The New York City Teachers Union Opened its Own Charter School. Disaster Ensued.
An attempt to demonstrate that unions are compatible with high performing schools unravels.
"This school is an oasis," then-New York City teachers union boss Randi Weingarten told The New York Sun in 2005, while sitting in a classroom at a brand new charter school in Brooklyn run by the United Federation of Teachers (UFT). Why would the teachers union open a charter? To prove that these publicly funded, privately operated schools could be staffed by unionized teachers and be highly successful. "This kind of effort, this kind of potential, is what we should be unleashing on the school system every single day," Weingarten told The Sun.
Let's hope not. A decade later, the union is closing the school. Capital New York has the details:
[T]he U.F.T. charter has consistently been one of the lowest performing schools—charter or otherwise—in the city and has received stern warnings from its authorizer, the SUNY Charter School Institute, about its viability.
Last year, SUNY issued a report on the U.F.T. Charter School in which it documented instability in leadership, low test scores particularly in middle school grades, lack of resources and disciplinary issues.
The school has been an embarrassment for the union from the get-go, starting with an unfortunate 2005 incident in which its principal ordered two boys to clean up another student's feces off the bathroom floor, which, of course, made the tabloids. Since then the school has been plagued by principal turnover, textbook and material shortages, and fiscal problems. There have been 10 reported incidents of corporal punishment.
Perhaps most embarrassing for the union, the school has had an unusually high student attrition rate. Ironically, the UFT has long claimed that New York's charters have generally outperformed traditional public schools because they push out failing students, but a recent report by the Independent Budget Office found that charters actually have lower rates of attrition. Apparently, the UFT school was an exception.
Is the takeaway here that a unionized charter can never be successful? No, it's that nobody can predict whether a school, or any organization for that matter, will succeed when it's just getting started, which is one of many reasons it should be easier to shutdown failing schools. It's a shame it took a decade to close the doors on this one.
Right around the same time that the UFT school opened, Randi Weingarten's old nemesis, Eva Moskowitz, was preparing to open her own charter school in New York—and things turnd out quite differently for that venture. To learn more, watch Nick Gillespie's interview with Moskowitz, which I produced:
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"You see? I told you charter schools couldn't work!"
Heh.
Stole my joke.
Life imitates the Onion.
Laid-Off Ford Employee Decides To Start Own Car Company.
I admire the ambition of the guy, but even if he had a real viable plan and the skilled workforce to accomplish it, he would be smashed like a bug by an insurmountable mountain of bureaucracy.
Actually yes, that is a quite defensible take-away, until someone presents a successful unionized charter school to disprove that theory.
Maybe if the kids are the ones unionized.
I hear you, man, ionized kids and the worst.
Heh. I love words, but never noticed unionized::un-ionized. There has to a puzzle in that somewhere.
Is the takeaway here that a unionized charter can never be successful?
What counts as "successful"?
For that matter, what counts as "unionized"?
They are one and the same, doncha know.
it's that nobody can predict whether a school, or any organization for that matter, will succeed when it's just getting started,
Its often very easy to predict that a business or organization will fail when it is just getting started, because it obviously lacks critical elements that are necessary to not fail.
R Clayton, proving again that if you're not first on Hit & Run, you're last.
"This kind of effort, this kind of potential, is what we should be unleashing on the school system every single day," Weingarten told The Sun.
Interesting choice of words...
Is the takeaway here that a unionized charter can never be successful? No, it's that nobody can predict whether a school, or any organization for that matter, will succeed
Uhm, point of order... I think one can reasonably predict when something will fail.
For instance, pretend you start a business. We'll call it 'business X'. Business X says that the pathway to prosperity and growth is to deficit-spend eternally.
Anyone wanna chime in on what the over-under is on whether or not Business X will be successful or not?
I put the o/u at $10 mil in losses b4 the business shuts down, and take the over.
'and things turnd out quite differently'
/Crosses arms. Casually swats fly from face. Narrows gaze.
Roll that beautiful bean footage!
http://www.AnonStuff.tk
Lmao. I predict that a unionized charter school will never succeed.