Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Bowe Bergdahl Charged with Desertion, Zayn Malik Quits One Direction, ISIS Conquers Tataouine: P.M. Links

Duck Dynasty's Phil Roberts not winning converts.

Robby Soave | 3.25.2015 4:30 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | Zayn Malik
(Zayn Malik)
  • Zayn Malik
    Instagram

    Bowe Bergdahl has been formally charged with desertion. The two counts are "desertion with intent to shirk important or hazardous duty," and "misbehavior before the enemy, endangering the safety of a command, unit or place." The latter charge carries a maximum sentence of life in prison.

  • Zayn Malik is leaving teen uber-band One Direction. So it's a rough day, if you're a 13-year-old girl.
  • Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson thinks that if atheists' families were raped and murdered in front of their eyes, they might change their minds about this whole "God does not exist" thing.
  • ISIS has conquered Tataouine.
  • POLITICO says Sen. Lindsey Graham is positioning himself as the "realist" Republican 2016 candidate. Okay.
  • The Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control needs to control itself.

Follow Reason on Twitter, and like us on Facebook. You can also get the top stories mailed to you—sign up here.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Threat of Grexit Looms as Things Heat Up (Again) in Europe

Robby Soave is a senior editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (451)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Bowe Bergdahl has been formally charged with desertion.

    I forget, what domestic blunder was the prisoner swap supposed to distract from? Bergdahl should be charged with that, too.

    1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Hello.

      "Bowe Bergdahl has been formally charged with desertion."

      Now that was one awesome trade.

      Obama is just too damn smart for us all.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        He didn't even get a first edition Garbage Pail Kid in return.

    2. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      Also hold him accountable for the five guys who died searching for him.

      1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

        That 2nd charge is meant to do just that, thus the possible life sentence.

        1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

          Good. Somebody should go interview that Marie Harf moron who told everyone that the administration had a better understanding of Bergdahl's situation than his squad mates did.

      2. Matrix   10 years ago

        Wasn't he on guard duty at the time, too, when he left?

    3. MJGreen   10 years ago

      I think that was the IRS scandal? Or it was the one right after the IRS.

      1. MJGreen   10 years ago

        Veterans! That was it, I'm almost positive. The VA hospital scandals.

        1. Juice   10 years ago

          yes

    4. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      It's so long ago, I can't even remember. IRS? Obamacare website?

      I also don't remember what blunder they used to distract from the prisoner swap.

      1. RBS   10 years ago

        It's blunders all the way down.

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          "It's blunders all the way down"

          -Inscription over the entrance to the Obama Presidential Library

          1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

            What about the Obama Monument, which will be a taller, darker obelisk built next to the Washington Monument?

            1. Catatafish   10 years ago

              He'll likely opt to just cover the original in pitch, set it on fire and rename it after himself.

            2. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

              Or a sparkling fountain in front of the library, 'The Cascade of Blunders'.

              1. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

                Just one fountain? Or two separate fountains?

            3. Xeones   10 years ago

              You're thinking of the Clinton Monument.

              1. Rich   10 years ago

                The one with the, um, distinctive feature?

                1. Xeones   10 years ago

                  It curves slightly to the left about 2/3 of the way up.

          2. db   10 years ago

            There won't be any inscriptions...because the Most Transparent Administration in History will be memorialized in an empty glass building with all signage redacted.

            1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

              So, kind of like a secular Crystal Cathedral?

      2. Dances-with-Trolls   10 years ago

        I think it was the VA scandal.

        1. db   10 years ago

          The what now?

          1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

            You know, the thing that was like 17 scandals ago.

      3. bacon-magic   10 years ago

        That's the point, this administration counted on the short term memory of the American people. Long story short: Obama and his ilk are douchebags.

    5. Rich   10 years ago

      See?! It *worked*!

    6. jay_dubya   10 years ago

      Im no Obo fan, but what are we saying here, exactly? we shouldve left a US soldier to die?

      1. Catatafish   10 years ago

        Some turn of phrase regarding making ones bed and then sleeping in it comes to mind.

      2. John   10 years ago

        If that soldier was a deserter, no. But we sure as hell shouldn't have traded any of our prisoners for him.

      3. kinnath   10 years ago

        The right solution was to bring him back in chains and publicly announce we don't leave our people there, but we don't forgive capital war crimes either.

        Trading prisoners to get him back was a mistake.

        Bringing out the cheerleaders to welcome the dude back on TV was beyond a mistake.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          Beyond the pale I prefer.

          1. kinnath   10 years ago

            kinnath lives beyond the pale.

            1. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

              Dublin is kind of a boring town, anyway.

    7. GILMORE   10 years ago

      "I forget, what domestic blunder was the prisoner swap supposed to distract from? "

      I believe that was the Veteran Affairs Department "letting people die from neglect, then covering it up, and the rest of the Federal Government knowing all about it for many years, and even pretending to care when it was politically convenient, but then sweeping it under the rug when it wasn't"-thing

    8. warparykamcaiao   10 years ago

      I make up to usd90 an hour working from my home. My story is that I quit working at Walmart to work online and with a little effort I easily bring in around $40h to usd86h Someone was good to me by sharing this link with me, so now i am hoping i could help someone else out there by sharing this link......... Try it, you won't regret it!... http://www.wixjob.com

  2. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

    ISIS has conquered Tataouine.

    We don't know how many yet. They marched in single file to conceal their numbers.

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Jesus, I didn't know they had a military capacity in space.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Thank NASA for making it a priority.

        1. Tonio   10 years ago

          Good one, Fisty.

          1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            Say, that's right! Wow, who knew all those crazy theories were true?

    2. paranoid android   10 years ago

      And you thought it was hard to find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy before...

      1. MJGreen   10 years ago

        Before, you'd only get your arm chopped off. But now...

      2. Mickey Rat   10 years ago

        How would know? They don't serve your kind there.

      3. Hamster of Doom   10 years ago

        It isn't just my mind that went there first.

        Whew.

    3. Zwak   10 years ago

      These are not the Muslims you are looking for.

  3. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    So it's a rough day, if you're a 13-year-old girl.

    It always appears to be a rough day if you're a 13-year-old girl.

    1. db   10 years ago

      ...he says from personal experience.

      1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

        Is this Zayn Malik the same guy who bombed the Boston Marathon?

    2. db   10 years ago

      Alternately:

      ...especially the ones in Warty's "club."

      1. Almanian!   10 years ago

        It's much sadder to be a 13 yo boy in said club.

        So I've been told...

        1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

          Or happy, if you're into that sort of thing. Some people are. Not me, but some people.

          1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

            Hey, stop talking about me when I'm not here.

    3. Almanian!   10 years ago

      "OH MY GOD!! LIKE YOU EVEN KNOW!!! YOU HAVE NO IDEA! UGGGGGH!!! AHHHHHGGG!!!!"

      *runs to room*

      /lived through two daughters teen years

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Were you at peak booze back then?

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          No, Peak Booze was when my wife went through The Change?. Holy Mother of God, that is some heavy shit....

          1. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

            My teenage daughter wasn't too bad. The wife is going through the change now and it is everything it was billed as and then some.

          2. Harvard   10 years ago

            I duct taped my daughter to the fridge for two years when she turned 13. It worked so well I made it through the wife's menocrazy that way too.

          3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

            I read you guys loud and clear. Trade the wife in for a newer model when she's 45.

            1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

              That can get expensive. 8 cows would be a bargain.

    4. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

      maybe this makes me a bad person, butI thought the picture was of Dzhokar Tsarnev(sp?), who, I understand, some 13yo girls also find dreamy.

      I did not know that One Direction was a terrorist organization.

      1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

        Some boy bands have been known to promote military action:

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5UAnq33zRq8

  4. Protagoronus   10 years ago

    Wow! A NY Times article that criticizes zero sum economic thinking!!1!!on1
    The Libertarian moment is here?

    Whenever I'm tempted by the notion that humans are rational beings, carefully evaluating the world and acting in ways that maximize our happiness, I think of our meager immigration policies. For me, it's close to proof that we are, collectively, still jealous, nervous creatures, hoarding what we have, afraid of taking even the most promising risk, displaying loyalty to our own tribe while we stare, suspiciously, at everyone else.

    Come for the decent article, stay for the comment section replete with economic fallacy, racist projection, environmental nonsense (Ehrlich mentioned of course). You know, gems like this:

    The real racists are those who claim that they should have as many children "as they feel like," and the rest of us should just accept it.

    1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      "The real racists are those who claim that they should have as many children "as they feel like," and the rest of us should just accept it."

      I'm desperately trying to figure out how this is racist and just can't do it.

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        Yeah, I got nothin'

      2. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

        Was that a comment from the NYT?

        Because they can derp it up with the best of them.

        1. Protagoronus   10 years ago

          'twas a comment. 'twas minor derp, but I couldn't take that cesspool much longer.

      3. Raven Nation   10 years ago

        *Channels NYT prog commentator*

        Because southern, white Christians want to have as many kids as possible but are opposed to brown Latino coming here with their kids.

      4. Rich   10 years ago

        Perhaps the commenter meant "speciesist".

      5. Dweebston   10 years ago

        Having more children than

        1. Dweebston   10 years ago

          Welp, less/great than signs are still borked. THANKS, OBAMA

          1. Almanian!   10 years ago

            It's Obama's interwebs - we're just surfing it.

      6. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        I'm desperately trying to figure out how this is racist and just can't do it.

        Try harder, Hitler.

        1. Xeones   10 years ago

          You know who else tried harder?

          1. Protagoronus   10 years ago

            A steel town girl on a Saturday night?

      7. Zeb   10 years ago

        Seems like being more "privileged" correlates pretty well with having fewer children. I can't figure it out. Maybe "racist" just means "I don't like it" now.

    2. grrizzly   10 years ago

      Whenever I'm tempted by the notion that humans are rational beings, carefully evaluating the world and acting in ways that maximize our happiness, I think of our meager immigration policies. For me, it's close to proof that we are, collectively, still jealous, nervous creatures, hoarding what we have, afraid of taking even the most promising risk, displaying loyalty to our own tribe while we stare, suspiciously, at everyone else.

      Hey, hold on. My partner's green card was approved this week -- now the country is full.

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        HE TOOK MY JOB!

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          THEY TOOK OUR JERBS!

      2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

        Congrats!

        *Closes national portcullis*

    3. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      Holy mother of God, those comments are idiotic:

      "If anything has convinced me that I am right, as a Democrat, to oppose illegal immigration, it is this article.

      "People in the middle and upper-middle classes don't mind poorly educated, low-skilled immigrants entering the country."

      Seriously? First of all, it's a blanket assertion that if you oppose illegal immigration--or, in the writer's convolution "immigration" overall--you must be in the lower classes.

      But since when do Democrats ignore anything that does not harm them directly? Since when do we say--hey, I'm OK, fend for yourself."

      Okay - you realize that when you tell a poor immigrant not to come into the country, you're telling them 'hey, I'm ok, fend for yourself?' Or do only Americans count as people?

      1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

        Somebody needs to use italics or blockquotes or better opening/closing "", because that was confusing and scary.

        1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

          Don't tell me what to do. I'm a loose cannon commenter who doesn't play by the rules.

          1. Protagoronus   10 years ago

            Irish is a maverick

          2. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

            So which commenter is your partner who is only days away from retirement?

          3. Brian D   10 years ago

            If you're Irish, you must be McBain!

    4. SusanM   10 years ago

      How much you want to bet that they're under investigation for using illegals as cheap labor?

  5. NidhoggRocketman   10 years ago

    ISIS has conquered Tataouine.

    Holy shit, they've invented a hyperdrive!?

  6. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    Duck Dynasty star Phil Robertson thinks that if atheists' families were raped and murdered in front of their eyes, they might change their minds about this whole "God does not exist" thing.

    Just like Kitty Dukakis?

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      Drinking rubbing alcohol will do strange things to your mind.

    2. Warty   10 years ago

      Robertson kept going: "Then you take a sharp knife and take his manhood and hold it in front of him and say, 'Wouldn't it be something if this [sic] was something wrong with this? But you're the one who says there is no God, there's no right, there's no wrong, so we're just having fun. We're sick in the head, have a nice day.'"

      What a fine beard to waste on such a man.

      1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

        Um...

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          DON'T TALK SHIT ABOUT HIS BEARD

        2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          In an unusual turn of events, I'm going to have to agree with Nikki on this.

          1. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

            I was going to defend Warty and point out that he was using "beard" in the context of a slang term describing a person who is used, knowingly or unknowingly, as a date, romantic partner (boyfriend or girlfriend), or spouse to conceal one's sexual orientation.

            Then I looked at a picture of Phil's wife (aka the Beard) and decided that if Warty was referring to her as a "fine beard" then he should have his driving privileges revoked due to his virtual blindness.

            1. Warty   10 years ago

              HE HAS A NICE BEARD ALL RIGHT???

              1. Slammer   10 years ago

                Awesome Beard

                1. Warty   10 years ago

                  Fuck, I love Crowbar.

              2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                Extensive ? "nice"

      2. John   10 years ago

        He is just making the same point that I make from time to time and stole from the Marquise de Sade, if there is no God, who are you to tell me what I am doing is wrong? You think murdering and torturing people is wrong. Well that is nice, I happen to think it is fun. Without some higher authority to appeal to, who is to say you are right and I am wrong?

        1. Warty   10 years ago

          Exactly. He's just accidentally saying it in a way that tells us his sexual fantasies.

          1. John   10 years ago

            Maybe. But to know that you would have to read his mind. I think he is just making his point in a way calculated to shock people. I often argue with anarchists in the first person saying things like "that is nice but I am taking everything you own and if you try and stop me, me and my friends are going to blow your head off." And often it goes right over their heads and I am accused of really being a secret want to be mad killer. I think the same thing is going on here.

          2. Enough About Palin   10 years ago

            He does talk graphically about gay sex and cocks a lot.

            1. SugarFree   10 years ago

              He does talk graphically about gay sex and cocks a lot.

              And they are always the ones that get caught with a rentboy and a bag of meth.

        2. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

          So your argument is that the appeal to authority, which in every other instance you would mock as a moronic logical fallacy, is completely reasonable if you just call that authority God.

          1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

            And it's not like I can't respond with, "Nuh uh, my god says you're wrong!"

            1. John   10 years ago

              Sure you can. And at least withing your moral universe, your response makes sense. If however, your moral universe doesn't include any higher authority, it makes no sense at all for you to claim your moral values are anything other than what you like. You like people and being nice. Good for you. Others feel differently. You have no ability to claim they are wrong.

              1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

                I don't believe in absolute morality so I don't disagree with you entirely. I just don't think God gets it for you either. I mean, if He exists, and you correctly identify him, you still don't have anything but your own judgment and reason to tell you His morality is correct.

                1. John   10 years ago

                  I don't believe in absolute morality so I don't disagree with you entirely. I just don't think God gets it for you either.

                  Sure you don't. You don't believe there is a God. So how could you?

                  f He exists, and you correctly identify him, you still don't have anything but your own judgment and reason to tell you His morality is correct.

                  Yes, I suppose he could be an evil God who leads you astray. That however is something that you are never going to know if true. If he is powerful enough to create the universe, he is certainly powerful enough to fool you. So if you believe he exists, you have to believe he is moral and his morality is authoritative since you have no way of knowing if it isn't.

                  1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

                    So if you believe he exists, you have to believe he is moral and his morality is authoritative since you have no way of knowing if it isn't.

                    That really doesn't follow. It would be completely possible to believe in and be suspicious of him--people do hold those two beliefs simultaneously. You don't "have to" react any specific way to believing there is a god. You still have power over your own judgment to decide whether you ought to worship Him or not.

                    1. John   10 years ago

                      Sure it follows Niki. It is just a restatement of the whole Matrix thing. What if life is an illusion? Well what if it is? I will never know that so I can't possibly consider it or act on it being that way. If I can't ever know it, it is effectively an impossibility from my perspective.

                    2. Juice   10 years ago

                      Above replace "life" with "God" and you should now be an atheist. Congrats.

          2. John   10 years ago

            No you fucking half wit. My argument is that everyone has to have assumptions from which to reason. Without a higher authority to appeal, there is nothing that says your assumptions are any better than mine.

            It is a simple argument. I don't understand why atheists can't ever grasp it.

            1. Warty   10 years ago

              The problem is that your final authority is a childish fantasy. Not only are your assumptions not better than mine, they're much worse./

            2. SugarFree   10 years ago

              We grasp your argument just fine, John. We just think it's horseshit.

            3. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

              It absolutely is an argument from authority. "This is the correct morality because the highest possible authority said so" is arguing morality from authority.

              1. John   10 years ago

                No its not Niki. First, I am not making a moral argument. I am talking about the ability to even have a morality. Can't you see that difference.

                If you don't think there is a God, good for you. Nothing that I am saying says you are wrong. All I am saying is that if you don't think there is a God, stop pretending that your moral assumptions and morality are anything other than your personal tastes or have any sort of primacy over anyone else' morality. That is all this is about.

                1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

                  But the reason you believe God provides morality is because you believe God is correct about what is moral. But He is only correct about what is moral because he is God. That means you are arguing "correct morality is correct because an authority said it was."

                  1. John   10 years ago

                    So what Niki? Really so what? Just because there is a right and wrong in an ultimate sense is no guarantee I or anyone else is going to get it right. I might get it wrong, but it is there so I am wrong. If it is not, then it doesn't matter. I can't be right or wrong. I just am what I choose to be.

                2. Zeb   10 years ago

                  You can still have morality. It just can't be absolute. Why would you think it would be?

                  I can accept that the views of the more thoughtful people I disagree with come from different assumptions about what it right and desirable and that we can't come to an agreement based on first principles, but only by convincing people that my principles are better in some way.

                3. Protagoronus   10 years ago

                  We are order creating replicating machines evolved over billions of years. Our existence only makes sense if we value our selves and value order.

            4. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

              Do you get your impeccable manners from god too?

            5. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              I doubt it's that atheists "can't" grasp it and more that it's a retarded and irrelevant argument to them.

              Even within a single denomination of a single religion the interpetation of God's morality will vary person to person. Even the most basic rules that the religious broadly agree on end up with a laundry list of exceptions and justifications.

              Thou shall not kill (unless it's self-defense, or there's a war, or the voices in your head command you to strike down an unbeliever, or).

              1. John   10 years ago

                No Jesse, you claim it is retarded because you would rather live in fantasy land where there is really a right and wrong instead of the abyss. You call it retarded because you are a fucking child who doesn't want his make believe disturbed.

                The dumbest theist is less pathetic than the atheist running around pretending there is not an abyss.

                1. Zeb   10 years ago

                  I got no problem with the abyss. I don't know why people think that the abyss means that nothing else can be meaningful. There is no absolute morality, so what? There are plenty of other kinds of morality that seem to work pretty well.

                2. Warty   10 years ago

                  You call it retarded because you are a fucking child who doesn't want his make believe disturbed.

                  I sometimes wonder if you're afraid that it's only your belief in god that keeps you from doing terrible things.

                3. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                  A) Not an atheist. I believe that the the full breadth of the universe is unknowable to my very limited senses, but have not personally experienced divinity.

                  B) you're claiming that atheists are living in a childish fantasy world because they don't want to face the abyss but theists are somehow accurately assessing the universe by pretending there's a father figure waiting to hug them when they get to said abyss?

                  Am I understanding that correctly? Because that seems...backwards to me.

                  1. Juice   10 years ago

                    A) Not an atheist. I believe that the the full breadth of the universe is unknowable to my very limited senses, but have not personally experienced divinity.

                    No, that means you are an atheist. It sounds like you do not have a belief or faith in spirits or gods.

                    1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                      Possibly. They aren't really mutually exclusive, it's just that agnosticism fits how I interpret the world around me in a very accurate way.

                      The essence of Huxley's agnosticism?and his statement, as the inventor of the term, must be peculiarly authoritative?was not a profession of total ignorance, nor even of total ignorance within one special but very large sphere; rather, he insisted, it was "not a creed but a method, the essence of which lies in the rigorous application of a single principle," viz., to follow reason "as far as it can take you"; but then, when you have established as much as you can, frankly and honestly to recognize the limits of your knowledge.

            6. SusanM   10 years ago

              Just because we do not want a god to decide morality doesn't mean we want to morality.

              And in any case, given some of the things religious people think are perfectly moral these days (the Russians are being very good christians these days and the folks with ISIS and al-Queida are very devout) I'll take my chances with no god at all.

              1. SusanM   10 years ago

                Just because we do not want a god to decide morality doesn't mean we want to have no morality.

                1. John   10 years ago

                  Sure Susan. You want to make shit up and pretend that there is meaning in the universe. Yeah you want morality, but tough shit there isn't one. There is just your will to pretend. That is it.

                  1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                    You want to make shit up and pretend that there is meaning in the universe. Yeah you want morality, but tough shit there isn't one. There is just your will to pretend. That is it.

                    Said the atheist to the believer...

                    You're really not dealing with the fact that even the faithful have an individual morality shaped by culture, experience and personal preference, which they then link back to God. A capitalist looks to the rebuilding of the walls of Jerusalem and sees the benefit of enlightened self interest, the communist sees Jesus telling his disciples to give up their worldly goods and follow him.

                    As my mother always says, people are very good at justifying what they want to believe. That's no less true for the Christian, Buddhist or anarcho-syndicalist.

            7. Juice   10 years ago

              there is nothing that says your assumptions are any better than mine

              By George, I think he's got it!

            8. utabintarbo   10 years ago

              It's just question-begging into infinity. The "higher authority" begs the question. Your fealty to said authority begs the question. Ad infinitum.

        3. Warty   10 years ago

          The statement "murder is wrong because of God" doesn't contain any more information than the statement "murder is wrong". You don't need God for any of this.

          1. John   10 years ago

            Yes you do. God is a higher authority than man and thus can provide real authority to give assumptions from which to reason. If you don't believe there is a God, then your assumptions are your own. You like them but there is nothing to say I or anyone else has to.

            What usually happens is atheists dream up "natural rights" in place of God and pretend that there is some kind of rational imperative that requires people to respect those rights. In fact, there is no such thing. Nothing requires me to respect your rights or necessarily says my doing so is the right thing.

            1. MJGreen   10 years ago

              Nothing requires me to respect God or his arbitrary preferences, either.

            2. Zeb   10 years ago

              But your assumptions about God are your own as well. How do you know your understanding of God is correct? Maybe God doesn't give a shit about murder. Maybe more important things are going on that our puny minds can't comprehend. Maybe the radical Islam terrorists have it right and God wants them to murder lots of people.

              And even supposing God exists and people can know God's mind to some extent, what is to say that there isn't an even higher authority than that?

              I think Warty is right. Inserting God doesn't get you anywhere. If people want to use God as the source of moral authority, that's fine. But it isn't any different in content from an atheist saying "natural rights".

              1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

                The Founding Fathers starting point was that all their writings flowed from the authority of God.

                Vico - among the greatest of all historians - asserted the same in his epic 'New Science'.

                They felt the source was God.

                1. Azathoth!!   10 years ago

                  The Founding Fathers starting point was that rights--not 'all their writings'-- came from one's Creator.

                  Not 'the Creator', or 'Our Creator', but 'their Creator'.

                  This an incredibly important point--one that is constantly overlooked. The Founders removed rights from anything public or anything held in common and made them personal and individual.

                  Your Creator may not be my Creator, but both of our Creators endowed us with inalienable rights.

              2. Warty   10 years ago

                If people want to use God as the source of moral authority, that's fine. But it isn't any different in content from an atheist saying "natural rights".

                YES. That's what I'm saying. It's the same thing as the argument about the Prime Mover - "God set the universe in motion" is the same thing as saying "I dunno".

                John, if you're unaware, there are compelling arguments for a biological basis for the concept of rights. Here's one that I haven't read but I heard is good.

                1. John   10 years ago

                  And those arguments are horse shit Warty. How can you believe such shit? So fucking what, my biology compels me to respect rights. Since when can we not ignore our instinct? Instinct doesn't make something right or wrong. So what? I don't like my instinct and plan to ignore it. Who are you to say I am wrong/

                  1. Carl ?s the level   10 years ago

                    And those arguments are horse shit John. How can you believe such shit? So fucking what, my God compels me to respect rights. Since when can we not ignore our deities? God doesn't make something right or wrong. So what? I don't like my god and plan to ignore him. Who are you to say I am wrong/

                  2. Warty   10 years ago

                    You are providing a master class in missing the point today. Do you think the Hebrews were on the verge of dying out from murdering each other and raping each other's wives before Moses came down with his tablets? People knew how to act long before they invented god.

                    1. kilroy   10 years ago

                      Yes. John has the causality backwards. Humans constructed a system of morality and codified it into a religion with an all-powerful enforcer, one that transcends even death. You get your carrot at the end.

            3. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

              Yes you do. God is a higher authority than man and thus can provide real authority to give assumptions from which to reason.

              My God says that you must not eat bacon. And we had him before you did. Why do you think it's right to offend God?

              1. John   10 years ago

                So what Old Man? Maybe you are right and I am wrong. There still is a right and a wrong. I just am on the wrong side. That is totally different than there being no God and no right or wrong.

                My God you people are dense.

                1. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

                  My God you people are dense.

                  I never took you for an antisemite before.

                  1. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

                    Show me on the doll where that nasty Jew touched you.

                  2. Zeb   10 years ago

                    I think "you people" refers to everyone who is not John.

                    1. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

                      I think "you people" refers to everyone who is not John.

                      E.g., Jews. That's really very vicious.

                    2. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

                      I never knew I was jewish. Does this mean I can use the hard J?

                    3. Old Man With Candy   10 years ago

                      Only if Antisemite John says that his god allows it. The Jew god is apparently a worthless piece of shit.

                2. paranoid android   10 years ago

                  So what Old Man? Maybe you are right and I am wrong. There still is a right and a wrong. I just am on the wrong side. That is totally different than there being no God and no right or wrong.

                  This means that at the absolute best, your argument shows that if there is an absolute morality determined by a being that has the power/authority to decide such things, this as humans does us no good, since we have no way of knowing anything about the nature of that being, or its tastes, or what the absolute morality it has designed for us actually is (since any scriptures/prophecies it chooses to give us could just be mistakes or lies).

                  How is that any better than a position stating that there probably is no absolute morality?

                  1. John   10 years ago

                    Android,

                    It is better in that it is at least internally consistent. If you don't believe in God, fine. Perhaps you are correct. To me the worst thing to be is to not even be consistent in your own system. So, if you don't believe in God be consistent and say your morality is your own and not necessarily applicable to anyone else. That is all I am saying.

                    1. paranoid android   10 years ago

                      It is better in that it is at least internally consistent. If you don't believe in God, fine. Perhaps you are correct. To me the worst thing to be is to not even be consistent in your own system. So, if you don't believe in God be consistent and say your morality is your own and not necessarily applicable to anyone else. That is all I am saying.

                      But to bring it back around to the original topic of discussion, it doesn't make the statement of an atheist who tells the people murdering his family "what you are doing is wrong" any more or less valid than the believer saying the same thing.

                    2. John   10 years ago

                      Android,

                      The point is that from a theists perspective, they can say it is wrong but the atheist, if he is being honest and taking his views to their logical conclusion, can't. What Robertson is saying here is "without God there is moral chaos", which is true.

                    3. Zeb   10 years ago

                      I don't think that is true, John. The atheist and the theist just mean slightly different things by "that is wrong". I say that what is wrong is hurting other people except when necessary for self defense, or defense of others who are not harming anyone. To me that seems like a far better moral standard that "what God says is wrong is wrong". People sincerely believe that God says all sorts of terrible things.

                      I do see what you are getting at. And at a very deep level, you are right. Morality is something that applies in the context of human beings relating to each other and I wouldn't say it is necessarily universal. I wouldn't say it applies to non-human animals unless I can be convinced that they can comprehend and act in a moral way. It's not immoral to kill a cow just to eat it. It's not immoral for a polar bear to eat cubs so it can mate with a female. Morality exists for people because we are capable of thinking that way. Unless you want to say that there is such a thing as morality in a "state of nature", I don't think you can say that it precedes humanity in any meaningful way.

                    4. Carl ?s the level   10 years ago

                      ayy lmao...

                      John|3.25.15 @ 5:29PM

                      To me the worst thing to be is to not even be consistent in your own system.

                      John|6.13.14 @ 10:43AM

                      Consitency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

                    5. John   10 years ago

                      Carl,

                      Internal rational consistency is not the same as petty consistency in the real world. That second statement doesn't mean what you think it does.

                    6. Carl ?s the level   10 years ago

                      I'm quite aware of what it means.

                    7. AdamJ   10 years ago

                      My morality is my own. Most libertarians understand this. I do not share a morality with progressives, I do not share a morality with conservatives. I do not believe rights are granted by governments or deities. My rights are granted by those around me who chose whether or not to infringe on them. My morality likely comes from a combination of logic and empathy that I use to navigate the waters of society. Even though my morality is my own, that does not stop me from hoping other's morality will align with mine, and therefore make pleas to others' logic and empathy so we can coexist.

            4. Hyperion   10 years ago

              Yes you do. God is a higher authority than man

              As soon as the heretofore invisible sky god appears and says 'well here I am unbelievers, you're all living in this simulation that i built on my PC, and if you don't say I'm the one and true god, I'm unplugging this rig', then I'll admit that you are right.

              1. Hyperion   10 years ago

                I'll add this. If there really is an invisible sky god who created this entire universe, then invisible sky god is a being that is so far more technologically advanced than we mutated tree monkeys that it would be incomprehensible to us in our current primitive state.

                Now who created the invisible sky god that created us? It's just fucking turtles all the way down, we may as well accept that.

                1. Trigger Warning   10 years ago

                  I figured it all out one night, but the DMT wore off, and I didn't take notes.

                  1. Hyperion   10 years ago

                    I figured it all out one night, but the DMT wore off, and I didn't take notes.

                    I really hate it when that happens. I've written some songs complete with guitar solos that are better than anything ever in the history of music, but I couldn't remember any of it the next day.

              2. John   10 years ago

                Hyperion,

                See my comment to android above. If you don't believe in God, fine. But do yourself a favor and not believe in God. Don't claim not to and then sneak him in when you need some kind of absolute to reason from. Don't put him in a "natural rights mask" or a "rational morality" costume and pretend you don't believe. If he is not there, then all of that shit is nothing but your preference. A good preference in my view for sure. But a preference none the less.

                1. Hyperion   10 years ago

                  I neither believe or don't believe in a god. You know why I say that? Because unlike other people who claim to know one way or the other, I'm not afraid to admit that I can't know.

                  Not trying to get into a pissing contest here. I respect your beliefs or opinion or whatever. Everyone has a right to their own opinions. Just that at this time, no one can prove they are right.

                  But if there is a god, like I said, it's a super technologically advanced being, that is all.

                  1. John   10 years ago

                    All I ask for Hyperion is internal consistency. I don't know is a fine answer.

                  2. Warty   10 years ago

                    I neither believe or don't believe in a god. You know why I say that? Because unlike other people who claim to know one way or the other, I'm not afraid to admit that I can't know.

                    This is a bit of a copout. What you just said is that you don't believe in god, but you don't want to start a fight over it, so you don't want to call yourself an atheist.

                    And for what it's worth, none of us claim to know for sure that gods don't exist.

                    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

                      Sorry, Warty, You're way off there. In my first post I clearly said that if there is a god it's a technologically advanced being. I've been saying this for a long time because it's what I believe.

                      Does this god exist? I don't know, neither does anyone else. I'm not trying to avoid a fight, as I have no problems with fighting for the right reasons. But I'm not going to fight over something that I can't know if I am right or not. So I just admit, I don't know.

                      Maybe none of us here don't claim to know anything for sure, but there are millions of people around the world who do claim to know for sure, and they even kill each other over it.

                    2. Hyperion   10 years ago

                      Also, I don't want to be called an atheist because I'm not. An atheist is someone who claims to know there is no god. That's not me. I think agnostic is the proper term for me.

                    3. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

                      I think agnostic is the proper term for me.

                      I had a Mormon missionary burst into tears when I described myself as a "devout agnostic". I wish I'd recorded the encounter.

                    4. Hyperion   10 years ago

                      I had a Mormon missionary burst into tears when I described myself as a "devout agnostic". I wish I'd recorded the encounter.

                      Probably because felt a loss of power. Religion has been used as a control mechanism for a very long time. Now we just have government with all of their weapons and so they don't really give a shit if we believe their bullshit or not. They try, but in the end, they just use force on us deniers.

                    5. Warty   10 years ago

                      The agnostic says the existence of god can't be proven one way or the other. The atheist says that he doesn't believe in god. The two terms are answers to two different questions.

                      But I always argue that the agnostic, by stating that there can't be any evidence for god, has already stated that he doesn't believe in god. It's a built-in copout term.

                    6. Azathoth!!   10 years ago

                      But I always argue that the agnostic, by stating that there can't be any evidence for god,

                      But this is not what the agnostic says. The agnostic says that there is currently no evidence for god. The agnostic admits that humans do not know everything--that humans may not even comprehend the depths of their ignorance.

                      The atheist makes a definitive statement out of the incorrect assumption that humans understand now all that they can understand.

                      For humans, agnosticism is the logical stance. Religion and atheism rely on unproven assumptions.

                    7. Juice   10 years ago

                      Also, I don't want to be called an atheist because I'm not. An atheist is someone who claims to know there is no god. That's not me. I think agnostic is the proper term for me.

                      Agnostic is a type of atheist. If you are an agnostic you are an atheist. Atheist just means without belief in a god.

                    8. Warty   10 years ago

                      It's a semantic point, and not terribly important, but what you said is equivalent to saying that you don't believe in god. I don't have enough information to know whether there are advanced alien civilizations in this galaxy. There might be, there might not be. I haven't seen any evidence to convince me that they exist or that they don't exist. So, you tell me, do I believe in advanced alien civilizations?

                    9. Carl ?s the level   10 years ago

                      This is a bit of a copout. What you just said is that you don't believe in god, but you don't want to start a fight over it, so you don't want to call yourself an atheist.

                      And for what it's worth, none of us claim to know for sure that gods don't exist.

                      I know this is one of your "things", but if "us" means "atheists" rather than "H&Rers;" (which it has other times you've brought it up), then your last statement just isn't true, whether we like it or not.

                      Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (archived because it appears to be down):

                      Atheism is the view that there is no God.

                      Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

                      'Atheism' means the negation of theism, the denial of the existence of God.

                      Wikipedia, being a bit more ecumenical:

                      Atheism is, in a broad sense, the rejection of belief in the existence of deities.[1][2] In a narrower sense, atheism is specifically the position that there are no deities.[3][4][5] Most inclusively, atheism is the absence of belief that any deities exist.[4][5][6][7]

                    10. Warty   10 years ago

                      Any atheists who claim positive disproof of God don't know anything. You can't disprove a negative, as you know.

                    11. Warty   10 years ago

                      Well, you can't prove a negative outside of math, at any rate.

                  3. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

                    But if there is a god, like I said, it's a super technologically advanced being, that is all.

                    God is Izaya the Highfather?

                    Hail Darkseid!

                  4. Juice   10 years ago

                    I neither believe or don't believe in a god.

                    ugh, this means that you DON'T believe

                2. TimothyZ   10 years ago

                  Don't go sneaking God in when you need some sort of absolute proof of the pythagoean theorem.

            5. Slammer   10 years ago

              Question: If god is the ultimate arbiter of morality how do YOU know what you are being told/commanded is actually right/moral? If you're just obeying rules, how do YOU know if the rules are actually moral? The rules given by god could be capricious or arbitrary. If god tells you something is moral and you find it personally repugnant, you're probably a better judge of the thing's morality. You still have to figure the commandments through your own human filter.

              1. Hyperion   10 years ago

                So far, this god hasn't told me jack shit. I know and have known people all my life who claim that god told them this, that, and you know I think they are full of shit. People lie all of the time, and saying god told me this, it's just a way of saying that hey I'm right because god said so! I'm waiting for proggies to start using this any time now, not sure how they missed it.

                As soon as god tells me something, I'll let everyone know. So far, he's chosen to remain silent.

                1. Hyperion   10 years ago

                  I give up here. I've clearly stated that I don't know if there is a god or not. I'm open to the possibility until I see evidence one way or the other.

                  It's no different than if a scientist before Newton would have said, 'you know there might be some invisible force causing an apple to fall down from a tree, instead of up. But I don't have any proof of it'. I hope to one day know.

                  To me, someone who says 'There's a god, I talk to him every day!', and someone who says 'There's no fucking god because I can't see him and we've proved evolution is real!', are equally dishonest.

                  And yes, I believe that there are probably advanced civilizations out there, far more advanced than us. It's hard to look at the vastness of the known universe and not think that is probable.

            6. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

              Yes you do.

              No, YOU do, I don't. Your limitations are not mine.

        4. Zeb   10 years ago

          But that's not really an argument for the existence of God. The fact that a universe without a God seems like a nasty amoral place to some people is in no way evidence for God's existence. Maybe the universe is just amoral.
          Then there is also always the possibility that God doesn't agree with the human notion of morality and wants people to rape and murder your loved ones. It sounds terrible, but who are we to tell God what to think?

          I'll stick to my morality based on rights and self ownership, even if it rests on assumed axioms. I don't see how God is anything but another name for assumed axioms.

          Though I will say that the fact that some people think this way makes me glad that religion exists. If it makes some people behave who wouldn't if they thought there was no punishment coming in the afterlife, that's good.

          1. John   10 years ago

            No it is not an argument for the existence of God. It is pointing out the implications of there not being a God. Nothing about it says there must be a God. It just says without God, there isn't any morality or ability to claim moral superiority of one system over another. That is all it means.

            1. Zeb   10 years ago

              But, as I say, there being a God does not imply that your notion of God is the correct one or that God's moral standards are the ones that you like. How do you know that the Islamic terrorists don't have it right? You can't. So saying that God is the source of morality doesn't get you any closer to what morality actually is.

              1. John   10 years ago

                So what if they do Zeb? That just means I am wrong. It still means there is a right, which isn't true if there is no God at all.

                1. Zeb   10 years ago

                  Well, the whole discussion seems pretty irrelevant then. So what if there is an absolute right and wrong if no one can know what that is?

                  1. John   10 years ago

                    ZEb,

                    Who says we can't know it? I say we can. You just don't agree. The point is that whatever you think, live with the rational consequences of it. So if you don't think there is a God, stop telling yourself there is any right or wrong.

                    1. Zeb   10 years ago

                      I guess I can't say that we can't know it. I don't know how anyone could tell if we did, though.

                      stop telling yourself there is any right or wrong.

                      I will if you stop telling yourself there is a God.

                      I think morality is something that arises from the way humans interact with each other. It may well be a complete accident. But it's what we have to work with. By and large, people's sense of right and wrong is fairly consistent. At least in modern cosmopolitan societies where tribal ideas about in-group don't dominate. I think that's all we have and I think it is good enough to go on.

                    2. TimothyZ   10 years ago

                      Morality is no more an accident. Why do sharks not have the teeth of a wholly mammoth? For reasons entirely different from accident and reasons long predating and wholly independent of our local deities of choice.

          2. MJGreen   10 years ago

            Though I will say that the fact that some people think this way makes me glad that religion exists. If it makes some people behave who wouldn't if they thought there was no punishment coming in the afterlife, that's good.

            Hayek's post-script in The Fatal Conceit is a good rendering of this point. He's basically agnostic, but he appreciates religion's ability to transmit valuable rules and customs over generations.

        5. Carl ?s the level   10 years ago

          So God told you that murder is wrong. Got it. Who, then, told you that God is the arbiter of what is right and what is wrong?

          1. Zeb   10 years ago

            And how do you know it was really God and not some part of your own mind? Or some people who wrote some books in the desert thousands of years ago?

          2. Warty   10 years ago

            And why is it all right for God to murder? Because he seems to love it.

            1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              And why is it all right for God to murder? Because he seems to love it.

              Dude, he had a shitty few millennia. He sent his son as an apology and we should be square now.

        6. Redmanfms   10 years ago

          You think murdering and torturing people is wrong. Well that is nice, I happen to think it is fun. Without some higher authority to appeal to, who is to say you are right and I am wrong?

          Oh, oh, can you skip to the part where you argue Nietzsche backs up your sky-daddy bullshit???

          Your infantile and profoundly ignorant understanding of philosophy is always amusing...

        7. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

          ITT, John is a moron who projects his inability to create a moral framework without higher instruction onto others.

          1. John   10 years ago

            You are a child Cyotoxic who likes to play make believe. That is all you are. It is pathetic you and your little "morality".

            1. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

              The guy who believes in God and can't reason his own morality without that belief is accusing others of pretending and being pathetic. Oh delicious.

        8. Azathoth!!   10 years ago

          Yes.

          But he's wrong. As are you.

          Any reference to 'morality' in the bible/torah/quran is incidental. The point God makes in all three books is this--worship me and you get to go to heaven. And nothing else.

          All the 'moral codes', 'laws', and 'lessons' are incidental to the thing God wants.

          Morality comes from within--

          Moral things are things you wouldn't mind someone doing to you.

          Immoral things are things you would mind someone doing to you.

          Doing immoral things puts one outside the system until restitution is made.

          All of this stems from internal human nature.

          The gods do not exist to moniter every action of every sentience. The idea that they (or, more properly, it) do, is a tenet of the cult of the One God and is not borne out by prior human/god interaction.

      3. SugarFree   10 years ago

        Projection isn't just for progressives anymore.

        1. John   10 years ago

          What is so hard to understand? What part of it eludes you?

          1. SugarFree   10 years ago

            None of it eludes me, John. I got what you were arguing the first time you argued it. But there's no "counter-argument" because of the flawed axiom at the heart of it.

            As long as you believe God exists, you are working on faith. Arguing against faith with reason is impossible. We have irreconcilable differences in viewpoint.

            1. John   10 years ago

              No SF. You miss my point. This argument has nothing to do with the existence of God. It is only saying if there is a God, there are no absolutes and thus nothing beyond our personal likes. There is no right or wrong. That is it.

              You think I am trying to convince you of God. I don't give a fuck if you believe in God. That is between you and God. What bugs me is not that people don't believe in God. What bugs me is people who claim not to believe in God and then also pretend there is any kind of absolute or right or wrong.

              1. Zeb   10 years ago

                Who is saying that there is absolute right and wrong? There is right and wrong in the context of human relations. That's it. Nothing that happens on the moon is right or wrong unless people are there. It is something that either people invented or is somehow inherent in our biology. I think that most people arguing with you here will agree more or less with that. Maybe there is some other race out there in the universe for whom eating most of their children is the right thing to do (if you haven't read any Frank Herbert books featuring the Gowachin, you should, if you like that sort of thing). To us that is morally abhorrent. To them it may be how life works and the only way things can work.

              2. SugarFree   10 years ago

                But if God doesn't exist, then there isn't an argument anymore. Or the argument turns into "Is a morality made up by humans better than a morality made up by different humans?"

                See, from my point of view, asking if there is an absolute right or wrong doesn't matter because a source that could provide such a thing doesn't exist.

            2. TimothyZ   10 years ago

              SugarFree, You give too much credit for the ability of faith to sustain itself in a mind where reasons contradict it, in social environments that do not reinforce it and in a universe fundamentally indifferent to it.

      4. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Say what you will about the tenets of National Socialism, at least it's an ethos.

        1. Francisco d'Anconia   10 years ago

          +1 Nihilist

    3. Zeb   10 years ago

      I would have thought the opposite.

      Actually, I would have thought that most people would just hold tighter to their beliefs if anything when something horrible happens. The old "no atheists in foxholes" fallacy.

    4. creech   10 years ago

      Sorry, Phil, I would just take that as further proof that an all-powerful and all-benevolent God did not exist.

      1. Hey Nikki!   10 years ago

        A single line of footprints only means HE WAS CARRYING YOU!!!

        1. Protagoronus   10 years ago

          Does this comment belong in the Tatooine part of the thread?

          1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

            Help me Obi Wan, you're my only hope?

  7. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

    After the Jeremy Clarkson Top Gear news, I have started watching the show from season 16 on (netflix). Great god damn show.

    1. Bam!   10 years ago

      Top Gear wonders if communism has ever produced a good car.

      1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

        Without watching the video, I'm going to say no. Tanks, yes, but not cars.

        1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          Lada?

          Skoda?

          AT LEAST I'M TRYING.

          1. Tonio   10 years ago

            Lada? LOL. They bought the plans and the plant from Fiat. Finicky Italian engineering, combined with Russian assembly = surprising any of them even ran.

            1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

              I wouldn't down play FIAT. They have come up with some of the most innovative designs in car history. And they have a car track on top of their building.

              Bad ass.

              1. Almanian!   10 years ago

                Fiats are pieces of shit. Period.

                Thanks.

                1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

                  Nah.

            2. grrizzly   10 years ago

              My grandpa had a Lada with letter F stamped on the engine. It ran for more than 20 years.

          2. Almanian!   10 years ago

            Come on, Trabant was the least most awesome Commie Car! I remember they tested one in Car and Driver back in the day, and it caught on fire.

            The body.

            Which was made of cardboard and plastic or some such thing....

            Spectacular!

            1. Tonio   10 years ago

              Pressed cardboard.

              Go, Trabi, Go!

            2. RBS   10 years ago

              Relevant

              1. Almanian!   10 years ago

                Exactly!

              2. Rich   10 years ago

                That was great. Thanks!

            3. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

              Some Trabs were powered by a 2-stroke V2 that was actually the starter motor for a Soviet Tank.

          3. Antilles   10 years ago

            Hey, I rode in a Skoda when I visited Romania a few years back! My brief exposure did not leave a positive impression...

        2. Restoras, OWG and RWC   10 years ago

          Not even the tanks. Storing all the ammo in the hull? Incredibly stupid.

          1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

            True, but T-34.

            1. Tonio   10 years ago

              Yeah, one of the few things the commies did worth a damn.

            2. Restoras, OWG and RWC   10 years ago

              Ok, I'll give you that one.

        3. DEG   10 years ago

          I knew a guy that had a Yugo. When asked about it, he said, "Yeah, Yugo. You go five miles an hour."

          1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

            There were a whole string of jokes about how bad those things were.

            You know why all Yugo's have rear window defrosters? To keep your hands warm.

            1. DEG   10 years ago

              Yes, and that guy heard then all. The 5 MPH one was his favorite.

              There are also similar versions of those jokes for all the Eastern Bloc cars. Trabants had a rear window defroster for the same reason. 😉

    2. tarran   10 years ago

      Power!!!!

    3. Jerry on the sea   10 years ago

      Hopefully they move to Sky or Netflix.

    4. Zeb   10 years ago

      I fucking love Top Gear. Even if you aren't really into cars, it is a very funny and well put together show.

      1. Zeb   10 years ago

        Sadly, until a few weeks ago Netflix had seasons 2-20 of Top Gear. Don't know what happened. BBC getting all bitchy maybe.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

    POLITICO says Sen. Lindsey Graham is positioning himself as the "realist" Republican 2016 candidate.

    So he's not running then?

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      [after Fist drops mic and walks offstage]

      He's here every day folks, but the material is always fresh. Just like the fish specials.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

        Someone has to entertain you people.

        1. Almanian!   10 years ago

          You people? We're "you people now".

          Mister "Big Time Show Guy, Got a Comedy Routine So Suddenly He Don't Need His Old Friends No More".

          OK, Mr. Hoity Toity Entertainment - fuck you, and good night.

        2. Tonio   10 years ago

          Here we are, now entertain us!

          1. Fist of Etiquette   10 years ago

            ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?

    2. Hyperion   10 years ago

      It's Politico, this is exactly the type of non-sense that you can expect from them.

  9. rts   10 years ago

    Mother sues B.C. Ministry of Children after baby dies in foster care

    A mother who says she was forced to hand her daughter over to government care is suing the B.C. Ministry of Children and Family Development after 21-month-old baby Isabella died while in foster care.

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      My, how ungrateful of her. They were just trying to help. Plus, if they took the kid away she was probably in danger of an even worse death.

    2. Winston   10 years ago

      The NDP would have prevented this.

    3. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      BIG EYE: What's her problem?

  10. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

    ISIS has conquered Tataouine.

    You spelled Tatooine wrong. *pulls lever, drops Robby into Rancor pit*

    1. MJGreen   10 years ago

      I wasn't sure at first if he was referring to Tatooine or not. It doesn't even work phonetically.

    2. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

      Tataouine is a Mos Eisley bar snack made from french fries covered with Bantha curds and Womprat gravy.

      1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

        Damn it. My lunch was inadequate and now I want poutine.

        Wait, I always want poutine.

  11. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

    Realist?

    What fucking dictionary is he looking in, because he has to be using some other definition.

    1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

      That would be the FYTW/Political Hack dictionary.

    2. RBS   10 years ago

      The same one as Cytotoxic?

      1. paranoid android   10 years ago

        The book boasts over a million definitions, but all of them are for the word "peacenazi"

        1. jay_dubya   10 years ago

          ha!

        2. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

          Many but not all.

    3. Dark Lord of the Cis   10 years ago

      He was looking at the wrong definition he meant "royalist"

    4. Rich   10 years ago

      "Realism (noun): the art of depicting nature as it is seen by toads." -- Ambrose Bierce

    5. Winston   10 years ago

      Well "realists" are assholes and so is Lindsey Graham, so....

  12. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

    "Zayn Malik is leaving teen uber-band One Direction. So it's a rough day, if you're a 13-year-old girl."

    Man, I'm having a rough day.

    1. Raven Nation   10 years ago

      Umm, yeah...

      *backs cautiously out of room without saying a word*

      1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        You'll be back.

        1. TimothyZ   10 years ago

          See you in 5 years. (too soon?)

  13. Tonio   10 years ago

    "Duck Dynasty" star Phil Robertson thinks that if atheists' families were raped and murdered in front of their eyes, they might change their minds about this whole "God does not exist" thing.

    Damn, if I'd have created a parody of an ignorant, backwoods fundie that statement would have been believably over-the-top. Also, the implied threat of conversion by the sword is a classic; reminds me of some other religion, just can't put my finger on that...

    1. Certified Public Asskicker   10 years ago

      Is this God of his one to love or fear?

      1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

        It depends on what chapters of his book you want to emphasize.

      2. Tonio   10 years ago

        Both. He loves you as long as you obey. But don't get him riled.

    2. Heroic Mulatto   10 years ago

      Molochism.

      1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

        I bet you could get even the most pious to feed babies to a Moloch furnace/altar if you trapped them together on an airplane for long periods of time.

    3. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

      Since it was from Talking Points memo, I assumed that his words had been purposefully taken out of context for political reasons.

      They were not. It's a pretty fair representation of what he said, except it's even dumber because he followed it up with this:

      "And then they can look at him and say, 'Isn't it great that I don't have to worry about being judged? Isn't it great that there's nothing wrong with this? There's no right or wrong, now is it dude?'""

      That's right! The only way to believe rape and murder is wrong is if God says so!

      1. Riven   10 years ago

        Hey, without religion, some folks would have no basis for their morality.

        1. Protagoronus   10 years ago

          Can't tell if sarc, but a whole lot of morality is selected for by evolution and can be seen in some degree in all sorts of other animals. So even if the feeble-minded think they need religion to direct them, they would have instincts without it.

      2. Tonio   10 years ago

        I'm always surprised that there are people who don't realize that there are real christian bigots and homophobes in our society. Sure, the left exaggerates, but that doesn't mean those people aren't really out there.

      3. MJGreen   10 years ago

        I love the argument that you should believe in God because it's a more comforting thought. It's a straightforward call for self-delusion. "Maybe you're not convinced there is a god, but wouldn't it be comforting to think there is and he will cast judgment on your enemies? And you have a purpose in life because of his will?" It's apparently not about truth, but what helps you sleep at night.

      4. John   10 years ago

        His point went right over your head. He is not saying he would do that or would want to. He is saying that if there is no God, he could do that and there is no way to say he was wrong in doing it.

        Now you may disagree with that and think the morality in your head has some kind of primacy. And that is a reasonable position. What is not reasonable is to read his comments as some kind of revenge fantasy. That is not what he is saying and it shouldn't be hard to understand that.

        1. Viscount Irish, Slayer of Huns   10 years ago

          If there is a God there's still no way of saying someone is doing something wrong.

          If God says something, that doesn't make it morally right. Up until the advent of monotheism, gods were essentially just super-powered humans whose morality was no more advanced than our own. I'd actually argue that the God of the Old Testament's morality is not only not more advanced than our own, but is actively more degraded and barbaric than 99% of people currently living on the planet.

          Tell you what, John. Go live for a year the way the God of the Bible tells you to. Unless you're willing to do that (in which case you'll spend a lot of time in prison), I'm willing to bet that you don't get your moral sense from God, you just appeal to his authority without accurately understanding what that authority is.

          1. Restoras, OWG and RWC   10 years ago

            Plus your gods were always on your side, so TEAM! especially when going against (insert rival tribe name here).

        2. Redmanfms   10 years ago

          His point went right over your head.

          No John, it clearly did not go over Irish's head.

          He just thought the point was fucking stupid.

          And you know what John, this is the point I'll make about both Phil and you, if you need appeal to authority to have a moral compass, you are inherently immoral.

          The fact that YOU simply don't get that people can have a rational moral framework based on reason without appeal to spectre reflects on you, not them.

    4. Warty   10 years ago

      I didn't read any threat in what he said. It sounded to me like he was just adding his sexual fantasies to the retarded premise that people who don't believe in gods don't believe in right and wrong.

  14. rts   10 years ago

    Scientists to Smithsonian: Cut ties with Koch brothers

    Three dozen scientists sent an open letter to museums of natural history calling on them to cut ties with the Koch brothers and anyone else with connections to the fossil fuel industry.

    Who on this planet doesn't have connections to fossil fuels?

    1. Bam!   10 years ago

      The answer to these things is always Hitler, right?

      1. Dances-with-Trolls   10 years ago

        That is actually.. kinda accurate..

      2. Almanian!   10 years ago

        You are correct, sir

    2. Andrew S.   10 years ago

      George Soros? His money's clean and pure, right?

    3. Grand Moff Serious Man   10 years ago

      Since climate change is going to kill millions of people why aren't these scientists also demanding that every hospial the Koch Brothers donate to give back the money? It's only ethical.

    4. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      So no more NOVA?

      1. Almanian!   10 years ago

        I wish Chevy would bring back the Nova. They made Camaro wannabe's happy, like all my friends who didn't have a '71 Rally Sport 350 like mine....

        /brushes back mullet

        1. Restoras, OWG and RWC   10 years ago

          Plus, they looked bad ass when pimped out like a hot rod - Cragar SS wheels FTW!

          1. Almanian!   10 years ago

            My buddy Fisher had a really nice one with the Cragar SS's - he put on about a $2000 (c~1980) paint job. It was SWAYT!

            He still wanted my '71 Rally Sport with the split front bumper in Lime Green with a Jade Green interior. That car was a chick MAGNET, I tell ya....

            1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

              From 1978-1980 I had a bright green Ford Maverick Grabber, complete with factory racing striping and a spoiler. I guess mine was for Mustang wannabes. I don't know about chick magnet, since the heater never managed to work despite trying everything -- and that discouraged the chicks during Illinois winters from ever wanting to go for a second ride with me.

              I do remember one girl's younger brother laughing hysterically when I tried to say it was a 'sports car'.

              1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

                He was basically laughing at your penis.

    5. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

      The hate for the fossil fuel industry is incredible. Nevermind that it has completely enabled our way of life, including long easy lives with heat and air conditions and no fear of starvation.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        Where are you with my fusion reactor, anyway? The sun tasks me with its fusing ways.

        1. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

          I just need 10 more years!

          1. Almanian!   10 years ago

            I hear the Russians are just FIVE years away! Hurry!

          2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            Look, fusion this year, or I send Warty over to ask you why not.

            1. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

              ....I'll get it to you next week

              1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

                I think Kuhn wrote of this.

      2. Restoras, OWG and RWC   10 years ago

        The progtards and watermelons, in addition to thinking magically in the realm of legislation and reality, are also magical thinkers when it comes to things like food, shelter, and clothing.

      3. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        You hear it here first from Smilin' Joe!

        The fossil fuel industry is a bunch on enablers!!!

        1. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

          The Koch brothers are the devil in the progs view of government as the eternal saviour. The devil is an enabler of sin. It is beginning to all make sense in an insane sort of way.

    6. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

      Open letters are gay.

      1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        Ah, so you think these scientists desire the Kochs in a sexual way? That would explain the odd obsession with them.

      2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

        Open letter to hit and run:

        Dear readers,

        Rufus is gay.

        Thank you and have a wonderful day.

        1. RBS   10 years ago

          An obviously inappropriate open letter, indicative of a deep and abiding undercurrent of microagression.

        2. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

          They should've sent a poet. So meta. So meta... I had no idea.

        3. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

          DONT TALK ABOUT RUFUS LIKE THAT

          Lets go get some poutines and drink our labatt bleu's, eh Rufus.

          1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

            I hate Labatt and don't eat poutine.

            I'm a baaaaadddd Canadian.

            1. Smilin' Joe Fission   10 years ago

              So gay

              1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

                Rufus?

                1. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

                  ZAPPA!!!!!!!!!

                  Now that's a compliment. Thanks Bobarian!

                  1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

                    You're welcome

            2. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

              But do you drink Tim Horton's?

        4. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

          I'm more of a grumpy sort not known for my gaiety.

        5. Enough About Palin   10 years ago

          Open letter to HyR commenters:

          Enough with the religion/morality shit.

          Someone here suggested permanent threads for shit like that. I think that's a very good idea.

          1. SugarFree   10 years ago

            Thor commands me to argue with you.

            1. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

              Thor? I expected something quirkier from you. How about Perun?

              Also:

              The thunder god went out to ride
              Upon his favorite filly
              "I'M THOR!" he cried,
              And his horse replied:
              "Of course you are,
              You forgot your thaddle thilly."

              1. SugarFree   10 years ago

                Keep your fake gods. My God has a hammer and a movie franchise!

            2. Slammer   10 years ago

              'Cross the Rainbow Bridge of Asgard, Where the booming heavens roar, You'll behold in breathless wonder, The god of Thunder, Mighty THOR

    7. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      The single largest consumer of fossil fuels on this planet is the United States Federal Government.

      Speaking of which, I have a crazy idea for reducing the usage of fossil fuels. I wonder if these scientists will like it?

      1. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

        I like the way this is headed...

    8. Tonio   10 years ago

      Covered in the Mourning Lynx.

      1. rts   10 years ago

        As a Pacific Time Zone dweller, I do not recognize the Morning Links.

  15. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

    I hope this becomes the Team Red outrage of the week:

    Hair buns for 400, Alex: Mystery over Michelle Obama's new 'do on 'Jeopardy' solved

    Just so we can call it Bunghazi.

  16. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    Question: How much does the Bergdahl thing hurt (or not) Obama?

    What was he motive or angle to go and rescue his sorry ass in the first place?

    1. Winston   10 years ago

      Old News...

    2. Restoras, OWG and RWC   10 years ago

      Since the media is covering for him, does not hurt at all.

    3. Almanian!   10 years ago

      FAYK SKANDULL - moving on dot org....

    4. Catatafish   10 years ago

      MAYBE if they catch one of the five guys traded for him holding a smoking AK with the bullet-riddled bodies of an entire elementary school at his feet...it will make top of the fold on page 8 of the NYT.

  17. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

    http://tinyurl.com/phqymtu

    "On galois representations associated to Hilbert modular forms"

    1. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

      http://tinyurl.com/nw5omdv

      Sorry, screwed up the link.

    2. db   10 years ago

      I hope you're leading up to a history changing discovery by linking these papers in a slow build up day by day.

      1. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

        Isn't it obvious? I'm providing the scientific basis for a libertarian colony on the Jovian moon Europa.

        1. Winston   10 years ago

          ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS EXCEPT EUROPA

          1. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

            Don't tell me what to do.

        2. db   10 years ago

          How about a libertarian prison colony.there? I prefer warm weather.

          1. db   10 years ago

            Dr, nonlibertarian. The leftists get to talk about sending us to camps all the time.

          2. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

            Nope, Rura Penthe is already reserved as the libertarian prison colony.

  18. Winston   10 years ago

    ISIS has conquered Tataouine.

    What will Jabba do now?

    And there goes anymore more Tunisia scenes in the new Star Wars movies.

  19. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    Re-posted -

    "A teacher at a Los Angeles charter school has been removed from the classroom and hit with a lawsuit from the parents of a biracial student who claims he barraged his class with racial stereotypes and said that Michael Brown "got what he deserved."

    "Other parents and students, however, claim the teacher is the victim of a preposterous witch hunt."

    Apparently, he also mentioned that President Lincoln's opponents called Lincoln a n-word lover.

    http://dailycaller.com/2015/03.....wn-a-thug/

  20. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

    http://www.nature.com/nature/j.....8177a.html

    "Gravitational tractor for towing asteroids"

  21. jay_dubya   10 years ago

    nothing like the rape & murder of your entire family to make you love Magic Sky Daddy

    1. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      You will know nothing but infinite love after that.

    2. Protagoronus   10 years ago

      It's all part of his plan. No one usually mentions that his plan is to watch messed up porn.

  22. Rhywun   10 years ago

    Zayn Malik is leaving teen uber-band One Direction

    I'm not normally one to say this, but... why the fuck is this news?

    1. Winston   10 years ago

      Reason desperately wants to show its relevance and hipness?

      1. Rhywun   10 years ago

        I can see maybe Pat Robertson thinking One Direction is "relevant" or "hip" but not anyone at Reason.

        1. Tonio   10 years ago

          Burn!

        2. Winston   10 years ago

          Well the entertainment news was all talking about Malik so I guess that makes him "relevant".

          1. Rhywun   10 years ago

            The entertainment news is being trolled.

    2. Pl?ya Manhattan.   10 years ago

      Winston needs something to complain about.

      1. Winston   10 years ago

        Is Anchorman 2 the most important film of 2013?

    3. grrizzly   10 years ago

      At least the news that Looking wasn't renewed for Season 3 didn't make it to reason. Oh, did it?

      1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

        Great, thanks for ruining the suprise.

        /stomps off in a huff

      2. Winston   10 years ago

        Who?

  23. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

    http://link.springer.com/chapt....._32#page-1

    "The Iceberg and the Titanic: Human Economic Behavior in Ecological Models"

  24. Rich   10 years ago

    'Robots on reins' could soon replace guide dogs: Machines use tactile sensors and vibrations to help people navigate

    Ima go out on a limb and predict "companion robots".

    1. db   10 years ago

      Dibs on the Inara model.

      1. Almanian!   10 years ago

        Dibs on the "Emma Stone" model...

    2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      Kids, it's no longer plastics. Get into robotics. Shit is getting real.

      1. Brett L   10 years ago

        robotics is so 2000s. Teledildonics is the future

        1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

          It's all connected.

          1. db   10 years ago

            Plate o' robot shrimp.

            1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

              Exactly. John Wayne was a fag.

              1. C. Anacreon   10 years ago

                He answered the door wearing a dress.

                1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

                  Really, Hit & Run should do a post on the glory that is that movie. Brought to us by Liquid Paper and the Monkees.

                2. Puddin' Stick   10 years ago

                  No, it was like this.

    3. Hyperion   10 years ago

      They done took our jerbz!

      /The dogs

      1. Tonio   10 years ago

        Actually, that's a concern. Now, Billy, would you rather have a nice robot pet that will live forever and never makes a mess, or mangy old Fido here?

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          Think of how that could apply to human like companions ... just sayin ...

  25. BiMonSciFiCon   10 years ago

    ISIS has conquered Tataouine

    The French restaurant in Tunis?

  26. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

    http://link.springer.com/artic.....012-9461-8

    "Instabilities in the Sun?Jupiter?Asteroid three body problem" by John Urschel of the Baltimore Ravens.

    1. Tonio   10 years ago

      Was that the guy who just quit because of fear of brain injury?

      1. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

        No. He's still in the league. He just published another paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.0565

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          I bet he's quite the hit in the locker room. Probably hard to get the guys back on the field after half time when they're having a lively conversation about cascadic multigrid algorithms.

          1. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

            I hear he has a teaching job at Penn State this summer.

            1. Hyperion   10 years ago

              I'm sure the NFL gig pays more, but it's so short lived, I think I'd take the Penn State gig if it's going to become a tenured position. Little easier on the body too.

              1. Caleb Turberville   10 years ago

                He's listed as $546,140 with the Ravens: http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/ran.....it/guard/.

                With a PhD in math, he could make about $150,000 a year.

                I'd say, he should stay in the league as long as possible. He should use it to gain name recognition. Then, when his body starts to decline, retire and finish his graduate studies.

                1. Juice   10 years ago

                  With a PhD in math, he could make about $150,000 a year.

                  Where? Maybe a math phd that found his way into finance is raking in that kind of dough, but the average one is not.

                  1. mauricegirodias   10 years ago

                    If he can do any kind of applied statistics/big data/machine learning/AI algorithms, he's getting paid. And I suspect he can. Weirdly, before that chap, the Ravens had Matt Birk as center for years. He's the dude who went to Harvard, lost 90 pounds the minute his playing days ended (but is extremely pro-life/nobama.)

  27. Bring the Paine   10 years ago

    Feminism? So pas?. I'm more interested in the post-feminist wave that ISIS has to offer:

    Western analysts have also neglected the possibility that, through its repetitive disavowal of gender equality, ISIL's manifesto may be targeting those women who have found feminism's quest for parity hollow and unfulfilling. As such, these women may consider joining ISIL because they have given up on equality altogether.

    Let's also not forget that forward-thinking muslim feminists know that gender segregation is the true answer to our problems:

    The emerging analysis fails to even consider the fact that ISIL's female recruits may see gender segregation, freely chosen, as a solution to the discrimination, abuse and other problems facing women. Indeed, Al-Khansaa's manifesto contains a critique of various feminist issues. For example, it denounces plastic surgery (and its inherent degradations), which leads women to "demand that surgeons change their nose, ear, chin and nails," as well as an untrammeled careerism, which drives women to "farthest mountains and deepest valleys" in pursuit of an unachievable equality while accruing gobs of guilt for neglecting their jobs as mothers.

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      I see it clearly now. The ultimate goal of feminism was always to willingly become the property of a bunch of barbarians who will stone them to death if they get too mouthy.

      I hope the SJWs are read to follow them.

    2. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      It's Al Jazeera.

  28. Rich   10 years ago

    Obama Fails To Show After Being Introduced at ObamaCare Event

    The president finally arrived eight minutes after being introduced, but did not offer an explanation or apology to the crowd

    He probably thought *everything* about the Affordable Care Act had been rescheduled.

    1. RBS   10 years ago

      I'm sure he was just finishing a quick 18.

    2. db   10 years ago

      He was just reading the newspaper attending an impromptu briefing on important world matters that went over time.

      1. db   10 years ago

        Frig

    3. Hyperion   10 years ago

      He's done totally fucked up one of the best healthcare system on earth. Mission accomplished, nothing else to do.

      1. Winston   10 years ago

        Libertarian Moment!

        1. Hyperion   10 years ago

          Everything is a libertarian moment, no?

          1. Winston   10 years ago

            Who is more delusional: the folks at Reason talking about the inevitable libertarian moment or the homeless guy with a sandwich board proclaiming that "The End of the World is Nigh?"

            1. Hyperion   10 years ago

              The folks at Reason. Although both are to some degree delusional.

            2. Somalian Road Corporation   10 years ago

              Whoa, are you saying the same bright minds that put Weigel and Richman on the payroll make serious errors of judgement elsewhere?

            3. lap83   10 years ago

              They're equally delusional, but Reason folks probably smell better. Although I can't say for sure.

      2. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

        He's the best worst president in history. No one can take that away from him.

        1. Winston   10 years ago

          The next one?

          1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

            I meant not yet. As godawful as he is, a president could be theoretically worse.

        2. Brett L   10 years ago

          President Biden begs to differ b

          1. Hyperion   10 years ago

            Not is president Hill can beat him to it.

    4. Xeones   10 years ago

      SIGNATURE ACHIEVEMENT

  29. Brett L   10 years ago

    Special Forces invade Texas. I say bring it on. I always wanted to mount a .50 in my pickup bed.

    1. Pro Libertate   10 years ago

      My money is on Texas.

  30. The Other Kevin   10 years ago

    Wow, people in Indiana are having a shit fit over this "religious freedom" bill. Apparently it means we will no longer serve black people at lunch counters and we will stone gay people here.

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      They stopped stoning gay people in Indiana? Huh, I guess I haven't been there since November, and things change quickly in Indiana. I mean it's like one day there's no corn and then 'poof', there the fuck it is!

    2. Stormy Dragon   10 years ago

      It does create a civil action by individual employees against their employers for failing to accomodate their religious beliefs, so as a business owner, you're would be hostage to the whims over whomever your most religious employee is. That is, even if you're fine baking a gay wedding cake, if your cashier won't serve them, you're now powerless to fire them for not doing their job.

  31. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Speaking of the "Another douchebag named Bo"-story....

    ...i think an angle which wasn't widely seen was the degree to which the NYT really went above and beyond the call of TEAM UBER ALLES-duty to try and destroy the credibility all the other members of Berghdahl's platoon who accused him of deserting.

    I know its like "par for the course" for the Times, and no one is the slightest bit surprised, but they sicc'ed Eric Schmitt on the story, and he was supposed to be one of their "best people"....

    (*notable= he's also the same guy who attended briefings about chemical weapons munitions discovered in Iraq in 2004... and sat on the story for 8 years.... then ran it as an 'expose' that the Bush Admin had 'repressed' the story because it didn't fit the WMD narrative)

    ....basically, the emphasis they placed on discrediting his *unit*, and the extensive effort made to try and paint Berghdahl as "driven away" rather than as "a deserter" was one of the more-blatant examples of 'hack journalism' i've ever seen in the paper of record. Basically because it was so unbelievably inconsistent with the actual *facts* of the story. "Piss on me and tell me its raining"-type journalism.

    1. Hyperion   10 years ago

      So, what have you people done with Bo? I haven't seen him in a while.

      1. GILMORE   10 years ago

        I have no idea who you're talking about

    2. Raven Nation   10 years ago

      It's part of progressivism: those who disagree with you cannot merely be critiqued, they must be destroyed. Also, see my comment at 4:49.

  32. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    In today's favorite-H&R-topics news:

    "A group of circumcision protestors have crafted an incredibly realistic foreskin sculpture in an effort to raise awareness for their cause. And you can buy one for only $1,000 on their Kickstarter."

    http://www.cosmopolitan.com/se.....cumcision/

    1. db   10 years ago

      It's always about the protestors. They're loud, they get the press coverage. But won't someone think about the circumcision protestees?

    2. GILMORE   10 years ago

      "A group of circumcision protestors"

      They have those?

      Personally, I think people who do that freaky shit with their earlobes are worse

      I mean, ears and dicks are both pretty ugly to begin with. but people don't have dicks attached to their head. well, most people.

  33. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

    Abraham Lincoln and plays just don't seem to mix well:

    "About Face Theatre is pleased to continue its 2014-15 season with the Chicago premiere of ABRAHAM LINCOLN WAS A F*GG*T by Bixby Elliot... [asterisks in original]

    "Discover the truth lurking just beneath the stovepipe hat in this clever, time-jumping play about history, family and the importance of heroes."

    http://www.broadwayworld.com/c.....-20150324#

  34. Libertarian   10 years ago

    Someone really needs to work on the "list of federal political scandals" on wikipedia concerning Obama. There are only FIVE of them!

  35. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Reuters =

    Campus 'Rape Culture' is Complete Horseshit

    " If you lived in Gallup, New Mexico in 2013, you were 47 times more likely to be raped than if you attended Harvard, according to the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) statistics. Yet chances are you won't see any protesters in New Mexico. ....

    A 2014 report from the Department of Justice called Rape and Sexual Assault Victimization Among College-Age Females, 1995?2013 found that non-students aged 18-24 were 20% more likely to be sexually assaulted than students. Also, as these Reuters graphics show, the severity of the assault was worse for non-students, the rate of completed rape as opposed to other kinds of assault being 50% higher."

    Noting = no other media organization will draw any fucking attention to this point at all.

    1. OldMexican   10 years ago

      Linky no worky.

      1. GILMORE   10 years ago

        DONT INVALIDATE MY EXPERIENCES

        Actual rape-culture-debunking report, here

        1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

          So...Scott Walker didn't finish college because he was pursuing rape culture?

    2. GILMORE   10 years ago

      actually -

      if any other media DO draw any attention to this report, it will be entirely to highlight *minor details far below the headline* which contribute to their 'rape hysteria' narrative rather than undermine it....

      specifically, things like =

      Rape and sexual assault victimizations of students (80%)
      were more likely than nonstudent victimizations (67%) to
      go unreported to police
      ....
      Fewer than 1 in 5 female student (16%) and nonstudent
      (18%) victims of rape and sexual assault received assistance
      from a victim services agency"

      while scrupulously avoiding 'complicating' data, such as

      "Student victims (12%) were more likely than nonstudent
      victims (5%) to state that the incident was not important
      enough to report."

      .... which seems to suggest contradicting attitudes = a willingness to categorize 'sexual assault' much more broadly...but also treating it as less significant.

    3. Notorious G.K.C.   10 years ago

      Well, at least the media has no class bias, so we can rule that out as a motive for covering coeds-in-peril rather than waitresses and clerks.

  36. GILMORE   10 years ago

    Obama = Imperialist Capitalist Pig, Say Venezuelans

    I lol'ed

  37. Trigger Warning   10 years ago

    He does talk graphically about gay sex and cocks a lot.

    I noticed that. Like it's on his mind all the time or something. Like he just can't get the picture of a thick, hard cock out of his brain, and that disturbs him, so he just jabbers on about the gay. As if his words were a talisman warding off buttsecks.

    Reminds me of this.

    1. GILMORE   10 years ago

      That, and the Smoove B editorials were the best things the Onion ever did.

      1. db   10 years ago

        Don't forget Herbert Kornfeld!

        1. BakedPenguin   10 years ago

          Tha Letta Opener of Death was great, admittedly.

      2. Zeb   10 years ago

        Oh, yeah, Smoove B. "I'm gonna give it to you"

      3. Trigger Warning   10 years ago

        That, and the Smoove B editorials were the best things the Onion ever did.

        Fuck yeah! That and Herbert Kornfeld, before they killed him off.

  38. OldMexican   10 years ago

    ISIS has conquered Tataouine.

    And Al Qaeda has defaced Ratatouille.

    (*)By the way, now we know Robby is not a Star Wars fanatic.

  39. Cytotoxic   10 years ago

    I have my reservations about Cruz, but he is excellent on energy and his willingness to take on King Corn.

    http://business.financialpost......king-corn/

  40. Alice Bowie   10 years ago

    Bowe Bergdahl Charged with Desertion,

    Hasn't this man suffered enough.

    He was fighting for conoco philips and the like...not the american people.

    1. OldMexican   10 years ago

      Re: Alice Bowie,

      He was fighting for conoco philips and the like

      I thought he was fighting for souvenirs, just like every other GI that has invaded other lands since WWI onward.

      Maybe Afghan souvenirs are not as collectible and that is why he deserted. I don't know.

      1. Bobarian (sexbot hand model)   10 years ago

        Maybe he was trying to get the whole set? Some of them are hard to find.

      2. Zeb   10 years ago

        If you count loot and rape as souvenirs, that's been the motivation of many a soldier for a lot longer than that.

    2. kbolino   10 years ago

      2/10 lacks effort

    3. GILMORE   10 years ago

      lol

      Afghanistan, Alice. we were there on behalf of Big Ruby to steal all their *jewels*

      1. GILMORE   10 years ago

        *note = the reference is to a Michael Yon piece from way back where he quoted some SOF guy who said that half the people he interviewed thought that the Americans were in Afghanistan to capture their *ruby mines* and kidnap their women.

  41. Enough About Palin   10 years ago

    My ex is is likely menopausal at this point (52) and she has two 13-year-old daughters. I actually feel kind of sorry for her husband. Thankfully, they're thousands of miles from me.

  42. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    Tundra,

    I've got a 14 year old boy going to MGJH (8th grade). We may have to discuss dowries soon.

    The boy is dumb enough that I'm not sure I want him deciding for himself who he should be marrying.

  43. Rufus J. Firefly   10 years ago

    Some of the greatest and most influential car designers in history cam through Fiat ranks going back to the 1920s. It has a long storied history with many kick ass sports cars in its repertoire.

    The Dino is a beautiful example.

  44. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    MGSH next year. I have to warn you, the boy stands out as a pillar of obnoxiousness even in a sea of 8th grade boys.

    I see this being our negotiations:

    http://tinyurl.com/nbnquod

  45. Pope Jimbo   10 years ago

    We watched that video in 8th grade health class for some reason. I think it was supposed to teach us something about self esteem.

    Instead it led to all of us little assholes rating all the girls in our class and calling them 2-cows or something to their face.

    We ended up having an assembly of just us boys where the old school vice principal threatened to twist our heads off if we kept it up.

  46. NealAppeal   10 years ago

    Ma'hona, you ugly!

  47. jesse.in.mb   10 years ago

    Clearly you're unfamiliar with Sithrak. List of Sithrak's appearences here.

  48. BakedPenguin   10 years ago

    Jim Anchower. I knew so many real guys like him.

  49. Trigger Warning   10 years ago

    Jim Anchower. I knew so many real guys like him.

    I've always marveled at how terrifyingly real the Anchower ones are. He is truly the archetypal slack-ass loser. He could have been my brother or any one of his friends (because that's how my bro lives his life).

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Maryland's New 3 Percent Tax Will Chill the State's Emerging Tech Sector

Tosin Akintola | 7.6.2025 6:30 AM

Conflicts and Contrasts Make Jerusalem Endlessly Fascinating

Jacob Sullum | From the August/September 2025 issue

In Defense of the Tourist Trap: Why Following the Crowd Might Be the Smartest Way To Travel

Christian Britschgi | From the August/September 2025 issue

69 Percent of Americans Say American Dream Is Not Dead

Autumn Billings | 7.4.2025 8:30 AM

With Environmental Regulatory Reform, California Gov. Gavin Newsom Finally Does Something Substantial

Steven Greenhut | 7.4.2025 7:30 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!