Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

The Work of Anti-Hillary Art in the Age of Social Media

Nick Gillespie | 4.13.2015 4:05 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Weekly Standard

The U.K. Independent reports that almost immediately upon Hillary Clinton announcing her presidential campaign the hashtag #WhyImNotVotingforHillary became the top trending topic on Twitter. It's still going strong; you can check it out here.

The hashtag was the work of Markeece Young, a former Democrat turned Republican who tweets @YoungBLKRepub.

Most of the tweets are dumb and filled with recycled jokes, cartoons, and '90s-era gags about Slick Willie, Monica Lewinsky, and the like. Benghazi is a popular topic, as is email-gate, Mrs. Clinton's vast wealth, and her generally disastrous run as Secretary of State.

Cosmopolitan has rounded up a host of true knuckle-dragging misogynist tweets about the former First Laday and senator from New York.

Clinton may be the first candidate who will face campaigning in the social-media era with lots and lots of scandals in her past. Some of those "scandals" are phony outrages and others are legitimate issues that will be resurrected and pored over again and again and again. The difference now, I'd argue, is that a host of technologies allow people more than ever to keep things alive. That may well work to Clinton's favor, especially if the most deranged critics of Clinton become so visible and so outspoken that all her political adversaries have to work to distance themselves from anything resembling such attacks. 

And the same sorts of social media and messaging technologies that let wingnuts and moonbats of all persuasions rip on everybody about everything all the time also allows for some genuinely smart commentary, too. The image to the upper right was photographed in Brooklyn and posted by an unknown artist. It mocks the attempt by the HRC Super Volunteers to demonize critics as illegitimate if they call Clinton polarizing, ambitious, inevitable, secretive, and other terms that are well within anybody's sense of acceptable discourse. There's more examples of this street art at The Weekly Standard.

The poster is highly reminscent of Robbie Canal's anti-Reagan (and right-wingers more generally) art from the late 1980s and '90s. Shephard Fairey's iconography was a boost to President Obama's campaign in 2008. It may well turn out that some well-turned anti-Hillary posters—not to mention ones attacking the various GOP hopefuls—will have an influence over the next year and a half of insufferable Laff Olympics we call political campaigns. This is much is certain at least: Images, videos, and other messages mocking and praising candidates will be be more easily circulated than ever before.

Take it away, Obama Kids Sing for Change (Pyongyang Remix):

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Marco Rubio Is the Anti-Rand Paul on Foreign Policy

Nick Gillespie is an editor at large at Reason and host of The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie.

PoliticsCultureScience & TechnologyNanny StateHillary ClintonElection 2016
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (15)

Latest

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

If Viewers Love PBS So Much, Let Them Pay for It

Robby Soave | 6.5.2025 3:20 PM

Florida Woman Fined $165,000 for Trivial Code Violations Takes Her Case to the Florida Supreme Court

Autumn Billings | 6.5.2025 3:05 PM

Nathan Fielder's 737 Stunt Involved Elaborate Workaround of Ridiculous 1,500-Hour Rule

Christian Britschgi | 6.5.2025 2:50 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!