Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Patriot Act

Rand Paul Starting a Filibuster Against PATRIOT Act: Watch Now!

Wants reforms, not reauthorization.

Scott Shackford | 5.20.2015 1:51 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | CSpan
(CSpan)

Rand Paul tweets:

Twitter

You can watch it live on C-Span right now, here.

Update: Politico notes that this isn't technically a "real" filibuster. There's a time limit on how long Paul can talk.

Update II: Roll Call explains how long Paul can actually talk.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Cathy Young on the Latest Strange Turn in the Columbia Rape Saga

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

Patriot ActSurveillanceRand Paul
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (94)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Slammer   10 years ago

    At what time did he actually start? Im watching now.

  2. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

    YEA BOY. A stand on par with the Spartan 300.

    Even if Rand doesn't succeed here, he will have great victory in the form of endless ammo on the campaign trail.

  3. Spencer   10 years ago

    I wonder if it will be as good as the last one!

  4. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    With any luck, this will induce a brain embolism in Peter King.

    1. Mazakon   10 years ago

      You forgot about Christie.

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        Christie is loving this because he thinks he can use this against Paul. King is shitting himself with fear of terrorists - the islamist sort, anyway, he's fine with the celtic nationalist variety.

    2. Loki   10 years ago

      And Lindsey Graham

  5. MJGreen   10 years ago

    All of this has happened before...

    1. Swiss Servator, Quelle frisch   10 years ago

      So say we all!

      1. Krieger's Waifu   10 years ago

        Rand Paul will lead the human race to its end.

      2. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

        Let's give up our advanced technology and gambol freely about the plains.

        1. Rhywun   10 years ago

          WORST ENDING EVAR!

  6. Libertarian Joe   10 years ago

    GO Rand GO!!!!

  7. widget   10 years ago

    Rand Paul has cozied up to shakedown artist Al Sharpton. A beta SWPL maneuver. The party of Lincoln could do better than that. There's no chance that a Republican candidate could get a majority of black votes, but he doesn't have to poison the well.

    1. jay_dubya   10 years ago

      riiiight

  8. RBS   10 years ago

    What the fuck, why do people make appointments then no show and not bother to call?

    1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

      Are you saying you had an appointment with Senator Paul this afternoon?

      1. RBS   10 years ago

        Ha, no just waiting on a potential client that made her appointment less than 24 hours ago.

        1. Spencer   10 years ago

          she found your comments on here and ran for the hills.

        2. Tonio   10 years ago

          Last-minute planning is often a sign of flakiness.

          1. RBS   10 years ago

            That describes about 90% of my clients.

  9. Banjos   10 years ago

    I'll be in my bunk...with C-SPAN on.

    1. widget   10 years ago

      Don't you have a geeky husband who will take you to Taco Bell and to the movie theater to watch "Fury Road"?

      1. Florida Man   10 years ago

        I didn't care for it. I was also very drunk, so I might have missed some of the nuances the film was shooting for.

        1. Overt   10 years ago

          That film was many things. Nuanced is not one of them. I loved it, but can see how people could take or leave it.

          1. Florida Man   10 years ago

            Yes Overt, that was the joke.

      2. Ted S.   10 years ago

        I thought he preferred to watch "Furry Road". :-p

  10. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    "...lost two or three arms."

    Point = invalidated.

  11. DaveSs   10 years ago

    Looks like he is talking to an empty room.

    1. Curtisls87   10 years ago

      You mean it's filled with empty-headed senators, or you mean it's literally an empty room?

    2. Evil Capitalist   10 years ago

      They don't give a shit about the Constitution or our rights, why would they want to hear him speak on them.

    3. DaveSs   10 years ago

      Ok, he really is talking to an empty room.

      The only other person there is whoever is sitting in the Chair.

    4. Tonio   10 years ago

      That's what generally happens during a filibuster. Nobody stays to hear that.

      1. DaveSs   10 years ago

        If this was a regular session of the Senate then a quorum would need to be maintained while he was talking.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    He's going after structuring now.

    1. Swiss Servator, Quelle frisch   10 years ago

      *swoons in a mancrush*

  13. Andrew S.   10 years ago

    He's talking about civil asset forfeiture and structuring right now. As important as doing away with the PATRIOT Act is doing away with that shit.

  14. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    You forgot about Christie.

    The list is long. Lindsey Graham is on it, too.

    1. jay_dubya   10 years ago

      Its easier to count who is not on the list.

  15. ThisGuy   10 years ago

    Hey Scott, he still has to yield the floor, so it is a filibuster if he last long enough to delay proceedings tomorrow.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    And the drug war.

  17. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

    None of the cable networks are covering this. CNN is instead showing Roger Goddell's press conference about the Patriots.

    1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      Priorities, man!

    2. Sudden   10 years ago

      You'll enjoy your bread and circuses and ask for seconds, got it plebe?

      1. robc   10 years ago

        The fact that they are covering private business dealings instead of government ones is a step in the right direction.

    3. Slammer   10 years ago

      Is he answering who deflated the Colts balls?

  18. The Late P Brooks   10 years ago

    I assume MSNBC will portray this as Rand's desperate attempt to shield kkkorporationz from accountability, or some such nonsense.

    1. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      He's technically not filibustering so this is all just a ploy to get attention for his Koch-funded agenda to enslave American workers and put blacks back in chainzzzz!

      But really, because he's also self-promoting they're going to insist that his impure motives nullify what he's talking about.

    2. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      Based on the comments on C-SPAN's Facebook, I've learned that he's just doing this to appease his Tea Party base, that he's just doing this for contributions, and he's not really a doctor(?), so they shouldn't be calling him Dr. Paul.

      1. RBS   10 years ago

        he's not really a doctor(?)

        They probably think he's an optometrist.

      2. Trevor St McGoodbody   10 years ago

        Oh jeez. There are much easier paths to victory than appealing to "the Tea Party," most of which don't involve pissing off the bulk of your own party.

    3. Emmerson Biggins   10 years ago

      clearly, this is motivated by a simple desire to hide his racism.

  19. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Now he's shitting where he eats.

  20. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Now he's going after national security letters (writs of assistance).

  21. Andrew S.   10 years ago

    And here comes Senator Wyden to join in.

  22. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    RON WYDEN IS RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT TOO!

  23. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

    I signed some petition supporting the filibuster. I figured I was already on a watch list for donating to his campaign.

    As weakened as we are, we're still, relative to the rest of the world, a staggeringly massive economic and military powerhouse. We're so much more powerful than our competition that we have the luxury of not having to wring our hands over whether our values are contrary to our survival. We can operate on the high road, preserving, protecting, and advancing civil liberties and free(er) markets, playing by the rules domestically and abroad, and using military force of any kind only as a last, not a first, resort.

    We don't need to spy on our own people, torture suspected terrorists, or constantly kill enemies and bystanders to retain our security. Of all of the countries on Earth, we can choose to be what we want to be. Why not choose to be that shining city on the hill we claim we are?

    America, you are full of stupid.

  24. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    I'M NOT HEARING A QUESTION, RON.

    1. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      Saw someone say they couldn't wait for Wyden's 45 minute "question". I love hearing these two talk on this subject.

      I mean, I hate hearing these two talk on this subject, because it's all so fucking stupid no civilized country would have ever done this in the first place. But other than that...

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        It was a softball question.

  25. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Ugh. This filibuster is taking FOR-ever.

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Like, I know, really. Why do they have to take so, um, long and stuff?

    2. Trevor St McGoodbody   10 years ago

      Sure is, but it's not nearly as boring as most filibuster topics. Most are so dry that it's like choking down Saltines without a glass of water.

  26. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Ouch for Clapper.

  27. Bill Dalasio   10 years ago

    And this is why I view pretty much any whining about Paul's stance on abortion or gay marriage or military spending pretty much horseshit. Right now, there's really just one politician making anything like an effort to stop the government from spying on its own citizens. And Paul's it.

    1. Trevor St McGoodbody   10 years ago

      We don't have to vote for him. I'm just glad that someone who's in the headlines is talking about it. Sometimes that's what it takes to push this into the national consciousness, although for the life of me I can't understand why more people aren't actively aware and concerned about it.

      1. Bill Dalasio   10 years ago

        I'm so glad you're happy he's pushing the issue into the national consciousness. So, you can vote for someone who agrees with you on abortion or gay marriage or military spending or whatever your particular hobby horse is. But, still supports (or at least isn't willing to do anything about) the government spying on its own citizens.

  28. Andrew S.   10 years ago

    He's going after Obama now. And idiot Republicans at the same time.

  29. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Rand Paul is being paid off by the warrant rubber stamp makers.

  30. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Now he's channeling his old man.

  31. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Mike Lee blames you, the voter!

  32. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    I'm not hearing a question, Mike.

  33. jack rombouts   10 years ago

    It is about time someone goes after that unconstitutional patriot act. Don't expect our jerk off Supreme Court Justices to void the P act on constitutional grounds. They have no respect for the Bill of Rights. Here are some recent examples for you: The high court said Obamacare was legal under the feds power to tax. John Roberts was the swing vote on this ruling. I said back in 2005, that he was no dam good, yet conservatives thought he was the greatest. The high court also ruled in favor of the government taking forced DNA samples from people arrested for speeding. Alito, Kennedy, Roberts, Thomas, and one other justice that I cannot recall, allowed this outrageous violation of our Fourth Amendment. They also allowed in mid-2000's ruling, that police can break down your door without even announcing who they are. And they can legally gun you down if you fight back, thinking that they are intruders. How are you supposed to know who they are if they don't announce, and they are wearing ski masks and fatigues? They also ruled that prosecutors are exempt from law suits brought by citizens who were wrongfully convicted because of prosecutorial abuses of power. So even if a prosecutor knows you are innocent but lies to the judge and jury, you have no recourse! Even if you spent years behind bars for nothing.

    1. jack rombouts   10 years ago

      Also, they recently upheld the police practice of pulling people over for a traffic violation, and making them wait several hours to have the outside of their car searched by a drug sniffing dog. Even if the police have no evidence to suggest that the people are involved with drugs to begin with. What a bunch of jokers we have on the bench! And these are just a few recent examples! I could go on for hours.

  34. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    HOW DARE THEY CONTINUE TO UTTER SNOWDEN'S NAME ON THE FLOOR OF THE SENATE WITHOUT SPITTING.

  35. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Ha, he said queery.

  36. bacon-magic   10 years ago

    Rand Paul needs to be voted for...

  37. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Heinrich, you sure you want to be on record cheerleading Obama at this point in your career?

  38. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Paul putting his faith in the Supreme Court.

  39. Loki   10 years ago

    Nice...

    Although it would be better if he could talk as he can, but I guess they don't want a repeat of his 13 hour drone policy filibuster.

    Also, I'm sure HuffPo will be explaining to all the good little proggies out there how this is just a PR stunt, and they shouldn't like Rand Paul 'cause he's still icky and stuff.

    1. John Galt   10 years ago

      Enough voters seemed to sympathize with the last PR stunt to turn the tables in DC.

  40. julieejulia748   10 years ago

    Start working from home! Great job for students, stay-at-home moms or anyone needing an extra income... You only need a computer and a reliable internet connection... Make $90 hourly and up to $12000 a month by following link at the bottom and signing up... You can have your first check by the end of this week...............

    http://www.Jobsyelp.com

  41. Conservationist   10 years ago

    Rand Paul earning his pay today as a leader.

    1. John Galt   10 years ago

      That's something pols very seldom do. In fact the vast majority never do it even once.

  42. John Galt   10 years ago

    Go, Rand!

  43. wwhorton   10 years ago

    Oh, hell. I was all ready to forego voting at all ever again, but I might turn out one last time for Rand.

  44. waffles   10 years ago

    This Rand guy is pretty cool guys. Has Reason ever covered him before?

    1. Vampire   10 years ago

      *looks on as pancakes beats the syrup out of you.

  45. DaveSs   10 years ago

    I love how he's tying all kinds of overreach together.

    Structuring, asset forfeiture, drug war, mandatory minimums, wetlands, gun registration

  46. Don'tTreadOnMe   10 years ago

    OMG, he is exhausted.....GO RAAAAAND!

  47. Don'tTreadOnMe   10 years ago

    Look at the FISA judges......a bunch of old fucks most born from 1934 to the 1940's. Do they even know what the interwebs are? JFC!!

    http://www.fisc.uscourts.gov/current-membership

  48. Don'tTreadOnMe   10 years ago

    I bet most of them are actually dead and the one young one born in the 60's is pulling all the levers. Star chamber, baby!

  49. Don'tTreadOnMe   10 years ago

    anyone out there? Helloooooo?!

    1. Brochettaward   10 years ago

      Watching. And disgusted to see Cruz stroll up with his slicked back hair. Pompous prick.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Destroy Thousands of Acres of Tomato Crops in Florida

Autumn Billings | 5.12.2025 5:14 PM

Defenders of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order Offer an Implausible Take on a 127-Year-Old Precedent

Jacob Sullum | 5.12.2025 4:52 PM

Why DOGE Failed

Eric Boehm | 5.12.2025 3:20 PM

The Indian-Pakistani Ceasefire Is What U.S. Diplomacy Should Look Like

Matthew Petti | 5.12.2025 12:11 PM

Republicans Want To Redefine Obscenity

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 5.12.2025 11:45 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!