Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Brickbat: First in Flight

Charles Oliver | 12.26.2014 6:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
SS&SS / photo on flickr

Officials with the Charlotte, N.C., city government fired fire investigator Crystal Eschert after she posted on the killing of Michael Brown on her personal Facebook page. Eschert, who did not identify herself as a city employee, referenced another shooting near Ferguson and asked why President Barack Obama, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and others did not take a stand on it.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Reason-Rupe: Americans Want Action Against ISIS...

Charles Oliver is a contributing editor at Reason.

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (15)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. hurts_donut   10 years ago

    Well I guess if you can get fired from a private firm (not that I agree with the city gov) for saying racial charged shit why not on the public side. Too drunk off Christmas parties to go into detail so I'll repost my beer review.

    hurts_donut|12.21.14 @ 3:19AM|#
    Fister Sisters Anytime All day DIPA
    A: Poured into a gold lipped Belgium ale glass. Head is off white like a 1954 vintage grand wizards hood, frothy. Pours an amber/orange with heavy carbonation.
    S: Citrus notes play off the nose like a young Mozart's symphony. Grapefruit, pine, orange and cascade hops bring up the front. Briess Carapils malt, Briess Caramel and 200 year old wolf pussy bring up the back end.
    T: The front of the tongue is like a million shorthorn steer stampeding across the tongue with hooves made of dark chocolate. Middle of the tongue taste like a 16th century cobbler's shop and the back side is pocket aged "Kings" candy cigarettes.
    M: Medium bodied. Raw egg whites and last nights Bud Light/Taco bell early morning "beer puddle" shits round this category off.
    O: I would buy again if it was available in my area on a regular basis but won't seek it out.
    -HD

    1. Suthenboy   10 years ago

      Fister Sisters. Huh.

      I think I know them.

      1. hurts_donut   10 years ago

        You're out of LA right? I been looking for a BBQ sauce out of your area to make. It's butter based right? If you got a recipe for a LA sauce post it.

  2. vahtryn   10 years ago

    If it was posted on their own computer and off working hours then work should have nothing to care about it.

    1. hurts_donut   10 years ago

      I completely agree but unfortunately it seems like it doesn't work that way on the private or public side. Smartest thing to do if you want to keep your job is to use social media to keep in touch with friends and family. Not make political statements. Not saying its right. It just is what it is.

      1. sarcasmic   10 years ago

        It's OK to express political opinions, as long as they are the correct political opinions.

    2. Agammamon   10 years ago

      Well - except that the things you do and say on your own reflect on the organizations you are part of.

      In general I support the right of free association - including businesses.

      *Government* agencies becomes a difficult case to decide. On the one hand - freedom of speech (doesn't come without consequences/needs to be protected from government intrusion) vs freedom of association (do I want openly serving Klan members working in local government?).

      1. Seamus   10 years ago

        "Are you now or have you ever been a member of the Ku Klux Klan?"

  3. daniellebegum   10 years ago

    I have faith ...that...my mother in law woz like realy bringing home money part-time on their laptop. . there great aunt had bean doing this for under twenty one months and by now repaid the depts on there apartment and got a brand new Lexus LS400 .
    find more info ------------ http://www.jobsfish.com

  4. hurts_donut   10 years ago

    My old lady has got me watching this show "Bizarre Foods" with Andrew Zimmern on Netflix. Apparently, he goes around every inch of the globe tasting animal dick and balls. I didn't think he was ever going to find work after he killed that black kid in Florida.

    1. Steve G   10 years ago

      *narrows gaze then smirks*

  5. Seamus   10 years ago

    I have a hard time understanding how, if public employees have a first amendment right to say that they hope that assassins succeed in killing Reagan the next time they try (as the Supreme Court held that they do), they don't have a first amendment right to comment seriously, on their own time, on their personal Facebook account, on public policy matters.

    Actually, that's a lie. I would only have a hard time understanding it if I weren't aware of the "THAT'S RACIST" exception to the first amendment.

    1. GILMORE   10 years ago

      "if public employees have a first amendment right to say they hope that assassins succeed in killing Reagan the next time they try (as the Supreme Court held that they do)..."

      Yeah, but wasn't all of that Supreme Court just trying to impress Jody Foster? It was the thing at the time.

  6. Rich   10 years ago

    I predict an uptick in social media posts of the form "There are those who say 'If you are a thug and worthless to society, it's not race ? You're just a waste no matter what religion, race or sex you are!'"

  7. wadair   10 years ago

    It seems that Free speech is only allowed once ratified by a court.

    I agree with right-to-work policies--that an employee can be fired for whatever reason an employer chooses. However, when the government is the employer, and when a situation is politically charged, employees should not be penalized for the side they take on that political issue. At least as long as the bureaucracy is so large as it is today, such that government employees cannot be changed out effectively, there should be a clemency for government employees with an opposing opinion.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

As Trump Threatens Columbia's Accreditation, the School Should Stop Trying To Placate Him

Autumn Billings | 6.6.2025 1:21 PM

Texas Cop Who Killed Unarmed Man Is Not Entitled to Qualified Immunity

Tosin Akintola | 6.6.2025 1:00 PM

The 5 Worst Green Energy Projects Funded by Biden

Jeff Luse | 6.6.2025 12:45 PM

Why Can't Elon Musk and Donald Trump Both Win?

Christian Britschgi | 6.6.2025 12:00 PM

Unanimous Supreme Court Affirms That There Is No 'Good' Discrimination

Emma Camp | 6.6.2025 11:51 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!