Sex Worker Laura Lee to Launch Legal Challenge to Northern Ireland Prostitution Law
In Northern Ireland people can be convicted of paying for sex starting in June.


Escort and activist Laura Lee hopes to overturn Northern Ireland's new prostitution law by using E.U. human-rights rules and a crowdfunded legal challenge. Last fall Northern Ireland adopted what's known as the "Nordic Model" of prostitution criminalization, making it illegal to pay for sex but treating anyone who sells sex as a victim of human trafficking.
"The region is the only part of the UK where people can be convicted of paying for sex," reports The Guardian. Lee plans to launch her case in June, when Northern Ireland's new prostitution law takes effect.
Lee, 37, said: "I am doing this because I believe that when two consenting adults have sex behind closed doors and if money changes hands then that is none of the state's business."
The suit will rely on articles of the European convention on human rights. "There are several articles that we can look starting with article 8 that governs the right to privacy," Lee told the Guardian.
"We will also focus on article 2 that concerns the right to life and we will argue that this law puts sex workers' safety by the fact the legislation will drive the trade further and further underground. And then article 3 is about protection from degrading treatment, which is very relevant because in Scotland police have been subjecting sex workers to terrible things such as strip searching on women working in Edinburgh saunas. Our legal team will also refer to the right to earn a living enshrined in the European social charter."
Though the legal particulars are obviously different, Lee's case echoes a suit brought earlier this month against California prostitution law. In the (also partially crowdfunded) challenge, a group of former sex workers and one would-be client claim that the law deprives individuals of the right to engage in private sexual activity, enter freely into contracts and association with others, and make a living at their chosen professon.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
... I believe that when two consenting adults have sex behind closed doors and if money changes hands then that is none of the state's business.
How can they be consenting and victims at the same time? This woman makes no sense.
Where did she say sex workers were victims? I think Northern Ireland's law indicates that, the same as the Nordic version, but I don't think she thinks she is a victim...at least not until Scottish police abuse her for the type of work she does.
False consciousness. It's almost like you're new here, FoE.
Doesn't anybody here know how to write in ways that don't cause an unintended "Huh??"?
Starting in June, people in Northern Ireland can be convicted of paying for sex.
Or better, "...paying for sexual services."
I read it as "In Northern, Ireland people can be convicted of paying, for sex starting in June."