Population

Friday A/V Club: Donald Duck Explains Birth Control

When Disney met the Population Council

|

In 1968, the Population Council produced a film on family planning. They had help from a celebrity: Donald Duck.

In a history of sex-ed films written for Collectors Weekly, Lisa Hix explains how this cartoon came to be:

While it was couched as an altruistic attempt to alleviate strain on limited resources and improve life on earth, [the population-control campaign] largely targeted the non-white developing world.

I'm also licensed to perform vasectomies.
Disney/Population Council

That's how beloved children's character Donald Duck ended up shilling contraception on the big screen in 1968. The film "Family Planning"…focuses on a nuclear family of an unspecified non-white ethnic group who faces disaster if too many children are born. The way these babies are made—sex—is not mentioned, and the wife is so demure, she refuses to speak out loud, instead whispering her questions in her husband's ear.

As surprising as it may seem in the era of "anti-contraception conservatives," the financial backers of this pro-birth control film were, in fact, business-minded Republicans—Standard Oil-fortune heir John D. Rockefeller III and his Population Council. Rockefeller's father had also been a big proponent of eugenics in the original American Social Hygiene Association. In the late '60s and '70s, "Family Planning" was translated into 25 languages and distributed throughout Asia and Central and South America to urge population control in developing countries.

The narrator does actually mention sex once, using a euphemism—he calls it "normal relations as man and wife." But yes, this is basically a population-panic picture, not a how-to guide.

Hix's whole history is worth a read, by the way. Here's how her article describes a movie made outside the Disney/Rockefeller orbit:

Even more peculiar is 1976's celebration of male masturbation, "Masturbatory Story." "Some of the '70s films should have never been made," [Brenda] Goodman says. "'Masturbatory Story' shows this 30-year-old guy in a bathtub while a country song about masturbation plays. I was like, 'This could not have been shown anywhere!', but then I looked at the leader on the film, and it said the 'Los Angeles School System.'"

That one does not appear to be on YouTube.

(For past installments of the Friday A/V Club, go here.)

NEXT: The End of Farming

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. “As surprising as it may seem in the era of “anti-contraception conservatives,” the financial backers of this pro-birth control film were, in fact, business-minded Republicans?Standard Oil-fortune heir John D. Rockefeller III and his Population Council.”

    Even back then, the term “Rockefeller Republican” was in wide use among conservatives. It was not a compliment.

    1. The phrase was a reference to Nelson, not to John III?but it certainly applies to both.

      1. Fair enough.

        1. There were other terms, IIRC – “East Coast Establishment,” or just “establishment.”

          The Establishment – you don’t have to be a dirty hippie to bash it!

          1. And we still hear concern-trolling about how those were the good old days when Republicans were “moderate.”

            Nothing more moderate than videos urging brown people to have fewer children, or teaching schoolchildren the virtues of masturbation by showing a creepy dude jacking it in the bathtub.

            I think this helps illustrate why so many grassroots conservatives rejected the “moderates.”

            1. The masturbation movie wasn’t made by the Population Council. But I can see how the post can be misread that way. I’ll rephrase it.

              1. Oh – “outside the Disney/Rockefeller orbit.” Again, my bad.

                1. No, you’re good; I added that phrase after I saw your comment, to make sure no one else misunderstood.

            2. The creepy dude had the right idea?that was the 1st way I tested my bubble mixture ( http://users.bestweb.net/~robgood/lather.html ) against urogenital irrit’n. However, it’s unlikely to draw much from the water into a male urethra. Masturbation is more likely to be contributory to vulvovaginitis & possibly urethritis in masturbating females. But if the water’s the right depth, the foam from my mixture does make a nice lubricant & makes cleanup of ejaculate easier; still not an adequate substitute for soap for general washing, though.

    2. I’ve made $64,000 so far this year working online and I’m a full time student. I’m using an online business opportunity I heard about and I’ve made such great money. It’s really user friendly and I’m just so happy that I found out about it. Heres what I’ve been doing
      http://www.work-cash.com

  2. Does the video delve into duck rape culture? #yesalldrakes

    1. That would be the Wiley Coyote bird butt sex video.

    2. THE PERVERT IS NOT WEARING PANTS.

      1. The smock covers a multitude of sins.

      2. Plus, Dr. Duck is a quack.

        1. He over bills as well.

      3. “HE PERVERT IS NOT WEARING PANTS.”

        You know who else didn’t wear….

        Oh nevermind.

        1. Hitler after a bender in the Bunker?

          “I invaded *what?*”

  3. And now, almost 50 years later, with birth control easily accessed and affordable to most everyone….still unexpected and unwanted children are being born. Are people this stupid or has FedGov made it easily profitable for them to do so?

    1. Yes.

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.