Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Brickbat: Eat Up

Charles Oliver | 1.28.2015 6:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Large image on homepages | avrene / photo on flickr
(avrene / photo on flickr)
avrene / photo on flickr

A survey by the Oklahoma State University Department of Agricultural Economics found that more than 80 percent of Americans support mandatory labeling on foods containing DNA.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Owning Ideas—An Outdated Idea?

Charles Oliver is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (37)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

    Get your DNA-free Salt here!

    1. Libertarian   11 years ago

      No way. I eat organic only.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   11 years ago

    The Oklahoma State survey result is probably an example of the intersection between scientific ignorance and political ignorance, both of which are widespread.

    Probably.

  3. Rebel Scum   11 years ago

    We should also have heavier regulation of that dangerous di-hydrogen monoxide.

    1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

      Why does everyone focus on DHMO when the equally common Hydrogen Hydroxide contains an alarming 156 ppm of Deuterium!

      1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

        Really? We have that in our house. Ugh, I don't feel so good--maybe I should go soak in some.

  4. Monty Crisco   11 years ago

    Gonna keep retweeting this for everyone til everyone reads it:

    http://hotair.com/archives/201.....ves-arbys/

    Remember a couple of days ago the cops that killed a girl with a gun in their lobby. This CITIZEN managed a good deal more than that with a good deal less:

    "This guy went above and beyond the call in terms of avoiding violence. Upon returning to the restaurant he confronted the deranged robber and ordered her to cease and desist. In the initial encounter ? probably hoping that the woman was aware of the rule about not bringing a knife to a gunfight ? he didn't even draw his weapon. He just showed her the butt of the weapon. Rather than complying, she she kept her knife and approached him, causing him to then draw his weapon.

    Even then, with every justification to take the shot, he chose to grab her arm and take away the knife. When police arrived he set down his weapon and gave them all the details as they took her into custody."

    1. Gene   11 years ago

      She was lucky, we all know how it would have turned out if it was a cop who first confronted her.

    2. Ted S.   11 years ago

      And then the cops shot her?

  5. Malkavian   11 years ago

    There are a couple of issues here. First, obviously, is that the public doesn't understand what DNA is. Ignorance for the win! But it is less of a concern.

    Far more importantly, public does not understand what a mandate is. Mandate must be backed by force and punishment for non compliance, otherwise it is useless. So if public understands what DNA is, understands that it is present in all foods, and still wants wants to make this triviality a probable cause for fine or arrest, we are off to a fun future. It also gives an idea why Obamacare mandates passed.

    Perhaps better question would be 'what should the punishment be for not including trivial information on a label?'

  6. Tommy_Grand   11 years ago

    Calcium causes hypercalcemia. Ban calcium or children face hypercalcemia. why do you hate the little children so? why do you homophobes fear man-dates?

  7. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Next up:

    FOOD LABELING ON ALL NON-PACKAGED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES!

    As if they don't come with enough stickers on them.

  8. John Galt   11 years ago

    Sounds a lot like those polls asking people to ban Dihydrogen Monoxide. The only difference is the DNA poll isn't a hoax designed to reveal how frightened and ignorant people can be easily manipulated into making very poor decisions. It does prove the same point, though.

    1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

      Look, GMOs contain DNA. Why do you want to hide the truth from consumers?

      1. UnCivilServant   11 years ago

        Look, so-called 'Organic' foods contain just as much, if not more, given their lack of pest controls and overuse of excrement-based fertilizers.

        1. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Then the only answer is synthetic food. Down to the base elements, without this evil DNA substance.

          1. CharlesWT   11 years ago

            For a 2,000 calorie a day diet without DNA, drink about five ounces of gasoline a day.

            1. CharlesWT   11 years ago

              Miscalculation. 8-9 ounces actually.

        2. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

          Oh, no, there's DNA in my children!

          1. John Galt   11 years ago

            DNA is the new carbon ( to be avoided at all costs ).

        3. Seamus   11 years ago

          Organic foods (i.e., those containing carbon) certainly contain more DNA than non-organic foods (i.e, those, such as NaCl, or salt, that don't contain carbon).

          1. John Galt   11 years ago

            We all know carbon is evil. From now on I'm only feeding my children table salt.

      2. John Galt   11 years ago

        Because I'm a dick?

  9. Pro Libertate   11 years ago

    Since the general population and, perhaps even more so, politicians don't have much of a grasp on science--method or knowledge--it makes little sense to leave scientific decisions in the hands of government. This goes for most other things, aside from stealing money and killing people.

  10. Rich   11 years ago

    A little DNA, like a few insect parts, in the food is fine.

    It's the presence of *charged sub-atomic particles* that should be labelled.

  11. sheilavargas   11 years ago

    just before I saw the bank draft four $7417 , I did not believe that...my... sister was like actualie receiving money part time from their laptop. . there friend brother had bean doing this 4 only six months and just paid for the mortgage on there place and purchased a new Honda NSX .
    read this post here======= http://www.jobsfish.com

  12. Drake   11 years ago

    Does the label have to include the entire genetic map of all DNA in the food? They are going to need bigger labels.

    1. Rich   11 years ago

      Nah. This is the 21st Century. The label will contain a matrix barcode to bring up the genetic maps on your smartphone.

  13. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Comment winner?

    Sheryl Boutin
    1/25/2015 10:18 PM EST
    And we wonder where all the autism is coming from...

  14. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

    Hang on. In comes Dave:

    Dave Harris0413
    1/25/2015 7:05 PM EST
    Republicans take it a step further. They are not only ignorant, they think their ignorance makes them better than somebody else. To them, only people who know nothing know anything, because knowing anything makes you an 'elitist', and they hate them. Especially those uppity scientists who are always STUDYING things. Everything Republicans need to know is in their Holy Book, which they'll get around to reading one of these days.

    1. sarcasmic   11 years ago

      There was an interesting bit on NPR this morning regarding studies that show bilingual people use more of their brain. Turned out that there were four studies, only one of which showed the desired result. That one got published while the others were shelved. Then when someone tried to duplicate it, they failed. That one didn't get published either.

      Did the reports make any logical leaps?

      Of course not.

      1. Rufus J. Firefly   11 years ago

        I'm trilingual.

        I proof the study can easily be refuted.

      2. Tommy_Grand   11 years ago

        Rag, from Hardbodies, can flip you off in like 20 languages. He must use 110% of his brain!

  15. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    Hike It Off! Taylor Swift displays her slender legs in tiny shorts as she goes on a trek in Hawaii with the Haim sisters

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....sters.html
    I wouldn't mind making some music with them. Not one bit.

  16. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    'My phone isn't ringing off the hook with great parts': Drew Barrymore, 39, explains why she stepped back from acting to focus on Flower Beauty

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs.....mpany.html
    I wonder why. No, actually I don't.

  17. sarcasmic   11 years ago

    Whoops. Back to the lynx.

  18. philomenaw   11 years ago

    Up to I looked at the check for $4922 , I didnt believe that...my... friend was truly bringing in money parttime from there pretty old laptop. . there great aunt haz done this for under thirteen months and a short time ago paid for the dept on there cottage and bought a gorgeous Honda .
    have a peek at this web-site ????????? http://www.jobsfish.com

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Wild Animals Are Thriving on South Africa's Private Reserves and Game Farms

Ronald Bailey | From the August/September 2025 issue

Science Needs Dissent: NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya on COVID, Autism, and Climate Change

Matthew Rozsa | 8.2.2025 7:00 AM

Chris Arnade on China, Wall Street, and Walking Around the World

Tyler Cowen | From the August/September 2025 issue

Trump Is Openly Using the Presidency To Enrich the Trump Brand

Matt Welch | 8.1.2025 5:00 PM

A Cop Lied, Fabricated a Sex-Trafficking Case, and Jailed a Teen on False Charges—and Still Can't Be Sued

Billy Binion | 8.1.2025 4:49 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!