good fortune. It's gambling."

    In Matt Breunig's crazy nonsense world, people just randomly invest in companies with no rhyme or reason so it's no different than the lottery.

    1. Longtorso, Johnny   10 years ago

      The politicians they vote for, of course, are well thought out and therefore those votes are meaningful instead of totally random.

      1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

        The difference being, that whatever politician is voted for, or elected, the outcome is the same...

        You have a chance at winning the lottery.

    2. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      Compensation on the basis of risk is no different, on an individual deservingness level, than compensation for lottery winnings.

      Deserves got nothing to do with it.

    3. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

      Under capitalism, two people taking on identical risks (e.g. equities with the same risk profiles) do not receive identical compensation for doing so.

      Because in some non-capitalist system, there is someone with a God's eye view who does what exactly? Ensures that everyone who takes a certain type of risk on, ends up with the same result? How is it risk then? What the hell does this even mean.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        I don't understand that sentence. If you and I buy the same Small-cap fund and the same time with the same $500 investment we get the same price so how does it happen we have different compensation?

        Also, he's tripping into that Bernie Sanders 'who needs that much' trap with his 'deservingness' nonsense.

        1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

          That Bernie Sanders "too many brands of toothpaste" is straight out of old John Kenneth Galbraith. Apparently going back to the 70s is not enough for the Dems, they want to go back to the 60s now.

          1. Marshall Gill   10 years ago

            When you say 60's you mean 1860's right?

            1. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

              Have you considered how much demand would get a boost from a replay of Civil War?

              /Krugman

            2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              '60s and 1860s.

              I really try not to be that pedant, but I had a coworker that I had to go in and change dozens of his reports because he was doing two digit dates as 57' instead of '57 because of this common error. It's a contraction apostrophe to indicate the removal of the century.

              Seriously. I'm sorry to be that guy on this.

              1. Pathogen   10 years ago

                Fascist...

        2. Root Boy   10 years ago

          Think he's talking about private equity. Like the guys who funded Google were just lucky compared to the guys who funded pets.com

    4. Jerry on the sea   10 years ago

      Uncertainty vs. risk, how does it work?

    5. SugarFree   10 years ago

      It's all part of the "luck" narrative. People are only successful because of luck, blind random chance. And people are only unsuccessful because of luck too. So if it is all just random, the "unlucky" deserve the wealth of the "lucky."

      This also feeds the "privilege" narrative.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        I don't deny some luck is involved sometimes but these people seem to think it's the single most important factor in the equation.

        Using luck is a nice way to neatly package your envy.

        1. SugarFree   10 years ago

          But see... it's not envy, it's righting the wrongs of a universe indifferent to virtue.

    6. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      on an individual deservingness level...

      Possibly the stupidest series of words ever written.

      1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

        The Breunigs are the family that keeps on giving. I can't wait to read what their child has to say 30 years from now. It's going to be so fucking stupid I can hardly even stand it.

    7. MJGreen   10 years ago

      You see, the capitalist doesn't just put capital in and get passive income out. There is at least some chance that they don't get passive income out and may even take losses.

      Is it just me, or is this dripping with undeserved snark on a high undeservingness level? I think Matt honestly pictures all capitalists as fat cats in 3 piece suits, throwing money into a bank and getting profits back.

      They "may even take losses." Yes, that's what happens to most people who invest in capital and try to start a business. Something of which I'm sure you'll never have first-hand experience, you twat.

  15. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Diqus, which means a 50/50 chance the comments won't work at all.

    Yeah, disqus comments NEVER load on my computer. It's a blessing.

  16. Longtorso, Johnny   10 years ago

    Compensation on the basis of risk is no different, on an individual deservingness level, than compensation for lottery winnings.

    Yes it is. If we don't compensate big risks, people won't take them, and we won't benefit from the ones that succeed.

    1. R C Dean   10 years ago

      How do you figure that an individual doesn't "deserve" to get compensated for taking risk, again?

      Would this also mean that someone who risks their life to save someone doesn't "deserve" more recognition than someone who does not?

      1. Longtorso, Johnny   10 years ago

        Was that reply to me or to the original comment? I'm on your side here.

        1. R C Dean   10 years ago

          That was a rhetorical "you", not a Torso-targeted "you".

      2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        All I know is the left is wasting its time with this 'who deserves what' argument.

        There is literally endless streams of permutations to render the exercise futile. Unless they take over our lives, they can never know who 'deserves' what. It's quite mad actually to believe they can.

        1. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

          Yet it's the core of social justice philosophy. They see something they don't like, and say that goverment ought to go fix that. It leads not only to economic stagnation and less freedom, but arbitrary and contradictory behavior by the government.

          1. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

            And rent-seeking Oppression Olympics on the part of the populace.

          2. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

            And rent-seeking Oppression Olympics on the part of the populace.

      3. MJGreen   10 years ago

        People "deserve" whatever was agreed upon ahead of time. We don't need a third party judging who gets what based on their own subjective values.

        If the two parties concerned with a deal agree that Party A gets all of the profits, then Party A deserves all of the profits. It's their business, and they decided that.

  17. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

    So, is everyone still on vacation or something? 60 comments 30 minutes into the links is pretty low.

    Somebody toss out a sexy, sensationalist story to punch things up.

    1. Lady Bertrum   10 years ago

      It's not sensationalist but very sexy.

      I'll put this here

      1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

        He's a sexy fellow when he isn't going full homeless.

      2. Warty   10 years ago

        He looked better when he was roiding it up more blatantly, but it's nice to see useful-looking dudes getting praise.

        1. Lady Bertrum   10 years ago

          He's doesn't need to be useful, just pretty, pretty and dirty. The homeless scruff is nice because he can always be scraped and hosed.

          I think he did some chemicals when he did that MMA film, but it was a temporary thing for the movie. He's quite skinny now.

          1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

            He's doesn't need to be useful, just pretty, pretty and dirty

            Someone's been reading my diary.

          2. Warty   10 years ago

            but it was a temporary thing for the movie

            Oh my sweet summer child. I bet you think Thor wasn't on the Dianabol and Accutane diet either.

            1. Lady Bertrum   10 years ago

              Oh, I assume when actors get really big and/or cut for a role they use something from the pharmacy. I just don't think they necessarily use it after.

              Tom Hardy got skinny as did Bradley Cooper after American Sniper. I assume they use it as a tool temporarily (if they're smart).

        2. Steve G   10 years ago

          Concur, "insane muscles" is vastly overstating it... after waiting for the page to load.

    2. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      http://www.chron.com/sports/ro.....110416.php

      and

      http://www.newsday.com/enterta.....1.10304405

    3. db   10 years ago

      Everyone is spending all their time in the new secret chat room.

      1. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Shush!

        1. db   10 years ago

          I'll keep talking about it until I receive my invitation..

          1. SugarFree   10 years ago

            How can you be invited to something that doesn't exist?

            1. db   10 years ago

              Ja, genau.

              1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                *Throws black bag over db's head, renditions him to North African black site*

                1. MJGreen   10 years ago

                  There's a north Africa?

    4. Steve G   10 years ago


      Jessica Alba is perfect

      1. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

        Too skinny.

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          Now you're on sarcasmic's list.

        2. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

          Too skinny for what?

          Were you looking for her to move furniture for ya?

          Maybe you should be on Jesse's list.

      2. Catatafish   10 years ago

        And hasn't she cranked out a couple of little ones as well? Impressive.

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          Oi, I didn't see your jab in the Ru Paul thread until later and I wanted to say "well done".

          1. Catatafish   10 years ago

            *flipper salute*

            My time here has been relatively short and infrequent though so I HAVE been guilty of stepping into an argument on behalf of certain individuals of whom I have little notion of their historical behavior.

            1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              If you wait for perfect knowledge of inside jokes you'll never jump in. The crack you took was redemptive.

        2. Enough About Palin   10 years ago

          Four kids.

          1. Catatafish   10 years ago

            Good genes and a good trainer.

            I would gargle with her bathwater.

      3. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        I'm curious: Would Jesse hit that?

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          Wayne's World era Tia Carrere or bust.

          1. Catatafish   10 years ago

            *nod aggressively*

          2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

            So nobody really is *that* gay?

    5. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

      John's not here. Probably cuts overall post count in half. More if a troll shows up.

      1. Steve G   10 years ago

        John's not here and trolls aren't either...hmmmmm

        1. Catatafish   10 years ago

          Has John finally gone Deathwish and tracked them all down?!

  18. Longtorso, Johnny   10 years ago

    IRS Says Identity Thieves Accessed Tax Transcripts For More Than 100,000 Taxpayers

    1. Rich   10 years ago

      OK, *now* can we stop using Social Security numbers for stuff other than Social SecuritHAHAHAHAHAHAA!! Damn, couldn't quite get it out!

    2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      How many of the identity thieves are actively drawing paychecks from the IRS?

    3. Kwix   10 years ago

      If you don't receive a letter, you don't need to worry:...

      Or, you know, the USPS lost your letter.

      1. Pathogen   10 years ago

        Unpossible!

  19. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

    Guess the feminist who thinks you're all committed rape apologists.

    Note: The conclusion of the study that she links to as 'proof' that you're all a bunch of rape denialists has the following conclusion:

    "Both incapacitated and forcible sexual assaults and rape have reached epidemic levels among college women. Interventions to address sexual violence on campus are urgently needed."

    Gee - that sure is an awful lot of feminist cliches jammed into one sentence. I'm sure there was no way the researcher could possibly have a motive to run an illegitimate study for political reasons.

    And, once again!, the study she links to is behind a paywall so I can't read the full text. How much do you want to bet that if I were to read the full text of the study there'd be methodological errors out the ass? And how much do you want to bet Valenti herself didn't pay the $30 to read the full study and is therefore basing her claims about rape denial on an abstract the methodology of which she hasn't actually read?

    I will say that at least this time the person who ran the study actually had enough subjects that the study could theoretically be legitimate. They actually say they had 400 subjects, so at least I don't have to mock them for having 60 subjects and claiming they're a legitimate survey.

    1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      I was wrong. I guessed ESB. Guess I was thinking she could out-idiot her hubby (I'm surprised she's not a political lesbian, by the way).

    2. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

      I've never been committed.

      1. Catatafish   10 years ago

        To a cause or a place, Bobarian?

        1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

          Uhhh.... yes.

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      I noticed with these articles the comments section often blast Valenti.

      Also, one of my employees just exposed her ass right in front of me as I sit at my desk as she leaned over to sign a paper.

      /cue devil and angel from 'Animal House'.

      1. Swiss Servator, Kaffee bitte!   10 years ago

        DANGER, WILL ROBINSON!

        /flailing robot arms

    4. MJGreen   10 years ago

      Is there some objective, scientific definition of "epidemic levels"?

      1. mad libertarian guy   10 years ago

        In SJW language, "epidemic levels" means we actually can't find a single verifiable case of what we're talking about but we're SURE it must be a lot!

  20. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    Both incapacitated and forcible sexual assaults and rape have reached epidemic levels among college women.

    Define "epidemic". With numbers. Verifiable numbers.

    1. R C Dean   10 years ago

      While you're at it, define "incapacitated" and support the inclusion of "incapacitated" rapes with objective validation of the alleged victim's level of incapacitation.

      1. Catatafish   10 years ago

        Obvs "incapacitated" means "being female and having imbibed any amount, no matter how small, of one or more intoxicants...also when you said 'yes' but really meant 'no' and the male in the encounter did not properly use his mutant telepathic abilities."

    2. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      In this case, she claims the number is 20% because of a single study that came out regarding an unnamed (!) university. Furthermore, the entire study is hidden behind a paywall and Valenti makes no mention of the study's actual methodology, so I can only conclude that she's determined it's totally legitimate based on nothing but an abstract.

      I'm willing to bet this study was loaded with self-selection bias, which is normally how feminist hacks get the numbers they want.

      That's not how you science.

    3. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Or videos.

      ...is what a misogynist would say, but not me.

    4. Longtorso, Johnny   10 years ago

      Science is rape
      During what is known now as the "Science Wars", she was part of a debate regarding the value-neutrality of the sciences. This aspect of her work has been criticized by some scientists.[2] Harding referred to Newton's Principia Mathematica as a "rape manual" in her 1986 book "The Science Question in Feminism", a characterization that she later said she regretted.[3]

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        Principia Mathematica, raw and uncensored, yours for a low, low price when purchased together with the erotic classic Origin of Species!

      2. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

        Reminds me of the introductory paragraph to this article, which I always thought was pretty good, the rest of the article less so.

      3. rts   10 years ago

        Harding referred to Newton's Principia Mathematica as a "rape manual"

        The mind boggles.

    5. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      Considering the term "epidemic" specifically refers to the rate of spread of infectious disease, not amount of cases, their metaphor is meaningless and completely unjustified when it comes to the conclusions we can base from quantitative data. A good editor should have caught that.

      But who gives a fuck about scholarship and academic rigor, right?

      1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

        Probably the best evidence that feminist science is total horseshit is the fact that no matter how they define rape feminists studies always manage to come to the conclusion that 20% of women are raped.

        It's hilarious. Logically speaking, if you define rape differently in two different studies, you should not continuously get 20%. There are studies that include literally all unwanted sexual touching and conclude that it's 20% and there are studies that include only forced rape and come to the conclusion that it's 20%.

        What this means is that feminists have it in their heads that 20% is the number and they purposefully fuck around with statistics until they get a pre-determined answer.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          20% is like 8%.

        2. The Last American Hero   10 years ago

          What kind of evil parents take out a second mortgage on their house to send their daughter to a place where there's a 20 percent chance she'll be raped?

          Better yet, what kind of mentally deficient women attend these colleges with their 20 percent rape rates and rules against carrying firearms?

  21. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    They actually say they had 400 subjects

    Why do I automatically assume those 400 subjects were offered an opportunity to come forward and share anecdotes about their victimization on campus?

    1. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      Ahem...it's called "criterion sampling"...gotta get hip to the lingo, man!

    2. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Professor Warty observed all the scientific protocols with his subjects.

  22. Rich   10 years ago

    The challengers claim that taking account of total population can lead to vast differences in the number of voters in particular districts, along with corresponding differences in the power of those voters.

    Is that so?

  23. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    I'm later than usual, and John seems to be absent, but I'm going to try this again this year anyway: Going to Cozumel in 3 weeks for fishing, scuba diving, drinking and reading, and I need book suggestions. Preferably comedy. Best books I've read in the last few years are Lamb and The Gun Seller. Anybody got any suggestions?

    1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Thomas a Kempis, Imitation of Christ.

      Or something by Dave Barry.

      Only you can choose.

      1. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

        I mean Dave Barry's overtly comedic work - avoid his novels, they try to be serious.

        1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

          I did not know Barry wrote anything other than a column.

          1. db   10 years ago

            He wrote a book called "Claw Your Way to the Top: How to Become the Head of a Major Corporation in Roughly a Week" a long time ago. It was a hoot.

            1. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

              Are actual claws involved?

            2. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

              Not available on Kindle, unfortunately.

    2. Pan Zagloba   10 years ago

      Monster Hunter International! Gun nut bruiser accountant works for private company that hunts monsters for government bounties, when not butting heads with a government agency that has a similar, but not same, goal. Not big on style, or subtlety, but lots of humor, action, lovingly described guns and sexy ladies (and gentlemen) who wield them.
      It recently got posted as free ebook on Baen's site, so only thing at risk is your time!

      1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

        Got it. Thanks.

    3. AuH20   10 years ago

      Terry pratchett if you haven't yet. Try Going Postal to start

    4. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

      If you like the outdoors, Patrick F. McManus is the absolute greatest.

      His books are the only ones I haven't ditched for ebook versions.
      http://www.amazon.com/Patrick-.....sr=1-2-ent

      A Fine and Pleasant Misery
      The Grasshopper Trap
      They Shoot Canoes, Don't They

      One of my favorite stories by him:
      http://tinyurl.com/qzzg3a3

  24. Warty   10 years ago

    http://money.cnn.com/2015/05/2.....data-hack/

    This cyberattack wasn't a hack in the traditional sense, the IRS said. No one broke into its computer systems and stole information. They merely used a public tool for nefarious purposes. And it was an attack the agency wasn't well suited to combat, Koskinen said.

    1. Warty   10 years ago

      Oh goddammit. Here's the link.

  25. Enough About Palin   10 years ago

    2 Of Hillary's Libya Emails Are Missing

    http://dailycaller.com/2015/05.....e-missing/

    1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      Only 2?

  26. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

    Hookah smoking could be banned in Toronto establishments

    And the comments are the typical garbage:

    Lucygal
    Good, it's about time. Why should hookah smoking be allowed in public establishments, when tobacco smoking is not? Fair is fair.

    Fuck. This. Province.

    1. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

      Wait, who from reason posted on this article?...

      Liberty112233
      Society is getting really ridiculous. When I go to the states they practice common logic where you have non smoking places and places that allow smoking. This "right" to walk into a private business and demand they cater to you is non existent and is only a manifestation of the anti smoking lobby trying to convince us that any place with smoke should be treated like some biohazard area where you'll drop dead in seconds. This isn't even tobacco smoke. This makes as much sense when they use to have those smoking huts. Non-smokers for some odd reason waltzed in them and complained not because they were exposed to second hand smoke against their choice but simply because they were brain washed into the idea that they could go wherever they want so they got rid of them. I'm to believe a non-smoker is going to walk into a hookah bar (why would they in the first place?) for kicks or some non-smoking candidate who is health conscious is going to act na?ve and then is entitled to a government compensation check if they get sick? We don't even have logic anymore with designated areas or heck even outdoor smoking bans are now leaving non-smokers equally baffled

      1. Beautiful Bean Footage   10 years ago

        This "right" to walk into a private business and demand they cater to you is non existent

        *cough*Gay wedding cakes and pizza*cough*

    2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Where you been?

      And...yeah. Ontario is Beyond Derpdome.

      1. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

        I've just been lurking a lot and not commenting.

        I need to get back into it. I miss the action.

    3. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

      What does she think people smoke in hookahs??

      1. db   10 years ago

        Banana peels, duh.

      2. Swiss Servator, Kaffee bitte!   10 years ago

        Hashish.

        1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          Oooopiiiiummmm

          1. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

            Ah yes. Opium, the opiate of the masses.

  27. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

    I can't get the link to open, but 'inciting debauchery' sounds rather praise-worthy.

  28. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    Yay! Now hurry up and get my ATM-sized Popeye's franchise within walking distance!

  29. Steve G   10 years ago

    put more people out of work

    Wait, I thought that was touted as a successful outcome of obamacare? Something, something, free to paint watercolors or write trashy novels now..

  30. Medical Physics Guy   10 years ago

    Someone has to fill in for John.

  31. Enough About Palin   10 years ago

    I loved watching her in Honey. Not a great movie, but whao!

  32. Catatafish   10 years ago

    Tundra, if I watch that I won't be able to get up from behind my desk for 15 minutes.

  33. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    I've read all of Moore's stuff. The latest, A Dirty Job, is particularly good.

  34. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    Not the latest chronologically, but the latest I read.

  35. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    Nope.

  36. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    Bought on Kindle. Thanks.

  37. Slammer   10 years ago

    I hope you mean IT'S walking distance to you!

  38. HeteroPatriarch   10 years ago

    *Gasp* I never even considered...

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Mom Arrested, Facing 5 Years in Prison for Leaving 8- and 10-Year-Old Boys at Home

Lenore Skenazy | 5.29.2025 10:30 AM

The Chinese Student Crackdown

Liz Wolfe | 5.29.2025 9:30 AM

Trump Deletes Database Containing Over 5,000 Police Misconduct Incidents

C.J. Ciaramella | From the June 2025 issue

Brickbat: Tough Guy

Charles Oliver | 5.29.2025 4:00 AM

Are We Headed for Another Disaster With Fannie and Freddie?

Veronique de Rugy | 5.29.2025 1:10 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!