Search Engines Trump Traditional Media as Most-Trusted by Millennials
In Google News we trust.


Millennials have now overtaken boomers as the largest living generation, and new evidence shows that search engines are overtaking "traditional media" as their most-trusted news source. According to a report from public-relations firm Edelman, 72 percent of the most wealthy and educated millennials say they find online search engines a trustworthy source of general news and information, while only 64 percent feel the same way about "traditional media" such as newspapers and TV.
For the report, Edelman surveyed 33,000 online respondents ages 25 to 64, from 27 countries. Respondents were slotted into a group Edelman (somewhat snobbishly) calls "the informed public" if they were college-educated, in the top 25 percent of incomes for their country and age bracket, and said they follow public policy and consume news regularly.
Across all age groups, 64 percent of the "informed public" trusted search engines, while just 62 percent trusted traditional media. This is the first year that search engines have come out on top of Edelman's trust scale.
"Sobering news for anyone in the journalism industry," writes John McDuling at Quartz.
But I don't know. First, it's hard to say what it really means with newspapers and television lumped together; people generally seem to have higher levels of trust in newspapers than TV news, which is seen as more sensationalistic. Second, it leaves web publications entirely out of the picture. The choices weren't search engines/news aggregation in constrast to traditional journalistic writing in general but in contrast to print papers and TV news.
McDuling frets that "Google does not actually report on anything, but instead serves up links to stories on a mix of other sites that users, apparently, trust less than the aggregator itself." But common sense tells us that most people using a search engine are indeed searching for further information, not merely the spectacle of link text, and many will go on to click some of the links Google serves up, including links to web journalism.
"Getting an at-a-glance look at a wide range of stories deemed relevant by a search-engine algorithm—be they from traditional news outlets, blogs, advertisements, and much else besides—is more comforting to the curious reader, it seems, than simply pulling up a single news outlet's site (or indeed picking up a newspaper or turning on the TV)," writes McDuling.
Which is rather wonderful, no? For a group labeled as the "informed public", wouldn't we prefer a desire to seek out truth on one's own terms rather than blithely accepting the account of one media outlet? For all the rather dismal prognosticating this survey will likely inspire, the main takeaway might best be summed up as: millennials are savvy news consumers.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Millennials have now overtaken boomers as the largest living generation"
and are rapidly overtaking the Boomers in the "most annoying" category.
Watch me not care
Be nice. Elizabeth is cute and this is her generation. When you read these sorts of posts just think of this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAHQ-9Fniac
and it puts things in perspective. I bet Elizabeth doesn't even remember the Queen of Soul.
Do you want the rest of us to go to the movoes so you can be alone with ENB at last?
I dig the Real Clear sites. But I'm not sure how that would have registered on this survey, since I think it's more a portal than a search engine.
Yeah, it's not clear to me that this public-relations firm knows what a "search engine" is.
That is the good news. The bad news is that the search engine they most trust is UpWorthy.
I can't wait to see tomorrow's poll on how millennials liked the state of the union address.
Worst. State of the Union Address. Ever.
SLATE of the Union is how I read that. Ouch!!
They won't watch a minute of it. Too boring.
Why would I spend an hour of my time listening some guy lie to me?
Followed by another guy lying to me in response?
Sad news. Search engines return commonly linked crap and paid ads.
I just searched on the TPP free trade agreement and all I got was anti trade psycho-prog moaning.
Maybe in the case of your preferred search engine. There is more than one.
Then why is social security in trouble?
We can't be broke.
We still have plenty of Millennials.[to throw on the fiscal fire]
I trust Bloomberg News, WSJ, and the NYTimes for news.
*pssst*
nobody cares
hth
Cool Story, bro.
http://blogs.wsj.com/economics...../?mod=e2tw
The WSJ, you say? According to that august institution your highly touted recovery is missing in quite a few places.
Of course you do.
More important, from Buzz FUCKING Aldrin, via the Tweeterzzzzz:
Buzz Aldrin @TheRealBuzz ? 20m 20 minutes ago
Four score and 5 years ago, my mother, Marion MOON , brought me into the world and what a life I've had. Thanks mom! http://www.whosay.com/l/lJQa2nX
And to think that son of a bitch in the White House made Buzz ride in the back of the plane.
Too bad Buzz didn't punch him in the face.
Wouldn't it have been great? He is Buzz fucking Aldrin. What would they do, send him to prison? Yeah, good luck with that.
"Mr. Aldrin, would you like to say anything to the cameras before you are imprisoned?"
[flinty stare]. "Call me Buzz." [walks off]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M--bD_xmVb0
I am pretty sure Buzz would be a rock star in prison.
I am surprised Buzz got by security. He is off in the head now. Could be that Ali G interview smackdown.
Yeah sure, whatever. Cool story.
Was this a none-too-subtle retribution for Jim Crow? I wouldn't put it past these a-holes.
Newspapers still beat search engines in a number of areas:
- Cleaning windows
- Lining bird cages
- Insulating coolers
Suck it, Google!
And wrapping fish. That has always been the primary function of newspapers.
Yes. Conservatives like you have long hated informed people.
Says the dumbest human being in the known universe.
John, we must admit that there are some self-hating conservatives.
Says the person who thinks Sarah Palin is a wise leader.
Remember, all scores are relative.
What Mickey said. When your competition is Obama, "wise leader" is not exactly a high bar.
That's been illegal for a long time.
Really?
Yep. Look it up. Health and safety, you know. Because so many people got sick from it or something.
I had no idea. Must be something in the ink.
No, just nannies wielding the precautionary principle.
The thought of ink getting into the fish is kind of gross though.
When we were preparing to have our first child, one of the midwives who taught our Lamaze class said that if we had the kid in the car we should put it in fresh newspaper, since it was aseptic. So we carried around an unread copy of the local rag for a few weeks.
I find it difficult to believe that a fresh news paper would be any more or less aspectic than any other paper.
The paper is produced from an acidic solution, rolled, and dried. So most of the germs are eliminated. The rolls are used in an automated printing process where they never come into contact with people or much else. I'd be surprised if they were truly germ-free, but probably better than the blanked in the car that the dog sleeps on.
they find online search engines a trustworthy source of general news and information,
Which is weird, because search engines aren't a source of news and information.
They help you find the sources of news and information. Calling them a source is like saying your realtor is a homebuilder.
So Millenials don't actually know what a source is. Shocked, I am.
"Which is weird, because search engines aren't a source of news and information."
This.
I mean Bing or Google are places that refer you to where you get information.
They're great for confirming my bias!
Thank you for putting that thought into words.
Most frightening: Millenials trust Social Media 59%
Wow! The stupidest generation. Or maybe The least self-aware generation.
Social media. They actually believe the dumb ass shit that gets shared on Facebook.
Maybe that universal suffrage thing isn't just a good idea anymore.
And since they select their social-media friends, they set up resonators for derp.
Yeah. Anyone who calls bullshit on the link to Democratic Underground about the Kochs funding the Tuskegee experiments is immediately kicked out of the hive.
I think they have hit a death spiral of crazy. They will keep kicking more and more people out until only the real crazies remain.
Social media are echo-chambers. They are a lot like MSNBC or to some extent Fox (Hannity).
You say that, but the conservatives and libertarians I know are all pretty well informed. I don't know where this Hannity echo chamber is, but I never see it or know anyone who is a part of it. IN contrast, most of the liberals I know are in the MSNBC Salon echo chamber. A few are not, but most are.
while just 62 percent trusted traditional media.
Uh, call me when its below 50%
I think that the 'quiet' millenials that don't care about 'social media' also don't respond to polls like these.
Already mentioned?
ENB interviewed at Libertarianism.org on libertarian feminism:
http://www.libertarianism.org/.....inism-look
(haven't listened to it yet but I promise I will).
It would seem to me that actual classical liberalism or anything approaching Libertarianism would eliminate any need for "feminism" in politics. If the government actually treats everyone equal before the law and recognizes the individual's right to the pursuit of happiness as the highest and most protected value in government, what need is there for feminism?
My friend's mother makes $61 an hour on the internet . She has been without a job for ten months but last month her pay was $15622 just working on the internet for a few hours.
over here. ???????? http://www.jobsfish.com
She was paid $15622 last month; SHE HAS A FUCKING JOB!
But, it's not a JOB-job!
And a pretty hard job, at that, seeing as she worked 256 hours last month, which averages out to over 8 hours a day, every single day.
what need is there for feminism?
If libertarianism would place men and women on an equal footing before the law, we would still need feminism to secure a women a superior position before the law, and in society.
Unless you actually believe feminism is about achieving equality, rather than obtaining privilege.
Yes. there is that. Classical liberalism does nothing to ensure the continued privilege and social dominance of the upper class white female. How could I forget about the upper class white women?
Societies dominated by white heterosexual males have only built the modern world, created the most tolerant and diverse cultures in the history of the world and accumulated more wealth in their traditional institutions like the family, than ever seen before in human history.
But white people are evil so we need to be more like the southern hemisphere kleptocracies. And we need a culture controlled by a synthesis of Andrea Dworkin and Robert Mugabe. Then society will finally achieve it's potential. /progressivism nutshelled
John has a hard time being objective about feminism when he thinks ENB might be listening.
duckduckgo.com
They've gotten better.
How does one "trust search engines"? That seems to leave a lot open to interpretation. I trust search engines to help me search for reading material online, but I don't necessarily trust the results to be factual.
Somehow, I have a strong suspicion that a lot of the responses were along the lines of:
'Yeah, whatever'.
This article really doesn't say anything.
Millenials use search engines? And?
So does genex, and boomers, and pretty much everyone who uses the interwebs.
What next? An article about the millenials widespead and intelligently innovative use of air as a breathing additive?