Venezuelan Fuel Subsidies Mean Cheap Gas—for Colombians

They should probably enjoy that cheap gas while they can get it.


Andrés E. Azpúrua

Plunging oil prices mean cheaper gasoline for people around the world. But Venezuelans have long enjoyed rock-bottom tabs at the pump courtesy of government subsidies meant to keep people happy (and content with the regime). It's a strategy that has sort of worked. Price controls across the country mean shortages of basic goods, including toilet paper. But Venezuela is an oil producer with a government monopoly, so it's pull up to the pump and all you can drink, right?

Well…sort of. But lots of people loving those low gas prices actually live in neighboring countries, because subsidized prices in Venezuela mean a hell of a profitable opportunity for smugglers. Makeshift, a magazine about innovation, followed a smuggler on his regular trip into Colombia.

For a year and a half, Gregorio has smuggled gas through clandestine routes along the inhospitable frontier, marked only by the desolated ranches of indigenous Wayúu people. He can earn up to 20,000 bolívares a week (USD 300 officially speaking, or USD 2,000 on the black market; Venezuela has several exchange rates).

His operation is bolstered by this simple fact: in Venezuela, a liter of gasoline officially costs a cent and a half, thanks to heavy government subsidies that make it the cheapest gas in the world. But at black market prices, a liter costs next to nothing: a tenth of a cent. In neighboring Colombia, by contrast, gasoline runs USD 1.20 per liter.

Even with costs inflated by the price of bribing troops and guerrillas along the border, that means a nice living for enterprising black market entrepreneurs, and a price for gas that's a third to a half of the market rate for Colombians.

About one-fifth of Venezuela's fuel exports are believed to leave the country this way.

Gasoline isn't the only good price controlled and subsidized to the benefit of black market buyers across the border. Last summer, the Miami Herald reported that "from 40 to 50 percent of all goods are spirited into neighboring Colombia where they can fetch five times more money."

At these prices, why wouldn't your average Colombian want Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro, Hugo Chavez's thuggier and crazier successor, to stay in office indefinitely (especially since they don't have to live with any of his other policies)?

But the Maduro regime buys good will with oil money, and the price of oil is plummeting. Those gifts to the neighbors are getting harder to sustain as the government goes broke, with the smart money betting it will default on its debt. Venezuelan economist Angel Garcia Banchs predicts. "chaos that will probably lead to barbarity and people looting."

Colombians should probably enjoy that cheap gas while they can get it.

Combustible Contraband from Makeshift on Vimeo.

NEXT: Shikha Dalmia on Why Both the Pauls Are Wrong About Charlie Hebdo

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time. Report abuses.

  1. I’m looking forward to proggies infighting about what is better – cheap gas (OMG Mother Earth, CO2!) or nationalized gasoline with subsidies (Yay socialism! Long Live Comrade Chavez!).

  2. The last couple of weeks BBC America has had the Top Gear Patagonia special on. They drive through Argentina and Chile down to some Argentine city on Tierra del Feuego. What is remarkable about it is how much nicer Chile is than Argentina. They were in some small city in the far south of Chile and it looked like Canada or Western Europe, lots of nice stores, everyone seemed to be driving nice cars, lots of nice, well kept houses. Argentina in contrast is a fascist shit hole.

    The reason for the difference is that in Chile Pinocet murdered or locked up all of the socialists. I am not going to defend the morality of murder or claim the ends justify those means. The fact is however, Chile is by any objective measure a much nicer place because of what Pinchet did. The lesson of that isn’t that we should murder our own socialists. It is that perhaps socialists should take a step back and realize what a plague on humanity they are and walk away from the evil and destructive ideology. Fat chance I know. But we can always dream.

    1. If you had to run, Chile, Hong Kong, or Singapore?

      1. Chile. Hong Kong’s days as a free place are numbered. The Chinese are going to fuck it up. It is just a matter of time. Singapore is great, but it is also boring and has a ton of nanny state laws. Chile is Latin America, it is plenty fun and seems to be doing okay.

        1. Chile also has a huge cost advantage right now, too.

          That said, I’d probably take the food and climate of Singapore over the others… oh, well, except no weed. Damnit.

          1. I don’t mind the cold and I like Latin American women. So I would go for Chile. But Singapore isn’t bad either.

  3. No. I’m, I’m simply saying that trade, uh… finds a way.

  4. why wouldn’t your average Colombian want Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro, Hugo Chavez’s thuggier and crazier successor, to stay in office indefinitely (especially since they don’t have to live with any of his other policies)?

    It could be because Maduro is also subsidizing other exports to Colombia… namely terrorism.

    1. My friend’s mother makes $61 an hour on the internet . She has been without a job for ten months but last month her pay was $15622 just working on the internet for a few hours.
      over here. ????????

  5. How’s the black market gasoline even cheaper, a mil/L? Is it stolen?

Please to post comments

Comments are closed.